Cover not available
Article published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 35:2 (2018) ► pp.165–209
Articles / Aufsätze

A native origin for Present-Day English they, their, them

| Utrecht University
It is commonly held that Present-Day English they, their, them are not descended from Old English but derive from the Old Norse third-person plural pronouns þeir, þeira, þeim. This paper argues that the early northern English orthographic and distributional textual evidence agrees with an internal trajectory for the ‘þ-’ type personal pronouns in the North and indicates an origin in the Old English demonstratives þā, þāra, þām. The Northern Middle English third-person plural pronominal system was the result of the reanalysis from demonstrative to personal pronoun that is common cross-linguistically in Germanic and non-Germanic languages alike.
Keywords: Old Northumbrian, Old English, Old Norse, Northern Middle English, personal pronoun, demonstrative, Lindisfarne Gospels gloss, LAEME
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Pronoun usage in Old English
  • 3.Pronoun usage in Old Northumbrian
    • 3.1Preliminaries
    • 3.2Old Northumbrian data
      • 3.2.1Old Northumbrian nominative pronouns
      • 3.2.2Old Northumbrian dative and accusative pronouns
      • 3.2.3Old Northumbrian genitive pronouns
    • 3.3Discussion thus far
  • 4.Third-person plural pronouns in Northern Middle English
    • 4.1Morphosyntactic continuity
    • 4.2Phonological continuity
      • 4.2.1A variationist account
      • 4.2.2Northern Middle English development of OE ā
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 July 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.16026.col
References (96)
References
Aitken, Adam J. 1977. How to pronounce Older Scots. In Adam J. Aitken, Matthew P. McDiarmid & Derick S. Thomson (eds.), Bards and makars: Scottish language and literature, Medieval and Renaissance, 1–21. Glasgow: Glasgow University Press.Google Scholar
Allen, Cynthia. 2008. Genitives in early English: Typology and evidence. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baugh, Albert. 1957. A history of the English language. 2nd edn. New York: Appleton Century Crofts.Google Scholar
Benskin, Michael, Margaret Laing, Vasilis Karaiskos & Keith Williamson. 2013. An electronic version of a linguistic atlas of late mediaeval English. Edinburgh: The University of Edinburgh. [URL] (September 30, 2017.)
Bergen, Linda van. 2008. Negative contraction and Old English dialects: Evidence from glosses and prose. Part 1. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 109(4). 275–312.Google Scholar
Björkman, Erik. 1900. Scandinavian loan-words in Middle English. Part 1. Halle: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Bolze, Christine. 2016. Multiple glosses with present tense forms of OE beon ‘to be’ in Aldred’s gloss to the Lindisfarne Gospels. In Julia Fernández-Cuesta & Sara M. Pons-Sanz (eds.), The Old English glosses to the Lindisfarne Gospels: Language, author and context, 289–300. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bosch, Peter, Tom Rozario & Yufan Zhao. 2003. Demonstrative pronouns and personal pronouns. German der vs. er . In Proceedings of the EACL 2003 workshop on the computational treatment of anaphora, 61–68. Budapest: EACL.Google Scholar
Bosch, Peter & Carla Umbach. 2007. Reference determination for demonstrative pronouns. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 481. 39–51.Google Scholar
Brown, Michelle P. 2003. The Lindisfarne Gospels: Society, spirituality and the scribe. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Brunner, Karl. 1948. Abriss der mittelenglischen Grammatik. 2nd edn. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
. 1965. Altenglische Grammatik, nach der angelsächsischen Grammatik von Eduard Sievers neubearbeitet. 3rd edn. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Alistair. 1959. Old English grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cole, Marcelle. 2012. The Old English origins of the Northern Subject Rule: Evidence from the Lindisfarne Gloss to the Gospels of John and Mark. In Merja Stenroos, Martti Mäkinen & Inge Særheim (eds.), Language contact and development around the North Sea, 141–168. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Verbal morphosyntax in Old Northumbrian and the (Northern) Subject Rule. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. The periphrastic subjunctive in the Old English multiple glosses to the Lindisfarne Gospels. In Britt Erman, Gunnel Melchers, Philip Shaw & Peter Sundkvist (eds.), From clerks to corpora: Essays in honour of Nils-Lennart Johannesson, 71–86. Stockholm: Stockholm University Press.Google Scholar
. 2016. Identifying the author(s) of the Lindisfarne Gloss: Linguistic variation as a diagnostic for determining authorship. In Julia Fernández-Cuesta & Sara M. Pons-Sanz (eds.), The Old English glosses to the Lindisfarne Gospels: Language, author and context, 169–188. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017a. Pronominal anaphoric strategies in the West Saxon dialect of Old English. English Language and Linguistics 21(2). 381–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017b. Subject and adjacency effects in the Old Northumbrian gloss to the Lindisfarne Gospels. English Language and Linguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. Forthcoming. A revised history for third-person plural personal pronouns in Midlands Middle English.
