This article addresses the diachronic development of so-called rival forms, i.e., words or grammatical constructions that appear to be synonyms, based on a detailed empirical analysis of two seemingly synonymous constructions in Russian. Corresponding to the English ‘decade construction’ in the twenties, Russian has two rival constructions, viz. v dvadcatye gody [lit. “in the twentieth years”] (with the numeral and noun in the accusative) and v dvadcatyx godax (with the numeral and noun in the locative case). Three hypotheses about rival forms are considered: leveling (whereby one form ousts its rival), sociolinguistic differentiation (whereby the two rivals survive in different varieties of a language) and semantic differentiation (whereby the two rivals develop different meanings over time). Contrary to what has been suggested in the literature, we find little evidence for semantic and sociolinguistic differentiation. Instead, we demonstrate that leveling is taking place, since the accusative construction is in the process of ousting its rival. While our study shows that corpus data facilitate detailed analysis of the interaction between leveling, sociolinguistic differentiation and semantic differentiation, our analysis also points to limitations, especially when it comes to corpus-based analysis of sociolinguistic and semantic factors.
Baayen, R. Harald, Anna Endresen, Laura A. Janda, Anastasia Makarova & Tore Nesset. 2013. Making choices in Russian: Pros and cons of statistical methods for rival forms. Russian Linguistics 37(3). 253–291.
Bjorvand, Harald. 2000. Diakron lingvistikk. In Rolf Theil Endresen, Hanne Gram Simonsen & Andreas Sveen (eds.), Innføring i lingvistikk, 307–339. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Blythe, Richard A. & William Croft. 2012. S-curves and the mechanisms of propagation in language change. Language 88(2). 269–304.
Bolinger, Dwight. 1968. Entailment and the meaning of structures. Glossa: An International Journal of Linguistics 21. 119–127.
Bondarko, Aleksandr B.2001. Osnovy funkcional’noj grammatiki: jazykovaja interpretacija idei vremeni. St. Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo SPbGU.
Breiman, Leo. 2001. Random forests. Machine Learning 45(1). 5–32.
Bresnan, Joan, Anna Cueni, Tatiana Nikitina & R. Harald Baayen. 2007. Predicting the dative alternation. In Gerlof Bouma, Irene Krämer & Joost Zwarts (eds.), Cognitive foundations of interpretation, 69–94. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.
Bresnan, Joan & Marilyn Ford. 2010. Predicting syntax: Processing dative constructions in American and Australian varieties of English. Language 86(1). 168–213.
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 1994. Inflection classes, gender, and the principle of contrast. Language 70(4). 737–788.
Chambers, J. K.2002. Patterns of variation including change. In J. K. Chambers, Peter Trudgill & Natalie Schilling-Estes (eds.), Handbook of language variation and change, 349–372. Oxford: Blackwell.
Chambers, J. K. & Peter Trudgill. 1998. Dialectology, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, Eve V.1993. The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Croft, William. 2000. Explaining language change. Harlow, UK: Longman.
Croft, William. 2001. Radical construction grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cruse, D. Alan. 1986. Lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dickey, Stephen M.2000. Parameters of Slavic aspect. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Forsyth, James. 1970. A grammar of aspect: Usage and meaning in the Russian verb. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fraser, Norman M. & Greville G. Corbett. 1997. Defaults in Arapesh. Lingua 1031. 25–57.
Jakobson, Roman O.1984. Structure of the Russian verb. In Linda R. Waugh & Morris Halle, Russian and Slavic grammar: Studies 1931–1981. Berlin: Mouton.
Janda, Laura A. & Olga N. Lyashevskaya. 2011. Aspectual pairs in the Russian National Corpus. Scando-Slavica 57(2). 201–215.
King, Bruce M. & Edward W. Minium. 2008. Statistical reasoning in the behavioral sciences. Wiley: Hoboken.
Nesset, Tore. 2013. How Russian became typologically unusual: The history of Russian temporal adverbials with v “in(to)”. Scando-Slavica 59(1). 32–57.
Nesset, Tore & Anastasia Makarova. 2015. Prostranstvo vo vremeni? Asimmetrija predloga v v prostranstvennyx i vremennyx konstrukcijax. In Andrej A. Kibrik & Aleksej D. Košelev (eds.), Jazyk i mysl’: sovremennaja kognitivnaja lingvistika, 388–410. Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury.
Nida, Eugene A.1958. Analysis of meaning and dictionary making. International Journal of American Linguistics 24(4). 279–292.
Padučeva, Elena V.2010. Semantičeskie issledovanija. Semantika vida i vremeni v russkom jazyke. Semantika narrativa. 2nd edn. Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury.
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1983 [1916]. Course in general linguistics. Translated and annotated by Roy Harris. London: Duckworth.
Sokolova, Svetlana, Olga Lyashevskaya & Laura A. Janda. 2012. The locative alternation and the Russian ‘empty’ prefixes: A case study of the verb gruzit’ “load”. In Dagmar Divjak & Stefan Th. Gries (eds.), Frequency effects in language representation, 51–86. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Szymanek, Bogdan. 2005. The latest trends in English word-formation. In Pavol Štekauer & Rochelle Lieber (eds.), Handbook of word-formation, 429–448. Dordrecht: Springer.
Strobl, Carolin, James Malley & Gerhard Tutz. 2009. An introduction to recursive partitioning: Rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging, and random forests. Psychological Methods 14(4). 323–348.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & R. Harald Baayen. 2012. Models, forests and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language Variation and Change 24(2). 135–178.
Vendler, Zeno. 1957. Verbs and times. Philosophical Review 661. 143–160.
Wade, Terence. 1992. A comprehensive grammar of Russian. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wulff, Stefanie. 2006. Go-V vs. go-and-V in English: A case of constructional synonymy? In Stefan Th. Gries & Anatol Stefanowitsch (eds.), Corpora in cognitive linguistics: Corpus-based approaches to syntax and lexis, 101–125. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Zaliznjak, Anna A. & Aleksej D. Šmelev. 2000. Vvedenie v russkuju aspektologiju. Moscow: Jazyki russkoj kul’tury.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Nesset, Tore, Martina Björklund & Svetlana Sokolova
2024. Shortening mechanisms in construction morphology: the Russian spec-N construction. Morphology 34:4 ► pp. 501 ff.
Nesset, Tore
2020. A long birth. Diachronica 37:4 ► pp. 514 ff.
Nesset, Tore
2022. Language Change and Cognitive Linguistics,
Naccarato, Chiara
2019. Agentive (para)synthetic compounds in Russian: a quantitative study of rival constructions. Morphology 29:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.