Cover not available
Review published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 2:1 (1985) ► pp.83–88
Book review

Alfred Bammesberger. Lateinische Sprachwissenschaft [Eichst ätter Materialien, 6]. Regensburg: Verlag Friedrich Pustet, 1984. 128 pp.

Reviewed by
| University of Florida
Published online: 1 January 1985
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.2.1.07mil
References (30)
References
Allen, W. Sidney. 1973. Accent and Rhythm: Prosodic features of Latin and Greek. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
. 1965. Vox Latina. Ibid.Google Scholar
Devine, Andrew M. & Laurence D. Stephens. 1977. Two Studies in Latin Phonology. Saratoga, Calif.: Anma Libri.Google Scholar
Diehl, Ernestus, ed. 1967. Poetarum Romanorum Veterum Reliquiae. 6th ed. Berlin: W. de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dumézil, Georges. 1970. “A propos de 1’inscription du Lapis Niger”. Latomus 291.1038–45.Google Scholar
Ernout, Alfred. 1957. Recueil de textes archaïques. 2nd ed. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Gordon, Arthur E. 1969. “On the Origins of the Latin Alphabet: Modern views”. California Studies in Classical Antiquity (= CSCA) 21.157–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1973. The Letter Names of the Latin Alphabet. (= University of California Publications; Classical Studies, 91.) Berkeley & Los Angeles: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
1975. The Inscribed Fibula Praenestina: Problems of authenticity. (= University of California Publications; Classical Studies, 161.) Ibid.Google Scholar
1976. “Notes on the Duenos-Vase Inscription in Berlin”. CSCA 81.53–72, plates 1–2.Google Scholar
1983. Illustrated Introduction to Latin Epigraphy. Berkeley & Los Angeles: Univ. of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoenigswald, Henry M. 1980. “On the Impact of Vowel Syncope in Latin”. Italic and Romance Linguistic Studies in Honor of Ernst Pulgram ed. by Herbert J. Izzo, 53–57. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janson, Tore. 1979. Mechanisms of Language Change in Latin. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David W. 1979. Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Miller, D. Gary. 1973. “On the Motivation of Phonological Change”. Issues in Linguistics: Papers in honor of Henry and Renee Kahane ed. by Braj B. Kachru et al., 686–718. Urbana: Univ. of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
. 1975. “Indo-European: VSO, SOV, SVO, or all three?”. Lingua 371.31–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nyman, Martti. 1974. UBI EST and UBIST: The problem of Latin aphaeresis and the phonology of ESSE. Turku, Finland: Turun Yliopisto Seura.Google Scholar
. 1977a. “Where Does Latin sum Come from?”. Lg 531.39–60.Google Scholar
. “Mytacism in Latin Phonology”. Glotta 551.111–20.
Peters, Martin. 1980. “Attisch TpaOpa: Griechische Etymologie und indo-germanischeLabiolaryngale”. Lautgeschichte und Etymologie: Akten der VI. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft ed. by Manfred Mayrhofer et al., 328–52. Wiesbaden: L. Reichert.Google Scholar
Reighard, John. 1975. “The Evolution of Variable Rules: A case of lexical constraints”. Montreal Working Papers in Linguistics 41.159–72. Montreal: Dept of Linguistics, McGill Univ.Google Scholar
St. John, Jack. 1974. “Archaic Latin faxit etc.”. KZ 881.147–53.Google Scholar
Sturtevant, Edgar H. 1940. The Pronunciation of Greek and Latin. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Tiffou, Etienne. 1980. “Remarques sur le vase de Duenos”. Melanges d’E-tudes anciennes offerts a Maurice Lebel publies sous la direction de Jean Benoît Caron et al., 223–30. Quebec: Sphinx.Google Scholar
Vetter, Emil. 1953. Handbuch der italischen Dialekte. Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar
Watkins, Calvert. 1965. “Lat. nox ‘by night’: A problem in syntactic reconstruction”. Symbolae Linguisticae in Honorem Georgii Kurylowicz ed. by Adam Heinz et al., 351–58. Wroclaw-Warszawa-Krakow: Zaklad. im. Ossolinskich & Wyd. PAN.Google Scholar
. 1966a. “An Indo-European Construction in Greek and Latin”. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 711.115–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1966b. “Italo-Celtic Revisited”. Ancient Indo-European Dialects ed. by Henrik Birnbaum & Jaan Puhvel, 29–50. Berkeley &, Los Angeles: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
. 1969. Geschichte der indogermanischen Verbalflexion. (= In-dogermanische Grammatik, 3:1.) Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar
. 1970. “Studies in Indo-European Legal Language, Institutions, and Mythology”. Indo-European and Indo-Europeans ed. by George Cardona et al., 321–54. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar