Book review
Olga Fischer. Morphosyntactic Change: Functional and formal perspectives. Olga Fischer. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. xviii, 378 pp.
References (17)
References
Abraham, Werner. 1993. “Einleitung zum Thema dieses Bandes. Grammatikalisierung und Reanalyse: Einander ausschließende oder ergänzende Begriffe”? Folia Linguistica Historica 13:1/2.7–26.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fischer, Olga & Leek F. C. van der. 1981. “Optional vs. radical reanalysis: Mechanisms of syntactic change”. (Review of Lightfoot 1979). Lingua 551.301–50. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Guasti, Maria Teresa. 2002. Language Acquisition: The growth of grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kemenade, Ans van. 2000. “Structural factors in the history of English modals”. History of Englishes: New methods and interpretations in the history of English modals ed. by Matti Rissanen, 287–309. Berlin: Mouton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Legendre, Géraldine, Jane Grimshaw, & Sten Vikner, eds. 2001. Optimality-Theoretic Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lightfoot, David. 1974. “The diachronic analysis of English modals”. Historical Linguistics ed. by John M. Anderson & Charles Jones, 219–49. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lightfoot, David. 1979. Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pulvermüller, Friedemann. 2002. The Neuroscience of Language: On brain circuits of words and serial order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roberts, Ian. 2007. Diachronic Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roberts, Ian & Roussou Anna. 2003. Syntactic Change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Visser, Fredericus Th. 1963–73. An Historical Syntax of the English Language. 31 Vols. Leiden: E.J. Brill.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Warner, Anthony. 1993. English Auxiliaries: Structure and history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wexler, Kenneth. 1998. “Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: A new explanation of the new infinitive stage”. Lingua 1061.23–79. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)