Article published In:
Vol. 38:1 (2021) ► pp.124
Arcodia, Giorgio Francesco & Bianca Basciano
2020Morphology in Sino-Tibetan languages. In Mark Aronoff (ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauman, James John
1975Pronouns and pronominal morphology in Tibeto-Burman. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley dissertation.Google Scholar
Baxter, William H.
1992A handbook of Old Chinese phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baxter, William H. & Laurent Sagart
2014Old Chinese: A new reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar, Goma Banjade, Martin Gaenszle, Elena Lieven, Netra Paudyal, Ichchha Purna Rai, Manoj Rai, Novel Kishore Rai & Sabine Stoll
2007Free prefix ordering in Chintang. Language 83(1). 1–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bradley, David
1979Proto-Loloish. London: Curzon Press.Google Scholar
1997Tibeto-Burman languages and classification. In David Bradley (ed.), Papers in Southeast Asian linguistics No. 14: Tibeto-Burman languages of the Himalaya, 1–72. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Bruhn, Daniel W.
2014A phonological reconstruction of Proto-Central Naga. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley dissertation.Google Scholar
Coblin, Weldon South
1976Notes on Tibetan Verbal Morphology. T’oung Pao 621. 45–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
1989Verb agreement in Proto-Tibeto-Burman. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 52(2). 315–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010aLanguage replacement and the spread of Tibeto-Burman. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 3(1). 40–55.Google Scholar
2010bTowards a history of verb agreement in Tibeto-Burman. Himalayan Linguistics 9(1). 1–39.Google Scholar
2014Second person verb forms in Tibeto-Burman. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37(1). 3–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015The historical dynamics of morphological complexity in Trans-Himalayan. Linguistic Discovery 13(2). 37–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018Deictic and sociopragmatic effects in Tibeto-Burman sap indexation. In Sonia Cristofaro & Fernando Zúñiga (eds.), Typological hierarchies in synchrony and diachrony, 343–376. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dempsey, Jacob
1995A reconsideration of some phonological problems involved in reconstructing Sino-Tibetan numerals. Seattle:University of Washington dissertation.Google Scholar
Donegan, Patricia & David Stampe
2004Rhythm and the synthetic drift of Munda. In The yearbook of South Asian languages and linguistics, chap. Berlin, 3–36. Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doornenbal, Marius
2009A grammar of Bantawa: Grammar, paradigm tables, glossary and texts of a Rai language of Eastern Nepal. Leiden: Leiden University dissertation.Google Scholar
van Driem, George
1993The Proto-Tibeto-Burman verbal agreement system. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 56(2). 292–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997Sino-Bodic. Bulletin of the School of African and Oriental Studies 60(3). 455–488. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ebert, Karen
1990On the evidence for the relationship Kiranti-Rung. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman area 13(1). 57–78.Google Scholar
Gerber, Pascal & Selin Grollmann
2018What is Kiranti? Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics 11(2). 99–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gong, Hwang-cherng
1995The system of finals in Proto-Sino-Tibetan. In William S-Y. Wang (ed.), The ancestry of Chinese (Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series 8), 41–92. Berkeley: Project on Linguistic Analysis.Google Scholar
Gong, Xun
2014Personal agreement system of Zbu rGyalrong (Ngyaltsu variety). Transactions of the Philological Society 112(1). 44–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017Verb stems in Tangut and their orthography. Scripta 91. 29–48.Google Scholar
Greenhill, Simon J., Chieh-Hsi Wu, Xia Hua, Michael Dunn, Stephen C. Levinson & Russell D. Gray
2017Evolutionary dynamics of language systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114(42). E8822–E8829. DOI logo
Güldemann, Tom
2008The Macro-Sudan belt: Towards identifying a linguistic area in northern sub-Saharan Africa. In Bernd Heine & Derek Nurse (eds.), A linguistic geography of Africa, 151–185. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hammarström, Harald, Robert Forkel & Martin Haspelmath
2019Glottolog. Version 4.0. [URL]
Heath, Jeffrey
1998Pragmatic skewing in 1 ↔ 2 pronominal combinations in Native American languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 64(2). 83–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
2002World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hill, Nathan W.
2008 Verba moriendi in the Old Tibetan Annals . In Christopher Beckwith (ed.), Medieval Tibeto-Burman languages III, 71–86. Bonn: International Institute for Tibetan & Buddhist Studies.Google Scholar
2011An inventory of Tibetan sound laws. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 21(4). 441–457. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012The six vowel hypothesis of Old Chinese in comparative context. Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics 6(2). 1–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019The historical phonology of Tibetan, Burmese, and Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry
2011The Macro-Sudan belt and Niger-Congo reconstruction. Language Dynamics and Linguistic Change 1.1. 1–47.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume
2004Phonologie et morphologie du japhug (Rgyalrong). Paris: Université Paris-VII Denis Diderot dissertation.Google Scholar
2010The inverse in Japhug Rgyalrong. Language and Linguistics 11(1). 127–157.Google Scholar
2012Agreement morphology: The case of Rgyalrongic and Kiranti. Language and Linguistics 13(1). 83–116.Google Scholar
2013Harmonization and disharmonization of affix ordering and basic word order. Linguistic Typology 17(2). 187–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014aEsquisse de phonologie et de morphologie historique du tangoute. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014bOn Coblin’s law. In Richard VanNess Simmons & Newell Ann Van Auken (eds.), Studies in Chinese and Sino-Tibetan Linguistics, 155–166. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
2015Derivational morphology in Khaling. Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics 8(1). 78–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015–2016Dictionnaire japhug-chinois-français. 1.1. Paris: Projet HimalCo. [URL]
2016aLe sino-tibétain: Polysynthétique ou isolant? Faits de langues 47(1). 61–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016bTangut, Gyalrongic, Kiranti and the nature of person indexation in Sino-Tibetan/Trans-Himalayan. Linguistics Vanguard 2(1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017A reconstruction of Proto-Kiranti verb roots. Folia Linguistica Historica 51(s38). 177–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018Generic person marking in Japhug and other Rgyalrong languages. In Sonia Cristofaro and Fernando Zúñiga (eds.), Typological hierarchies in synchrony and diachrony, 403–424. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume, Aimée Lahaussois, Boyd Michailovsky & Dhan Bahadur Rai
2012An overview of Khaling verbal morphology. Language and Linguistics 13(6). 1095–1170.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume, Aimée Lahaussois, Dhan Bahadur Rai & Yadav Kumar
2015Khaling-Nepali-English dictionary. 1.0. Paris: Projet HimalCo. [URL]
Jacques, Guillaume & Alexis Michaud
Kurabe, Keita
2017A Classified Lexicon of Shan Loanwords in Jinghpaw. Asian and African Languages and Linguistics 111. 129–166.Google Scholar
Lai, Yunfan
2015The person agreement system of Wobzi Lavrung (Rgyalrongic, Tibeto-Burman). Transactions of the Philological Society 113(3). 271–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017Grammaire du khroskyabs de Wobzi. Paris: Université Paris 3 dissertation. Google Scholar
LaPolla, Randy J.