Collins, Beverley & Inger Margrethe Mees. 1981. The sounds of English Dutch. Leiden: Leiden University Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 2000. Pragmatic binding: Demonstratives as anaphors in Dutch. In Matthew Juge & Jeri Moxley (eds.), The twenty-third annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 50–61. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Cook, Albert S. 1894. A glossary of the Old Northumbrian Gospels. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Dance, Richard. 2003. Words derived from Old Norse in early Middle English: Studies in the vocabulary of the South-West Midlands Texts. Tempe: Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies.Google Scholar
Di Paolo Healey, Antonette, with John Price Wilkin & Xin Xiang. 2009. Dictionary of Old English corpus (DOEC). Toronto: University of Toronto. [URL] (February 20, 2017.)
Diessel, Holger. 1999. The morphosyntax of demonstratives in synchrony and diachrony. Linguistic Typology 31. 1–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dobson, Eric J. 1968. English pronunciation 1500–1700, vol. 11. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga, Ans van Kemenade, Willem Koopman & Wim van der Wurff. 2000. The syntax of early English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Förster, Max. 1941. Die spätae. deiktische Pronominalform þæge and ne. they. Anglia Beiblatt 521, 274–280.Google Scholar
. 1942. Nochmals ae. þæge. Anglia Beiblatt 531. 86f.Google Scholar
Gelderen, Elly van. 2013. The diachrony of pronouns and demonstratives. In Terje Lohndal (ed.), In search of universal grammar: From Old Norse to Zoque, 195–218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. A history of English reflexive pronouns. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gericke, Bernhard. 1934. Die Flexion des Personalpronomen der 3. Person in Spätags. Leipzig: Mayer & Müller.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1976. Topic, pronoun and grammatical agreement. In Charles Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 149–188. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Eric V. 1957. An introduction to Old Norse. Revised by Arnold R. Taylor. 2nd revised edn. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar. 1982. Scandinavian language structures: A comparative historical survey. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Heltveit, Trygve. 1953. Studies in English demonstrative pronouns: A contribution to the history of English morphology. Oslo: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Hertzenberg, Mari Johanne. 2011. Classical and Romance usages of ipse in the Vulgate. In Eirik Welo (ed.), Indo-European syntax and pragmatics: Contrastive approaches, 173–188. Oslo: University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Heuven, Vincent van, Loulou Edelman & Renée van Bezooijen. 2002. The pronunciation of /ei/ by male and female speakers of avant-garde Dutch. In Hans Broekhuis & Paula Fikkert (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands, 61–72. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hogg, Richard. 1992. Phonology and morphology. In Richard Hogg (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. 11: The beginnings to 1066, 67–167. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hogg, Richard & R. D. Fulk. 2011. A grammar of Old English, vol. 2: Morphology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Horall, Sarah. 1978. The southern version of the Cursor Mundi, vol. 11. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar
Howe, Stephen. 1996. The personal pronouns in the Germanic languages. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hulk, Aafke & Ans van Kemenade. 1995. V2, pro-drop, functional projections and language change. In Adrian Battye & Ian Roberts (eds.), Clause structure and language change, 227–256. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ingham, Richard. 2006. On two negative concord dialects in early English. Language Variation and Change 18(3). 241–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobi, Irene. 2009. On variation and change in diphthongs and long vowels in spoken Dutch. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University dissertation.Google Scholar
Janecka, Joanna & Anna Wojtys. 2011. Of ðæm or bi him: On the scribal repertoire of Latin-English pronominal equivalents in the Lindisfarne Gospels. In Piotr P. Chruszczewski & Zdzisław Wąsik (eds.), Languages in contact 2010, 81–98. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Wyższej Szkoły Filologicznej.Google Scholar
Jordan, Richard. 1974. Handbook of Middle English grammar: Phonology. Translated & revised by Eugene J. Crook. The Hague: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kemenade, Ans van. 1987. Syntactic case and morphological case in the history of English. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kluge, Friedrich. 1899. Geschichte der Englischen Sprache. 21 vols. Berlin: Felber.Google Scholar
Kniezsa, Veronika. 1981. The problem of the merger of Middle English /a:/ and /ai/ in Northern English. In Michael Davenport, Erik Hansen & Hans Frede Nielsen (eds.), Current topics in English historical linguistics: Proceedings of the second international conference on English historical linguistics at Odense University 1981, 95–102. Odense: Odense University Press.Google Scholar
. 1983. <ai> and <a> in medieval northern English manuscripts. Folia Linguistica Historica 4(1). 45–53.Google Scholar
Kotake, Tadashi. 2006. Aldred’s multiple glosses: Is the order significant? In Michiko Ogura (ed.), Textual and contextual studies in medieval English: Towards the reunion of linguistics and philology, 35–51. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony & Ann Taylor. 1997. Verb movement in Old and Middle English: Dialect variation and language contact. In Ans van Kemenade & Nigel Vincent (eds.), Parameters of morphosyntactic change, 297–325. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony, Ann Taylor & Don Ringe. 2000. The Middle English verb-second constraint: A case study in language contact and language change. In Susan Herring, Pieter van Reenen & Lene Schøsler (eds.), Textual parameters in older languages, 353–391. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kurath, Hans, Sherman M. Kuhn & Robert E. Lewis. 1952–2001. The Middle English dictionary. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. [URL] (May 22, 2016.)
Laing, Margaret. 2013. A linguistic atlas of early Middle English, 1150–1325, version 3.2. Edinburgh: The University of Edinburgh. [URL] (September 30, 2017.)
Laing, Margaret & Roger Lass. 2014. On Middle English she, sho: A refurbished narrative. Folia Linguistica Historica 35(1). 201–240.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1992. Phonology and morphology. In Norman Blake (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. 2: 1066–1476, 23–155. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. Phonology and morphology. In Roger Lass (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. 3: 1478–1776, 56–186. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger, Margaret Laing, Rhona Alcorn & Keith Williamson. 2013. A corpus of narrative etymologies from Proto-Old English to early Middle English and accompanying corpus of changes, version 1.1. Edinburgh: The University of Edinburgh. [URL] (June 15, 2016.)
