The production of a contour tone requires a longer duration than the production of a level tone. This paper demonstrates that this durational relationship becomes considerably more complex when tones are realized on bimoraic sonorant units that can support both level tones and contour tones. Evidence comes from diachronic processes in which pitch and duration interact. In languages where (intrinsic) durational differences between two groups of bimoraic units lead to tonal contrasts, the longer units commonly receive a contour tone, and the shorter ones a level tone; yet over time, the units with the fully developed contour tone tend to shorten, and those with the level tone tend to lengthen. Ultimately, this can even lead to durational reversals between the units in question. The discussion focuses primarily on Franconian tone accent dialects but also incorporates data from Estonian, Hup, Las Norias Piman and North Low Saxon.
Asu, Eva Liina, Pärtel Lippus, Pire Teras & Tuuli Tuisk. 2009. The realization of Estonian quantity characteristics in spontaneous speech. Nordic Prosody 101. 49–56.
Bach, Adolf. 1921. Die Schärfung in der moselfränkischen Mundart von Arzbach (Unterwesterwaldkreis). Beiträge zur Geschichte der Deutschen Sprache und Literatur 451. 266–290.
Beckman, Mary E. & Jennifer J. Venditti. 2010. Tone and intonation. In William J. Hardcastle & John Laver (eds.), The handbook of phonetic sciences, 603–652. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Beckman, Mary E. & Jennifer J. Venditti. 2011. Intonation. In John Goldsmith, Jason Riggle & Alan C.L. Yu (eds.), The handbook of phonological theory, 2nd edn., 485–532. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Boersma, Paul. 2006. The history of the Franconian tone contrast. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam manuscript.
Boersma, Paul. Forthcoming. The history of the Franconian tone contrast. In Wolfgang Kehrein, Björn Köhnlein, Paul Boersma & Marc van Oostendorp (eds.), Segmental structure and tone. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Bremer, Otto. 1929. Der Schleifton im Nordniedersächsischen. Niederdeutsches Jahrbuch 531. 1–32.
Cajot, José. 2006. Phonologisch bedingter Polytonieverlust – eine tonlose Enklave südlich von Maastricht. In Michiel de Vaan (ed.), Germanic tone accents. First International Workshop on Franconian Tone Accents, Leiden, 13–14 June 2003 (Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik, Beiheft 131), 11–24. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
Cumming, Ruth. 2011. The effect of dynamic fundamental frequency on the perception of duration. Journal of Phonetics 39(3). 375–387.
Dogil, Grzegorz & Briony Williams. 1999. The phonetic manifestation of word stress. In Harry van der Hulst (ed.), Word prosodic systems in the languages of Europe, 272–334. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Eek, Arvo. 1980. Estonian quantity: Notes on the perception of duration. In Arvo Eek (ed.), Estonian papers in phonetics, 5–29. Tallinn: Academy of Sciences of the Estonian S. S. R., Institute of Language and Literature.
Eis, Gerhard. 1958. Historische Laut- und Formenlehre des Mittelhochdeutschen. Halle: Niemeyer.
Epps, Patience. 2008. A grammar of Hup. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Feyer, Ursula. 1941. Die Mundart des Dorfes Baden (Kreis Verden) grammatisch und phonetisch dargestellt, mit einer quantitativen Analyse der Vokale. Berlin: University of Berlin dissertation.
Fikkert, Paula & Haike Jacobs (eds.). 2003. Development in prosodic systems. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Gilles, Peter. 2002. Einflüsse der Rheinischen Akzentuierung auf die segmentelle Ebene. Evidenz aus dem Luxemburgischen. In Peter Auer, Peter Gilles & Helmut Spiekermann (eds.), Silbenschnitt und Tonakzente (Linguistische Arbeiten 463), 265–282. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Goldsmith, John. 1976. Autosegmental phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation [Published 1979. New York: Garland.].
Gussenhoven, Carlos. 1993. The Dutch foot and the chanted call. Journal of Linguistics 29(1). 37–63.
Gussenhoven, Carlos. 2000a. The lexical tone contrast of Roermond Dutch in optimality theory. In Merle Horne (ed.), Intonation: Theory and experiment, 129–167. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers. _6
Gussenhoven, Carlos. 2000b. On the origin and development of the Central Franconian tone contrast. In Aditi Lahiri (ed.), Analogy, levelling, markedness, 215–260. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Gussenhoven, Carlos. 2004. The phonology of tone and intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gussenhoven, Carlos. 2007. A vowel height split explained: Compensatory listening and speaker control. Laboratory Phonology 91. 145–172.
