Cover not available
Article published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 37:3 (2020) ► pp.368–409

The distribution, reconstruction and varied fates of topographical deixis in Trans-Himalayan (Sino-Tibetan)

Implications for the reconstruction of an early Trans-Himalayan environment

ORCID logo | The University of Sydney
Topographical deixis refers to a variety of spatial-environmental deixis, in which typically distal reference to entities is made in terms of a set of topographically-anchored referential planes: most often, upward, downward, or on the same level. This article reviews the genealogical and geographic distribution of topographical deixis in Trans-Himalayan (Sino-Tibetan) languages, reviews the conditions in which topographical deixis in Trans-Himalayan languages may be gained or lost, and concludes that (a) topographical deixis is overwhelmingly found in languages spoken in montane environments, and (b) topographical deixis most likely reconstructs to a deep level within Trans-Himalayan. The language spoken at that level – whose precise phylogenetic status cannot yet be specified – was overwhelmingly likely to have been spoken in a montane environment.
Keywords: deixis, environmental deixis, topographical deixis, linguistic geography, montane languages, Trans-Himalayan languages, Sino-Tibetan languages, Tibeto-Burman languages, Himalayan languages
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Topographical deixis
  • 3.Distribution in Trans-Himalayan
    • 3.1Survey and methods
    • 3.2Discussion
      • 3.2.1Kiranti
      • 3.2.2Macro-Tani (Tani and Siangic)
      • 3.2.3Lolo-Burmese
      • 3.2.4Kachinic and Brahmaputran (“Sal”)
      • 3.2.5Tamangic, Bodish, East Bodish, West Himalayish, ‘Olekha (Black Mountain) and Tshangla
      • 3.2.6Lepcha
      • 3.2.7rGyalrongic-Qiangic, Ěrsūish and Naic
      • 3.2.8Mishmic
      • 3.2.9Kho-Bwa
      • 3.2.10“Hrusish” (Hruso and Mijiic)
      • 3.2.11Nungish
      • 3.2.12Kuki-Chin, and other language groups of the Indo-Myanmar border region
      • 3.2.13Other subgroups
  • 4.Historical status
    • 4.1Summary of genealogical distribution
    • 4.2Summary of geographic distribution
    • 4.3Conservation or parallel innovation?
    • 4.4Implications for Trans-Himalayan prehistory
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 3 August 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.19018.pos
References (135)
References
Allen, Nicholas Justin. 1975. Sketch of Thulung grammar. Ithaca: Cornell University East Asia Series.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. & Edward L. Keenan. 1985. Deixis. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description volume III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 259–308. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Andvik, Erik E. 2010. A grammar of Tshangla. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arokianathan, S. 1987. Tangkhul Naga grammar. Mysore: Central Institute for Indian Languages.Google Scholar
Baclawski, Kenneth P. 2012. Deictic elements in Hyow and Kuki-Chin. Dartmouth College, B.A. thesis.Google Scholar
Barnard, Joseph Terence Owen. 1934. A handbook of the Răwang dialect of the Nung language. Rangoon: Superintendent of Government Printing and Stationery.Google Scholar
Bartee, Ellen. 2007. A grammar of Dongwang Tibetan. University of California, Doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Benedict, Paul K. 1972. Sino-Tibetan: A conspectus. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhattacharya, Pramod Chandra. 1977. A descriptive analysis of the Boro language. Gauhati: Department of Publication, Gauhati University.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar. 2001. Deictic transposition and referential practice in Belhare.’ Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 10(2). 224–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blench, Roger & Mark W. Post. 2014. Re-thinking Sino-Tibetan phylogeny from the perspective of North East Indian languages. In Nathan Hill & Tom Owen-Smith (eds.), Trans-Himalayan linguistics: Historical and descriptive linguistics of the Himalayan area, 71–104. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
. 2011. Declassifying Eastern Himalayan languages: Reconsidering the evidence. Unpublished ms.Google Scholar
Bodt, Timotheus A. 2017. Grammar of Duhumbi (Chugpa). Universität Bern, Doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Bodt, Timotheus A. & Ismael Lieberherr. 2015. First notes on the phonology and classification of the Bangru language of India. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 38(1). 66–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borchers, Dörte. 2008. A grammar of Sunwar: Descriptive grammar, paradigms, texts, and glossary. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Boro, Krishna. 2017. A grammar of Hakhun Tangsa. University of Oregon, Doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Bradley, David. 1979. Proto-Loloish. London: Curzon Press.Google Scholar
. 1997. Tibeto-Burman languages and classification. In David Bradley (ed.), Tibeto-Burman languages of the Himalayas, 1–72. Canberra: Australian National University Press.Google Scholar
. 2002. The subgrouping of Tibeto-Burman. In Christopher I. Beckwith (ed.), Medieval Tibeto-Burman languages, 73–112. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
. 2003. Deictic patterns in Lisu and Southeastern Tibeto-Burman. In David Bradley, Randy J. LaPolla, Boyd Michailovsky & Graham Thurgood (eds.), Language variation: Papers on variation and change in the Sinosphere and in the Indosphere in honour of James A. Matisoff, 219–236. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Brassett, Cecilia, Philip Brassett & Meiyan Lu. 2006. The Tujia language. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
van Breugel, Seino. 2014. A grammar of Atong. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burling, Robbins. 1965. Hill farms and padi fields: Life in mainland Southeast Asia. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
. 1983. The Sal languages. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 7(2). 1–32.Google Scholar
. 2004. The Language of the Modhipur Mandi (Garo). Volume I: Grammar . New Delhi: Bibliophile South Asia.Google Scholar
Caughley, Ross. 2000. Dicitonary of Chepang: A Tibeto-Burman language of Nepal. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Chelliah, Shobhana L. 1997. Meithei. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coupe, Alec. 2007. A grammar of Mongsen Ao. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Das Gupta, Kamalesh. 1977. A phrase book in Miju. Shillong: Government of Arunachal Pradesh Research Department.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 2012. On the origins of Bodo-Garo. In Gwendolyn Hyslop, Stephen Morey & Mark Post (eds.), North East Indian linguistics volume 4, 3–20. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press India.Google Scholar
Denwood, Philip. 1999. Tibetan. Amsterdam, Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ding, Picus Sizhi. 2014. A grammar of Prinmi: Based on the central dialect of Northwest Yunnan, China. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dirksmeyer, Tyko. 2008. Spatial deixis in Chintang: Aspects of a grammar of space. Universität Leipzig, M.A. Thesis.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1972. The Dyirbal language of North Queensland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doornenbal, Marius. 2009. A grammar of Bantawa: Grammar, paradigm tables, glossary and texts of a Rai language of Eastern Nepal. Leiden University, Doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
van Driem, George. 1993. A grammar of Dumi. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. Dzongkha. Leiden: Leiden University Research School CNWS.Google Scholar
. 2001. Languages of the Himalayas: An ethnolinguistic handbook of the Greater Himalayan Region, containing an introduction to the symbiotic theory of language. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
. 2014. Trans-Himalayan. In Nathan W. Hill & Thomas Owen-Smith (eds.), Trans-Himalayan linguistics: Historical and descriptive linguistics of the Himalayan area, 11–40. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Ebert, Karen. 1997. A grammar of Athpare. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
. 2003. Kiranti languages: An overview. In Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 505–517. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Evans, Jonathan. 2004. Reconstruction of Proto-Qiang verb inflection. In Ying-Chin Lin, Fang-Min Hsu, Chun-Chih Lee, Jackson Tian-Shin Sun, Hsiu-Fang Yang & Dah-An Ho (eds.), Studies on Sino-Tibetan languages: Papers in honor of Professor Hwang-Cherng Gong on his seventieth birthday, 201–238. Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Forker, Diana. 2019. Elevation as a category of grammar: Sanzhi Dargwa and beyond. Linguistic Typology 23(1): 59–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gawne, Lauren. 2016. A sketch grammar of Lamjung Yolmo. Canberra: Asia-Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Genetti, Carol. 2007. A grammar of Dolokha Newar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giridhar, P. P. 1980. Angami grammar. Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages.Google Scholar
1994. Mao Naga grammar. Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages.Google Scholar