Los, Bettelou & Kemenade, Ans van. 2017. Syntax and the morphology of deixis: The loss of demonstratives and paratactic clause linking. In Marco Coniglio, Eva Schlachter & Tonjes Veenstra (eds.), Demonstratives. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Luick, Karl. 1967 [1914–1940]. Historische Grammatik der englischen Sprache, part 1 (1914–1921) & part 2 (1992–1940). Leipzig: Tauchnitz. Reprint, 21 vols., Stuttgart/Oxford: Tauchnitz/Blackwell. Citations refer to the Tauchnitz edition.Google Scholar
McIntosh, Angus, M. L. Samuels, Michael Benskin, with Margaret Laing & Keith Williamson (eds.). 1986. A linguistic atlas of late mediaeval English, vol. 31: Linguistic profiles. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar
Minkova, Donna. 2014. A historical phonology of English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Bruce. 1985. Old English syntax. Oxford: Clarendon. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moore, Samuel, Sanford B. Meech & Harold Whitehall. 1935. Middle English dialect characteristics and dialect boundaries. In Essays and studies in English and comparative literature 131. 1–60. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Moore, Samuel. 1969. Historical outlines of English sounds and inflections. Revised by Albert H. Marckwardt. Ann Arbor: George Wahr.Google Scholar
Morris, Richard. 1878. Cursor mundi (The cursur o the world): A Northumbrian poem of the XIVth century in four versions. London: Early English Text Society.Google Scholar
Morse-Gagné, Elise. 2003. Viking pronouns in England: Charting the course of THEY, THEIR, and THEM. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania dissertation.Google Scholar
Murray, James A. H. 1873. The dialect of the southern counties of Scotland. London: Philological Society.Google Scholar
Nagucka, Ruta. 1997. Glossal translation in the Lindisfarne Gospel according to Saint Matthew. Studia Anglicana Posnaniensa 311. 179–201.Google Scholar
Nevanlinna, Saara (ed.). 1972. The Northern Homily Cycle: The expanded version in MSS Harley 4196 and Cotton Tiberius E vii. Parts 1–4. Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki XLIII. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
OED3. Oxford English Dictionary online. [URL] (October 30, 2017.)
Panhuis, Dirk. 2009. Latin grammar. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan. 1991. Phrase structures in competition: Variation and change in Old English word order. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania dissertation.Google Scholar
Pons-Sanz, Sara M. 2013. The lexical effects of Anglo-Scandinavian linguistic contact in Old English. Turnhout: Brepols. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prokosch, Eduard. 1939. A comparative Germanic grammar. Baltimore: Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar
Ross, Alan S. C. 1937. Studies in the accidence of the Lindisfarne Gospels (Leeds School of English Language Texts and Monographs 2). Kendal: Leeds School of English Language.Google Scholar
Ross, Alan S. C., Eric G. Stanley & T. Julian Brown. 1960. Some observations on the gloss and the glossator. In T. D. Kendrick, T. J. Brown, R. L. S. Bruce-Mitford, H. Roosen-Runge, A. S. C. Ross, E. G. Stanley & A. E. A. Werner (eds.), Evangeliorum Quattuor Codex Lindisfarnensis, Musei Britannici Codex Nero D.IV, vol. 21, book 21, 5–33. Olten: Graf.Google Scholar
Schulte, Michael. 2005. Phonological developments from Old Norse to early Modern Nordic I: West Scandinavian. In Oskar Bandle, Kurt Braunmuller, Ernst Hakon Jahr, Allan Karker, Hans-Peter Naumann & Ulf Teleman (eds.), The Nordic languages: An international handbook of the history of the North Germanic languages, vol. 21, 1081–1096. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Serjeantson, Mary Sidney. 1936. A history of foreign words in English. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Skeat, Walter W. (ed.). 1871–1887. The holy gospels in Anglo-Saxon, Northumbrian, and Old Mercian versions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stenbrenden, Gjertrud F. 2016. Long-vowel shifts in English, c. 1050–1700. Evidence from spelling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strang, Barbara M. H. 1970. A history of English. London: Methuen & Co.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey & Terence Kaufman. 1988. Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Anne. 2008. (ed.) The Northern Homily Cycle. Kalamazoo: Medieval Institute Publications.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth. 1992. Syntax. In Richard Hogg (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. 11: The beginnings to 1066, 168–289. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Velde, Hans van de, Roeland van Hout & Marinel Gerritsen. 1997. Watch Dutch change: A real time study of variation and change in Standard Dutch pronunciation. Journal of Sociolinguistics 1(3). 361–391. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Voortman, Berber. 1994. Regionale variatie in het taalgebruik van notabelen: Een sociolinguïstisch onderzoek in Middelburg, Roermond en Zutphen. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University dissertation.Google Scholar
