Cover not available
Review published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 6:1 (1989) ► pp.123–136
Book review

Raimo Anttila. Historical and Comparative Linguistics. Raimo Anttila. [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 6]. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1989. xv, 462 pp.

Reviewed by
| Memorial University of Newfoundland
Published online: 1 January 1989
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.6.1.09bub
References (25)
References
Anderson, Stephen R. 1988. “Morphological Change”. Linguistics: The Cam-bridge Survey ed. by Frederick J. Newmeyer. Vol.11: Linguistic Theory: Foundations, 324–362. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Anttila, Raimo. 1972. Introduction to Historical and Comparative Linguistics. New York: Macmillan; London: Collier-Macmillan.Google Scholar
. 1977. Analogy. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Bynon, Theodora. 1977. Historical Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Gerald L. & Joseph Wallfield. 1985. “Etymology of Greek agap-‘love’”. Indogermanische Forschungen 901.99–103.Google Scholar
Dik, Simon C. 1978. Functional Grammar. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Dressier, Wolfgang. 1988. “Language Death”. Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey ed. by Frederick J. Newmeyer. Vol. IV1: Language: The socio-cultur-al context, 184–192. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Paul. 1975. Proto-Indo-European Syntax. (= JIES Monograph , 11.) Butte, Mont.: Montana Coll. of Mineral Science & Technology.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1984. Syntax: A functional-typological introduction. Amster-dam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 1983. Word Order Universals. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich. 1976. Review of Anttila (1972). Language 521.202–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1986. Principles of Historical Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1966. “Slavic Epic Verse”. Selected Writings, vol.IV1, 414–463. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Jeffers, Robert J. & Ilse Lehiste. 1979. Principles and Methods for Historical Linguistics. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1979. PEnini as a Variationist. Poona: Poona Univ. Press.Google Scholar
. 1988. “Phonological Change”. Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey ed. by Frederick J. Newmeyer, Vol.11: Linguistic Theory: Foundations, 363–415. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Klein, Ernest. 1988. A Comprehensive Etymological Dictionary of the Hebrew Language for Readers of English. Jerusalem: Carta.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1980. On Explaining Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred P. 1973. Historical Linguistics: An introduction. 2nd ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. (First ed., 1962.)Google Scholar
1986. A Gothic Etymological Dictionary. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Parry, Milman. 1971 [1933]. The Making of Homeric Verse: The collected papers of Milman Parry. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Shipley, Joseph T. 1984. The Origins of English Words. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Szemerényi, Oswald J. L. 1978. Review of Anttila (1972). Lingua 441.302–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thumb, Albert & Eduard Kieckers. 1932. Handbuch der griechischen Diaekte. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Vincent, Nigel. 1975. Review of Anttila (1972). Journal of Linguistics 111. 343–347.Google Scholar