Cover not available
Article published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 37:1 (2020) ► pp.1–42

Grammaticalization without Feature Economy

Evidence from the Voice Cycle in Hungarian

ORCID logo | Research Institute for Linguistics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences
The present paper is a corpus-based study of the Voice Cycle in Hungarian. Based on data from the Old Hungarian Corpus and the Hungarian Historical Corpus, I will argue that while in Old Hungarian, middle voice was encoded through a separate inflectional paradigm (contextual allomorphy in the subject agreement suffix conditional on the feature content of a silent Voice head), in Modern Hungarian, middle voice is encoded through dedicated middle voice suffixes (i.e., the Voice head is spelled out overtly). I will claim that the underlying grammaticalization process involved the reanalysis of frequentative suffixes (v heads) as middle voice suffixes (Voice heads). I will show that this reinterpretation was not based on shared abstract features, but rather, on a principled correlation between middle voice and frequentative aspect: since some types of middles (antipassives and dispositional middles) were more likely to be associated with a frequentative or habitual reading than actives, frequentative suffixes were susceptible to reanalysis as middle suffixes in the course of language acquisition. I will thus claim that in addition to Feature Economy (van Gelderen 2011), reinterpretation based on correlation between featurally independent grammatical markers should also be regarded as a mechanism of grammaticalization.
Keywords: grammaticalization, cycles, voice, middles, syntax, morphology, Hungarian
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Middle voice: A note on terminology
  • 3.Late Old Hungarian: AgrS allomorphy conditional on voice
  • 4.Excursion: A finer-grained syntax and semantics
  • 5.The collapse of the middle paradigm
  • 6.The emergence of middle voice suffixes
  • 7.Reinterpretation based on correlation between middle voice and frequentative aspect
  • 8.The breakdown of voice syncretism and the rise of suffix stacking
  • 9.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 7 April 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.19008.hal
References (91)
References
Ahn, Mikyung & Foong Ha Yap. 2017. From middle to passive: A diachronic analysis of Korean -eci constructions. Diachronica 34(4). 437–469. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis. 2014. Roots in transitivity alternations: afto/auto reflexives. In Artemis Alexiadou, Hagit Borer & Florian Schäfer (eds.), The syntax of roots and the roots of syntax, 57–80. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis & Edit Doron. 2012. The syntactic construction of two non-active Voices: Passive and middle. Journal of Linguistics 481. 1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Florian Schäfer. 2015. External arguments in alternations: A layering approach. Vol. 551. Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arregi, Karlos & Andrew Nevins. 2012. Morphotactics: Basque auxiliaries and the structure of spellout. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Austin, Peter. 1981. A grammar of Diyari, South Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark. 1985. The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry 161. 373–415.Google Scholar
. 1988. Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bárány, András. 2017. Person, case, and agreement: The morphosyntax of inverse agreement and global case splits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bartos, Huba. 1999. Morfoszintaxis és interpretáció. A magyar inflexiós jelenségek szintaktikai háttere. [Morphosyntax and interpretation. The syntactic background of inflectional phenomena in Hungarian.] PhD dissertation, Eötvös Loránd University.Google Scholar
Benkő, Loránd. 1967. A magyar nyelv történeti-etimológiai szótára. [A Historical-Etymological Dictionary of Hungarian.] Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar, Bernard Comrie & Martin Haspelmath. 2008. The Leipzig glossing rules: Conventions for interlinear morpheme by morpheme glosses. Department of Linguistics of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology & Department of Linguistics of the University of Leipzig. Retrieved January, 28, 2010.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan. 2000. The ins and outs of contextual allomorphy. In Kleanthes K. Grohmann & Caro Struijke (eds.), University of Maryland working papers in linguistics, vol. 101. 35–71. College Park: University of Maryland, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
. 2012. Universals in comparative morphology. Cambridge: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan & Heidi Harley. 2017. Suppletion is local: Evidence from Hiaki. In Heather Newell, Maire Noonan, Glyne Piggott & Lisa Travis (eds.), The structure of words at the interfaces, 141–159. Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Bok-Bennema, Reineke. 1991. Case and agreement in Inuit. Berlin and New York: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Budenz, József. 1884. Az ugor nyelvek összehasonlító alaktana. [The comparative morphology of Uralic Languages.] Nyelvtudományi Közlemények (18)2. 161–319.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist program. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Robin & Ian Roberts. 1993. A computational model of language learnability and language change. Linguistic Inquiry 24(2). 299–345.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1979. Degrees of ergativity: Some Chukchee evidence. In Frans Plank (ed.), Ergativity: Towards a theory of grammatical relations, 219–240. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cooreman, Anne. 1988. The antipassive in Chamorro: Variations on the theme of transitivity. In Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), Passive and voice, 561–593. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1994. A functional typology of antipassives. In Barbara Fox & Paul Hopper (eds.), Voice: Form and function, 49–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
