Dialogue – The Mixed Game
Author
The ‘Mixed Game Model’ represents a holistic theory of dialogue which starts from human beings’ competence-in-performance and describes how language is integrated in a general theory of human action and behaviour. Human beings are able to adapt to changing conditions and to pursue their interests by the integrated use of various communicative means, mainly verbal, perceptual and cognitive. The core unit is the dialogic action game or ‘the mixed game’ with human beings at the centre acting and reacting in cultural surroundings. The key to opening up the complex whole is human beings’ nature. The Mixed Game Model demonstrates how the different disciplines of the natural and social sciences and the humanities are mutually interconnected. After a detailed overview of the state of the art, the fundamentals of the theory are laid down. They include a typology of action games which ranges from minimal games to complex institutional games. The description is illustrated by analyses of authentic games.
[Dialogue Studies, 10] 2010. xii, 304 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Preface | pp. xi–xii
-
Introduction: The simple and the complex | pp. 1–8
-
I. Rethinking theory: Patterns & beyond
-
1. The state of the art | pp. 11–38
-
2. The turning point in theorizing: Starting from the integrated whole | pp. 39–50
-
II. The Theory of Dialogic Action Games or the Mixed Game Model
-
1. Premises about the object: From human affairs to language | pp. 55–70
-
2. The methodology: Principles of Probability | pp. 71–124
-
3. To sum up: The mixed game of human competence-in-performance | pp. 125–126
-
III. Minimal action games or the issue of a speech act taxonomy
-
1. Minimal versus complex action games | pp. 129–130
-
2. Controversial issues in setting up a taxonomy of speech acts: The state of the art | pp. 131–140
-
3. The issue of a dialogic taxonomy of speech acts | pp. 141–206
-
4. To sum up | p. 207
-
IV. The architecture of complex action games
-
1. Extending the minimal game | pp. 211–228
-
2. Complex human affairs: Dialogue in the stream of life | pp. 229–250
-
3. Literary action games or touching on the mystery of life | pp. 251–266
-
4. To sum up: Dialogue in human affairs | pp. 267–268
-
Summary and outlook: Towards an understanding of the dialogic species | pp. 269–272
-
-
Appendix | pp. 289–296
-
Index | pp. 297–304
“Professor Weigand’s new book marks a fundamental renewal of the language sciences and most notably linguistic pragmatics by developing a new theory of ‘language as dialogue’ which conforms to recent discoveries in neuroscience. She lays out the principles which constitute dialogic action in its fundamentals and draws up a typology of ‘dialogic action games’, by means of which she fundamentally renews classical speech act theory. This is an extremely important book: informed, rigorously argued, innovative, and free of dogmatism. It proposes a new paradigm for the social sciences and humanities that will inspire researchers who are looking for an approach that will unify the human sciences and the natural sciences.”
Alain Trognon, Professor of Social Psychology at Nancy University
“Dialogue - The Mixed Game embraces the complexity of life and uses it to reveal the beauty of language as it unfolds in human interactions. Edda Weigand’s book gives us a fresh perspective on dialogue and language and shows the many points in common between human language and human performance. Its implications are both theoretical and methodological. If you are interested in language, you must study who’s speaking it: human beings.”
Marco Iacoboni, Professor of Psychiatry at UCLA and author of Mirroring People
“Professor Edda Weigand’s new book “Dialogue - The Mixed Game” offers an entirely new look at language use. It focuses on the complexity of human communication in a holistic approach by analyzing how human beings tackle the challenges of social life in dialogic interaction. Dr. Weigand claims that language use cannot be separated from the use of other human abilities. Consequently, only an integrative approach can explain the complexity of human dialogic interaction. The book is full of intriguing ideas, insightful observations and makes a rigorous analysis of language use. It certainly is a must read to all who are interested in any aspect of language.”
Istvan Kecskes, Professor of Linguistics and Communication, State University of New York, Albany
“Weigand succeeds in proposing an innovative theory of language-in-use named the “Mixed Game Model” that severs ties to traditional speech act theory in an attempt toward a more holistic understanding of human interaction. Her model is truly interdisciplinary and includes linguistic, sociological, and biological premises as the foundation for her claims. [...] Ultimately, Weigand’s book expands the way that linguists understand dialogue by bringing the human actors engaging it to the forefront. Her theory is pragmatic to the core, and heralds the return of humanist concerns to the study of linguistic dialogue studies. Because of the intense interdisciplinary composition of this theory, audiences interested in Weigand’s work will likely come from various fields. [...] Weigand has written a book that will undoubtedly provoke some and inspire others. Her willingness to challenge paradigmatic assumptions is to be lauded, and her insistence upon the inclusion of a fully rational, skilled human actor is refreshing. Furthermore, unlike many books that claim interdisciplinary roots, Weigand’s writing in this book allows individuals from disciplines other than linguistics entrance into her complex ideas by developing her ideas logically and incrementally.”