Walkden, George. 2016. Null subjects in the Lindisfarne Gospels as evidence for syntactic variation in Old English. In Julia Fernández-Cuesta & Sara M. Pons-Sanz (eds.), The Old English glosses to the Lindisfarne Gospels: Language, author and context, 239–256. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel. 1968 [1953]. Languages in contact: Findings and problems. The Hague/Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Werner, Otmar. 1991. The incorporation of Old Norse pronouns into Middle English: Suppletion by loan. In Sture Ureland & George Broderick (eds.), Language contact in the British Isles. Proceedings of the eighth international symposium on language contact in Europe, Douglas, Isle of Man, 1988, 369–401. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wright, Joseph & Elizabeth Wright. 1923. An elementary Middle English grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Wyld, Henry C. 1914. A short history of English. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Cited by (17)

Cited by 17 other publications

Cole, Marcelle & Sara M. Pons-Sanz
2023. Origin and Spread of the Personal Pronoun They: La Estorie del Evangelie, a Case Study. In Medieval English in a Multilingual Context [New Approaches to English Historical Linguistics, ], ► pp. 311 ff. DOI logo
Knooihuizen, Remco
2023. Language Contact. In The Linguistics of the History of English, ► pp. 89 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Rongkun
2023. Loss of MID in English: Free Peasantry and Their Linguistic Advantage. Transactions of the Philological Society 121:2 ► pp. 251 ff. DOI logo
Pons-Sanz, Sara M. & Louise Sylvester
2023. Afterword. In Medieval English in a Multilingual Context [New Approaches to English Historical Linguistics, ], ► pp. 531 ff. DOI logo
Versloot, Arjen
2023. The West Germanic Heritage of Yorkshire English. In Medieval English in a Multilingual Context [New Approaches to English Historical Linguistics, ], ► pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Walkden, George, Juhani Klemola & Thomas Rainsford
2023. An Overview of Contact-Induced Morphosyntactic Changes in Early English. In Medieval English in a Multilingual Context [New Approaches to English Historical Linguistics, ], ► pp. 239 ff. DOI logo
Pons-Sanz, Sara M.
2022. Florian Dolberg: Agreement in language contact: Gender development in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle (Studies in Language Companion Series 208). Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 8:2 ► pp. 357 ff. DOI logo
Roig-Marín, Amanda
2021. Northern Middle English spelling evidence in the Durham Account Rolls. Lingua 253 ► pp. 103039 ff. DOI logo
ROIG-MARÍN, AMANDA
2022. Old Norse-derived lexis in multilingual accounts: a case study. English Language and Linguistics 26:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Durkin, Philip
2020. Contact and Lexical Borrowing. In The Handbook of Language Contact, ► pp. 169 ff. DOI logo
Keller, Jonas
2020. The Leipzig-Jakarta list as a means to test Old English / Old Norse mutual intelligibility. NOWELE. North-Western European Language Evolution 73:2 ► pp. 252 ff. DOI logo
Percillier, Michael
2020. A Variationist Approach to the Spread of Emergent Features in Middle English. Recherches anglaises et nord-américaines :53 ► pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Winters, Margaret E.
2020. Historical Linguistics, DOI logo
Caon, Luisella
2019. A Middle English Syntax, Parts of Speech. English Studies 100:2 ► pp. 249 ff. DOI logo
van Gelderen, Elly
2019. Reflexive pronouns in the Lindisfarne glosses. NOWELE. North-Western European Language Evolution 72:2 ► pp. 220 ff. DOI logo
van Gelderen, Elly
2019. The Northumbrian Old English glosses. NOWELE. North-Western European Language Evolution 72:2 ► pp. 119 ff. DOI logo
Dance, Richard
2018. Words derived from Old Norse inSir Gawain and the Green Knight: An etymological survey. Transactions of the Philological Society 116:S2 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.