Review published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 38:4 (2021) ► pp.628637
References (31)
References
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2013. Construction-based historical-comparative reconstruction. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 438–457. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle & Alice C. Harris. 2002. Syntactic reconstruction and demythologizing ‘Myths and the prehistory of grammars’. Journal of Linguistics 38(3). 599–618. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Ross. 2011. Birds. In Malcolm Ross, Andrew Pawley & Meredith Osmond (eds.), The lexicon of Proto Oceanic: The culture and environment of ancestral Oceanic society, volume 4: Animals, 271–370. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Daniels, Don. 2010. A preliminary phonological history of the Sogeram languages of Papua New Guinea. Oceanic Linguistics 49(1). 163–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. A reconstruction of Proto-Sogeram: Phonology, lexicon, and morphosyntax. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.
. 2017. A method for mitigating the problem of borrowing in syntactic reconstruction. Studies in Language 41(3). 577–614. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daniels, Don, Danielle Barth & Wolfgang Barth. 2019. Subgrouping the Sogeram languages: A critical appraisal of historical glottometry. Journal of Historical Linguistics 9(1). 92–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
François, Alexandre. 2014. Trees, waves and linkages: Models of language diversification. In Claire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans (eds.), The Routledge handbook of historical linguistics, 161–189. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hammarström, Harald, Robert Forkel, Martin Haspelmath & Sebastian Bank. 2021. Glottolog 4.4. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL]
Harris, Alice C. & Lyle Campbell. 1995. Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Kyle. 1990. Nend grammar essentials. In John R. Roberts (ed.), Two grammatical studies (Data Papers on Papua New Guinea Languages 37), 73–156. Ukarumpa: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Healey, Alan. 1970. Proto-Awyu-Dumut phonology. In Stephen A. Wurm & Donald C. Laycock (eds.), Pacific linguistic studies in honour of Arthur Capell, 997–1063. Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Kalyan, Siva & Alexandre François. 2018. Freeing the comparative method from the tree model: A framework for historical glottometry. In Ritsuko Kikusawa & Lawrence Reid (eds.), Let’s talk about trees: Genetic relationships of languages and their phylogenetic representation, 59–89. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David W. 1979. Principles of diachronic syntax (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 23). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2002a. Myths and the prehistory of grammars. Journal of Linguistics 38(1). 113–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002b. More myths. Journal of Linguistics 38(3). 619–626. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McElhanon, Kenneth & C. L. Voorhoeve. 1970. The Trans-New Guinea Phylum: Explorations in deep-level genetic relationships (Pacific Linguistics B16). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Pawley, Andrew. 1998. The Trans New Guinea Phylum hypothesis: A reassessment. In Jelle Miedema, Cecilia Odé & Rien A. C. Dam (eds.), Perspectives on the Bird’s Head of Irian Jaya, Indonesia: Proceedings of the conference, Leiden, 13–17 October 1997, 655–690. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
. 2012. How reconstructable is Proto Trans New Guinea? Problems, progress, prospects. In Harald Hammarström & Wilco van den Heuvel (eds.), History, contact and classification of Papuan languages (Special Issue of Language and Linguistics in Melanesia ), 88–164.Google Scholar
Pawley, Andrew & Harald Hammarström. 2018. The Trans New Guinea family. In Bill Palmer (ed.), The languages and linguistics of the New Guinea area: A comprehensive guide, 21–195. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Pick, Andrew. 2020. A reconstruction of Proto-Northern Adelbert phonology and lexicon. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa dissertation.
Ross, Malcolm. 2014. Proto-South-Adelbert. In Simon J. Greenhill (ed.), TransNewGuinea.org. [URL]
Suter, Edgar. 2018. Comparative morphology of the Huon Peninsula languages (Papua New Guinea). PhD dissertation, Universität zu Köln.
Sweeney, Mike. 1994. A description of the phonology of the Katiati (Mum) language. Unpublished MS, Pioneer Bible Translators.Google Scholar
Usher, Timothy. nd. a. Gants. New Guinea World. [URL]
. nd. b. Kursav. New Guinea World. [URL]
Voorhoeve, C. L. 2001. Proto-Awyu-Dumut phonology II. In Andrew Pawley, Malcolm Ross & Darrell Tryon (eds.), The boy from Bundaberg: Studies in Melanesian linguistics in honor of Tom Dutton, 361–381. Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Wade, Martha. 1989. A survey of the grammatical structures and semantic functions of the Apalɨ (Emerum) language. Unpublished MS, Pioneer Bible Translators.Google Scholar
Wester, Ruth. 2014. A linguistic history of Awyu-Dumut: Morphological study and reconstruction of a Papuan language family. PhD dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Wurm, Stephen A., Clemens L. Voorhoeve & Kenneth A. McElhanon. 1975. The Trans New Guinea Phylum in general. In Stephen A. Wurm (ed.), Papuan languages and the New Guinea linguistic scene (Pacific Linguistics C38), 299–322. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Z’graggen, John A. 1975. The Madang-Adelbert Range Sub-Phylum. In Stephen A. Wurm (ed.), Papuan languages and the New Guinea linguistic scene (Pacific Linguistics C38), 569–612. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar