Article published In:
DiachronicaVol. 31:2 (2014) ► pp.159–191
Lexical expansion in the HAVE and BE perfect in Dutch
A constructionist prototype account
This article investigates lexical expansion in the HAVE and BE perfect in Dutch. It is known from previous research that early perfects show more lexical restrictions than their modern counterparts. The aim of this article is to uncover how perfects change their collocational preferences over time. The present study tackles this issue taking a quantitative corpus perspective. The empirical basis for this study is a sample of HAVE and BE perfects taken from a corpus of Dutch legal texts (1250–1800). The sample is analyzed using the method of diachronic distinctive collexeme analysis. The statistical analysis indicates that both perfect constructions show fine-grained shifts in collocational preferences over time. The observed lexical expansion has the following properties: it proceeds (a) gradually, (b) through semantically related verb classes, (c) away from a prototype. These properties are accounted for making use of insights from prototype theory and construction grammar.
References (55)
de Acosta, Diego. 2011. Rethinking the genesis of the Romance periphrastic perfect. Diachronica 281. 143–185. 
. 2012. The Old English have-perfect and its congeners. Journal of English Linguistics 411. 133–164.
Baayen, Harald. 2008. Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Benveniste, Émile. 1968. Mutations of linguistic categories. In Winfred Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics, 85–94. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Boogaart, Ronny. 1996. Aspect and temporal ordering: A contrastive analysis of Dutch and English. Amsterdam: VU University Amsterdam dissertation.
Bybee, Joan & David Eddington. 2006. A usage-based approach to Spanish verbs of ‘becoming’. Language 821. 323–355.
Bybee, Joan & Östen Dahl. 1989. The creation of tense and aspect systems in the languages of the world. Studies in Language 131. 51–103.
Bybee, Joan. 2003. Cognitive processes in grammaticalization. In Michael Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language, vol. 21, 145–167. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
. 2010. Language, usage and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Carey, Kathleen. 1994. Pragmatics, subjectivity and the grammaticalization of the English perfect. San Diego: University of California dissertation.
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspects and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coussé, Evie. 2008. Motivaties voor volgordevariatie: Een diachrone studie van werkwoordsvolgorde in het Nederlands. Ghent: Ghent University dissertation.
.
. 2010. Een digitaal compilatiecorpus historisch Nederlands. Lexikos 201. 123–142.
. 2011. On ambiguous past participles in Dutch. Linguistics 491. 611–634.
. 2013. The grammaticalization of the have perfect in Dutch: A corpus study of contextual extension and semantic generalization. Language Sciences 361. 103–112.
Croft, William. 2001. Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Detges, Ulrich. 2000. Time and truth: The grammaticalization of resultatives and perfects within a theory of subjectification. Studies in Language 241. 345–377.
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, Adele E., Devin M. Casenhiser & Nitya Sethuraman. 2004. Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics 151. 289–316.
Gries, Stefan Th. & Anatol Stefanowitsch. 2004. Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 91. 97–129.
Gries, Stefan Th. 2007. Coll.analysis 3.2. A program for R for Windows 2.x.
. 2012. Frequencies, probabilities, association measures in usage-/exemplar-based linguistics: Some necessary clarifications. Studies in Language 361. 477–510.
Haeseryn, Walter, Kirsten Romijn, Guido Geerts, Jaap de Rooij & Maarten C. van den Toorn. 1997. Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst. Groningen/Deurne: Martinus Nijhoff uitgevers/Wolters Plantyn.
Harris, Alice C. 2003. Cross-linguistic perspectives on syntactic change. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 529–551. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hilpert, Martin. 2006. Distinctive collexeme analysis and diachrony. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 21. 243–257.
. 2008. Germanic future constructions: A usage-based approach to language change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2004. Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal? In Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds.), What makes grammaticalization: A look from its components and its fringes, 21–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 561. 251–299.
Kern, Johan Hendrik. 1912. De met het participium praeteriti omschreven werkwoordsvormen in ‘t Nederlands. Amsterdam: Johannes Müller.
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Langacker, Ronald. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McFadden, Thomas & Artemis Alexiadou. 2006. Auxiliary selection and counterfactuality in the history of English and Germanic. In Jutta M. Hartmann & László Molnárfi (eds.), Comparative studies in Germanic syntax, 237–262. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2010. Perfects, resultatives, and auxiliaries in Earlier English. Linguistic Inquiry 411. 389–425.
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. & Sergej Jaxontov. 1988. The typology of resultative constructions. In Vladimir P. Nedjalkov (ed.), Typology of resultative constructions, 3–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Paul, Hermann. 1902. Die Umschreibung des Perfektums im Deutschen mit haben und sein. Munich: Verlag der k. Akademie.
