The principle of directionality is an important part of the comparative method: in order to arrive at a
reconstruction, historical linguists need a robust theory that informs them in what direction linguistic change is likely to
proceed. But any such theory will have exceptions. How are these to be spotted? I examine one case in which a counter-directional
change, degrammaticalization, can be reconstructed by invoking the phonotactics of the proto-language. The degrammaticalized form
is the Sirva 3sg pronoun be, and the proto-language is Proto-Sogeram. After making this reconstruction,
I also demonstrate that it can be used to enhance our understanding of degrammaticalization. Be spawned a small
family of related forms, which shows us that degrammaticalized forms can become polygrammaticalized in the same way as other
grammatical morphemes.
Ahern, Christopher & Robin Clark. 2017. Conflict, cheap talk, and Jespersen’s cycle. Semantics and Pragmatics 101.
Auwera, Johan van der. 2002. More thoughts on degrammaticalization. In Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, 19–29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2013. Construction-based historical-comparative reconstruction. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 438–457. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bickel, Balthasar & Johanna Nichols. 2007. Inflectional morphology. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. III1: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 169–240. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Börjars, Kersti & Nigel Vincent. 2011. Grammaticalization and directionality. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 163–176. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bybee, Joan. 2001. Phonology and language use. (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 94.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bybee, Joan. 2006. From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language 82(4). 711–733.
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Campbell, Lyle & Alice C. Harris. 2002. Syntactic reconstruction and demythologizing “Myths and the prehistory of grammars.” Journal of Linguistics 38(3). 599–618.
Carroll, Matthew. 2016. The Ngkolmpu language, with special reference to distributed exponence. Canberra: Australian National University Ph.D. dissertation.
Craig, Colette. 1991. Ways to go in Rama: A case study in polygrammaticalization. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization II. (Typological Studies in Language 19), vol. II1: Focus on Types of Grammatical Markers, 455–492. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dahl, Östen. 2001. Inflationary effects in language and elsewhere. In Joan Bybee & Paul J. Hopper (eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. (Typological Studies in Language 45), 471–480. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Daniels, Don. 2015. A reconstruction of Proto-Sogeram: Phonology, lexicon, and morphosyntax. Santa Barbara, CA: University of California, Santa Barbara Ph.D. dissertation.
Daniels, Don. 2016. Magɨ: An undocumented language of Papua New Guinea. Oceanic Linguistics 55(1). 199–224.
Daniels, Don. 2017a. Gants is a Sogeram language. Language and Linguistics in Melanesia 351. 82–93.
Daniels, Don. 2018. Papuan Languages Collection. Archival collection, 960 items. Pacific and Regional Archive for Digital Sources in Endangered Cultures (PARADISEC). [URL]
Daniels, Don, Danielle Barth & Wolfgang Barth. Forthcoming. Subgrouping the Sogeram languages: A critical appraisal of historical glottometry. Journal of Historical Linguistics.
Daniels, Don & Joseph D. Brooks. Forthcoming. The history of *=a: Contact and reconstruction in northeast New Guinea. Journal of Language Contact.
Evans, Nicholas & Stephen C. Levinson. 2009. The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32(5). 429–448.
Goldberg, Adele E.1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Harris, Alice C.2008. Reconstruction in syntax: Reconstruction of patterns. In Gisella Ferraresi & Maria Goldbach (eds.), Principles of syntactic reconstruction. (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 302), 73–95. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Harris, Kyle. 1990. Nend grammar essentials. In John R. Roberts (ed.), Two grammatical studies (Data Papers on Papua New Guinea Languages 37), 73–156. Ukarumpa: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
Haspelmath, Martin. 1999. Why is grammaticalization irreversible?Linguistics 371. 1043–1068.
Heine, Bernd. 2003a. On degrammaticalization. In Barry J. Blake & Kate Burridge (eds.), Historical linguistics 2001: Selected papers from the 15th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Melbourne, 13–17 August 2001, 163–180. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Heine, Bernd. 2003b. Grammaticalization. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 575–601. Oxford: Blackwell.
Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi & Frederike Hünnemeyer. 1991. Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2002. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heine, Bernd & Kyung-An Song. 2011. On the grammaticalization of personal pronouns. Journal of Linguistics 47(3). 587–630.
Hetzron, Robert. 1976. Two principles of genetic reconstruction. Lingua 38(2). 89–108.
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.2004. Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal? In Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds.), What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components, 21–42. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Hoffmann, Thomas & Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Construction Grammar: Introduction. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 1–12. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hopper, Paul J.1991. On some principles of grammaticization. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization. (Typological Studies in Language 19), 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Joseph, Brian D.2014. What counts as (an instance of) grammaticalization?Folia Linguistica 48(2). 361–383.
Koch, Harold. 1996. Reconstruction in morphology. In Mark Durie & Malcolm Ross (eds.), The comparative method reviewed: Regularity and irregularity in language change, 218–263. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kulick, Don. 1992. Language shift and cultural reproduction: Socialization, self, and syncretism in a Papua New Guinean village. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lehmann, Christian. 2002. Thoughts on grammaticalization. 2nd ed. Erfurt: Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität.
