Cover not available
Review published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 23:1 (2006) ► pp.206–223
Book review

James A. Matisoff. Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and philosophy of Sino-Tibeto-Burman reconstruction. James A. Matisoff. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003. xlii, 750 pp.

Reviewed by
| Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris
Published online: 29 June 2006
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.23.1.14sag
References (41)
References
Baxter, William H. 1992. A Handbook of Old Chinese Phonology. (= Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs , 641.) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bellwood, Peter S. 1997. Prehistory of the Indo-Malaysian Archipelago. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Benedict, Paul K. 1972. Sino-Tibetan: A conspectus. Cambridge: University Printing House. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1976. Sino-Tibetan: Another look. Journal of the American Oriental Society 961.167–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beyer, Stephan V. 1992. The Classical Tibetan Language. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Bodman, Nicholas C. 1954. A Linguistic Study of the Shih Ming. (= Harvard-Yenching Institute Studies , XI1.) Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bradley, David. 1979. Proto-Loloish. (= Scandinavian Institute Monograph series , 391.) London & Malmø: Curzon.Google Scholar
Burling, Robbins. 1983. The Sal languages. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 71.1–31.Google Scholar
. 1999. On “Kamarupan”. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 221.169–171.Google Scholar
. 2004. The Language of the Modhupur Mandi (Garo). Vol. I1: Grammar . New Delhi: Bibliophile South Asia / Morganville: Promilla & Co.Google Scholar
Coblin, W. South. 1994. A Compendium of Phonetics in Northwest Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics monograph series, 71.Google Scholar
van Driem, George. 2001. Languages of the Himalayas: An ethnolinguistic handbook of the Greater Himalayan Region, 21 vols, Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
. 1997. Sino-Bodic. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 601.455–488. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferlus, Michel. 1982. Spirantisation des obstruantes médiales et formation du système consonantique du vietnamien. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 111.83–106.Google Scholar
Gong, Hwang-cherng. 2002. Collected Papers on Sino-Tibetan Linguistics. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics (preparatory office), Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Haudricourt, André-Georges. 1954a. De l’origine des tons du vietnamien. Journal Asiatique 2421.69–82.Google Scholar
. 1954b. Comment reconstruire le chinois archaïque.Word 101.351–364. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume. 2004. Phonologie et morphologie du Japhug (rGyalrong). Thèse de doctorat de l’université Paris 71. [URL]
Karlgren, Bernhard. 1940. Grammata Serica (Script and phonetics in Chinese and Sino-Japanese). (= Bulletin of the Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities , 1940,121.) Stockholm.Google Scholar
. 1964. Grammata Serica Recensa. Göteborg: Elanders Boktryckeri Aktiebolag.Google Scholar
Li Fang-kuei. 1971. Shanggu Yin Yanjiu. Tsinghua Journal of Chinese Studies, New Series 91.1–61.Google Scholar
. 1976. Jige Shanggu shengmu wenti. Zongtong Jiang Gong shishi zhounian jinian lunwenji ed. by Szu Ch’i-liang, et al., 1143–1150. Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, George B. 1979 [1898]. Dictionary of the Lepcha Language, revised and completed by Albert Grünwedel. Kathmandu: Ratna Pustak Bhandar.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A. 1972. The Loloish Tonal Split Revisited. Occasional papers of the Wolfenden Society.Google Scholar
1991. New goals for Sino-Tibetan linguistics. Keynote speech at the 24th International conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics, Ramkhamhaeng University, Bangkok, 7 October 1991.
Ostapirat, Weera. 2005. Tai-Kadai and Austronesian: Notes on phonological correspondences and vocabulary distribution. The Peopling of East Asia: Putting together archaeology, linguistics and genetics, ed. by Laurent Sagart, Roger Blench and Alicia Sanchez-Mazas, 107–131. London: Routledge Curzon. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peiros, Ilia & Starostin Sergei. 1996. A Comparative Vocabulary of Five Sino-Tibetan Languages. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne, Department of Linguistics and Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl R. 1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, Edwin G. 1962. The consonantal system of Old Chinese. Asia Major 91.58–144; 206–265.Google Scholar
Sagart, Laurent. 1990. Chinese and Austronesian are genetically related. Paper presented at the 23rd International Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics, October 1990, Arlington, Texas.
. 1993. New views on Old Chinese phonology. Diachronica 101.237–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1994. Old Chinese and Proto-Austronesian evidence for Sino-Austronesian. Oceanic Linguistics 331.271–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. The Roots of Old Chinese. (= Current Issues in Linguistic Theory , 1841.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Sources of Middle Chinese manner types: Old Chinese prenasalized initials in Hmong-Mien and Sino-Tibetan perspective. Language and Linguistics 41.757–768.Google Scholar
. 2004. The higher phylogeny of Austronesian and the position of Tai-Kadai. Oceanic Linguistics 431.411–444. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Sino-Tibetan-Austronesian: An updated and improved argument. The Peopling of East Asia: Putting together archaeology, linguistics and genetics, ed. by Laurent Sagart, Roger Blench & Alicia Sanchez-Mazas, 161–176. London: Routledge Curzon. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Solheim, Wilhelm G. 1971. New light on a forgotten past. National Geographic Magazine, 1391.330–39.Google Scholar
Starostin, Sergei A. 1989. Rekonstrukcija drevnekitajskoj fonologičeskoj sistemy [A reconstruction of the Old Chinese phonological system]. Moscow: Nauka, Glavnaya Redakcija Vostočnoj Literatury.Google Scholar
Wolfenden, Stuart N. 1929. Outlines of Tibeto-Burman Linguistic Morphology. London, Royal Asiatic Society.Google Scholar
Yakhontov, S. E. 1965. Shanggu Hanyu. Hanyu Shi Lun Ji ed. by Tang Zuofan, Hu Shuangbao, 197–224. Beijing: Beijing University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Zhengzhang Shangfang. 1987. Shanggu yunmu xitong he sideng, jieyin, shengdiao de fayuan wenti. Wenzhou Shiyuan Xuebao 41.Google Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Schuessler, Axel
2024. Sino-Tibetan *w in Tibetan and Old Chinese. Language and Linguistics. 語言暨語言學 25:1 ► pp. 80 ff. DOI logo
Sims, Nathaniel
2024. Methodological issues in Rma etymology. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Sims, Nathaniel A.
2021. Tonogenesis in Northeastern Trans‐Himalayan. Transactions of the Philological Society 119:3 ► pp. 281 ff. DOI logo
Hill, Nathan
2019. The Historical Phonology of Tibetan, Burmese, and Chinese, DOI logo
Baxter, William H. & Laurent Sagart
2017. Old Chinese reconstruction. Diachronica 34:4 ► pp. 559 ff. DOI logo
LaPolla, Randy J.
2016. Once again on methodology and argumentation in linguistics. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 39:2 ► pp. 282 ff. DOI logo
HILL, NATHAN W.
2011. An Inventory of Tibetan Sound Laws. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 21:4 ► pp. 441 ff. DOI logo
Sagart, Laurent
2011. How Many Independent Rice Vocabularies in Asia?. Rice 4:3-4 ► pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Handel, Zev
2008. What is Sino‐Tibetan? Snapshot of a Field and a Language Family in Flux. Language and Linguistics Compass 2:3 ► pp. 422 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.