Article published In:
Vol. 40:4 (2023) ► pp.532556
Baath, Rasmus
2014Bayesian First Aid: A package that implements Bayesian alternatives to the classical *.test functions in R. In UseR! 2014 – the International R User Conference, 861. [URL]
Bean, Marian C.
1983The development of word order patterns in Old English. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar, Alena Witzlack-Makarevich, Kamal K. Choudhary, Matthias Schlesewsky & Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky
2015The neurophysiology of language processing shapes the evolution of grammar: Evidence from case marking. PLoS ONE 10(8). e0132819. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bollback, Jonathan P.
2006SIMMAP: Stochastic character mapping of discrete traits on phylogenies. BMC Bioinformatics 7(1). 88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bouckaert, Remco, Philippe Lemey, Michael Dunn, Simon J. Greenhill, Alexander V. Alekseyenko, Alexei J. Drummond, Russell D. Gray, Marc A. Suchard & Quentin D. Atkinson
2012Mapping the origins and expansion of the Indo-European language family. Science 337(6097). 957–960. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan
2002Main clauses are innovative, subordinate clauses are conservative: Consequences for the nature of constructions. In Joan Bybee, Michael Noonan & Sandra Thompson (eds.), Complex sentences in grammar and discourse: Essays in honor of Sandra A. Thompson, 1–17. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cathcart, Chundra Aroor
2018Modeling linguistic evolution: A look under the hood. Linguistics Vanguard 4(1). 20170043. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chang, Will, Chundra Cathcart, David Hall & Andrew Garrett
2015Ancestry-constrained phylogenetic analysis supports the Indo-European steppe hypothesis. Language 91(1). 194–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1981Language universals and linguistic typology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cysouw, Michael
2011Understanding transition probabilities. Linguistic Typology 151. 415–431. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Danckaert, Lieven
2017The loss of Latin OV: Steps towards an analysis. In Enoch Aboh, Eric Haeberli, Genoveva Puskas & Manuela Schonenberger (eds.), Elements of comparative syntax. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
1981An interpretation of split ergativity and related patterns. Language 571. 626–657. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demiral, Şükrü, Matthias Schlesewsky & Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky
2008On the universality of language comprehension strategies: Evidence from Turkish. Cognition 1061. 484–500. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S.
1989Large linguistic areas and language sampling. Studies in Language 13(2). 257–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997On the six-way word order typology. Studies in Language 21(1). 69–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013aOn the six-way word order typology, again. Studies in Language 37(2). 267–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013bOrder of Subject, Object and Verb. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL]
Dunn, Michael, Simon J. Greenhill, Stephen C. Levinson & Russell D. Gray
2011Evolved structure of language shows lineage-specific trends in word-order universals. Nature 473(7345). 79–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Felsenstein, Joseph
1973Maximum likelihood and minimum-steps methods for estimating evolutionary trees from data on discrete characters. Systematic Zoology 22(3). 240–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferrer i Cancho, Ramon
2017The placement of the head that maximizes predictability. An information theoretic approach. Glottometrics (39). 38–71. [URL]
Friedrich, Paul
1975Proto-Indo-European syntax: The order of meaningful elements. Butte: Montana College of Mineral Sciences.Google Scholar
Fuß, Eric
2018The OV/VO alternation in early German: Diagnostics for basic word order. In Gisella Ferraresi Agnes Jäger & Helmut Weiß (eds.), Clause structure and word order in the history of German. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Futrell, Richard, Tina Hickey, Aldrin Lee, Eunice Lim, Elena Luchkina & Edward Gibson
2015Cross-linguistic gestures reflect typological universals: A subject-initial, verb-final bias in speakers of diverse languages. Cognition 1361. 215–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Futrell, Richard, Kyle Mahowald & Edward Gibson
2015Large-scale evidence of dependency length minimization in 37 languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112(33). 10336–10341. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gell-Mann, Murray & Merritt Ruhlen
2011The origin and evolution of word order. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108(42). 17290–17295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1979On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1983Topic continuity and word order pragmatics in Ute. In Talmy Givón (ed.), Topic continuity in discourse. A quantitative cross-language study, 141–214. John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, Susan, Wing Chee So, Asli Özyürek & Carolyn Mylander
2008The natural order of events: How speakers of different languages represent events nonverbally. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(27). 9163–9168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1963Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of language, 58–60. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Greenhill, Simon J., Chieh-Hsi Wu, Xia Hua, Michael Dunn, Stephen C. Levinson & Russell D. Gray
2017Evolutionary dynamics of language systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114(42). E8822–E8829. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette Marie
1975The role of topic and comment in linguistic theory. Harwood Academic.Google Scholar
Haupt, Friederike S., Matthias Schlesewsky, Dietmar Roehm, Angela D. Friederici & Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky
2008The status of subject-object reanalyses in the language comprehension architecture. Journal of Memory and Language 59(1). 54–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John A.