Jennifer L. Adams, DePauw University, USA, in Journal of Language and Social Psychology Vol. 31:2 (2012) pag. 226-229
Cited by
Cited by 163 other publications
Adams, Jennifer L.
Agyekum, Kofi
2017. The language of Akan herbal drug sellers and advertisers. Language and Dialogue 7:3 ► pp. 360 ff. 
Alhedayani, Rukayah, Reem Alkhammash & Anastassia Zabrodskaja
2023. Crises information dissemination through social media in the UK and Saudi Arabia: A linguistic perspective. PLOS ONE 18:5 ► pp. e0284857 ff.
Barrios Rodríguez, María Auxiliadora
2022. Meaning and function of Spanish formulemes and pragmatemes vs. illocutionary verbs. Russian Journal of Linguistics 26:4 ► pp. 1031 ff.
Bartesaghi, Mariaelena & Jessica M.F. Hughes
Bencherki, Nicolas & Coline Sénac
2023. Instrumental dialogue and the ethics of expressing solicitude for each other’s existence. Language and Dialogue 13:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Bondi, Marina
Bondi, Marina
2018. Dialogicity in written language use. In From Pragmatics to Dialogue [Dialogue Studies, 31], ► pp. 137 ff.
Bondi, Marina
2018. Try to prove me wrong : Dialogicity and audience involvement in economics blogs. Discourse, Context & Media 24 ► pp. 33 ff.
Bondi, Marina & Jessica Jane Nocella
Botaș, Adina
2023. A dialogic speech act approach to ridiculing references in the French presidential debate of 2022. Language and Dialogue 13:3 ► pp. 364 ff.
Bull, Peter
2016. Claps and claptrap: The analysis of speaker-audience interaction in political speeches. Journal of Social and Political Psychology 4:1 ► pp. 473 ff.
Capone, Alessandro & Jacob L. Mey
2016. Introduction: Pragmatics, Linguistics, and Sociocultural Diversity. In Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 4], ► pp. 1 ff.
Caronia, Letizia
2018. Research interview as social interaction. In From Pragmatics to Dialogue [Dialogue Studies, 31], ► pp. 83 ff.
Caronia, Letizia
2021. Language, culture and social interaction. In Language and Social Interaction at Home and School [Dialogue Studies, 32], ► pp. 1 ff.
Caronia, Letizia & Arturo Chieregato
Caronia, Letizia & Franca Orletti
Carretero, Marta
2014. Chapter 2. The role of authorial voice in professional and non-professional reviews of films. In Dialogicity in Written Specialised Genres [Dialogue Studies, 23], ► pp. 55 ff.
Carretero, Marta
2023. The Expression of Epistemicity in British Internet Discussion Forums in Contrast with Newspaper Opinion Articles and Political Speeches. Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies :32/2 ► pp. 43 ff.
Carretero, Marta, Carmen Maíz-Arévalo & M. Ángeles Martínez
2014. “Hope This Helps!” An Analysis of Expressive Speech Acts in Online Task-Oriented Interaction by University Students. In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2014 [Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, 2], ► pp. 261 ff.
Carretero, Marta, Carmen Maíz-Arévalo & M. Ángeles Martínez
2015. An Analysis of Expressive Speech Acts in Online Task-oriented Interaction by University Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 173 ► pp. 186 ff.
Castor, Theresa
2024. Review of Hughes & Bartesaghi (2023): Disability in Dialogue. Language and Dialogue 14:1 ► pp. 152 ff.
Castor, Theresa R.
Cañada, Maria Dolors & Carmen López-Ferrero
Chen, Huey-Rong
Choi, Hyangmi & Peter Bull
Chovanec, Jan
2017. Gil-Salom & Soler-Monreal, eds. (2014). Dialogicity in Written Specialised Genres. English Text Construction 10:1 ► pp. 165 ff.
