Phylogenies based on lexical innovations refute the Rung hypothesis
Sino-Tibetan (Trans-Himalayan) is one of the typologically most diverse language families in the world, one of the few
comprising all gradients of morphological complexity, from isolating to polysynthetic. No consensus exists as yet on whether the rich
morphology found in some languages, in particular person indexation, should be reconstructed in the common Sino-Tibetan ancestor or whether it is a
later innovation confined to and defining a particular “Rung” subgroup. In this article, we argue that this question is fundamentally a
problem of phylogeny, and that the results of recent works on the phylogeny of Sino-Tibetan, supplemented by a more refined investigation of
shared lexical innovations, provide support for the idea that person indexation morphology is not a recent innovation and that the languages
lacking such a feature are thus innovative.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Sino-Tibetan verbal morphology and phylogeny
- 2.1Rgyalrong and Kiranti person indexation
- 2.2The Rung vs Polysynthetic Sino-Tibetan hypotheses
- 2.3Geographical distribution
- 3.Lexical innovations and the Rung hypothesis
- 3.1Recent phylogenetic studies and the Rung hypothesis
- 3.2Prediction of the Rung hypothesis
- 3.3Testing the prediction of the Rung hypothesis
- 4.Alternatives to the Rung hypothesis
- 4.1Burmo-Rgyalrongic
- 4.2Tibeto-Rgyalrongic
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References (78)
References
Arcodia, Giorgio Francesco & Bianca Basciano. 2020. Morphology in Sino-Tibetan languages. In Mark Aronoff (ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bauman, James John. 1975. Pronouns and pronominal morphology in Tibeto-Burman. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley dissertation.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baxter, William H. 1992. A handbook of Old Chinese phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baxter, William H. & Laurent Sagart. 2014. Old Chinese: A new reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bickel, Balthasar, Goma Banjade, Martin Gaenszle, Elena Lieven, Netra Paudyal, Ichchha Purna Rai, Manoj Rai, Novel Kishore Rai & Sabine Stoll. 2007. Free prefix ordering in Chintang. Language 83(1). 1–31. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bradley, David. 1979. Proto-Loloish. London: Curzon Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bradley, David. 1997. Tibeto-Burman languages and classification. In David Bradley (ed.), Papers in Southeast Asian linguistics No. 14: Tibeto-Burman languages of the Himalaya, 1–72. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bruhn, Daniel W. 2014. A phonological reconstruction of Proto-Central Naga. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley dissertation.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coblin, Weldon South. 1976. Notes on Tibetan Verbal Morphology. T’oung Pao 621. 45–70. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
DeLancey, Scott. 1989. Verb agreement in Proto-Tibeto-Burman. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 52(2). 315–333. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
DeLancey, Scott. 2010a. Language replacement and the spread of Tibeto-Burman. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 3(1). 40–55.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
DeLancey, Scott. 2010b. Towards a history of verb agreement in Tibeto-Burman. Himalayan Linguistics 9(1). 1–39.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
DeLancey, Scott. 2015. The historical dynamics of morphological complexity in Trans-Himalayan. Linguistic Discovery 13(2). 37–56. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dempsey, Jacob. 1995. A reconsideration of some phonological problems involved in reconstructing Sino-Tibetan numerals. Seattle:University of Washington dissertation.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Donegan, Patricia & David Stampe. 2004. Rhythm and the synthetic drift of Munda. In The yearbook of South Asian languages and linguistics, chap. Berlin, 3–36. Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Doornenbal, Marius. 2009. A grammar of Bantawa: Grammar, paradigm tables, glossary and texts of a Rai language of Eastern Nepal. Leiden: Leiden University dissertation.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Driem, George. 1993. The Proto-Tibeto-Burman verbal agreement system. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 56(2). 292–334. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Driem, George. 1997. Sino-Bodic. Bulletin of the School of African and Oriental Studies 60(3). 455–488. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ebert, Karen. 1990. On the evidence for the relationship Kiranti-Rung. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman area 13(1). 57–78.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gerber, Pascal & Selin Grollmann. 2018. What is Kiranti? Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics 11(2). 99–152. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gong, Hwang-cherng. 1995. The system of finals in Proto-Sino-Tibetan. In William S-Y. Wang (ed.), The ancestry of Chinese (Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series 8), 41–92. Berkeley: Project on Linguistic Analysis.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gong, Xun. 2014. Personal agreement system of Zbu rGyalrong (Ngyaltsu variety). Transactions of the Philological Society 112(1). 44–60. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gong, Xun. 2017. Verb stems in Tangut and their orthography. Scripta 91. 29–48.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Greenhill, Simon J., Chieh-Hsi Wu, Xia Hua, Michael Dunn, Stephen C. Levinson & Russell D. Gray. 2017. Evolutionary dynamics of language systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114(42). E8822–E8829. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Güldemann, Tom. 2008. The Macro-Sudan belt: Towards identifying a linguistic area in northern sub-Saharan Africa. In Bernd Heine & Derek Nurse (eds.), A linguistic geography of Africa, 151–185. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hammarström, Harald, Robert Forkel & Martin Haspelmath. 2019. Glottolog. Version 4.0. [URL]
Heath, Jeffrey. 1998. Pragmatic skewing in 1 ↔ 2 pronominal combinations in Native American languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 64(2). 83–104. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2002. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hill, Nathan W. 2008.
