Cover not available
Article published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 39:1 (2022) ► pp.88–127

Bidirectionality between modal and conditional constructions in Mandarin Chinese

A constructionalization account

ORCID logo | University of Edinburgh
This paper proposes that modal constructions can develop into conditional constructions in Mandarin Chinese and vice versa. Therefore, bidirectionality exists between these kinds of constructions diachronically. While bidirectionality is an apparent violation of unidirectionality, both directions of change are shown to be regular cases of procedural constructionalization, enabled by the fact that modal and conditional constructions can perform identical indirect speech acts (i.e., they are performatively equivalent) and instances of one may be morphosyntactically categorized as the other in Chinese (i.e., they are morphosyntactically vague). A crosslinguistically generalizable prediction is then proposed: bidirectionality is possible if instances of two constructions are performatively equivalent and morphosyntactically vague with respect to each other in certain contexts.
Keywords: modals, conditionals, constructionalization, diachronic construction grammar, grammaticalization, inferencing, performative equivalence, vagueness
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The invited inferencing theory of semantic change and diachronic construction grammar
    • 2.1The frameworks
    • 2.2Contexts in constructionalization
  • 3.Data
  • 4.Modal and conditional constructions in Chinese
    • 4.1Modal and conditional constructions characterized
    • 4.2Vagueness between modals and protasis connectives
    • 4.3Morphosyntactic contexts of vagueness
  • 5.From modality to conditionality
    • 5.1The modal and conditional xū constructions
    • 5.2[xū p shǐ dé] as a construction
    • 5.3[xū p shǐ dé] as the critical context
  • 6.From conditionality to modality
    • 6.1The conditional and modal fēi constructions
    • 6.2[fēi p bù kě] as the critical context
  • 7.Discussion
  • 8.The bidirectional prediction
  • 9.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 14 September 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.20047.kuo
References (88)
References
Akatsuka, Noriko. 1992. Japanese modals are conditionals. In Diane Brentari, Gary N. Larson & Lynn A. MacLeod (eds.), The joy of grammar, 1–10. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Akatsuka, Noriko & Patricia M. Clancy. 1993. Conditionality and deontic modality in Japanese and Korean. In Patricia M. Clancy (ed.), Japanese/Korean linguistics, vol. 21, 177–192. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Anderl, Christoph. 2004. Studies in the language of Zu-tang ji. PhD dissertation, The University of Oslo.
Auwera, Johan van der & Vladimir A. Plungian. 1998. Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2(1). 79–124.Google Scholar
Bergs, Alexander. 2017. The myth of the complete sentence – a response to Traugott. English Language and Linguistics 21(2). 311–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biq, Yung-O. 1988. From focus in proposition to focus in speech situation: Cai and jiu in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 16(1). 72–108.Google Scholar
Bisang, Walter. 2010. Grammaticalization in Chinese: A construction-based account. In Elizabeth C. Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), Gradualness, gradience, and grammaticalization, 245–277. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House & Gabriele Kasper (eds.). 1989. Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Booij, Geert. 2010. Construction morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Börjars, Kersti & Nigel Vincent. 2011. Grammaticalization and directionality. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 163–176. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren. 1968. A grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M., Noriko Akatsuka & Susan Strauss. 1997. Deontic modality and conditionality in discourse: A cross-linguistic study of adult speech to young children. In Akio Kamio (ed.), Directions in functional linguistics, 19–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara. 1998. Conditionals and prediction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara & Eve Sweetser. 2005. Mental spaces in grammar: Conditional constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Denison, David. 2010. Category change in English with and without structural change. In Elizabeth C. Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), Gradualness, gradience, and grammaticalization, 105–128. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Ambiguity and vagueness in historical change. In Marianne Hundt, Sandra Mollin & Simone. E. Pfenninger (eds.), The changing English language: Psycholinguistic perspectives, 292–318. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. Why would anyone take long? Word classes and Construction Grammar in the history of long . In Kristel Van Goethem, Muriel Norde, Evie Coussé & Gudrun Vanderbauwhede (eds.), Category change from a constructional perspective, 119–148. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diessel, Holger. 2019. The grammar network. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele. 2002. A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. In Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, 103–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele & Elena Smirnova. 2010. Evidentiality in German: Linguistic realization and regularities in grammaticalization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eifring, Halvor. 1995. Clause combination in Chinese. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 2007. Insubordination and its uses. In Irina Nicholaeva (ed.), Finiteness: Theoretical and empirical foundations, 366–431. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas & Honoré Watanabe (eds.). 2016. Insubordination. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fintel, Kai von. 1991. Exceptive conditionals: The meaning of unless . North East Linguistics Society (NELS) 221. 135–148.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga. 2018. Analogy: Its role in language learning, categorization, and in models of language change such as grammaticalization and constructionalization. In Sylvie Hancil, Tine Breban & José Vicente Lozano (eds.), New trends in grammaticalization and language change, 75–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt & Bill Jirsa. 2006. The principle of indirect means in language use and language structure. Journal of Pragmatics 381. 513–542. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fujii, Seiko. 2004. Lexically (un)filled constructional schemes and construction types: The case of Japanese modal conditional constructions. In Mirjam Fried & Jan-Ola Östman (eds.), Construction grammar in a cross-language perspective, 121–155. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gisborne, Nikolas. 2010. The event structure of perception verbs. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gisborne, Nikolas & Amanda Patten. 2011. Grammaticalization and Construction Grammar. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 92–104. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
He, Leshi, Jinghao Ao, Kezhong Wang, Meiqiao, Mai & Haifen Wang (eds.) 1985. Gǔdài hànyǔ xūcí tōng shì [A dictionary of function words in Ancient Chinese]. Beijing: Beijing Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Herforth, Derek. 1994. Conditional sentences in Old Chinese. PhD dissertation, University of California Berkeley.
Hong, Bo & Dong Zhengcun. 2004. “Fēi X bùkě” géshì de lìshǐ yǎnhuà hé yǔfǎ huà [The historical evolution and grammaticalization of the expression “fei X bu ke ”]. Zhongguo Yuwen 31. 253–261.Google Scholar
Huang, Chu-Ren & Keh-Jiann Chen. 1998. Zhōngyāng yán jiù yuàn hàn yǔliàokù de nèiróng yǔ shuōmíng [Sinica Corpus User Manual], [URL] (18 February, 2021)
Kaltenböck, Gunther. 2016. On the grammatical status of insubordinate if-clauses. In Gunther Kaltenböck, Evelien Keizer & Arne Lohmann (eds.), Outside the clause, 341–377. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kawalya, Deo, Gilles-Maurice de Schryver & Koen Bostoen. 2018. From conditionality to modality in Luganda (Bantu, JE15): A synchronic and diachronic corpus analysis of the verbal prefix -andi-. Journal of Pragmatics 1271. 84–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 2012. Modals and conditionals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kuo, Yueh Hsin. 2020a. Late-stage grammatical change in Chinese: A constructional account. PhD dissertation, University of Edinburgh.
. Forthcoming a. From deontic modality to conditionality: A diachronic investigation into bì in Classical Chinese. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 22(2).
Lehmann, Christian. 1995 [1982]. Thoughts on grammaticalization. Munich/Newcastle: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1976. Subject and topic: A new typology of language. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 457–489. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Li, Ming. 2016. Hanyu Zhudongci De Lishi Yanbian Yanjiu [A study of the historical development of Chinese auxiliary verbs]. Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Li, Renzhi. 2004. Modality in English and Chinese: A typological perspective. PhD dissertation, University of Antwerp.