Cienki, Alan
2017. Utterance Construction Grammar (UCxG) and the variable multimodality of constructions. Linguistics Vanguard 3:s1
Colomina-Almiñana, Juan J.
Cooren, François
2018. Review of Weigand (2017): The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue. Language and Dialogue 8:3 ► pp. 468 ff.
Cooren, François
Do, Hoa, Tran Huu Thuy Giang & Ket Mai
Dolata-Zaród, Anna
2021. Text operators as dialogical mechanisms in judgments of the French Court of Cassation. Language and Dialogue 11:2 ► pp. 173 ff.
Dolón, Rosana
2014. Chapter 6. A corpus-based study of the discursive creation of a child consumer identity in official tourist information websites vs. opinion forums. In Dialogicity in Written Specialised Genres [Dialogue Studies, 23], ► pp. 165 ff.
Doomen, Jasper
Druzhinin, Andrey S., Tom Scholte & Tatiana A. Fomina
2024. (Im)politeness mismatches in the multi-dialogic pragmatics of telecinematic satire. Language and Dialogue 14:1 ► pp. 33 ff.
Dumitrescu, Domnita
Duncker, Dorthe
El-Dakhs, Dina Abdel Salam
El-Dakhs, Dina Abdel Salam
2021. #StayHome – A pragmatic analysis of COVID-19 health advice in Saudi and Australian tweets. Language and Dialogue 11:2 ► pp. 223 ff.
El-Dakhs, Dina Abdel Salam & Mervat M. Ahmed
El-Dakhs, Dina Abdel Salam & Mervat M. Ahmed
2023. A pragmatic analysis of students’ complaints and professors’ responses to complaints: A case study of an Egyptian private university. Cogent Arts & Humanities 10:1
El-Dakhs, Dina Abdel Salam, Jawaher Nasser Al-Haqbani, Manal A. Althaqafi & Shorouq Al-Fouzan
El-Dakhs, Dina Abdel Salam & Nermine Galal Ibrahim
2023. The realization of the speech acts of complaint and responding to complaint in Vodafone Egypt versus Vodafone
UK. Language and Dialogue 13:3 ► pp. 336 ff.
Ellederová, Eva
2022. Information technology students’ involvement in in-class debates: Speech acts and modification of the illocutionary force. Discourse and Interaction 15:2 ► pp. 28 ff.
Feldman, Ofer & Ken Kinoshita
Feller, Sebastian
2014. Designing a Cognitive Speech Act Taxonomy for Dialogic Teaching and Learning: Explorative Action Games for Conceptual Change Learning. Journal of Language Teaching and Research 5:3
Feller, Sebastian
2014. Uncertainty as integrated part of meaning and understanding. In Communicating Certainty and Uncertainty in Medical, Supportive and Scientific Contexts [Dialogue Studies, 25], ► pp. 99 ff.
Feller, Sebastian
Feller, Sebastian
2014. Teaching and learning as explorative action games. Guidelines for the design of dialogic educational technology. In Educating in Dialog [Dialogue Studies, 24], ► pp. 223 ff.
Feller, Sebastian
Feller, Sebastian
2015. Dialogic knowledge building in learning communities. In Dialogue in Multilingual and Multimodal Communities [Dialogue Studies, 27], ► pp. 195 ff.
Femers-Koch, Susanne & Stefanie Molthagen-Schnöring
2018. Einführung: Das Spiel mit dem Text – Spielarten, Spielregeln, Spielerfinder. In Textspiele in der Wirtschaftskommunikation, ► pp. 7 ff.
Femers-Koch, Susanne & Stefanie Molthagen-Schnöring
2018. Rhetorik in der Unternehmenskommunikation – Vom strategischen Gebrauch der Sprache. In Textspiele in der Wirtschaftskommunikation, ► pp. 309 ff.
Fialkoff, Yonatan & Amit Pinchevski
Flowerdew, John
Furkó, Bálint Péter
Fusari, Sabrina
2021. Chapter 10. Student-teacher e-mail interaction as asynchronous dialogue in an academic setting. In Language and Social Interaction at Home and School [Dialogue Studies, 32], ► pp. 351 ff.
Garcia, Angela Cora
Gea-Valor, Maria-Lluïsa
2014. Chapter 4. From ‘Readers may be left wondering’ to I’m genuinely puzzled’. In Dialogicity in Written Specialised Genres [Dialogue Studies, 23], ► pp. 113 ff.