Goswami, Dipjyoti. 2017. Lexical nominalization and the extended functions of the demonstrative kəra² in Rera, a Northern Naga Language. Payap University, M.A. Thesis.Google Scholar
Grollmann, Selin. 2018. A grammar of Bjokapakha. Unpublished ms.Google Scholar
Hammarström, Harald, Robert Forkel & Martin Haspelmath. 2018. Glottolog 3.3. Accessed 2018-08-07, [URL]
Hansson, Inga-Lill. 2003. Akha. In Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 236–252. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, David. 2003. Kathmandu Newar (Nepal Bhasa). In Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla, (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 371–384. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2004. Directional prefixes in Kathmandu Newar. In Anju Saxena (ed.), Himalayan languages: Past and present, 273–284. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Häsler, Katrin Louise. 1999. A grammar of the Tibetan Dege (Sde dge) Dialect. Universität Bern, Doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Hesselmeyer, George. 1868. The hill tribes of the northern frontier of Assam. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Bengal 41. 192–208.Google Scholar
Hildebrandt, Kristine A. 2004. A grammar and glossary of the Manange language. In Carol Genetti (ed.), Tibeto-Burman languages of Nepal: Manange and Sherpa, 3–189. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Hyslop, Gwendolyn. 2017. A Grammar of Kurtöp. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume. 2004. Phonologie et morphologie du Japhug (rGyalrong). Université de Paris VII – Denis Diderot, Doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
. 2015. The genetic position of Chinese. In Rint Sybesma (ed.), Encyclopedia of Chinese language, 297–306. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Jacquesson, François. 2015. An introduction to Sherdukpen language. Bochum: Universitätsverlag Dr. N. Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Kato, Atsuhiko. 2003. Pwo Karen. In Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan Languages, 633–648. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Khaling, Mosyel Syelsaangthyel & Teshangran Tontang. 2019. ‘This’ and ‘that’ in Uipo. Paper presented at the 52nd International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics, University of Sydney.
King, John Timothy. 2009. A grammar of Dhimal. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Konnerth, Linda. 2014. A grammar of Karbi. University of Oregon, Doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Kurabe, Keita. 2017. Jinghpaw. In Randy LaPolla & Graham Thurgood (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 993–1010. 2nd edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Landi, Victor. 2005. The Meyors and their language. Itanagar: Arunachal Pradesh Directorate of Research.Google Scholar
LaPolla, Randy J. 1994. Parallel grammaticalizations in Tibeto-Burman languages: Evidence of Sapir’s “drift”. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 171. 61–80.Google Scholar
2017. Dulong. In Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan Languages, 635–645. 2nd edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
LaPolla, Randy J. & Chenglong Huang. 2003. A grammar of Qiang: With annotated texts and glossary. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Li, Xuping. 2018. A grammar of Gan Chinese. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lidz, Liberty. 2010. A descriptive grammar of Yongning Na. University of Texas, Doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Lieberherr, Ismael. 2017. A grammar of Bulu Puroik. Universität Bern, Doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Lieberherr, Ismael & Timotheus Adrianus Bodt. 2018. Sub-grouping Kho-Bwa based on shared core vocabulary. Himalayan Linguistics 16(2). 26–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lustig, Anton. 2010. A grammar and dictionary of Zaiwa. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, Laura. 1990. A grammar of Tauya. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, Alexander. 1884. History of the relations of the government with the hill tribes of the north-east frontier of Bengal. Calcutta: Royal Asiatic Society.Google Scholar
Manson, Kenneth. 2010. A grammar of Kayan, a Tibeto-Burman language. La Trobe University, Doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A. 1973. The grammar of Lahu. (University of California Publications in Linguistics 75.) Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
