Linkage models of language diversification (Ross 1988, François 2014) represent the slow differentiation of closely related sister languages via dialect continua. Such historical relationships are said to prevent the reconstruction of branchinternal phylogeny. A newly defined mode of linkage variation challenges this restriction. In cladistic hinge diversification, speakers of a geographically central variety mediate innovations between isolated extremes of a sub-branch, while all three daughter branches maintain evidence of their own exclusive innovations. The resulting pattern blends linkage relations with family relations. Following a contextual review, the paper presents supporting evidence for the distinction from the Phowa languages of southwest China (Ngwi < Burmic < Tibeto-Burman). Data analysis includes sociohistory, dialectometry and genetic linguistic components. The argument affirms both wave and tree models of language change, enabling an enriched understanding of focal, relic and transition areas and their influence on the leveling, development and diffusion of linguistic innovations.
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & Robert M.W. Dixon (eds.). 2001. Areal diffusion and genetic inheritance: Problems in comparative linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Anttila, Raimo. 1994. Collaterality and genetic linguistics. In Michael Shapiro (ed.), The Peirce Seminar papers: Essays in semiotic analysis, vol. 21, 29–46. Providence, RI: Berghahn Books.
Bailey, Charles-James N. 1973. Variation and linguistic theory. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Bailey, Charles-James N. 1974. Naturalness in historical reconstruction and changes that are not natural. In Anthony Bruck, Robert A. Fox & Michael W. LaGaly (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Natural Phonology, April 18, 1974, 13–29. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.
Bailey, Charles-James N. 1996. Conceptualizing dialects as implicational constellations rather than as entities bounded by isoglossic bundles. In Peter Mülhäusler (ed.), Essays on time-based linguistic analysis, 118–150. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Bowern, Claire. 2013. Relatedness as a factor in language contact. Journal of Language Contact 6(2). 411–432.
Bowern, Claire, Patience Epps, Russell Gray, Jane Hill, Keith Hunley, Patrick McConvell & Jason Zentz. 2011. Does lateral transmission obscure inheritance in hunter-gatherer languages?PloS ONE 6(9), e25195. 1–9.
Bowern, Claire & Quentin Atkinson. 2012. Computational phylogenetics and the internal structure of Pama-Nyungan. Language 88(4). 817–845.
Bradley, David. 1979. Proto-Loloish (Scandinavian Institute of Asian Studies Monograph 39). London: Curzon Press.
Bradley, David. 1995. Grammaticalization of extent in Mran-Ni. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 18(1). 1–28.
Bradley, David. 1997. What did they eat? Grain crops of the Burmic groups. Mon-Khmer Studies 271. 161–170.
Bradley, David. 2002. The subgrouping of Tibeto-Burman. In Christopher Beckwith & Henk Blezer (eds.), Medieval Tibeto-Burman languages (International Association for Tibetan Studies Proceedings 9 and Brill Tibetan Studies Library 2), 73–112. Leiden: Brill.
Bradley, David. 2012. The characteristics of the Burmic family of Tibeto-Burman. Language and Linguistics 13(1). 171–192.
Bryant, David & Vincent Moulton. 2004. Neighbor-Net: An agglomerative method for the construction of phylogenetic networks. Molecular Biology and Evolution 21(2). 255–265.
Chambers, James K. & Peter Trudgill. 1998. Dialectology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chao, Yuanren. 1930. A system of tone letters. Le Maître Phonétique 301. 24–27.
Croft, William. 1990. Typology and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Croft, William. 2000. Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. Essex: Longman.
Dixon, Robert M.W. 1997. The rise and fall of languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dixon, Robert M.W. 2002. Australian languages: Their nature and development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Edmondson, Jerold A. 2002. Phu Kha, Xá Phó, Mantsi, Coong, Sila, Lahu, Hani, and Proto-Loloish data List. Online: [URL] (1 July 2005).
Edmondson, Jerold A. 2003. Three Tibeto-Burman languages of Vietnam. In David Bradley, Boyd Michailovsky, Randy LaPolla & Graham Thurgood (eds.), Language variation: Papers on variation and change in the Sinosphere and in the Indosphere in honour of James A. Matisoff, 305–320. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
François, Alexandre. 2014. Trees, waves and linkages: Models of language diversification. In Claire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans (eds.), The Routledge handbook of historical linguistics, 161–189. New York: Routledge.
Fried, Robert Wayne. 2000. A preliminary phonological sketch of Phu-kha, a Tibeto-Burman language spoken in northern Vietnam. University of Texas, Arlington, MA thesis.
Gray, Russell D., David Bryant & Simon J. Greenhill. 2010. On the shape and fabric of human history. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London, B: Biological Sciences 3651. 3923–3933.
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1957 [2005]. The problem of linguistic subgroupings. In William Croft (ed.), Genetic linguistics: Essays on theory and method, 47–58. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Greenhill, Simon J., Thomas E. Currie & Russell D. Gray. 2009. Does horizontal transmission invalidate cultural phylogenies?Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2761. 2299–2306.
Greenhill, Simon J., Quentin D. Atkinson, Andrew Meade & Russell D. Gray. 2010. The shape and tempo of language evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2771. 2443–2450.
Hamp, Eric P. 1998. Whose were the Tocharians? Linguistic subgrouping and diagnostic idiosyncrasy. In Victor H. Mair (ed.), The Bronze Age and Early Iron Age peoples of eastern Central Asia, 307–346. Washington, D.C.: Institute for the Study of Man.
Heeringa, Wilbert & John Nerbonne. 2001. Dialect areas and dialect continua. Language Variation and Change 13(3). 375–400.
Heggarty, Paul, Warren Maguire & April McMahon. 2010. Splits or waves? Trees or webs? How divergence measures and network analysis can unravel language histories. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 3651. 3829–3843.
Heine, Bernd. 2011. Areas of grammaticalization and geographical typology. In Osamu Hieda, Christa König & Hiroshi Nakagawa (eds.), Geographical typology and linguistic areas: With special reference to Africa, 41–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
HHYC, Editorial Committee (eds.). 2002. 红河彝族辞典Hónghé Yízǔ cídiǎn [An encyclopedic dictionary on the Yi nationality of Honghe Prefecture]. Kunming: Yunnan Minzu Chubanshe.
Hieda, Osamu, Christa König & Hiroshi Nakagawa (eds.). 2011. Geographical typology and linguistic areas: With special reference to Africa (Tokyo University of Foreign Studies, Studies in Linguistics 2). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hock, Hans Henrich. 1991. Principles of historical linguistics, 2nd edn. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Holden, Clare J. & Russell D. Gray. 2006. Rapid radiation, borrowing, and dialect continua in the Bantu languages. In Peter Forster & Colin Renfrew (eds.), Phylogenetic methods and the prehistory of languages, 19–31. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archeological Research.
Huson, Daniel H. 1998. SplitsTree: A program for analyzing and visualizing evolutionary data. Bioinformatics 14(10). 68–73. [URL]
Huson, Daniel H. & David Bryant. 2010. SplitsTree4, version 4.11.3. Downloaded from [URL] (1 February 2011).
Kalyan, Siva & Alexandre François. Forthcoming. Freeing the comparative method from the tree model: A framework for historical glottometry. In Ritsuko Kikusawa & Lawrence A. Reid (eds.), Let’s talk about trees: Tackling problems in representing phylogenetic relationships among languages (Senri Ethnological Studies). Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology, [URL]. (2 July 2015).
Kessler, Brett. 2001. The significance of wordlists (Dissertations in Linguistics). Stanford: CLSI Publications.
Labov, William. 2007. Transmission and diffusion. Language 83(2). 344–387.
LaPolla, Randy J. 2012. Comments on methodology and evidence in Sino-Tibetan comparative linguistics. Language and Linguistics 13(1). 117–132.
Levinson, Stephen C. & Russell D. Gray. 2012. Tools from evolutionary biology shed new light on the diversification of languages. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16(3). 167–173.
Matisoff, James A. 1972. The Loloish tonal split revisited (Research Monograph 7). Berkeley: Center for South and Southeast Asia Studies.
Matisoff, James A. 1978. Variational semantics in Tibeto-Burman (Occasional Papers of the Wolfenden Society on Tibeto-Burman Linguistics 6). Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.
Matisoff, James A. 1983. Linguistic diversity and language contact. In John McKinnon & Wanat Bhruksasri (eds.), Highlanders of Thailand, 56–86. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Matisoff, James A. 1991. Sino-Tibetan linguistics: Present state and future prospects. Annual Review of Anthropology 201. 469–504.
Matras, Yaron. 2009. Language contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Meillet, Antoine. 1925 [1967]. La méthode comparative en linguistique historique[The comparative method in historical linguistics]. Translated by Gordon B. Ford, Jr. Paris: Librairie Honoré Champion.
Nerbonne, John. 2009. Data-driven dialectology. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(1). 175–198.
Nichols, Johanna. 1996. The comparative method as heuristic. In Mark Durie & Malcolm Ross (eds.), The comparative method reviewed, 39–71. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pelkey, Jamin. 2008. The Phula languages in synchronic and diachronic perspective. Melbourne: La Trobe University Ph.D. dissertation.
Pelkey, Jamin. 2011a. Dialectology as dialectic: Interpreting Phula variation (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 229). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Pelkey, Jamin. 2011b. A Phula comparative lexicon: Phola, Phuza, Muji, Phowa, Azha (SIL Language and Culture Documentation and Description 18). Dallas: SIL International.
Pelkey, Jamin. 2014. Diagnostic dialectology: Interpreting Ngwi variation in China’s Red River valley. In Alena Barysevich, Alexandra d’Arcy & David Heap (eds.), Proceedings of Methods XIV: Papers from the Fourteenth International Conference on Methods in Dialectology, 2011 (Bamberg Studies in English Linguistics 57), 236–248. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Ross, Malcolm D. 1997. Social networks and kinds of speech-community events. In Roger Blench & Matthew Spriggs (eds.), Archaeology and language 1: Theoretical and methodological orientations, 209–261. London: Routledge.
Ross, Malcolm D. 1988. Proto Oceanic and the Austronesian languages of western Melanesia. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Roth, Tim. 2011. The genetic classification of Wungu: Implications for Bantu historical linguistics. Langley, BC: Trinity Western University MA Thesis.
Schmidt, Johannes. 1872. Die Verwandschaftsverhältnisse der indogermanischen Sprachen. Weimar: Böhlau.
Shafer, Robert. 1974. Introduction to Sino-Tibetan, vol. 11. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
Sober, Elliott. 1991. Reconstructing the past: Parsimony, evolution, and inference. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Thomason, Sarah Grey & Terrence Kaufman. 1988. Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Trudgill, Peter. 1989. Contact and isolation in linguistic change. In Leiv E. Breivik & Ernst H. Jahr (eds.), Language change: Contributions to the study of its causes (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 43), 227–237. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
Trudgill, Peter. 1992. Dialect typology and social structure. In Ernst H. Jahr (ed.), Language contact: Theoretical and empirical studies, 195–212 (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 60). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Yang, Cathryn. 2012. Classifying Lalo languages: Subgrouping, phonetic distance and intelligibility. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 35(2). 113–137.
2018. Benedikt Szmrecsanyi, Grammatical variation in British English dialects: A study in corpus-based dialectometry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. xvii+211. 2013 hardback ISBN 9781107003453 and 2015 paperback ISBN 9781107515772.. English Language and Linguistics 22:01 ► pp. 183 ff.
Salmons, Joseph
2017. The Anglo-Frisian Relationship as Contact and Linkage. Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 77:1-2 ► pp. 377 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.