Gonzalez Rodriguez, Milton Fernando
Grein, Marion
2013. Review of Sharifian (2011): Cultural Conceptualisations and Language. Theoretical Framework and Applications. Language and Dialogue 3:3 ► pp. 490 ff.
Grein, Marion
2013. Review of Wilson & Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (2012): Dynamicity in Emotion Concepts. Language and Dialogue 3:2 ► pp. 299 ff.
Grein, Marion
Grein, Marion
Grein, Marion
2018. Progress in language teaching. In From Pragmatics to Dialogue [Dialogue Studies, 31], ► pp. 61 ff.
Grein, Marion
Guo, Yijing, I.A. Khan, S.N.F.B. Mohd Noor & D. Rad
2023. Exploring the Use of Austin’s Theory of Illocutionary Acts in Different Social Interactions. SHS Web of Conferences 171 ► pp. 01009 ff.
He, Zhongqing
2021.
From pragmatics to dialogue
. Intercultural Pragmatics 18:5 ► pp. 687 ff.
He, Zhongqing
2023. Edda Weigand and Istvan Kecskés: From Pragmatics to Dialogue
. Intercultural Pragmatics 20:2 ► pp. 213 ff.
Heidari, Afroozeh, Hossein Heidari Tabrizi, Azizeh Chalak & Jeroen van de Weijer
2020. Using short stories vs. video clips to improve upper intermediate EFL students’ sociopragmatic knowledge: Speech acts in focus. Cogent Arts & Humanities 7:1 ► pp. 1778977 ff.
Hoinărescu, Liliana
2018. Definition as an argumentative strategy in parliamentary discourse. Language and Dialogue 8:2 ► pp. 209 ff.
Hu, Yanwei
2024. A socio-cognitive reinterpretation of Grice’s theory of conversation. Intercultural Pragmatics 21:1 ► pp. 99 ff.
Ivanova, E. A., N. Chernova & N. V. Katakhova
2020. Pragmatic-Technological Integral for Academic Texts Build. In Proceeding of the International Science and Technology Conference "FarEastСon 2019" [Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 172], ► pp. 407 ff.
Izutsu, Katsunobu & Mitsuko Narita Izutsu
2021. Chapter 3. Presentation followed by negotiation. In Pragmatic Markers and Peripheries [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 325], ► pp. 77 ff.
Jones, Peter E.
2018. Integrationist reflections on the place of dialogue in our communicational universe. Language and Dialogue 8:1 ► pp. 118 ff.
Katambwe, Jo M.
Kecskes, Istvan
2016. Can Intercultural Pragmatics Bring Some New Insight into Pragmatic Theories?. In Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 4], ► pp. 43 ff.
Kecskes, Istvan
2019. English as a Lingua Franca,
Kohn, Ayelet
Koike, Dale A.
2015. Changing frames in native speaker and learner talk. In Dialogue in Multilingual and Multimodal Communities [Dialogue Studies, 27], ► pp. 253 ff.
Lam, Phoenix W.Y.
2015. Review of Măda & Săftoiu (2012): Professional Communication across Languages and Cultures. Pragmatics and Society 6:1 ► pp. 147 ff.
Lazzeretti, Cecilia & Maria Cristina Gatti
2023. Dialogic interaction between player and non-player characters in animal crossing. Language and Dialogue 13:1 ► pp. 81 ff.
Lejeune, Guillaume
2014. Early Romantic hopes of dialogue. In Literature as Dialogue [Dialogue Studies, 22], ► pp. 251 ff.
Linell, Per
Linell, Per
Linell, Per
Lipari, Lisbeth A.
2018. Humboldt, Bhartrihari, and the dialogic. In From Pragmatics to Dialogue [Dialogue Studies, 31], ► pp. 29 ff.
Létourneau, Alain
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
2015. The contextual component in a dialogic FDG. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 249 ff.
Mason, Jon
2014. The why dimension, dialogic inquiry, and technology supported learning. In Educating in Dialog [Dialogue Studies, 24], ► pp. 51 ff.
Maíz-Arévalo, Carmen
2017. Expressive Speech Acts in Educational e-chats. Pragmática Sociocultural / Sociocultural Pragmatics 5:2 ► pp. 151 ff.
Moghaddam, Mostafa Morady
Morady Moghaddam, Mostafa
2019. Direct and Indirect Reports. In The Praxis of Indirect Reports [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 21], ► pp. 81 ff.
