A case study in grammaticalized inflectional morphology
Origin and development of the Germanic weak preterite
Eugen Hill | Institut für Sprachwissenschaft / Indogermanistik der Universität Wien
This paper deals with one of the oldest and most controversial problems in the historical morphology of the Germanic branch of Indo-European: the origin and historical development of the so-called ‘weak preterite’. In Germanic, the weak preterite is the only means of forming the preterite tense of a derived verb. In spite of two hundred years of research into the weak preterite and a large number of hypotheses concerning its origin, it is not even securely established how the inflectional endings of this formation should be reconstructed for the common prehistory of the attested Germanic languages. Traditionally the inflectional endings of the weak preterite are conceived of as reflecting free inflectional forms of the verb “do”, only recently having been grammaticalized as inflectional morphology for derived verbs. But it has never been possible to identify the inflectional forms in question satisfactorily within the paradigm of “do”. This paper reconsiders the evidence of the Germanic daughter languages by taking into account West Germanic irregularities previously neglected or viewed as irrelevant. It is shown that the West Germanic evidence provides a key to understanding the origin and the later developments of the weak preterite inflectional endings.
Chatten, Alicia, Kimberley Baxter, Erwanne Mas, Jailyn Peña, Guy Tabachnick, Daniel Duncan & Laurel MacKenzie
2024. “I’ve Always Spoke Like This, You See”: Preterite-to-Participle Leveling in American and British Englishes. American Speech: A Quarterly of Linguistic Usage 99:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
2016. Indogermanistik und Germanistik. Historical Linguistics 129:1 ► pp. 233 ff.
Willi, Andreas
2016. The Oscan Perfect in ‐TT‐. Transactions of the Philological Society 114:1 ► pp. 75 ff.
Kim, R.I.
2015. MOTTAUSCH, KARL-HEINZ: Untersuchungen zur Vorgeschichte des germanischen starken Verbs. Die Rolle des Aorists. PHILOLOGIA – Sprachwissenschaftliche Forschungsergebnisse, 173.. Kratylos 60:1 ► pp. 89 ff.
Mees, Bernard
2013. ‘Giving’ and ‘Making’ in Early Runic Epigraphy. Transactions of the Philological Society 111:3 ► pp. 326 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.