Cover not available
Article published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 35:4 (2018) ► pp.525–551

The evolution of word prosody in the Papuan languages of Eastern Timor

 | Payap University
Word prosody and sentence-level intonation undergo complex interactions through time. In this study, I focus on the effects of intonation on the development of word prosody in two closely related Papuan languages, Makalero and Fataluku. Though both are very similar segmentally, Makalero’s prosodic system is based on trochaic stress, while Fataluku is characterized primarily by phrase-level intonational contours. On the basis of internal comparative evidence, I demonstrate that the trochaic stress system of Makalero is older, and that a series of well-motivated sound changes has led to a dissociation of stress and intonation in Fataluku. A disassociation between stress and intonation is typologically unexpected, and analysis of the historical development of Fataluku’s system sheds light on how such a dissociation may have taken place.
Keywords: stress, intonation, prosody change, Fataluku, Makalero, Makasae, Oirata, East Timor, Timor Leste, Proto-Eastern Timor, Proto-Timor-Alor-Pantar
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The interaction of word- and phrase-level prosody in the Autosegmental-Metrical framework
    • 2.1Common synchronic patterns
    • 2.2Common diachronic patterns
  • 3.The languages in this study
    • 3.1The Timor-Alor-Pantar language family
    • 3.2Makalero synchronic phonology
    • 3.3Fataluku synchronic phonology
  • 4.Previous reconstructions of stress in the Proto-Timor-Alor-Pantar family
  • 5.Analysis of PETim stress
  • 6.Analysis of PETim Pitch
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 17 January 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.17019.hes
References (55)
References
Arvaniti, Amalia & Mary Baltazani. 2005. Intonational analysis and prosodic annotation of Greek spoken corpora. In Sun-Ah Jun (ed.), Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing, 84–117. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campagnolo, Henri. 1973. La langue des Fataluku de Lórehe (Timor Portugais). Paris: Université René Descartes PhD Thesis.Google Scholar
Chong, Adam J. & James Sneed German. 2015. Prosodic phrasing and F0 in Singapore English. In The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 (ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 1–5. Glasgow, UK: University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
. 2017. The Accentual Phrase in Singapore English. Phonetica 74(2). 63–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Correia, Adérito José Guterres. 2011. Describing Makasae: A Trans-New Guinea language of East Timor. University of Western Sydney PhD Thesis.Google Scholar
van Engelenhoven, Aone. 2009a. On derivational processes in Fataluku, a non-Austronesian language in East Timor. In W. Leo Wetzels (ed.), The linguistics of endangered languages: Contributions to morphology and morphosyntax, 333–362. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
. 2009b. The position of Makuva among the Austronesian languages of Southwest Maluku and East Timor. In Alexander Adelaar & Andrew Pawley (eds.), Austronesian historical linguistics and culture history: A festschrift for Bob Blust, 425–442. (Pacific Linguistics 601). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.Google Scholar
. 2010. The Makuva enigma: Locating a hidden language in East Timor. Revue roumaine de linguistique 80(2). 161–181.Google Scholar
Fogaça, Jessé Silveira. 2011. Fonética e fonologia da língua Makasae. Brasília: Universidade de Brasília Master’s Thesis.Google Scholar
Hajek, John. 2006. Language contact and convergence in East Timor: The case of Tetun Dili. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), Grammars in contact: A cross-linguistic typology, 163–178. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 1995. Metrical stress theory: Principles and case studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heston, Tyler M. 2014a. The nature and underlying representations of long vowels and diphthongs in Fataluku. Oceanic Linguistics 53(2). 467–479. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014b. Prosodic differences between declaratives and polar questions in Fataluku. Proceedings of the 28th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computing, 395–403. Phuket, Thailand: Department of Linguistics, Chulalongkorn University.Google Scholar
2015a. The segmental and suprasegmental phonology of Fataluku. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i at Mānoa PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
2015b. Fataluku word-level prosody. In The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 (ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 1–5. Glasgow, UK: University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
2016a. Stress in Proto-Timor-Alor-Pantar. Oceanic Linguistics 55(1). 278–289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016b. The role of rhythm in intonational melody: A case study from Fataluku. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America, vol. 1, 14:1–8.Google Scholar
2017. A first reconstruction of vowels in Proto-Timor-Alor-Pantar. Oceanic Linguistics 56(1). 73–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heston, Tyler M. & Stephanie Locke. 2019. Fataluku. Journal of the International Phonetic Association. Forthcoming. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus. 2010. Notes on Waima'a intonational structure. In Michael C. Ewing & Marian Klamer (eds.), East Nusantara: Typological and areal analyses, 47–70. (Pacific Linguistics 618). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus & John Hajek. 2001. A report on the current sociolinguistic situation in Lautém (East Timor). Estudos de línguas e culturas de Timor Leste [Studies in Languages and Cultures of East Timor] 41. 88–97.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. & D. Robert Ladd. 2008. Prosodic description: An introduction for fieldworkers. Language Documentation & Conservation 2(2). 244–274.Google Scholar
Holton, Gary, Marian Klamer, František Kratochvíl, Laura C. Robinson & Antoinette Schapper. 2012. The historical relations of the Papuan languages of Alor and Pantar. Oceanic Linguistics 51(1). 86–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holton, Gary & Laura C. Robinson. 2014a. The internal history of the Alor-Pantar language family. In Marian Klamer (ed.), The Alor-Pantar languages, 55–97. (Studies in Diversity Linguistics 3). Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
. 2014b. The linguistic position of the Timor-Alor-Pantar languages. In Marian Klamer (ed.), The Alor-Pantar languages, 155–198. (Studies in Diversity Linguistics 3). Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Hualde, José Ignacio. 2003. Remarks on the diachronic reconstruction of intonational patterns in Romance with special attention to Occitan as a bridge language. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 21. 181–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Historical convergence and divergence in Basque accentuation. In Carlos Gussenhoven & Tomas Riad (eds.), Tones and tunes, vol. 11, 291–322. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Huber, Juliette. 2011. A grammar of Makalero: A Papuan language of East Timor. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
. In preparation. Proto-Eastern-Timor.