Perlmutter, David. 1978. Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS) 41. 157–189.
Pijnenburg, Willy J.J. & Tanneke H. Schoonheim. 1998. Het Vroegmiddelnederlands Woordenboek: De geschiedenis van een project. Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde 1121. 152–164.
Pinkster, Harm. 1987. The strategy of chronology of the development of future and perfect tense auxiliaries in Latin. In Martin Harris & Paola Ramat (eds.), Historical development of auxiliaries, 193–223. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
R Core Team. 2012. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Reenen, Pieter Th. van & Maaike Mulder. 1993. Een gegevensbank van 14de-eeuwse Middelnederlandse dialecten op de computer. Lexikos 31. 259–281.
Shannon, Thomas F. 1989. Perfect auxiliary variation as a function of transitivity and Aktionsart. In Joseph Emonds, P.J. Mistry, Vida Samiian & Linda Thornburg (eds.), Proceedings from the Western Conference on Linguistics (WECOL), 254–266. Fresno: California State University.
. 1990. The unaccusative hypothesis and the history of the perfect auxiliary in Germanic and Romance. In Henning Andersen & Konrad Koerner (eds.), Historical linguistics 1987: Papers from the 8th International Conference on Historical Linguistics (ICHL), 461–488. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 1993a.
To be or not to be in Dutch: A cognitive account of some puzzling perfect auxiliary phenomena. In Robert S. Kirsner (ed.), Beyond the Low Countries, 85–96. Lanham: University Press of America.
. 1993b. Split intransitivity in German and Dutch: Semantic and pragmatic parameters. In Rosina Lippi-Green (ed.), Recent developments in Germanic linguistics, 97–113. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 1995. Towards a cognitive explanation of perfect auxiliary selection: Some modal and aspectual effects in the history of German. American Journal of Germanic Linguistics & Literatures 71. 129–163.
Sorace, Antonella. 2000. Gradients in auxiliary selection with intransitive verbs. Language 761. 859–890.
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Stefan Th. Gries. 2003. Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 81. 209–243.
Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2006. Distinctive collexeme analysis and diachrony: A comment. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 21. 257–262.
Timberlake, Alan. 1975. Hierarchies in the genitive of negation. The Slavic and East European Journal 191. 123–138.
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1972. A history of English syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Vincent, Nigel. 1982. The development of the auxiliaries habere and esse in Romance. In Nigel Vincent & Martin Harris (eds.), Studies in the Romance verb, 71–96. London: Croom Helm.
Yoon, Soyeon. 2012. Constructions, semantic compatibility and coercion: An empirical usage-based approach. Houston: Rice University dissertation.
Cited by (10)
Cited by ten other publications
Hilpert, Martin
2024. Corpus linguistics meets historical linguistics and construction grammar: how far have we come, and where do we go from here?. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 20:3 ► pp. 481 ff. 
Norde, Muriel & Graeme Trousdale
2024. Creativity, paradigms and morphological constructions: evidence from Dutch pseudoparticiples. Linguistics
Broekhuis, Hans
2021. Chapter 11. The rise of the periphrastic perfect tense in the continental West Germanic languages. In The Perfect Volume [Studies in Language Companion Series, 217], ► pp. 262 ff.
Dekalo, Volodymyr
2021. Exploring relative degrees of auxiliarization empirically in German modal constructions with wissen and verstehen. In Modality and Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 32], ► pp. 53 ff.
Hilpert, Martin, Bert Cappelle & Ilse Depraetere
2021. Modality in Diachronic Construction Grammar. In Modality and Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 32], ► pp. 1 ff.
Larsson, Ida
2021. Chapter 12. On the emergence of auxiliary selection in Germanic. In The Perfect Volume [Studies in Language Companion Series, 217], ► pp. 292 ff.
Sommerer, Lotte
2019. Van Goethem, Kristel, Muriel Norde, Evie Coussé & Gudrun Vanderbauwhede (eds.). (2018).Category Change from a Constructional Perspective. Constructions and Frames 11:2 ► pp. 317 ff.
Coussé, Evie
2018. Chapter 4. Grammaticalization, host-class expansion and category change. In Category Change from a Constructional Perspective [Constructional Approaches to Language, 20], ► pp. 93 ff.
Gillmann, Melitta
2018. Manner of motion and semantic transitivity. In Reorganising Grammatical Variation [Studies in Language Companion Series, 203], ► pp. 231 ff.
Fonteyn, Lauren & Stefan Hartmann
2016. Usage-based perspectives on diachronic morphology: A mixed-methods approach towards English ing-nominals. Linguistics Vanguard 2:1
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.