Verba moriendi in the Old Tibetan Annals
. In Christopher Beckwith (ed.), Medieval Tibeto-Burman languages III, 71–86. Bonn: International Institute for Tibetan & Buddhist Studies.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hill, Nathan W. 2011. An inventory of Tibetan sound laws. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 21(4). 441–457. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hill, Nathan W. 2012. The six vowel hypothesis of Old Chinese in comparative context. Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics 6(2). 1–69. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hill, Nathan W. 2019. The historical phonology of Tibetan, Burmese, and Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hyman, Larry. 2011. The Macro-Sudan belt and Niger-Congo reconstruction. Language Dynamics and Linguistic Change 1.1. 1–47.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jacques, Guillaume. 2004. Phonologie et morphologie du japhug (Rgyalrong). Paris: Université Paris-VII Denis Diderot dissertation.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jacques, Guillaume. 2010. The inverse in Japhug Rgyalrong. Language and Linguistics 11(1). 127–157.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jacques, Guillaume. 2012. Agreement morphology: The case of Rgyalrongic and Kiranti. Language and Linguistics 13(1). 83–116.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jacques, Guillaume. 2013. Harmonization and disharmonization of affix ordering and basic word order. Linguistic Typology 17(2). 187–217. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jacques, Guillaume. 2014a. Esquisse de phonologie et de morphologie historique du tangoute. Leiden: Brill. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jacques, Guillaume. 2014b. On Coblin’s law. In Richard VanNess Simmons & Newell Ann Van Auken (eds.), Studies in Chinese and Sino-Tibetan Linguistics, 155–166. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jacques, Guillaume. 2015. Derivational morphology in Khaling. Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics 8(1). 78–85. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jacques, Guillaume. 2015–2016. Dictionnaire japhug-chinois-français. 1.1. Paris: Projet HimalCo. [URL]
Jacques, Guillaume. 2016a. Le sino-tibétain: Polysynthétique ou isolant? Faits de langues 47(1). 61–74. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jacques, Guillaume. 2016b. Tangut, Gyalrongic, Kiranti and the nature of person indexation in Sino-Tibetan/Trans-Himalayan. Linguistics Vanguard 2(1). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jacques, Guillaume. 2017. A reconstruction of Proto-Kiranti verb roots. Folia Linguistica Historica 51(s38). 177–215. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jacques, Guillaume, Aimée Lahaussois, Boyd Michailovsky & Dhan Bahadur Rai. 2012. An overview of Khaling verbal morphology. Language and Linguistics 13(6). 1095–1170.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jacques, Guillaume, Aimée Lahaussois, Dhan Bahadur Rai & Yadav Kumar. 2015. Khaling-Nepali-English dictionary. 1.0. Paris: Projet HimalCo. [URL]
Kurabe, Keita. 2017. A Classified Lexicon of Shan Loanwords in Jinghpaw. Asian and African Languages and Linguistics 111. 129–166.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lai, Yunfan. 2015. The person agreement system of Wobzi Lavrung (Rgyalrongic, Tibeto-Burman). Transactions of the Philological Society 113(3). 271–285. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lai, Yunfan. 2017. Grammaire du khroskyabs de Wobzi. Paris: Université Paris 3 dissertation. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
LaPolla, Randy J. 1992. On the dating and nature of the verb agreement in Tibeto-Burman. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 55(2). 298–315. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
LaPolla, Randy J. 2001. The role of migration and language contact in the development of the Sino-Tibetan language family. In R. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Aikhenvald (eds.), Areal diffusion and genetic inheritance: Case studies in language change, 225–254. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
LaPolla, Randy J. 2003. An overview of Sino-Tibetan morphosyntax. In Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 22–42. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
LaPolla, Randy J. 2006. Sino-Tibetan languages. In Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 2nd edn., 393–397. London: Elsevier. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