Gussenhoven, Carlos. 2009. Vowel duration, syllable quantity, and stress in Dutch. In Kristin Hanson & Sharon Inkelas (eds.), The nature of the word: Essays in honor of Paul Kiparsky, 181–198. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gussenhoven, Carlos. 2013. From Cologne to Arzbach: An account of the Franconian ‘tone reversal’. In Eva-Liina Asu & Partel Lippus (eds.), Nordic prosody. Proceedings of the XIth Conference, Tartu 2012, 11–24. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Gussenhoven, Carlos & Wencui Zhou. 2013. Revisiting pitch slope and height effects on perceived duration. Interspeech 20131. 1365–1369.
Greenberg, Steven & Eric Zee. 1979. On the perception of contour tones. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 451. 150–164.
Hanssen, Judith. 2005. Tone and intonation in the dialect of Sittard. Nijmegen: University of Nijmegen MA thesis.
Hayes, Bruce & Aditi Lahiri. 1992. Durationally specified intonation in English and Bengali. In Rolf Carlson, Lennart Nord & Johan Sundberg (eds.), 1990 Wenner-Gren Center conference on music, language, speech, and brain, 78–91. New York: Macmillan.
Hayes, Bruce. 1995. Metrical stress theory: Principles and case studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Heijmans, Linda. 2003. The relationship between tone and vowel length in two neighboring Dutch Limburgian dialects. In Paula Fikkert & Haike Jacobs (eds.), Development in prosodic systems, 7–46. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Hermans, Ben. 2009. The phonological structure of the Limburg tonal accents. In Kuniya Nasukawa & Phillip Backley (eds.), Strength relations in phonology, 317–372. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hermans, Ben. 2012. The phonological representation of the Limburgian tonal accents. In Bert Botma & Roland Noske (eds.), Phonological explorations: Empirical, theoretical and diachronic issues, 227–244. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Heuven, Vincent J.J.P. van. 2014. Stress and segment duration in Dutch. In René Kager, Janet Grijzenhout & Koen Sebregts (eds.), Where the principles fail: A festschrift for Wim Zonneveld on the occasion of his 64th birthday, 217–228. Utrecht: Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS.
Hildebrandt, Bruno. 1963. Experimentalphonetische Untersuchungen zur Bestimmung und Wertung der ‘durativen Funktion’ akzentuierter Vokale im Nordniedersächsischen. Hamburg: University of Hamburg dissertation.
Höder, Steffen. 2010. Das Lautsystem des Altenwerder Platt. Eine phonetisch-phonologische Bestandsaufnahme. Niederdeutsches Wort 501. 1–27.
Höder, Steffen. 2014. Low German: A profile of a word language. In Javier Caro Reina & Renata Szczepaniak (eds.), Syllable and word languages (Linguae & Litterae 40), 305–326. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hualde, José I. 2012. Two Basque accentual systems and the notion of pitch-accent language. Lingua 122(13). 1335–1351.
Hulst, Harry van der. 2011. Pitch accent systems. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, 1003–1026. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Hulst, Harry van der. 2012. Deconstructing stress. Lingua 122(13). 1494–1521.
Hyman, Larry M. 2006. Word-prosodic typology. Phonology 23(2). 225–257.
Hyman, Larry M. 2009. How (not) to do phonological typology: The case of pitch-accent. Language Sciences 31(2). 213–238.
Hyman, Larry M. 2011. In defense of prosodic typology: A response to Beckman & Venditti. UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report (2011). 200–235.
Hyman, Larry M. 2012. Coda conditions on tone. UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report (20121). 189–204.
Iosad, Pavel. 2015. Pitch accent and prosodic structure in Scottish Gaelic: Reassessing the role of contact. In Martin Hilpert, Janet Duke, Christine Mertzlufft, Jan-Ola Östman & Michael Rießler (eds.), New trends in Nordic and general linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Jespersen, Otto. 1913. Lehrbuch der Phonetik. Leipzig/Berlin: BG Teubner.
Jong, Kenneth J. de. 1995. The supraglottal articulation of prominence in English: Linguistic stress as localized hyperarticulation. Journal of Acoustical Society of America 971. 491–504.
