Cover not available
Article published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 34:4 (2017) ► pp.437–469
Articles / Aufsätze

From middle to passive

A diachronic analysis of Korean -eci constructions

| Hankuk University of Foreign Studies
| Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen | Hong Kong Polytechnic University
This paper examines the relationship between middle and passive voice constructions in Korean, in particular how they have come to share the same grammatical marker -eci. Based on diachronic data from the UNICONC (Korean historical) database, spanning Old, Middle and Modern Korean (15th to 20th century), our analysis reveals that -eci was initially used as a middle voice marker for spontaneous and inchoative events, with change-of-state as their common feature, then extended to transitive contexts, giving rise to passive voice usage. More recently, -eci has developed into a marker of facilitative middle constructions as well. These semantic extensions involve shifts in aspectual focus from change-of-state to resultative-state, and further to potential aspect and mood. This analysis contributes to our understanding of the diachrony of voice markers beyond the causative-to-passive pathway commonly seen in Northeast Asia to include the middle-to-passive pathway, with typological implications.
Keywords: middle voice, passive voice, Korean -eci , valence-change phenomena, diachrony of voice markers
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous studies on different pathways in the development of voice markers
  • 3.Grammaticalization of -eci as a voice marker in Korean
    • 3.1From lexical verb fall to spontaneous middle -eci
    • 3.2Further extensions within the middle domain: Spontaneous > inchoative > facilitative
      • 3.2.1From spontaneous middle to inchoative middle
      • 3.2.2Role of subjectification in the emergence of facilitative middle -eci constructions
    • 3.3From middles to passives: A secondary grammaticalization pathway for -eci
    • 3.4Layers of grammatical evolution of -eci
    • 3.5Interim summary
  • 4.Usage frequencies of -eci: A diachronic analysis
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 9 February 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.16037.ahn
References (76)
References
Alexiadou, Artemis & Edit Doron. 2012. The syntactic construction of two non-active voices: passive and middle. Journal of Linguistics 481.1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bae, Huyim. 1986. ‘-ci’wa phitong [ -ci and passive ] (Kwukehak Sinyenkwu 1 [New Studies on Korean 1]). Seoul: Thap Press.Google Scholar
. 1988. Kwukephitongyenkwu [Studies on the Korean passive]. Seoul: Kolyetay Mincok Mwunhwa Yenkwuso.Google Scholar
Barber, Elizabeth J. W. 1975. Voice – Beyond the passive. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 11. 16–24.Google Scholar
Berman, Ruth A. 1979. Form and function: Passives, middles, and impersonals in Modern Hebrew. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of Berkeley Linguistics Society 51. 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languagees of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Calude, Andreea S. 2004. Reflexive-middle and reciprocal middle continua in Romanian. In Ilana Mushin (ed.), Proceedings of the 2004 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society, 1–14.Google Scholar
Chen, Weirong & Foong Ha Yap. Forthcoming. Pathways to adversity and speaker-affectedness: On the emergence of unaccusative ‘give’ constructions in Chinese. Linguistics.
Davidse, Kristin & Liesbet Heyvaert. 2007. On the middle voice: An interpersonal analysis of the English middle. Linguistics 45(1). 37–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1991. A new approach to English grammar on semantic principles. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Eckardt, Regine. 2006. Meaning change in grammaticalization: An enquiry into semantic reanalysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faltz, Leonard. 1977. Reflexivization: A study in universal syntax. Berkeley: University of California dissertation.Google Scholar
Fellbaum, Christiane. 1985. On the middle construction in English. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Fleisher, Nicholas. 2006. The origin of passive get . English Language and Linguistics 10(2). 225–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1991. The evolution of dependent clause morpho-syntax in Biblical Hebrew. In Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. 21: Types of grammatical markers, 257–310. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. & Farrell Ackerman. 2001. The pragmatics of obligatory adjuncts. Language 77(4). 798–814. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1990. Grammaticalization of passive morphology. Studies in Language 14(1). 25–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. In Michael Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, vol. 21, 211–242. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2000. Polysemy involving reflexive and reciprocal markers in African languages. In Zygmunt Frajzyngier & Tracy S. Curl (eds.), Reflexives: Forms and functions (Typological Studies in Language 40), 1–29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2002. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. The genesis of grammar: A reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hilders, John H. & Jeremy C. D. Lawrance. 1956. An introduction to the Ateso language. Kampala: Eagle Press.Google Scholar