LaPolla, Randy J. 2012. Comments on methodology and evidence in Sino-Tibetan comparative linguistics. Language and Linguistics 13(1). 117–132.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
LaPolla, Randy J. 2019. The origin and spread of the Sino-Tibetan language family. Nature 5691. 45–47. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Li, Fang-Kuei. 1933. Certain Phonetic Influences of the Tibetan Prefixes upon the Root Initials. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 6(2). 135–157.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lǐ, Yǒngsuì (李永燧). 1998. Qiāngmiǎn yǔqún chúyì (羌缅语群刍议). Mínzú Yǔwén (民族语文) 11. 16–28.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lín, Xiàngróng (林向榮). 1993. Jiāróngyǔ yánjiū (嘉戎語研究) [A study on the Rgyalrong language]. Chengdu: Sichuan Minzu Chubanshe.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Matisoff, James A. 2010–2013. The Sino-Tibetan etymological dictionary and thesaurus. [URL]
Michailovsky, Boyd. 1994. Manner vs place of articulation in the Kiranti initial stops. In Hajime Kitamura, Tatsuo Nishida & Nagano Yasuhiko (eds.), Current issues in Sino-Tibetan linguistics. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Michailovsky, Boyd. 2002. Limbu-English dictionary. Kathmandu: Mandala Book Point.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Peiros, Ilia. 1998. Comparative linguistics in Southeast Asia (Pacific Linguistics, Series C 142). Canberra: Research School of Pacific & Asian Studies, Australian National University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Post, Mark W. & Robbins Burling. 2017. The Tibeto-Burman languages of Northeast India. In Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 2nd edn., 213–242. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sagart, Laurent, Guillaume Jacques, Yunfan Lai, Robin J. Ryder, Valentin Thouzeau, Simon J. Greenhill & Johann-Mattis List. 2019. Dated language phylogenies shed light on the ancestry of Sino-Tibetan. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116(21). 10317–10322. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sun, Jackson T.-S. 1993. A historical-comparative study of the Tani (Mirish) branch in Tibeto-Burman. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley dissertation.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sun, Jackson T.-S. 2015. Hēishuǐxiàn Shāshíduō Jiāróngyǔ dòngcí rénchēng fànchóu de tèdiǎn (黑水縣沙石多嘉戎語動詞人稱範疇的特點) [Remarkable features in the verb agreement system of Sastod Rgyalrong in Khrochu County]. Language and Linguistics 16(5). 731–750.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sun, Jackson T.-S. & Shidanluo. 2002. Cǎodēng Jiāróngyǔ yǔ rèntóng děngdì xiāngguān de yǔfǎ xiànxiàng (草登嘉戎語與「認同等第」相關的語法現象) [Empathy hierarchy in Caodeng rGyalrong grammar]. Language and Linguistics 3(1). 79–99.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thurgood, Graham. 1985. Pronouns, verb agreement systems, and the subgrouping of Tibeto-Burman. In Graham Thurgood, James A. Matisoff & David Bradley (eds.), Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman area: The state of the art, 376–400. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Xú, Xījiān, Jiāchéng Xiāo, Xiāngkūn Yuè & Qìngxià Dài. 1983. Jing-Han cidian (景汉辞典) [A Jingpo-Chinese dictionary]. Kunming: Yunnan Minzu Chubanshe.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zhang, Menghan, Shi Yan, Wuyun Pan & Li Jin. 2019. Phylogenetic evidence for Sino-Tibetan origin in northern China in the Late Neolithic. Nature 5691. 112–115. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zhang, Shuya. 2019. From proximate/obviative to number marking: Reanalysis of hierarchical indexation in Rgyalrong language. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 47(1). 125–150. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zhang, Shuya, Guillaume Jacques & Yunfan Lai. 2019. A study of cognates between Gyalrong languages and Old Chinese. Journal of Language Relationship 7(1). 73–92.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zide, Norman H. & Gregory D. S. Anderson. 2001. The Proto-Munda verb: some connections with Mon-Khmer. In B. Rao & K. V. Subbarao (eds.), Yearbook of South Asian linguistics, 517–540. Delhi: Sage Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
DeLancey, Scott
2023.
The antiquity of verb agreement in Trans-Himalayan (Sino-Tibetan).
Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 86:1
► pp. 101 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.