Jong, Kenneth J. de. 2004. Stress, lexical focus, and segmental focus in English: Patterns of variation in vowel duration. Journal of Phonetics 321. 493–516.
Kager, René & Violeta Martínez-Paricio. 2014. Antepenultimate mora effects: Typology and representation. Paper presented at the Workshop on Word Stress and Accent, Leiden, The Netherlands, August 17.
Kehrein, Wolfgang. 2007. Moraic stress in Franconian – and elsewhere. Paper presented at Phonetics and Phonology 4, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, October 8.
Kehrein, Wolfgang. Forthcoming. There’s no tone in Cologne: Against tone segment interactions in Franconian. In Wolfgang Kehrein, Björn Köhnlein, Paul Boersma & Marc van Oostendorp (eds.), Segmental structure and tone. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Kingston, John. 2011. Tonogenesis. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, 2304–2333. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. ’
Kiparsky, Paul. Forthcoming. Livonian stød. In Wolfgang Kehrein, Björn Köhnlein, Paul Boersma & Marc van Oostendorp (eds.), Segmental structure and tone. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Kohler, Klaus J. 2001. Überlänge im Niederdeutschen? In Robert Peters, Horst P. Pütz & Ulrich Weber (eds.), Vulpis Adolatio. Festschrift für Hubertus Menke zum 60. Geburtstag, 385–402. Heidelberg: C. Winter.
Köhnlein, Björn. 2011. Rule reversal revisited: Synchrony and diachrony of tone and prosodic structure in the Franconian dialect of Arzbach. Utrecht: LOT Dissertation Series.
Köhnlein, Björn. 2013. Optimizing the relation between tone and prominence: Evidence from Franconian, Scandinavian, and Serbo-Croatian tone accent systems. Lingua 1311. 1–28.
Köhnlein, Björn. Forthcoming. Synchronic alternations between monophthongs and diphthongs in Franconian: A metrical approach. In Wolfgang Kehrein, Björn Köhnlein, Paul Boersma & Marc van Oostendorp (eds.), Segmental structure and tone. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Köhnlein, Björn. Manuscript. Tone accent does not imply lexical tone: Revisiting Estonian overlength. Leiden: Leiden University.
Kortlandt, Frederik. 2007. The origin of the Franconian tone accents. Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 63(1). 1–3.
Kuck, Walther. 1925. Die nordöstliche Sprachgrenze des Ermlandes. Teuthonista 21. 91–106.
Kuck, Walther & Peter Wiesinger. 1965. Die nordöstliche Sprachgrenze des Ermlandes. Deutsche Dialektgeographie 561. 107–171.
Lahiri, Aditi & B. Elan Dresher. 1999. Open syllable lengthening in West Germanic. Language 75(4). 678–719.
Laver, John. 1994. Principles of phonetics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Leben, William R. 1973. Suprasegmental phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.
Lehiste, Ilse. 1960. Segmental and syllabic quantity in Estonian. American Studies in Uralic Linguistics 11. 21–82.
Lehiste, Ilse. 1976. Influence of fundamental frequency pattern on the perception of duration. Journal of Phonetics 41. 113–117.
Lehiste, Ilse. 1978. Polytonicity in the area surrounding the Baltic Sea. Nordic Prosody 11. 237–247.
Lehiste, Ilse. 2003. Prosodic change in progress: From quantity language to accent language. In Paula Fikkert & Haike Jacobs (eds.), Development in prosodic systems, 47–66. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Lehiste, Ilse & Douglas G. Danforth. 1977. Foneettisten vihjeiden hierarkia viron kvantiteetin havaitsemisessa. Virittäjä 81(4). 404–411.
Lehiste, Ilse & Pavle Ivić. 1986. Word and sentence prosody in Serbocroatian. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lehnert-LeHouillier, Heike. 2007. The influence of dynamic F0 on the perception of vowel duration: Cross-linguistic evidence. In Jürgen Trouvain & William J. Barry (eds.), Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences [ICPhS], 757–760. Dudweiler, Germany: Pirrot.
Liberman, Mark. 1975. The intonational system of English. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.
Liiv, Georg. 1961. Eesti keele kolme vältusastme vokaalide kestus ja meloodiatüübid. Keel ja Kirjandus 4(7–8). 412–424.
Lindblom, Björn. 1990. Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In William J. Hardcastle & Alain Marchal (eds.), Speech production and speech modeling (NATO ASI Series D: Behavioural and Social Sciences 55), 403–439. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Lippus, Pärtel, Karl Pajusalu & Jüri Allik. 2009. The tonal component of Estonian quantity in native and non-native perception. Journal of Phonetics 37(4). 388–396.
Lippus, Pärtel, Karl Pajusalu & Jüri Allik. 2011. The role of pitch cue in the perception of the Estonian long quantity. In Sónia Frota, Gorka Elordieta & Pilar Prieto (eds.), Prosodic categories: Production, perception and comprehension (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 82), 231–242. Dordrecht: Springer.
Lippus, Pärtel & Jaan Ross. 2011. Has Estonian quantity system changed in a century? Comparison of historical and contemporary data. In Wai-sum Lee & Eric Zee (eds.), Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences [ICPhS], 1262–1265. Hong Kong: Department of Chinese, Translation and Linguistics, City University of Hong Kong.
Meyer, Ernst A. 1896–1897. Zur Tonbewegung des Vokals im gesprochenen und gesungenen Einzelwort. Die neueren Sprachen 41. 1–21.
Meyer, Ernst A. 1903. Englische Lautdauer: Eine experimentalphonetische Untersuchung. Leipzig: Harrassowitz.
Miglio, Viola G. 1999. Interactions between markedness and faithfulness constraints in vowel systems. College Park, MD: University of Maryland dissertation.
Miglio, Viola G. 2005. Markedness and faithfulness in vowel systems. London: Psychology Press.
Morén, Bruce. 2005. Danish stød and Eastern Norwegian pitch accent: The myth of lexical tones. Paper presented at the 13th Manchester Phonology Meeting (mfm 13), Manchester, UK, May 26.
Morén, Bruce. 2007. Central Swedish pitch accent: A retro approach. Paper presented at the 4th Old World Conference in Phonology (OCP 4), Rhodes, Greece, January 19.
Morén-Duolljá, Bruce. 2013. The prosody of Swedish underived nouns: No lexical tones required. Nordlyd 40(1). 196–248.
Münch, Ferdinand. 1904. Grammatik der ripuarisch-fränkischen Mundart. Bonn: Cohen.
Niekerken, Walther. 1954. Zu den Problemen der Zweisprachigkeit im niederdeutschen Raum (mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des Nordniedersächsischen). Niederdeutsches Jahrbuch 761. 64–76.
Nörrenberg, Konstatin. 1884. Ein niederrheinisches accentgesetz. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 91. 402–412.
Odden, David. 1997. Some theoretical issues in Estonian prosody. In Ilse Lehiste & Jaan Ross (eds.), Estonian prosody: Papers from a symposium, 165–195. Tallinn: Institute of Estonian Language.
Ohala, John J. 1978. Production of tone. In Victoria A. Fromkin (ed.), Tone: A linguistic survey, 5–39. New York: Academic Press.
Ohala, John J. 1993. The phonetics of sound change. In Charles Jones (ed.), Historical linguistics: Problems and perspectives, 237–278. London: Longman.
Oostendorp, Marc van. Forthcoming. Tone, final devoicing and assimilation in Moresnet. In Wolfgang Kehrein, Björn Köhnlein, Paul Boersma & Marc van Oostendorp (eds.), Segmental structure and tone. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Peeters, Wim & Bert Schouten. 1989. Die Diphthongierung der westgermanischen î-und û-Laute im Limburgischen. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 56(3). 309–318.
Peters, Jörg. 2006. The Cologne word accent revisited. In Michiel de Vaan (ed.), Germanic tone accents. First International Workshop on Franconian Tone Accents, Leiden, 13–14 June 2003 (Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik, Beiheft 131), 107–133. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
Peters, Jörg. 2008. Tone and intonation in the dialect of Hasselt. Linguistics 461. 983–1018.
Pisoni, David B. 1976. Fundamental frequency and perceived vowel duration. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 59(1). 39.
Plüschke, Mareike. 2013. Peak alignment in Estonian. Munich: Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich dissertation.
Prehn, Maike. 2012. Vowel quantity and the fortis-lenis distinction in North Low Saxon. Utrecht: LOT Dissertation series.
Prince, Alan S. 1980. A metrical theory for Estonian quantity. Linguistic Inquiry 111. 511–562.
