Cover not available
Review published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 23:2 (2006) ► pp.440–447
Book review

Elly van Gelderen. Grammaticalization as Economy. Elly van Gelderen. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2004. xvii, 320 pp.

Reviewed by
| Radboud Universiteit, Nijmegen
Published online: 15 December 2006
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.23.2.13los
References (11)
References
Bobaljik, Jonathan & Jonas Dianne. 1996. “Subject positions and the roles of TP.” Linguistic Inquiry 271.195–236.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan & Höskuldur Thráinsson. 1998. “Two heads aren’t always better than one.” Syntax 11.37–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1994. “Functional categories, X-bar-theory, and grammaticalization theory.” Sprachtypologie und Universalforschung 471.3–15.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernt, Ulrike Claudi, & Friederike Hünnemeyer. 1991. Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuteva, Tania. 2001. Auxiliation: An enquiry into the nature of grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1995 [1982]. Thoughts on Grammaticalization (= LINCOM Studies in Theoretical Linguistics , 11.) München: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David W. 1979. Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Roussou Anna. 1999. “A formal approach to ‘grammaticalization’.” Linguistics 371.1011–1041. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Syntactic change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sobin, Nicholas. 1997. “Agreement, default rules, and grammatical viruses.” Linguistic Inquiry 281.318–343.Google Scholar
Wurff, Wim van der. 1997. “Deriving object-verb order in late ME.” Journal of Linguistics 331.485–509. DOI logoGoogle Scholar