Mauri, Caterina & Andrea Sansó. 2011. How directive constructions emerge: grammaticalization, constructionalization, cooptation. Journal of Pragmatics 43(14). 3489–3521. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narrog, Heiko. 2012. Modality, subjectivity, and semantic change: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. Insubordination in Japanese diachronically. In Nicholas Evans & Honoré Watanabe (eds.), Insubordination, 247–281. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norde, Muriel. 2009. Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norde, Muriel & Graeme Trousdale. 2016. Exaptation from the perspective of construction morphology. In Muriel Norde & Freek Van de Velde (eds.), Exaptation, 163–195. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ōta, Tatsuo. 1958. Chugokugo Rekishi Bunpō [A historical grammar of Modern Chinese]. Tokyo: Kōnan Shoin.Google Scholar
Petré, Peter. 2019. How constructions are born. The role of patterns in the constructionalization of be going to INF. In Beatrix Busse & Ruth Möhlig-Falke (eds.), Patterns in language and linguistics: New perspectives on a ubiquitous concept, 157–192. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pulleyblank, Edwin G. 1995. Outline of Classical Chinese grammar. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Rentzsch, Julian. 2012. Scope hierarchies and modality in Manchu. Studies in Language 36(4). 848–881. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Craige. 1989. Modal subordination and pronominal anaphora in discourse. Linguistics and Philosophy 12(6). 683–721. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R. 1979. Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smirnova, Elena. 2015. When secondary grammaticalization starts: A look from the constructional perspective. Language Sciences 471. 215–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2003. A construction-based approach to indirect speech acts. In Klaus-Uwe Panther & Linda L. Thornburg (eds.), Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing, 105–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Stefan Th. Gries. 2003. Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8(2). 209–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Struckmeier, Volker & Sebastian Kaiser. 2019. When insubordination is an artefact (of sentence type theories). In Karin Beijering, Gunther Kaltenböck & María Sol Sansiñena (eds.), Insubordination: Theoretical and empirical issues, 320–348. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sun, Chaofen. 1996. Word-order change and grammaticalization in the history of Chinese. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tanno, Koji. 2017. Semantic change through the discursive strategy of justification: The grammaticalization of the Japanese connective datte . Language Sciences 641. 34–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torrent, Tiago Timponi. 2015. On the relation between inheritance and change: The constructional convergence and the construction network reconfiguration hypotheses. In Jóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer & Spike Gildea (eds.), Diachronic construction grammar, 173–211. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1985. Conditional markers. In John Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in syntax, 289–307. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997. Unless and but conditionals. In Angeliki Athanasiadou & René Dirven (eds.), On conditionals again, 145–167. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003. From subjectification to intersubjectification. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Motives for language change, 124–139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017a. Low salience as an enabling factor in morphosyntactic change. In Marianne Hundt, Sandra Mollin & Simone. E. Pfenninger (eds.), The changing English Language: Psycholinguistic perspectives, 93–109. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017b. Insubordination in the light of the Uniformitarian Principle. English Language & Linguistics 21(2). 289–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018. Rethinking the role of invited inferencing in change from the perspective of interactional texts. Open Linguistics 41. 19–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Richard Dasher. 2002. Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trousdale, Graeme. 2014. On the relationship between grammaticalization and constructionalization. Folia Linguistica 48(2). 557–577. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trousdale, Graeme & Muriel Norde. 2013. Degrammaticalization and constructionalization: Two case studies. Language Sciences 361. 32–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tuggy, David. 1993. Ambiguity, polysemy, and vagueness. Cognitive Linguistics 4(3). 273–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Olmen, Daniël & Simone Heinold. 2017. Imperatives and directive strategies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe. 2001. Subjective and objective modality: Interpersonal and ideational functions in the English modal auxiliary system. Journal of Pragmatics 33(10). 1505–1528. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Canlong. 2008. “Fēi VP bùkě” jù shì zhōng “bùkě” de yǐnxiàn: Jiān tán “fēi” de xū huà [On the occurrence and non-occurrence of buke (不可) and the grammaticalization of fei (非) in the construction “fei + VP + buke ”]. Zhongguo Yuwen 21. 109–119.Google Scholar
Wen, Zhengxing. 2010. Táng sòng “shǐ dé” jù de lìshǐ yǎnhuà hé yǔfǎ huà [The historical evolution and grammaticalization of the “shide” (始得) sentence in the Tang and Song Dynasties]. Yǔwén Yánjiū 116(3). 45–52.Google Scholar
Wiedenhof, Jeroen. 2015. A grammar of Mandarin. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wu, Hsueh-ju. 2018. Xiānqín qíngtài dòngcí yánjiū [A Study of modal verbs in Pre-Qin Chinese]. Shanghai: Zhongxi Shuju.Google Scholar
Xiàndài Hànyǔ Cídiǎn, 7th edn. 2016. Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Yang, Fan-Pei. 2007. A cognitive approach to Mandarin conditionals. PhD dissertation, University of California Berkeley.
Zhan, Fangqiong & Elizabeth C. Traugott. 2015. The constructionalization of the Chinese cleft construction. Studies in Language 39(2). 459–491. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Kuo, Yueh Hsin
2022. From dynamic modal to conditional protasis connective. Functions of Language 29:2 ► pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Kuo, Yueh Hsin
2022. From deontic modality to conditionality. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 23:1 ► pp. 84 ff. DOI logo
KUO, YUEH HSIN
2024. Bidirectional grammaticalization: Chinese modal and conditional. Journal of Linguistics 60:2 ► pp. 363 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2024. Revisiting Modality [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 40], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.