Hŏ, Ung. 1975. Uri yet malbon: 15-segi kugŏ hyŏngt’aeron [The basis of Old Korean: 15th century Korean morphology]. Seoul: Saem Munhwasa.Google Scholar
Hong, Jongseon. 1998. Kuntaykwukeuy ihay [Understanding of Early Modern Korean]. Seoul: Pagijong Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul. 1991. On some principles of grammaticization. In Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. 1: Focus on theoretical and methodological issues, 17–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott. 2003[1993]. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jeong, Eon-hak. 2002. Study on the grammaticalization of the ‘-go isda’ construction. The Chin-tan Hakpo [The Chin-tan Scholarly Journal] 941. 167–203.Google Scholar
. 2006. Sangilonkwa pocoyongenuy yeksacek yenkwu [Historical studies on aspect and auxiliary verbs]. Seoul: Thayhaksa.Google Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne. 1993. The middle voice (Typological Studies in Language 23). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. & Leonard M. Faltz. 1985. Boolean semantics for natural language. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Keyser, Samuel J. & Thomas Roeper. 1984. On the middle and ergative constructions in English. Linguistic Inquiry 151. 381–416.Google Scholar
Kim, Cha Gyun. 1980. The meaning of causatives and passives in Korean. Hangeul 1681. 3–47.Google Scholar
Kim, Jae Min. 2014. A typological study of anticausative, middle and medio-passive constructions. Studies in Modern Grammar 811. 65–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knott, Judith. 1995. The causative-passive correlation. In David C. Bennett, Theodora Bynon & George B. Hewitt (eds.), Subject, voice, and ergativity: Selected essays, 53–59. London: University of London.Google Scholar
Ko, Yŏng-jin. 1997. Hankwukeuymwunpephwakwaceng: Phwulissiuykyengwu [Grammaticalization of Korean: In the case of predicates]. Seoul: Kookhak.Google Scholar
Köhler, Oswin. 1981. Les langues Khoisan, section 1: Passive corre’ensemble. In Jean Perrot (ed.), Les langues dans le mon e ancien et o erne, pre issive correlation. In David’afrique su saharienne, 455–482. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard & Claire Moyse-Faurie. 2010. Towards a typology of reflexivity. Lecture notes at the DGfS-CNRS Summer School on Linguistic Typology (4), Leipzig, 15 August – 3 September.Google Scholar
Kranich, Svenja. 2010a. The progressive in Modern English. A corpus-based study of grammaticalization and related changes (Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics 72). Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010b. Grammaticalization, subjectification and objectification. In Ekaterini Stathi, Elke Gehweiler & Ekkehard König (eds.), Grammaticalization: Current views and issues (Studies in Language Companion Series 119), 101–121. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kwon, Iksoo. 2012. Viewpoints in the Korean verbal complex: Evidence, perception, assessment, and time. Berkeley: University of California doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Lee, Hyo-Sang. 1991. Tense, aspect, and modality: A discourse-pragmatic analysis of verbal affixes in Korean from a typological perspective. Los Angeles: University of California doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Lee, Jung Tag. 2001. On the historical development of -ti-. Journal of Korean Linguistics 381. 117–134.Google Scholar
Lin, Huei-Ling. 2011. Pure unaccusatives with HOOI in Taiwan Southern Min. Lingua 1211. 2035–2047. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marelj, Marijana. 2004. Middles and argument structure across languages. Utrecht: Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Matthews, Stephen, Huiling Xu & Virginia Yip. 2005. Passive and unaccusative in the Jieyang dialect of Chaozhou. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 4(4). 267–298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nam, Su-Kyong. 2011. An essay on the meanings of ‘-eojida’: A typological perspective. The Society for Korean Language and Literary Research 1511. 175–202.Google Scholar
Narrog, Heiko. 2012. Beyond intersubjectification: Textual uses of modality and mood in subordinate clauses as part of speech-act orientation. In Lieselotte Brems, Lobke Ghesquière & Freek van de Velde (eds.), Intersections of intersubjectivity (Special issue of English Text Construction 5(1)), 29–52.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Igor. 1993. Causative-passive polysemy of the Manchu-Tungusic -bu/-v(u) . Linguistica Antverpiensa 271. 193–202.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. & Sergej J. Jaxontov. 1988. The typology of resultative constructions. In, Vladimir P. Nedjakov (ed.), Typology of resultative constructions, 4–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Frank Robert. 1979. Modality and the English modals. London: Longman.Google Scholar
. 1983. Semantic explanations for the syntax of the English modals. In Frank Henry & Barry Richards (eds.), Linguistics categories: Auxiliaries and related puzzles, vol. 21: The scope, order and distribution of English auxiliary verbs, 205–217. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1986. Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Park, Seong Jong. 1984. (A) study on Korean passive. Seoul: Seoul National University MA thesis.Google Scholar
Park, Jae-Yeon. 2007. On the modal meanings of auxiliary construction ‘-eoji-’. Kwukehak 50 [Korean Linguistics 50]. 269–293.Google Scholar
Rhee, Seongha. 2014. Grammaticalization of causatives and passives and their recent development into stance markers in Korean. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 50(3). 309–337.Google Scholar
Seng, Kwangswu. 1976. Kwuke kancepphitongey tayhaye [About indirect passive in Korean]. Mwunpepyenkwu 3 [Studies on Grammar 3]. 159–182.Google Scholar
Shirai, Yasuhiro & Roger Andersen. 1995. The acquisition of tense/aspect morphology: A prototype account. Language 711. 743–762. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1985. Passives and related constructions: A prototype analysis. Language 61(4). 821–848. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siewierska, Anna. 1984. The passive: A comparative linguistic analysis. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Solstad, Torgrim & Benjamin Lyngfelt. 2006. Perspectives on demotion: Introduction to the volume. In Benjamin Lyngfelt & Torgrim Solstad (eds.), Demoting the agent: Passive, middle and other voice phenomena (Linguistik Aktuell 96 [Linguistics Today 96]), 1–20 Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Son, Se-Mo-Dol. 1995. ‘Tita’wa ‘cita’uy uymikochal [Considerations on the meanings of ‘tita’ and ‘cita’]. Hanyangemwun Yenkwu 13 [Hanyang Language and Culture Studies 13]. 997–1018.Google Scholar
. 1996. (A) study of the Korean auxiliary verbs. Seoul: Hankookmunwhasa.Google Scholar
Song, Jae Jung. 1996. Causatives and causation: A universal typological perspective. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, 57–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 651. 31–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Subjectification in grammaticalisation. In Dieter Stein & Susan Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Linguistic perspectives, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. From etymology to historical pragmatics. In Donka Minkova & Robert Stockwell (eds.), Studying the history of the English language: Millennial perspectives, 19–49. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. From subjectification to intersubjectification. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Motives for language change, 124–139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In Kristine Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization, 29–71. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B. Dasher. 2002. Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Ekkehard König. 1991. The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. 11, 189–218. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Washio, Ryuichi. 1993. When causatives mean passive: A cross-linguistic perspective. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 21. 45–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Woo, Inhyey. 1997. Wulimalphitongyenkwu [Studies on Korean Passives]. Seoul: Hankwukmwunhwasa.Google Scholar
Yap, Foong Ha & Mikyung Ahn. 2017. Development of grammatical voice marking in Korean: On the causative, middle, and passive uses of suffix -i . Manuscript: School of Humanities and Social Science, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, China.Google Scholar
Yap, Foong Ha & Shoichi Iwasaki. 2003. From causative to passive: A passage in some East and Southeast Asian languages. In Eugene Casad & Gary Palmer (eds.), Cognitive linguistics and non-Indo-European languages (Cognitive Linguistics Research 18), 419–446. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yeon, Jae-Hoon. 1994. Grammatical relation changing constructions in Korean: A functional- typological study. London: University of London doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Inglese, Guglielmo
2022. Towards a typology of middle voice systems. Linguistic Typology 26:3 ► pp. 489 ff. DOI logo
Inglese, Guglielmo
2023. The rise of middle voice systems. Diachronica 40:2 ► pp. 195 ff. DOI logo
Ahn, Mikyung & Foong Ha Yap
2021. On the relationship between middles and passives. Language and Linguistics. 語言暨語言學 22:2 ► pp. 213 ff. DOI logo
Halm, Tamás
2020. Grammaticalization without Feature Economy. Diachronica 37:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Shinzato, Rumiko
2020. Passives as unmarked voice: a case of “warning” Passives in Okinawan. Language Sciences 80 ► pp. 101276 ff. DOI logo
Yap, Foong Ha & Mikyung Ahn
2019. Development of grammatical voice marking in Korean: On the causative, middle and passive uses of suffix -i. Lingua 219 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Dom, Sebastian, Leonid Kulikov & Koen Bostoen
2018. Valency-decreasing derivations and quasi-middles in Bantu: A typological perspective. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 36:3 ► pp. 165 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.