D. Bartha, Katalin. 1991. Az igeképzés. [The derivation of verbs.] In Loránd Benkő (ed.), A magyar nyelv történeti nyelvtana – A korai ómagyar kor és előzményei. [A historical grammar of Hungarian: Early Old Hungarian and before.], 60–103. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
. 1992. Az igeképzés. [The derivation of verbs.] In Loránd Benkő (ed.), A magyar nyelv történeti nyelvtana: A kései ómagyar kor: Morfematika [A historical grammar of Hungarian: The morphology of Late Old Hungarian], 55–119. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Deme, László & Samu Imre. 1968–77. A magyar nyelvjárások atlasza I-VI. [Dialect atlas of Hungarian I-VI.] Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Dékány, Éva. 2011. A profile of the Hungarian DP. PhD dissertation, University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
Déprez, Viviane. 2000. Parallel (a)symmetries and the internal structure of negative expressions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 181. 253–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dikken, Marcel den. 1999. On the structural representation of possession and agreement: The case of (anti-)agreement in Hungarian possessed nominal phrases. Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science Series 41. 137–178.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1972. The Dyirbal language of North Queensland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1977. A grammar of Yidiny. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dömötör, Adrienne. 2013. Az ó- és középmagyar kori magánéleti nyelvhasználat morfológiailag elemzett adatbázisa. [A morphologically annotated database of vernacular language use in Old and Middle Hungarian.] In Fazakas, Emese, Dezső Juhász, Csilla T. Szabó, Erika Terbe & Borbála Zsemlyei (eds.), Tér, idő és kultúra metszéspontjai a magyar nyelvben. [The intersection of space, time and culture in Hungarian], 11–121. Budapest-Cluj. Nemzetközi Magyarságtudományi Társaság – ELTE Magyar Nyelvtörténeti, Szociolingvisztikai és Dialektológiai Tanszék.Google Scholar
Embick, David. 2010. Localism versus globalism in morphology and phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
E. Abaffy, Erzsébet. 1978. A mediális igékről. [On middle verbs.] Magyar Nyelv 741, 280–293.Google Scholar
. 1992. Az igei személyragozás. [Verbal conjugation.] In Loránd Benkő (ed.), A magyar nyelv történeti nyelvtana: A kései ómagyar kor: Morfematika [A historical grammar of Hungarian: The morphology of Late Old Hungarian]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. 184–238.Google Scholar
É. Kiss, Katalin. 2002. The Syntax of Hungarian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faarlund, Jan Terje. 2008. A mentalist interpretation of grammaticalization theory. In Thórhallur Eythórsson (ed.), Grammatical change and linguistic theory: The Rosendal papers, 221–244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fortescue, Michael D. 1984. West Greenlandic. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Foulet, Lucien. 1990. Petite syntaxe de l’ancien français. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Geenhoven, Veerle van. 2004. For-adverbials, frequentative aspect and pluractionality. Natural Language Semantics 12:2, 135–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gelderen, Elly van. 2004. Grammaticalization as economy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. The linguistic cycle. Language change and the language faculty. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. The diachrony of verb meaning: Aspect and argument structure. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerdts, Donna B. & Hukari, Thomas E. 2005. Multiple antipassives in Halkomelem Salish. In Kratzer, A., Conathan, L. J., Good, J., Kavitskaya, D., Wulf, A., & Alan, C. L. (eds.), Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 261. 51–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerdts, Donna B., & Hukari, Thomas E. 2006. The Halkomelem middle: A complex network of constructions. Anthropological Linguistics, 44–81.Google Scholar
Grestenberger, Laura. 2014. Feature mismatch: Deponency in Indo-European languages. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
. 2018. Deponency in finite and nonfinite contexts. Language 94(3). 487–526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris. 1990. An approach to morphology. In Juli Carter, Rose-Marie Déchaine, Bill Philip & Tim Sherer (eds.) Proceedings of the 20th Conference of the North East Linguistic Society, 150–184. Amherst (MA): Graduate Linguistic Student Association of the University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20, 111–176. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi. 1995. Subjects, events, and licensing. Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi & Rolf Noyer. 2000. Formal versus encyclopedic properties of vocabulary: Evidence from nominalisations. In Bert Peeters (ed.), The lexicon/encyclopedia interface, 349–374. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2002. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne. 1993. The middle voice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klaiman, M. H. 1991. Grammatical voice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Komlósy, András. 2000. A műveltetés [Causativization]. In Ferenc Kiefer (ed.) Strukturális Magyar Nyelvtan 3. Morfológia [A Structural Grammar of Hungarian 3: Morphology], 215–292. Budapest, Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Kozinsky, Isaac, Vladimir Nedjalkov & Maria Polinskaja. 1988. Antipassive in Chukchee. In Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), Passive and voice, 651–706. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroch, Anthony. 1990. Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 11. 199–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lasersohn, Peter. 1995. Plurality, conjunction and events. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. In A. Dimitriadis, L. Siegel, C. Surek-Clark & A. Williams (eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium, Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4(2). 201–225. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Penn Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Márkus, Andrea. 2015. Taming the Hungarian (in)transitivity zoo. Undiagnosed species and a complete derivation of the morphosyntactic patterns. PhD dissertation, University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
Merchant, Jason. 2015. How much context is enough? Two cases of span-conditioned stem allomorphy. Linguistic Inquiry 461. 273–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondloch, James L. 1982. Voice in Quiche-Maya. PhD dissertation, State University of New York.Google Scholar
Neeleman, Ad & Kriszta Szendrői. 2007. Radical pro-drop and the morphology of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 381 41. 671–714. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newson, Mark. 2010. Syntax first, words after: A possible consequence of doing Alignment Syntax without a lexicon. In Varga, László (ed.), The even yearbook 9. School of English and American studies working papers in linguistics, 1–46. Budapest: Eötvös Loránd University.Google Scholar
Niyogi, Partha & Robert C. Berwick. 1997. Evolutionary consequences of language learning. Linguistics and Philosophy 201. 697–719. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Novák, Attila, György Orosz & Nóra Wenszky. 2013. Morphological annotation of Old and Middle Hungarian corpora. In Piroska Lendvai and Kalliopi Zervanou (eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Language Technology for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences and Humanities, 43–48. Sofia, Bulgaria: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Noyer, Rolf. 1992. Features, positions and affixes in autonomous morphological structure. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
. 1997. Features, positions and affixes in autonomous morphological structure. New York: Garland Press.Google Scholar
Polinskaja, Maria & Vladimir Nedjalkov. 1987. Contrasting the absolutive in Chukchee: Syntax, semantics, pragmatics. Lingua 711. 239–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, Maria. 2013. Antipassive. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.Google Scholar
. 2017. Antipassive. In Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa deMena Travis (eds.), The Oxford handbook of ergativity, 308–331. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rákosi, György. 2008. The inherently reflexive and the inherently reciprocal predicate in Hungarian: Each to their own argument structure. In Ekkehard König and Volker Gast (eds.), Reciprocals and reflexives: Theoretical and typological explorations, 411–450. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian. 2008. Lexical items in complex predications: Selection and underassociation. Nordlyd: Tromsø University Working Papers in Linguistics 351. 115–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R. Hutás, Magdolna. 1972. Az ikes ragozás állapota Révai Miklós korában. [The status of the ik verbal paradigm in the times of Miklós Révai.] Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Rebrus, Péter & Miklós Törkenczy. 2015. Monotonicity and the typology of front/back harmony. Theoretical Linguistics 41(1–2). 1–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian and Anna Roussou. 2003. Syntactic change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schäfer, Florian. 2008. The syntax of (anti-) causatives: External arguments in change-of-state contexts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sells, Peter, Zaenen, Annie and Zec, Draga. 1987. Reflexivization variation: Relations between syntax, semantics, and lexical structure. In Masayo Iida, Stephen Wechsler & Draga Zec (eds.), Working papers in grammatical theory and discourse structure. Volume I: Interactions of morphology, syntax, and discourse, 169–238. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Simonyi, Zsigmond. 1878. A visszaható igének egy különös haszálata. [On a peculiar usage of the reflexive verb.] Magyar Nyelvőr 71. 481–493.Google Scholar
. 1880. A magyar gyakorító és mozzanatos igék képzése. [The derivation of frequentative and semelfactive verbs in Hungarian.] Nyelvtudományi Közlemények 181. 237–269.Google Scholar
. 1905. Az ikes ragozás története. [The history of the -ik conjugation.] Magyar Nyelvőr 341. 1–11, 113–119, 337–349, 393–401, 444–454, 495–501.Google Scholar
Simon, Eszter. 2014. Corpus building from Old Hungarian codices. In Katalin É. Kiss (ed.), The evolution of functional left peripheries in Hungarian syntax, 224–236. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Simon, Eszter & Bálint Sass. 2012. Nyelvtechnológia és kulturális örökség, avagy korpuszépítés ómagyar kódexekből. [Language technology and cultural heritage: Building corpora from Old Hungarian Codices.] Általános Nyelvészeti Tanulmányok 241. 243–264.Google Scholar
Spreng, Bettina. 2012. Viewpoint aspect in Inuktitut: The syntax and semantics of antipassives. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter. 2012. Look both ways: Outward-looking allomorphy in Icelandic participles. LingBuzz. Available online at [URL] (accessed April 11, 2018).
Terrill, Angela. 1997. The development of antipassive constructions in Australian languages. Australian Journal of Linguistics 171. 71–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsunoda, Tasaku. 1988. Antipassives in Warrungu and other Australian languages. In Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), Passive and voice, 595–650. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Laurel. 1984. A grammar of Kiowa. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Weerman, Fred and Jacquelina Evers-Vermeul. 2002. Pronouns and case. Lingua 1121. 301–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 2003. Representation theory. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

den Dikken, Marcel
2022. Ordinals, reflexives and unaccusatives. Journal of Uralic Linguistics 1:2 ► pp. 215 ff. DOI logo
Halm, Tamás
2021. Radically Truncated Clauses in Hungarian and Beyond: Evidence for the Fine Structure of the Minimal VP. Syntax 24:3 ► pp. 376 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.