1992On the dating and nature of the verb agreement in Tibeto-Burman. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 55(2). 298–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001The role of migration and language contact in the development of the Sino-Tibetan language family. In R. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Aikhenvald (eds.), Areal diffusion and genetic inheritance: Case studies in language change, 225–254. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2003An overview of Sino-Tibetan morphosyntax. In Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 22–42. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2006Sino-Tibetan languages. In Keith Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 2nd edn., 393–397. London: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012Comments on methodology and evidence in Sino-Tibetan comparative linguistics. Language and Linguistics 13(1). 117–132.Google Scholar
2013Subgrouping in Tibeto-Burman: Can an individual-identifying standard be developed? How do we factor in the history of migrations and language contact? In Balthasar Bickel, Lenore A. Grenoble, David A. Peterson & Alan Timberlake (eds.), Language typology and historical contingency, 463–474. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019The origin and spread of the Sino-Tibetan language family. Nature 5691. 45–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Fang-Kuei
1933Certain Phonetic Influences of the Tibetan Prefixes upon the Root Initials. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 6(2). 135–157.Google Scholar
Lǐ, Yǒngsuì (李永燧)
1998 Qiāngmiǎn yǔqún chúyì (羌缅语群刍议). Mínzú Yǔwén (民族语文) 11. 16–28.Google Scholar
Lín, Xiàngróng (林向榮)
1993Jiāróngyǔ yánjiū (嘉戎語研究) [A study on the Rgyalrong language]. Chengdu: Sichuan Minzu Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A.
2010–2013The Sino-Tibetan etymological dictionary and thesaurus. [URL]
Michailovsky, Boyd
1994Manner vs place of articulation in the Kiranti initial stops. In Hajime Kitamura, Tatsuo Nishida & Nagano Yasuhiko (eds.), Current issues in Sino-Tibetan linguistics. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.Google Scholar
2002Limbu-English dictionary. Kathmandu: Mandala Book Point.Google Scholar
Peiros, Ilia
1998Comparative linguistics in Southeast Asia (Pacific Linguistics, Series C 142). Canberra: Research School of Pacific & Asian Studies, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Post, Mark W. & Robbins Burling
2017The Tibeto-Burman languages of Northeast India. In Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 2nd edn., 213–242. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sagart, Laurent, Guillaume Jacques, Yunfan Lai, Robin J. Ryder, Valentin Thouzeau, Simon J. Greenhill & Johann-Mattis List
2019Dated language phylogenies shed light on the ancestry of Sino-Tibetan. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116(21). 10317–10322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sun, Jackson T.-S.
1993A historical-comparative study of the Tani (Mirish) branch in Tibeto-Burman. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley dissertation.Google Scholar
2015 Hēishuǐxiàn Shāshíduō Jiāróngyǔ dòngcí rénchēng fànchóu de tèdiǎn (黑水縣沙石多嘉戎語動詞人稱範疇的特點) [Remarkable features in the verb agreement system of Sastod Rgyalrong in Khrochu County]. Language and Linguistics 16(5). 731–750.Google Scholar
Sun, Jackson T.-S. & Shidanluo
2002 Cǎodēng Jiāróngyǔ yǔ rèntóng děngdì xiāngguān de yǔfǎ xiànxiàng (草登嘉戎語與「認同等第」相關的語法現象) [Empathy hierarchy in Caodeng rGyalrong grammar]. Language and Linguistics 3(1). 79–99.Google Scholar
Thurgood, Graham
1985Pronouns, verb agreement systems, and the subgrouping of Tibeto-Burman. In Graham Thurgood, James A. Matisoff & David Bradley (eds.), Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman area: The state of the art, 376–400. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Xú, Xījiān, Jiāchéng Xiāo, Xiāngkūn Yuè & Qìngxià Dài
1983Jing-Han cidian (景汉辞典) [A Jingpo-Chinese dictionary]. Kunming: Yunnan Minzu Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Zhang, Menghan, Shi Yan, Wuyun Pan & Li Jin
2019Phylogenetic evidence for Sino-Tibetan origin in northern China in the Late Neolithic. Nature 5691. 112–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Shuya
2019From proximate/obviative to number marking: Reanalysis of hierarchical indexation in Rgyalrong language. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 47(1). 125–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Shuya, Guillaume Jacques & Yunfan Lai
2019A study of cognates between Gyalrong languages and Old Chinese. Journal of Language Relationship 7(1). 73–92.Google Scholar
Zide, Norman H. & Gregory D. S. Anderson
2001The Proto-Munda verb: some connections with Mon-Khmer. In B. Rao & K. V. Subbarao (eds.), Yearbook of South Asian linguistics, 517–540. Delhi: Sage Press.Google Scholar