Morady Moghaddam, Mostafa
2019. Conclusion and Future Concerns. In The Praxis of Indirect Reports [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 21], ► pp. 197 ff.
Morady Moghaddam, Mostafa
2019. Appraising and reappraising of compliments and the provision of responses. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 410 ff.
Morady Moghaddam, Mostafa
2019. Preliminaries. In The Praxis of Indirect Reports [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 21], ► pp. 1 ff.
Morady Moghaddam, Mostafa
2019. Politeness in Indirect Reporting. In The Praxis of Indirect Reports [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 21], ► pp. 137 ff.
Morady Moghaddam, Mostafa
2019. Sociocognitive vs. Structural Issues. In The Praxis of Indirect Reports [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 21], ► pp. 21 ff.
Morady Moghaddam, Mostafa
2019. Towards a Cognitively-Mediated Conceptualisation of the Cooperative Principle: An Introduction to the Maxim of Diplomacy. In Further Advances in Pragmatics and Philosophy: Part 2 Theories and Applications [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 20], ► pp. 469 ff.
Morady Moghaddam, Mostafa
2019. Principles Governing Indirect Reports. In The Praxis of Indirect Reports [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 21], ► pp. 119 ff.
Morady Moghaddam, Mostafa
2019. Philosophical Considerations. In The Praxis of Indirect Reports [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 21], ► pp. 49 ff.
Molthagen-Schnöring, Stefanie
2012. Review of Handford (2010): The Language of Business Meetings. Language and Dialogue 2:3 ► pp. 479 ff.
Morady Moghaddam, Mostafa & Seyyed Ali Ostovar-Namaghi
2022. Metapragmatics in indirect reports. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 32:3 ► pp. 381 ff.
Morgenstern, Aliyah, Stéphanie Caët, Camille Debras, Pauline Beaupoil-Hourdel & Marine Le Mené
2021. Chapter 1. Children’s socialization to multi-party interactive practices. In Language and Social Interaction at Home and School [Dialogue Studies, 32], ► pp. 45 ff.
Morrow, Raymond Allen & Carlos Alberto Torres
2019. Rereading Freire and Habermas. In The Wiley Handbook of Paulo Freire, ► pp. 239 ff.
Mustajoki, Arto
2017. Chapter 3. Why is miscommunication more common in everyday life than in lingua franca conversation?. In Current Issues in Intercultural Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 274], ► pp. 55 ff.
Măda, Stanca
2015. Markers of argumentation in intercultural professional discourse. In Persuasive Games in Political and Professional Dialogue [Dialogue Studies, 26], ► pp. 201 ff.
Nasi, Nicola
2022. Practices of inclusion/exclusion in and through classroom dialogue. Language and Dialogue 12:2 ► pp. 306 ff.
Nasi, Nicola
Neagu, Maria-Ionela
2015. Political debates. In Persuasive Games in Political and Professional Dialogue [Dialogue Studies, 26], ► pp. 85 ff.
Ogiermann, Eva & Spyridoula Bella
Okulska, Urszula
2022. Discourse approaches to the study of dialogue and culture(s). Language and Dialogue 12:2 ► pp. 169 ff.
Orman, Jon
Pablé, Adrian
Parker, Darlene Ciuffetelli & Debbie Pushor
Pileri, Anna
2021. Chapter 6. Dialogicity in diapers. In Language and Social Interaction at Home and School [Dialogue Studies, 32], ► pp. 221 ff.
Popescu, Carmen
2014. Subjectivity and the dialogic self. In Literature as Dialogue [Dialogue Studies, 22], ► pp. 197 ff.
Redekopp, Reynold
2014. Education and our conversations about, with and through technology. In Educating in Dialog [Dialogue Studies, 24], ► pp. 3 ff.
Sanders, Robert E. & Anita Pomerantz
2018. Bounded segments of interaction. In From Pragmatics to Dialogue [Dialogue Studies, 31], ► pp. 113 ff.
Santamaría-García, Carmen
2015. Review of Gil-Salom & Soler-Monreal (2014): Dialogicity in written specialised genres. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 28:2 ► pp. 647 ff.
Soler-Monreal, Carmen & Luz Gil-Salom
2014. Chapter 1. Academic voices and claims. In Dialogicity in Written Specialised Genres [Dialogue Studies, 23], ► pp. 23 ff.
Suau-Jiménez, Francisca
2014. Chapter 5. Dialogic voices of writers and readers in traveller forums through interpersonality. In Dialogicity in Written Specialised Genres [Dialogue Studies, 23], ► pp. 137 ff.
Săftoiu, Răzvan
Săftoiu, Răzvan
2018. Adriana Bolívar. 2018. Political Discourse as Dialogue. A Latin American Perspective
. Language and Dialogue 8:3 ► pp. 483 ff.
Săftoiu, Răzvan
Săftoiu, Răzvan
2020. Angela Smith & Michael Higgins, The Language of Journalism. A Multi-genre Perspective, 2nd edition, Bloomsbury, London, 2020, 224 p.. Diacronia :12
Săftoiu, Răzvan
2020. Angela Smith & Michael Higgins, The Language of Journalism. A Multi-genre Perspective, 2nd edition, Bloomsbury, London, 2020, 224 p.. Diacronia :12
Săftoiu, Răzvan
2021. Review of Pickering & Garrod (2021): Understanding Dialogue. Language Use and Social Interaction. Language and Dialogue 11:3 ► pp. 493 ff.
Săftoiu, Răzvan
SĂFTOIU, RĂZVAN
2023. A Case Study of the Speech Act Apology in Romanian. Studii și cercetări lingvistice 2023:2 ► pp. 275 ff.
Săftoiu, Răzvan & Adrian Toader
2018. The persuasive use of pronouns in action games of election campaigns. Language and Dialogue 8:1 ► pp. 21 ff.
Săftoiu, Răzvan & Noémi Tudor
Teubert, Wolfgang
Teubert, Wolfgang
Thibault, Paul J.
Vasilescu, Andra
2023. Yes(Rom.Da). Usages and functions in L2 proficiency examinations. Language and Dialogue 13:3 ► pp. 427 ff.
Vasilyeva, Alena L.
2015. Identity as a resource to shape mediation in dialogic interaction. Language and Dialogue 5:3 ► pp. 355 ff.
Vasilyeva, Alena L.
2016. Confrontation and collaboration in the course of the election debate. Language and Dialogue 6:3 ► pp. 370 ff.
Vasilyeva, Alena L.
2024. Review of Lewiński & Aakhus (2023): Argumentation in Complex Communication: Managing Disagreement in a Polylogue. Language and Dialogue 14:1 ► pp. 163 ff.
Wanphet, Phalangchok & Jalila Sfaxi
2019. Exploring bilingual children’s integration of gestures into talk-in-interaction. Language and Dialogue 9:3 ► pp. 349 ff.
Wei, Lifang & Zhongyi Xu
2021. Review of Weigand & Kecskes (2018): From pragmatics to dialogue. Pragmatics and Society 12:3 ► pp. 510 ff.
Weigand, Edda
2011. Paradigm changes in linguistics: from reductionism to holism. Language Sciences 33:4 ► pp. 544 ff.
Weigand, Edda
Weigand, Edda
2015. Persuasion or the integration of grammar and rhetoric. In Persuasive Games in Political and Professional Dialogue [Dialogue Studies, 26], ► pp. 1 ff.
Weigand, Edda
Weigand, Edda
Weigand, Edda
Weigand, Edda
Weigand, Edda
Weigand, Edda
Weigand, Edda
Weigand, Edda
2021. Language and dialogue in philosophy and science. Intercultural Pragmatics 18:4 ► pp. 533 ff.
Weigand, Edda
Weigand, Edda
Weigand, Edda & Istvan Kecskes
Wu, Guangting
2020. Mostafa Morady Moghaddam，The praxis of indirect reports: cognitive, sociopragmatic, and philosophical issues
. Pragmatics and Society 11:3 ► pp. 489 ff.
Yengin, Ilker & Martin Saerbeck
2012. 2012 International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET), ► pp. 1 ff.
Yus, Francisco
2014. Chapter 7. Interactions with readers through online specialised genres. In Dialogicity in Written Specialised Genres [Dialogue Studies, 23], ► pp. 189 ff.
Zubrzycki, Kamil
2021. Identity, agency and intercultural dialogic competencies in L2 ultimate attainment. Language and Dialogue 11:3 ► pp. 433 ff.
[no author supplied]
2011. PUBLICATIONS RECEIVED. Language in Society 40:4 ► pp. 535 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Communication Studies
Philosophy
Psychology
Main BIC Subject
CFG: Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General