Hull, Geoffrey. 2004. The Papuan languages of Timor. Estudos de línguas e culturas de Timor Leste [Studies in languages and cultures of East Timor] 61. 23–99.Google Scholar
. 2005. Fataluku. Dili: Instituto Nacional de Linguistica Universidade Nacional Timor Lorosa’e.Google Scholar
de Josselin de Jong, J. P. B. 1937. Studies in Indonesian Culture I: Oirata, a Timorese settlement on Kisar. Verhandelingen der Koninklijke Akademie van Wetenschappen te Amsterdam Afdeeling Letterkunde, Nieuwe Reeks 39. Amsterdam: N.V. Noord-Hollandsche Uitgevers- Maatschappij.Google Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah. 2005. Korean Intonational Phonology. In Sun-Ah Jun (ed.), Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing, 201–229. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah & Janet Fletcher. 2014. Methodology of studying intonation: From data collection to data analysis. In Sun-Ah Jun (ed.), Prosodic typology II: The phonology of intonation and phrasing, 493–519. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah & Cécile Fougeron. 2000. A phonological model of French intonation. In Antonis Botinis (ed.), Intonation: Analysis, modeling and technology, 209–242. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keane, Elinor. 2007. Distribution and alignment of F0 contours in Tamil. In Jürgen Trouvain & William J. Barry (eds.), Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 993–996. Saarbrücken, Germany.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert. 1996. Intonational Phonology. (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 79). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2008. Intonational Phonology. 2nd ed. (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 119). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lynch, John. 2000. Reconstructing Proto-Oceanic stress. Oceanic Linguistics 39(1). 53–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maskikit-Essed, Raechel & Carlos Gussenhoven. 2016. No stress, no pitch accent, no prosodic focus: The case of Ambonese Malay. Phonology 33(2). 353–389. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nácher, P. Alfonso. 2003. Fataluco-Português: Primeira Parte (Introdução e edição de Geoffrey Hull). Estudos de Línguas e Culturas de Timor-Leste 51. 135–196.Google Scholar
. 2004. Fataluco-Português: Secunda Parte. Estudos de Línguas e Culturas de Timor-Leste 61. 119–177.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet. 1980. The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation. Boston: MIT PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Riad, Tomas. 2003. Diachrony of the Scandinavian accent typology. In Paula Fikkert & Heike Jacobs (eds.), Development in prosodic systems, 91–144. (Studies in Generative Grammar 58). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, Malcolm. 2005. Pronouns as a preliminary diagnostic for grouping Papuan languages. In Andrew Pawley, Robert Attenborough, Jack Golson & Robin Hide (eds.), Papuan pasts: Cultural, linguistic and biological histories of Papuan-speaking peoples, 15–65. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Schapper, Antoinette. 2017. Stress and gemination in Alor-Pantar languages: Revising Heston (2016). Oceanic Linguistics 56(1). 257–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schapper, Antoinette, Juliette Huber & Aone van Engelenhoven. 2012. The historical relations of the Papuan languages of Timor and Kisar. In Harald Hammarström & Wilco van den Heuvel (eds.), Language & Linguistics in Melanesia, 194–242. Linguistic Society of Papua New Guinea.Google Scholar
Schapper, Antoinette, Juliette Huber, Aone van Engelenhoven & Marian Klamer. 2014. The relatedness of Timor-Kisar and Alor-Pantar languages: A preliminary demonstration. The Alor-Pantar languages: History and typology, 99–154. (Studies in Diversity Linguistics 3). Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Simons, Gary F. & Charles D. Fennig (eds.). 2018. Ethnologue: Languages of the world. 21st ed. Dallas, TX: SIL International. [URL] (8 September, 2018).
Stoel, Ruben. 2008. Fataluku as a tone language. In Paul Sidwell & Uri Tadmor (eds.), SEALS XVI: Papers from the 16th annual meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, 75–84. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Williams-van Klinken, Catharina, John Hajek & Rachel Nordlinger. 2002. Tetun Dili: A grammar of an East Timorese language. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Veilleux, Nanette, Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel & Alejna Brugos. 2006. 6.911 Transcribing prosodic structure of spoken utterances with ToBI, January IAP 2006. Massachusetts Institute of Technology: MIT OpenCourseWare. [URL] (1 September, 2013).
Venditti, Jennifer J. 2005. The J_ToBI Model of Japanese Intonation. In Sun-Ah Jun (ed.), Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing, 172–200. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vigário, Marina & Sónia Frota. 2003. The intonation of Standard and Northern European Portuguese: A comparative intonational phonology approach. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 2(2). 115–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Zanten, Ellen, Rob Goedemans & Jos Pacilly. 2003. The status of word stress in Indonesian. In Jeroen Maarten van de Weijer, Vincent van Heuven & Harry van der Hulst (eds.), The Phonological Spectrum: Suprasegmental structure, vol. 21. (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar