Article published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 32:2 (2015) ► pp.186230
References (51)
Amse-De Jong, Tine H. 1974. The meaning of the finite verb forms in the Old Church Slavonic Codex Suprasliensis: A synchronic study. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andersen, Henning. 2006. Grammation, regrammation, and degrammation: Tense loss in Russian. Diachronica 23(2). 231–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bary, Corien & Dag Trygve Truslew Haug. 2011. Temporal anaphora across and inside sentences: The function of participles. Semantics and Pragmatics 4(8). 1–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bermel, Neil. 1997. Context and the lexicon in the development of Russian aspect (University of California Publications in Linguistics 129). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen & Mary Swift. 2004. Event realization and default aspect. Linguistics and Philosophy 271. 263–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 2005. Structuring sense, volume II: The normal course of events. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borodič, Vera Vladimirovna. 1953. K voprosu o formirovanii soveršennogo i nesoveršennogo vida v slavjanskix jazykax. Voprosy jazykoznanija 61. 68–86.Google Scholar
Bronckart, Jean-Paul & Hermina Sinclair. 1973. Time, tense and aspect. Cognition 21. 107–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan & Östen Dahl. 1989. The creation of tense and aspect systems in the languages of the world. Studies in Language 13(1).51–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Capaldo, Mario. 1985. O nedostatkax i novšestvax novogo izdanija Suprasl’skogo sbornika. Polata Knigopisnaia: An Information Bulletin Devoted to the Study of Early Slavic Books, Texts and Literatures 131. 29–43.Google Scholar
Cejtlin, Ralja Michajlovna, Radoslav Večerka & Emilija Blagova. 1994. Staroslavjanskij slovar’ (po rukopisjam X–XI vekov). Moscow: Russkij jazyk.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Eystein. 2010. Time, tense and aspect in Early Vedic grammar: Exploring inflectional semantics in the Rigveda (Studies in Indo-European Languages and Linguistics 5). Leiden: Brill. DOI logo
Dahl, Östen. Tense and aspect systems. 1985. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Darden, Bill. 2004. A history of the East Slavic imperfect. Paper presented at the Conference of the American Association for the Advancement of Slavic Studies. [URL]
Dostál, Antonin. 1954. Studie o vidovém systému v staroslověnštině. Prague: Státní pedagogické nakladatelství.Google Scholar
Eckardt, Regine. 2006. Meaning change in grammaticalization: An enquiry into semantic reanalysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckhoff, Hanne & Laura Janda. 2014. Grammatical profiles and aspect in Old Church Slavonic. Transactions of the Philological Society 112(2). 231–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ernout, Alfred & François Thomas. 1959. Syntaxe latine, 2nd edn. Paris: Klincksieck.
Forsyth, James. 1972. The nature and development of the aspectual opposition in the Russian verb. The Slavonic and East European Review 50(121). 493–506.Google Scholar
Galton, Herbert. 1976. The main functions of the Slavic verbal aspect. Skopje: Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts.
Grønn, Atle. 2003. The semantics and pragmatics of the Russian factual imperfective. Oslo: University of Oslo dissertation.Google Scholar
Haug, Dag Trygve Truslew & Marius Jøhndal. 2008. Creating a parallel treebank of the old Indo-European Bible translations. In Caroline Sporleder & Kiril Ribarov (eds.), Proceedings of the LaTeCH Workshop – LREC, 27–34. Marrakech: [URL]Google Scholar
Haug, Dag Trygve Truslew, Marius Jøhndal, Hanne Martine Eckhoff, Eirik Welo, Mari Johanne Bordal Hertzenberg & Angelika Müth. 2009. Computational and linguistic issues in designing a syntactically annotated parallel corpus of Indo-European languages. Traitement Automatique des Langues 501. 17–45.Google Scholar
Hewson, John & Vit Bubenik. 1997. Tense and aspect in Indo-European languages: Theory, typology and diachrony (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 145). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo
Hofmann, Johann Baptist & Anton Szantyr. 1965. Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik. Munich: C. H. Beck. DOI logo
Jagić, Vatroslav. 1883. Quattuor evangeliorum versionis palaeoslovenicae Codex Marianus glagoliticus. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
. 1954. Quattuor Evangeliorum Codes Glagoliticus olim Zographensis nunc Petropolitanus: characteribus cyrillicis transcriptum notis criticis prolegomenis appendicibus auctum. Editiones monumentorum Slavicorum veteris dialecti. Graz: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1932. Zur Struktur des russischen Verbums. In Charisteria Guilelmo Mathesio quinquagenario: a discipulis et Circuli linguistici Pragensis sodalibus oblate, 74–84. Prague: Cercle Linguistique de Prague.Google Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang. 1994. Time in language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 1995. A time-relational analysis of Russian aspect. Language 711. 669–695. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kukuškina, Ol’ga Vladimirovna & Marija Naumovna Ševeleva. 1991. O formirovanii sovremennoj kategorii glagol’nogo vida. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta, serija 9, filologija 61. 38–49.Google Scholar
Łazorczyk, Agnieszka Agata. 2010. Decomposing Slavic aspect: The role of aspectual morphology in Polish and other Slavic languages. Los Angeles: University of Southern California dissertation.Google Scholar
Lunt, Horace G. 2001. Old Church Slavonic grammar, 7th edn. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maslov, Jurij Sergeevič. 2004. Rol’ tak nazyvaemoj perfektivacii i imperfektivacii v processe vozniknovenija slavjanskogo glagol’nogo vida. In Jurij Sergeevič Maslov, Izbrannye trudy: Aspektologija, obščee jazykoznanie, 165–195. Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine. 1902. Des aspects perfectif et imperfectif dans la traduction de l’évangile en vieux slave. In Antoine Meillet, Études sur l’étymologie et le vocabulaire du vieux slave, 2–104. Paris: Émile Bouillon.Google Scholar
. 1934. Le slave commun. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Menge, Hermann, Thorsten Burkard & Markus Schauer. 2000. Lehrbuch der lateinischen Syntax und Semantik. Darmstadt, Germany: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Molnár, Nándor. 1985. The calques of Greek origin in the most ancient Old Slavic gospel texts (Slavistische Forschungen 47). Cologne/Vienna: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Nesset, Tore. 2012. One or several categories? The Old Church Slavonic nǫ-verbs and linguistic profiling. Russian Linguistics 361.285–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Padučeva, Elena V. 1996. Semantičeskie issledovanija. Moscow: Jazyki russkoj kul’tury.Google Scholar
Růžička, Rudolf. 1957. Der Verbalaspekt in der altrussischen Nestorchronik (Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Slawistik 14). Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Scatton, Ernest A. 1993. Bulgarian. In Bernard Comrie & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), The Slavonic languages, 188–248. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schenker, Alexander M. 1995. The dawn of Slavic: An introduction to Slavic philology. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schooneveld, Cornelis H. van. 1951. The aspect system of the Old Church Slavonic and Old Russian verbum finitum byti. Word 71. 96–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schuyt, Roel. 1990. The morphology of Slavic verbal aspect: A descriptive and historical study (Studies in Slavic and General Linguistics 14). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Stoll, Sabine. 2005. Beginning and end in the acquisition of the perfective aspect in Russian. Journal of Child Language Research 321. 805–825. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tischendorf, Constantin von. 1869–1872. Novum Testamentum Graece, 8th edn. Leipzig: Hinrichs. DOI logo
Traugott, Elizabeth. 1988. Pragmatic strengthening and grammaticalization. In Shelley Axmaker, Annie Jaisser & Helen Singmaster (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 406–416. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Zaimov, Jordan & Mario Capaldo (eds.). 1982. Suprasŭlski ili Retkov sbornik: v dva to ma. Sofia: Izdatel’stvo na Bŭlgarskata Akademija na Naukite.Google Scholar
Cited by (12)

Cited by 12 other publications

Wiemer, Björn, Anna Socka & Joanna Wrzesień-Kwiatkowska
2023. Relacje między znaczeniami modalnymi i znaczeniami aspektowymi w języku polskim. Odpowiedzi z badania korpusowego. Polonica 43  pp. 77 ff. DOI logo
Kotin, Michaił & Patrycja Montusiewicz
2022. Modalność deontyczna w angielskiej, polskiej i rosyjskiej wersji powszechnej deklaracji praw człowieka. Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski 13:1  pp. 251 ff. DOI logo
Kotin, Michail L.
2020. Chapter 12. The Gothic perfective constructions in contrast to West Germanic. In Perfects in Indo-European Languages and Beyond [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 352],  pp. 412 ff. DOI logo
Gvozdanovic, Jadranka
Szymański, Leszek
2019. The semantic field of the English modal auxiliary can interacting with the grammatical aspect of the main verb in Contemporary American English. Brno studies in English :1  pp. [75] ff. DOI logo
Eckhoff, Hanne, Kristin Bech, Gerlof Bouma, Kristine Eide, Dag Haug, Odd Einar Haugen & Marius Jøhndal
2018. The PROIEL treebank family: a standard for early attestations of Indo-European languages. Language Resources and Evaluation 52:1  pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
Eckhoff, Hanne Martine
2018. A corpus approach to the history of Russian po delimitatives. Diachronica 35:3  pp. 338 ff. DOI logo
Eckhoff, Hanne Martine
2020. A corpus approach to the history of Russian po delimitatives. In Diachronic Treebanks for Historical Linguistics [Benjamins Current Topics, 113],  pp. 42 ff. DOI logo
Olsson, Gustaf
2018. The Formation of Aspectual Pairs of Borrowed ova-verbs in Russian. Scando-Slavica 64:2  pp. 228 ff. DOI logo
Plungjan, Vladimir A.
2017. К списку двувидовых глаголов в русском языке: история пасть. In The role of prefixes in the formation of aspectuality [Biblioteca di Studi Slavistici, 39],  pp. 167 ff. DOI logo
Wiemer, Björn
2017. О роли приставок и суффиксов на ранних и поздних этапах истории славянского вида. In The role of prefixes in the formation of aspectuality [Biblioteca di Studi Slavistici, 39],  pp. 219 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.