1983Word order universals. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
2014Cross-linguistic variation and efficiency. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hemon, Roparz
1975A historical morphology and syntax of Breton. Dublin: Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans H.
2013Proto-Indo-European verb-finality: Reconstruction, typology, validation. Journal of Historical Linguistics 3(1). 49–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich
1986Principles of historical linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991Principles of historical linguistics (2nd edn.). Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, Matthew D. & Andrew Gelman
2014The No-U-Turn sampler: Adaptively setting path lengths in Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. Journal of Machine Learning Research 15(1). 1593–1623. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Konstantin, Remco Bouckaert, Simon J. Greenhill & Denise Kühnert
2021Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of linguistic data using BEAST. Journal of Language Evolution 6(2). 119–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hooper, Joan B. & Sandra A. Thompson
1973On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 4(4). 465–497. [URL]
Hudson, Richard A.
1984Word grammar. Blackwell Oxford.Google Scholar
Huelsenbeck, John P., Rasmus Nielsen & Jonathan P. Bollback
2003Stochastic mapping of morphological characters. Systematic Biology 52(2). 131–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry
1975On the change from SOV to SVO: Evidence from Niger-Congo. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Word order and word order change, 267–305. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Jenny, Mathias
2020Verb-initial structures in Austroasiatic languages. In Mathias Jenny, Paul Sidwell & Mark J. Alves (eds.), Austroasiatic syntax in areal and diachronic perspective, 21–45. Boston: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kauhanen, Henri & George Walkden
2018Deriving the constant rate effect. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 36(2). 483–521. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemmerer, David
2014Word classes in the brain: Implications of linguistic typology for cognitive neuroscience. Cortex 581. 27–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krebs, Julia, Evie Malaia, Ronnie B. Wilbur & Dietmar Roehm
2018Subject preference emerges as cross-modal strategy for linguistic processing. Brain Research 16911. 105–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroch, Anthony S.
1989Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1(3). 199–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001Syntactic change. In Mark R. Baltin & Chris Collins (eds.), The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory. Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Wei-Wei & Mathias Jenny
Lehmann, Winfred P.
1992Historical linguistics: An introduction. Routledge.Google Scholar
1974Proto-Indo-European syntax. Austin & London: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N.
1980Mechanisms of syntactic change. University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David
1982The language lottery: Toward a biology of grammars. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1989The child’s trigger experience: Degree-0 learnability. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12(2). 321–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006How new languages emerge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Haitao
2008Dependency distance as a metric of language comprehension difficulty. Journal of Cognitive Science 9(2). 159–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009Dependency grammar from theory to practice. Beijing: Science Press.Google Scholar
MacLeish, Andrew
1969The Middle English subject-verb cluster. Mouton: The Hague. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maddison, Wayne P., Peter E. Midford & Sarah P. Otto
2007Estimating a binary character’s effect on speciation and extinction. Systematic Biology 56(5). 701–710. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maslova, Elena
2000A dynamic approach to the verification of distributional universals. Linguistic Typology 4(3). 307–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maurits, Luke & Thomas L. Griffiths
2014Tracing the roots of syntax with Bayesian phylogenetics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(37). 13576–13581. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McDonough, Colleen, Lulu Song, Kathy Hirsh-Pasek, Roberta Michnick Golinkoff & Robert Lannon
2011An image is worth a thousand words: Why nouns tend to dominate verbs in early word learning. Developmental Science 14(2). 181–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mel'čuk, Igor
1988Dependency syntax: Theory and practice. Albany: State University Press of New York.Google Scholar
Miller, D. Gary
1975Indo-European: VSO, SOV, SVO or all three. Lingua 371. 31–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Molnár, Valéria & Jorunn Hetland
2001Informationsstruktur und Reliefgebung. In Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard Konig, Wulf Oesterreicher, and Wolfgang Raible (ed.), Language typology and language universals: An international handbook, vol. 2:2, 617–633. De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Napoli, Donna Jo & Rachel Sutton-Spence
2014Order of the major constituents in sign languages: Implications for all language. Frontiers in Psychology 51. 376. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan & Ann Taylor
2008The loss of OV order in the history of English. In Ans van Kemenade & Los Bettelou (eds.), The handbook of the history of English, 249–278. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Revell, Liam J.
