Cover not available
Article published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 32:2 (2015) ► pp.268–276

notes / notizen — discussion / diskussion

Reply to Sampson (2013)

Published online: 15 October 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.32.2.04kap
References (25)
Baerman, Matthew. 2011. Defectiveness and homophony avoidance. Journal of Linguistics 47(1). 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Becker, Michael, Nihan Ketrez & Andrew Nevins. 2011. The surfeit of the stimulus: Analytic biases filter lexical statistics in Turkish laryngeal alternations. Language 87(1). 84–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blevins, Juliette & Andrew Wedel. 2009. Inhibited sound change: An evolutionary approach to lexical competition. Diachronica 26(2). 143–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bouchard-Cotê, Alexandre, David Hall, Thomas L. Griffiths & Dan Klein. 2013. Automated reconstruction of ancient languages using probabilistic models of sound change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110(11). 4224–4229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crosswhite, Katherine. 1999. Intra-paradigmatic homophony avoidance in two dialects of Slavic. In Matthew K. Gordon (ed.), Papers in phonology 2 (UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics 1), 48–67. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Gessner, Suzanne & Gunnar Ólafur Hansson. 2004. Anti-homophony effects in Dakelh (Carrier) valence morphology. In Marc Ettlinger, Nicholas Fleischer & Mischa Park-Doob (eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 93–104. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Gilliéron, Jules. 1918. Généalogie des mots qui désignent l’abeille d’apres l’atlas linguistique de la France. Paris: É. Champion.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce & James White. 2013. Phonological naturalness and phonotactic learning. Linguistic Inquiry 44(1). 45–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hockett, Charles F. 1967. The quantification of functional load. Word 231. 320–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ichimura, Larry K. 2006. Anti-homophony blocking and its productivity in transparadigmatic relations. Boston, MA: Boston University dissertation.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Abby. 2011. How much homophony is normal? Journal of Linguistics 47(3). 631–671. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, Abby & Yuka Muratani. Forthcoming. Categorical and gradient homophony avoidance: Evidence from Japanese. Laboratory Phonology 6(2). DOI logo
Kenstowicz, Michael. 2002. Paradigmatic uniformity and contrast. In Aniko Csirmaz, Zhiqiang Li, Andrew Nevins, Olga Vaysman & Michael Wagner (eds.), Phonological answers (and their corresponding questions) (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 42), 141–163. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
King, Robert D. 1967. Functional load and sound change. Language 43(4). 831–852. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kisseberth, Charles W. & Mohammad Imam Abasheikh. 1974. A case of systematic avoidance of homonyms. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 4(1). 107–124.Google Scholar
Martinet, André. 1952. Function, structure, and sound change. Word 8(1). 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondon, Jean-François. 2009. The nature of homophony and its effects on diachrony and synchrony. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania dissertation.Google Scholar
Moreton, Elliott. 1997. Phonotactic rules in speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 102(5). 3091. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muratani, Yuka. 2014. Categorical and gradient homophony avoidance: Evidence from Japanese. Paper presented at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Linguistics Colloquium, March 22.
Paster, Mary. 2010. The role of homophony avoidance in morphology: A case study from Mixtec. Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics 211. 29–39.Google Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey. 2013. A counterexample to homophony avoidance. Diachronica 30(4). 579–591. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverman, Daniel. 2010. Neutralization and anti-homophony in Korean. Journal of Linguistics 46(2). 453–482. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Neutralization (Key Topics in Phonology). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wedel, Andrew, Scott Jackson & Abby Kaplan. 2013a. Functional load and the lexicon: Evidence that syntactic category and frequency relationships in minimal lemma pairs predict the loss of phoneme contrasts. Language and Speech 56(3). 395–417. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wedel, Andrew, Abby Kaplan & Scott Jackson. 2013b. High functional load inhibits phonological contrast loss: A corpus study. Cognition 128(2). 179–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Ko, Edwin
2023. On the origins of multiple exponence in Crow. Diachronica 40:1 ► pp. 73 ff. DOI logo
Rangelov, Tihomir, Mary Walworth & Julie Barbour
2023. A multifaceted approach to understanding unexpected sound change. Diachronica 40:3 ► pp. 384 ff. DOI logo
Sims-Williams, Helen & Hans-Olav Enger
2021. The loss of inflection as grammar complication. Diachronica 38:1 ► pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
Sampson, Geoffrey
2019. An unaddressed phonological contradiction. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 6:2 ► pp. 221 ff. DOI logo
Yin, Sora Heng & James White
2018. Neutralization and homophony avoidance in phonological learning. Cognition 179 ► pp. 89 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.