Cover not available
Article published In:
Demystifying New Methods in Historical Linguistics
Edited by Erich Round
[Diachronica 41:3] 2024
► pp. 307–329

The dialect chain tree

ORCID logo | Uppsala University
ORCID logo | Uppsala University
A perennial conflict in historical linguistics centers around the theoretical and practical virtues of tree-like divergence and wave-like diffusion. This paper presents the Dialect Chain Tree, an extension of the tree model that incorporates both tree-like descent and disintegration of dialect chains in a systematic fashion. As such, it provides a formalization and sharpening of Ross’ (1997: 212–228) linkage concept that allows integration into quantitative approaches.
Keywords: phylogenetics, subgrouping, dialect chain, trees and waves
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Dialect disintegration
  • 3.Related work
  • 4.Assumptions underlying the new model
  • 5.The dialect chain tree
    • 5.1Description
    • 5.2Formal definition
    • 5.3Tree-like split as a special case of dialect divergence
  • 6.Maximum Parsimony for the DCT
    • 6.1Parsimony score and character coding
    • 6.2Order- and parsimony-equivalence between DCTs
    • 6.3A three-taxon example
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 2 July 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.23014.elg
References (20)
References
Campbell, Eric. 2013. The internal diversification and subgrouping of Chatino. International Journal of American Linguistics 79(3). 395–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Čelakovský, František L. 1853. Čtení o srovnavací mluvnici slovanské [Lectures on comparative grammar of Slavic]. Prague: V komisí u F. Řivnáče.Google Scholar
Dyen, Isidore. 1969. Reconstruction, the comparative method, and the proto-language uniformity assumption. Language 45(3). 499–518. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Felsenstein, Joseph. 2004. Inferring phylogenies. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Fitch, Walter M. 1971. Toward defining the course of evolution: Minimum change for a specific tree topology. Systematic Biology 20(4). 406–416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
François, Alexandre. 2014. Trees, waves and linkages: Models of language diversification. In Claire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans (eds.), The Routledge handbook of historical linguistics, 161–189. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goebl, Hans. 2005. Dialektometrie. In Gabriel Altmann, Reinhard Köhler & Rajmund Piotrowski (eds.), Quantitative Linguistik: Ein internationales Handbuch, 498–531. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hellström, Petter. 2019. Trees of knowledge: Science and the shape of genealogy. Uppsala: Uppsala University dissertation.
Jacques, Guillaume & Johann-Mattis List. 2019. Save the trees: Why we need tree models in linguistic reconstruction (and when we should apply them). Journal of Historical Linguistics 9(1). 128–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kalyan, Siva & Alexandre François. 2018. Freeing the comparative method from the tree model: A framework for historical glottometry. In Ritsuko Kikusawa & Lawrence A. Reid (eds.), Let’s talk about trees: Genetic relationships of languages and their phylogenetic representation (Senri Ethnological Studies 98), 59–89. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.Google Scholar
. 2019. When the waves meet the trees: A response to Jacques and List. Journal of Historical Linguistics 9(1). 168–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nakhleh, Luay. 2004. Phylogenetic networks. Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin dissertation.
Rexová, Kateřina, Daniel Frynta & Jan Zrzavý. 2003. Cladistic analysis of languages: Indo-European classification based on lexicostatistical data. Cladistics 19(2). 120–127.Google Scholar
Ringe, Don, Tandy Warnow & Ann Taylor. 2002. Indo-European and computational cladistics. Transactions of the Philological Society 100(1). 59–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, Malcolm. 1988. Proto-Oceanic and the Austronesian languages of western Melanesia, vol. 981 (Pacific Linguistics: Series C). Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University. [URL]
. 1997. Social networks and kinds of speech community event. In Roger M. Blench & Matthew Spriggs (eds.), Archaeology and language, I, vol. 271 (One World Archaeology), 209–261. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sankoff, David. 1975. Minimal mutation trees of sequences. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 28(1). 35–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schleicher, August. 1853. Die ersten Spaltungen des indogermanischen Urvolkes. In J. Gustav Droysen & Gregor W. Nitzsch (eds.), Allgemeine Monatsschrift für Wissenschaft und Literatur, 786–787. Braunschweig: C. A. Schwestchke & Sohn.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Johannes. 1872. Die Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse der indogermanischen Sprachen. Weimar: H. Böhlau.Google Scholar