Remmel, Mart. 1975. The phonetic scope of Estonian: Some specifications. Preprint KKI-5. Tallinn: Academy of Sciences of the Estonian S.S.R., Institute of Language and Literature.
Rietveld, Toni, Joop Kerkhoff & Carlos Gussenhoven. 2004. Word prosodic structure and vowel duration in Dutch. Journal of Phonetics 32(3). 349–371.
Rosen, Stuart M. 1977. The effect of fundamental frequency patterns on perceived duration. Speech Transmission Laboratory Quarterly Progress and Status Report 11. 17–30.
Ruscher, Maria D.H. 1983. On the phenomenon of Schleifton in the dialect of Heikendorf. Burnaby, BC: Simon Fraser University MA thesis.
Schmidt, Jürgen E. 1986. Die Mittelfränkischen Tonakzente (Rheinische Akzentuierung) (Mainzer Studien zur Sprach- und Volksforschung 8). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
Schmidt, Jürgen E. 2002. Die sprachhistorische Genese der mittelfränkischen Tonakzente. In Peter Auer, Peter Gilles & Helmut Spiekermann (eds.), Silbenschnitt und Tonakzente (Linguistische Arbeiten 463), 201–233. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Shaul, David L. 2006. Tonogenesis in a Piman variety. Sells/Tucson, AZ: Venito Garcia Library and Archives (Tohono O’odham Nation) & University of Arizona manuscript.
Stuhrmann, Johann. 1895–1898. Das Mitteldeutsche in Ostpreussen. Barms: Deutsch-Krone.
Teras, Pire. 2010. Quantity in Leivu. Linguistica Uralica 11. 1–16.
Ternes, Elmar. 1981. Über Herkunft und Verbreitung der Überlänge in deutschen Dialekten. In Wolfgang U. Dressler, Оskar E. Pfeiffer & John R. Rennison (eds.), Phonologica 1980, 379–386. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft.
Teßmann, Wilhelm. 1969. Kurze Laut- und Formenlehre des Hochpreußischen (des Oberländischen und des Breslauschen). Jahrbuch d. Albertus-Universität zu Königsberg/Preußen 191. 115–171.
Wells, John C. 1981. Accents of English. London: Longman.
Werth, Alexander. 2011. Perzeptionsphonologische Grundlagen der Prosodie. Eine Analyse der mittelfränkischen Tonakzentdistinktion (Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik, Beiheft 143). Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
Wijk, Nicolaas van. 1935. De klinkerrekking en de stoottoon voor stemhebbende medeklinkers in het Limburgs en in andere dialekten en talen. Nieuwe Taalgids 291. 405-41l.
Wijk, Nicolaas van. 1936. Rekking en stoottoon in het Limburgs. Onze Taaltuin 51. 179–183.
Wijk, Nicolaas van. 1939. De Rijns-Limburgse polytonie, vergeleken met de Kasjoebse. Onze Taaltuin 81. 146–152.
Yu, Alan C.L. 2010. Tonal effects on perceived vowel duration. Laboratory Phonology 101. 151–168.
Zhang, Jie. 2001. The effects of duration and sonority on contour tone distribution: Typological survey and formal analysis. Los Angeles: UCLA dissertation.
Cited by (7)
Cited by seven other publications
Bowern, Claire, John Charles Smith, Betsy Sneller, Meredith Tamminga, Jadranka Gvozdanović, John A. Goldsmith, Götz Keydana & Juliette Blevins
2024. What word-prosodic typology is missing: Motivating foot structure as an analytical tool for syllable-internal prosodic oppositions. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 42:3 ► pp. 1043 ff.
Lu, Yu-An & Sang-Im Lee-Kim
2021. The effect of linguistic experience on perceived vowel duration: Evidence from Taiwan Mandarin speakers. Journal of Phonetics 86 ► pp. 101049 ff.
Morrison, Donald Alasdair
2019. Metrical structure in Scottish Gaelic: tonal accent, glottalisation and overlength. Phonology 36:3 ► pp. 391 ff.
Köhnlein, Björn
2016. Contrastive foot structure in Franconian tone-accent dialects. Phonology 33:1 ► pp. 87 ff.
Köhnlein, Björn
2018. Apparent exceptions to final devoicing in High Prussian: A metrical analysis. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 30:4 ► pp. 371 ff.
Köhnlein, Björn
2020. Tone Accent in North and West Germanic. In The Cambridge Handbook of Germanic Linguistics, ► pp. 143 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.