2012phytools: An R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods in Ecology and Evolution 3(2). 217–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Riesberg, Sonja, Kurt Malcher & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann
2019How universal is agent-first? Evidence from symmetrical voice languages. Language 95(3). 523–561. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, John R.
1973The penthouse principle and the order of constituents. In Claudia Corum, T Cedric Smith-Stark & Ann Weiser (eds.), You take the high node and I’ll take the low node, 397–422. Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Salaberri, Iker
2018On the relationship between clause type and syntactic change: A corpus-based cross-linguistic study. Abstract presented at the 51st Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea. Tallinn.
Sasse, Hans-Jurgen
2006Theticity. In Giuliano Bernini & Marcia L. Schwartz (eds.), Pragmatic organization of discourse in the languages of Europe, 255–308. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sauppe, Sebastian
2017Symmetrical and asymmetrical voice systems and processing load: Pupillometric evidence from sentence production in Tagalog and German. Language 93(2). 288–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Statisticat & LLC
2021LaplacesDemon: Complete Environment for Bayesian Inference. R package version 16.1.6. [URL]
Stockwell, Robert & Donka Minkova
1991Subordination and word order change in the history of English. In Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), Historical English syntax, 367–408. Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stone, Gerald
1993Sorbian. In Bernard Comrie & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), The Slavonic languages, 593–685. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Temperley, David
2007Minimization of dependency length in written English. Cognition 105(2). 300–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Temperley, David & Daniel Gildea
2017Minimizing syntactic dependency lengths: Typological/cognitive universal? Annual Review of Linguistics 4(1). 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomlin, R. S.
1986Basic word order: Functional principles. Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Trips, Carola
2002From OV to VO in Early Middle English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vennemann, Theo
1974Topics, subjects, and word order: from SXV to SVX via TVX. In John Anderson & Charles Jones (eds.), Historical linguistics, 339–76. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
1975An explanation of drift. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Word order and word order change, 267–305. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Luming, Mathias Schlesewsky, Balthasar Bickel & Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky
2010The influence of topicality on Chinese word order processing. Abstract presented at the 23rd Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing. New York.
Wang, Luming, Matthias Schlesewsky, Balthasar Bickel & Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky
2009Exploring the nature of the ‘subject’-preference: Evidence from the online comprehension of simple sentences in Mandarin Chinese. Language and Cognitive Processes 241. 1180–1226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Widmer, Manuel, Sandra Auderset, Johanna Nichols, Paul Widmer & Balthasar Bickel
2017NP recursion over time: Evidence from Indo-European. Language 93(4). 799–826. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Witzlack-Makarevich, Alena, Taras Zakharko, Lennart Bierkandt, Fernando Zuniga & Balthasar Bickel
2016Decomposing hierarchical alignment: Co-arguments as conditions on alignment and the limits of referential hierarchies as explanations in verb agreement. Linguistics 541. 531–561. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, Charles D.
2000Internal and external forces in language change. Language Variation and Change 12(3). 231–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zeman, Daniel et al.
2021Universal Dependencies 2.9. LINDAT/CLARIN digital library at the Institute of Formal and Applied Linguistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University. [URL]
Zhou, Kevin & Claire Bowern
2015Quantifying uncertainty in the phylogenetics of Australian numeral systems. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2821. 20151278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar