Cover not available
Editorial published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 40:5 (2023) ► pp.666–682
Editorial

Diachrony and Diachronica

40@40

ORCID logo | Yale University
Article outline
  • Diachronica at 40
  • Forty years of diachronic generative syntax
  • Bad data, parsed corpora, and an underexplored natural alliance in the study of diachronic syntax
  • Experimental linguistics and language change
  • A few comments on the use of the time variable in historical corpus studies
  • The Life-Cycle Model of phonological change
  • Pertinacity in phonological change
  • References


This article is available free of charge.

Published online: 7 March 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.24014.bow
References (12)
References
Butt, Miriam & Aditi Lahiri. 2013. Diachronic pertinancy of light verbs. Lingua 1351, 7–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dresher, B. Elan & Aditi Lahiri. 2005. Main Stress Left in Early Middle English. In M. Fortescue, E. S. Jensen, J. E. Mogensen, & L. Schøsler (eds.) Historical Linguistics 2003: Selected Papers from the 16th International Congress of Historical Linguistics, Copenhagen 11–15 August, 74–85. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Honeybone, Patrick & Joseph Salmons. 2015. The Oxford handbook of historical phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kennard, Holly & Aditi Lahiri. 2020. Nonesuch phonemes in loanwords. Linguistics 581, 83–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keenan, Edward. 1994. Creating anaphors: An historical study of the English reflexive pronouns. Ms., University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
. 2002. Explaining the creation of reflexive pronouns in English. In D. Minkova & R. Stockwell (eds.) Studies in the history of the English language: A millennial perspective 325–354. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 2015. Phonologization. In P. Honeybone & J. Salmons (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Historical Phonology, 563–582. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lahiri, Aditi & Holly Kennard. 2019. Pertinacity in loanwords: Same underlying systems, different outputs. In M. Cennamo (ed.) Historical Linguistics 2015: Selected Papers from the 22nd International Congress of Historical Linguistics, Naples 27–31 July, 58–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 2001. Formal syntax, diachronic Minimalism, and etymology: The history of French chez . Linguistic Inquiry 321, 275–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plank, Frans & Aditi Lahiri. 2015. Macrosopic and microscopic typology: Basic Valance Orientation, more pertinacious than meets the naked eye. Linguistic Typology 191, 1–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plank, Frans. 2015. Time for change. In Carlotta Viti (ed.), Perspectives on Historical Syntax, §1.4. 61–91. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walkden, George. 2012. Against inertia, Lingua. 122(8), 891–901, DOI logo.Google Scholar