Lightfoot, David W.2002. Myths and the prehistory of grammars. Journal of Linguistics 38(1). 113–136.
Mengden, Ferdinand von. 2008. Reconstructing complex structures: A typological perspective. In Gisella Ferraresi & Maria Goldbach (eds.), Principles of syntactic reconstruction. (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 302), 97–119. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Narrog, Heiko & Bernd Heine (eds.). 2011. The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nevis, Joel A.1986. Decliticization and deaffixation in Saame: Abessive taga. In Brian D. Joseph (ed.), Studies on language change. (The Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics 34), 1–9.
Newmeyer, Frederick J.1998. Language form and language function. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Norde, Muriel. 2009. Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Norde, Muriel. 2010. Degrammaticalization: Three common controversies. In Katerina Stathi, Elke Gehweiler & Ekkehard König (eds.), Grammaticalization: Current views and issues, 123–150. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Norde, Muriel. 2011. Degrammaticalization. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 475–487. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pawley, Andrew. 1995. C. L. Voorhoeve and the Trans New Guinea Phylum hypothesis. In Connie Baak, Mary Bakker & Dick van der Meij (eds.), Tales from a concave world: Liber amicorum Bert Voorhoeve, 83–123. Leiden: Leiden University.
Pawley, Andrew. 1998. The Trans New Guinea Phylum hypothesis: A reassessment. In Jelle Miedema, Cecilia Odé & Rien A. C. Dam (eds.), Perspectives on the Bird’s Head of Irian Jaya, Indonesia: Proceedings of the conference, Leiden, 13–17 October 1997, 655–690. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Pawley, Andrew. 2005. The chequered career of the Trans New Guinea hypothesis: Recent research and its implications. In Andrew Pawley, Robert Attenborough, Jack Golson & Robin Hide (eds.), Papuan pasts: Cultural, linguistic and biological histories of Papuan-speaking peoples, 67–107. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Pawley, Andrew. 2012. How reconstructible is Proto Trans New Guinea? Problems, progress, prospects. In Harald Hammarström & Wilco van den Heuvel (eds.), History, contact and classification of Papuan languages. (Special issue of Language and Linguistics in Melanesia), 88–164.
Pawley, Andrew & Harald Hammarström. 2017. The Trans New Guinea family. In Bill Palmer (ed.), The languages and linguistics of the New Guinea area: A comprehensive guide, 21–195. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Pelkey, Jamin. 2011. A Phula comparative lexicon: Phola, Phuza, Muji, Phowa, Azha. SIL International.
Reinöhl, Uta & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann. 2017. Renewal: A figure of speech or a process sui generis?Language 93(2). 381–413.
Ross, Malcolm. 2000. A preliminary subgrouping of the Madang languages based on pronouns. Unpublished ms, Australian National University.
Ross, Malcolm. 2005. Pronouns as a preliminary diagnostic for grouping Papuan languages. In Andrew Pawley, Robert Attenborough, Jack Golson & Robin Hide (eds.), Papuan pasts: Cultural, linguistic and biological histories of Papuan-speaking peoples, 15–65. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Ross, Malcolm. 2015. The argument indexing of Early Austronesian verbs: A reconstructional myth? In Dag T. T. Haug (ed.),
Historical linguistics 2013: Selected papers from the21st International Conference on Historical Linguistics
, Oslo, 5–9 August 2013, 257–279. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and constructional changes. (Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics 6.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Viti, Carlotta. 2015. On degrammaticalization: Controversial points and possible explanations. Folia Linguistica 49(2). 381–419.
Wade, Martha. 1989. A survey of the grammatical structures and semantic functions of the Apalɨ (Emerum) language. Ms, Pioneer Bible Translators.
Wilkins, David P.1996. Natural tendencies of semantic change and the search for cognates. In Mark Durie & Malcolm Ross (eds.), The comparative method reviewed: Regularity and irregularity in language change, 264–304. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ylikoski, Jussi. 2016. Degrammaticalization in North Saami: Development of adpositions, adverbs and a free lexical noun from inflectional and derivational suffixes. Finnisch-Ugrische Mitteilungen 401. 113–173.
Z’graggen, John A.1971. Classificatory and typological studies in languages of the Madang District (Pacific Linguistics C 19). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Z’graggen, John A.1975a. The Madang-Adelbert Range subphylum. In Stephen A. Wurm (ed.), Papuan languages and the New Guinea linguistic scene. (Pacific Linguistics C 38), 569–612. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Z’graggen, John A.1975b. The languages of the Madang District, Papua New Guinea. (Pacific Linguistics B 41.) Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Z’graggen, John A.1980. A comparative word list of the Southern Adelbert Range languages, Madang Province, Papua New Guinea. (Pacific Linguistics D 33.) Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.