1982. Conjugal bliss: An Indo-Aryan word-family ‘pair’/’yoke’/’join’ in Tibeto-Burman. South Asian Review 6(3). 42–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991. Sino-Tibetan linguistics: Present state and future prospects. Annual Review of Anthropology 201. 469–504. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003. Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and philosophy of Sino-Tibetan reconstruction. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
2015. Re-examining the genetic position of Jingpho: Putting flesh on the bones of the Jingpho/Luish relationship. In Nicholas. J. Enfield & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Languages of mainland Southeast Asia: The state of the art, 111–151. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2015. The Sino-Tibetan etymological dictionary and thesaurus. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Matthews, Stephen & Virginia Yip. 1994. Cantonese: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Michailovsky, Boyd. 1988. La langue Hayu. Paris: Editions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
. 2015. On Limbu directionals and locative expressions. In Mark W. Post, Stephen Morey & Scott DeLancey (eds.), Language and culture in northeast India and beyond: In honor of Robbins Burling, 114–125. Canberra: Asia-Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Modi, Yankee. 2013. The nearest relatives of the Tani group. Paper presented at the 19th Himalayan Languages Symposium, Canberra, Australian National University.
. 2017. A Grammar of Milang. Universität Bern, Doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Mulder, Mijke. Forthcoming 2019. A descriptive grammar of Muklom Tangsa. La Trobe University, Doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Noonan, Michael & Kristine A. Hildebrandt. 2017. Chantyal. In Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 494–515. 2nd edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nyori, Tai. 1993. History and culture of the Adis. New Delhi: Omsons Publications.Google Scholar
Okell, John. 1969. A reference grammar of colloquial Burmese [21 Volumes]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Opgenort, Jean Robert. 2004. A grammar of Wambule. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
. 2005. A grammar of Jero: With a historical comparative study of the Kiranti languages. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Peiros, Ilia. 1997. Lolo-Burmese linguistic archaeology. Mon-Khmer Studies: A Journal of Southeast Asian Languages 271. 233–248.Google Scholar
Peterson, David A. 2017. Hakha Lai. In Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 258–276. 2nd edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Plaisier, Heleen. 2007. A grammar of Lepcha. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Post, Mark W. 2007. A grammar of Galo. La Trobe University, Doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
2011. Topographical deixis and the Tani languages of north-east India. In Gwendolyn Hyslop, Stephen Morey & Mark W. Post (eds.), North East Indian Linguistics Volume 3, 137–154. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press India. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017. The Tangam language: Grammar, lexicon and texts. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019. Topographical deixis in Trans-Himalayan (Sino-Tibetan) languages. Transactions of the Philological Society 117(2). 234–255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Post, Mark W. & Yankee Modi. 2011. Language contact and the genetic position of Milang (Eastern Himalaya). Anthropological Linguistics 53(3). 215–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Post, Mark W. & Kanno Tage. 2013. Apatani phonology and lexicon, with a special focus on tone. Himalayan Linguistics 12(1). 17–75.Google Scholar
Poudel, Kedar Prasad. 2006. Dhankute Tamang grammar. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Pulu, Jatan. 1978. Idu phrase-book. Shillong: Director of Information and Public Relations, Government of Arunachal Pradesh.Google Scholar
Rutgers, Roland. 1998. Yamphu: Grammar, texts and lexicon (Leiden University Languages of the Greater Himalayan Region v.2) Leiden University, Doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Sagart, Laurent, Guillaume Jacques, Yunfan Lai, Robin J. Ryder, Valentin Thouzeau, Simon J. Greenhill & Johann-Mattis List. 2019. Dated language phylogenies shed light on the ancestry of Sino-Tibetan. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciencesof the United States of America 116(21): 10317–10322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sangdong, David. 2012. A grammar of the Kadu (Asak) language. La Trobe University, Doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Sawada, Hideo. 2012. On the composition of noun phrases in Lhaovo. Paper presented at the 45th International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics, Singapore, Nanyang University.
Schackow, Diana. 2015. A grammar of Yakkha. Berlin: Language Science Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schorer, Nicolas. 2016. The Dura language: Grammar and phylogeny. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shafer, Robert. 1947. Hruso. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 12(1). 184–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
So-Hartmann, Helga. 2009. A descriptive grammar of Daai Chin. Berkeley: Sino-Tibetan Etymological Dictionary and Thesaurus Project.Google Scholar
Solnit, David B. 1997. Eastern Kayah Li: Grammar, texts, glossary. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Sreedhar, M. V. 1980. A Sema grammar. Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages.Google Scholar
Sun, Hongkai, Guangkun Liu, Fengxiang Li, Ela Thurgood & Graham Thurgood. 2009. A grammar of Anong: Language death under intense contact. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Sun, Tianshin Jackson. 1994. Linguistic characteristics of the Tani (Mirish) branch of Tibeto-Burman. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academica Sinica 65(1). 175–220.Google Scholar
. 2000. Parallelisms in the verb morphology of Sidaba rGyalrong and Lavrung in rGyalrongic. Language and Linguistics 1(1). 161–190.Google Scholar
Tayeng, Aduk. 1983. A phrase book in Padam. Shillong: Director of Research (Philology), Government of Arunachal Pradesh.Google Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas, Lhakpa Norbu Sherpa, Gyurme Chodrak & Guillaume Oisel. 2009. Sherpa-English and English-Sherpa dictionary, with literary Tibetan and Nepali equivalents. Kathmandu: Vajra Publications.Google Scholar
Watters, David E. 2002. A grammar of Kham. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wheatley, Julian K. 2017. Burmese. In Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 856–876. 2nd edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Widmer, Manuel. 2016. A descriptive grammar of Bunan. Universität Bern, Doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Wiersma, Grace Claire. 1990. A study of the Bai (Minjia) language along historical lines. University of California, Doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Willett, Thomas L. 1991. A reference grammar of Southeastern Tepehuan. Summer Institute of Linguistics and University of Texas at Arlington, Doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Williams, Nicholas. 2008. Directionals in Mru. Dartmouth College, B.A. Thesis.Google Scholar
Willis, Christina M. 2007. A descriptive grammar of Darma: An endangered Tibeto-Burman language. University of Texas at Austin, Doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Wright, Jonathan Michael. 2009. Hkongso grammar sketch. Dallas International University, M.A. Thesis.Google Scholar
Yaku, Redv́mwàng & Rvwàng Shànshér Lèga Gomidi. 2016. Rvwàng Kàrutóng Nv̀mlat Bok [Rvwàng grammar: A beginning and intermediate grammar]. Draft manuscript. Rvwàng Shànshér Lèga Gomidi [Rawang Bible Committee].Google Scholar
Zemp, Marius. 2013. A historical grammar of the Tibetan dialect spoken in Kargil (Purik). Universität Bern, Doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Zhang, Menghan, Shi Yan, Wuyun Pan & Li Jin. 2019. Phylogenetic evidence for Sino-Tibetan origin in northern China in the Late Neolithic. Nature 569(7754). 112–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Sihong. 2013. A reference grammar of Ersu, a Tibeto-Burman language of China. James Cook University, Doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Zhu, Yanhua. 2017. Zaiwa. In Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 877–884. 2nd edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Jacques, Guillaume & Aimée Lahaussois
2023. Elevational deixis in the Kiranti verb. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 46:1 ► pp. 6 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Shuya
2023. Towards a New Generalisation of the Tri‐Axial Orientation System in Situ Rgyalrong. Transactions of the Philological Society 121:2 ► pp. 203 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.