Part of
Literature as Dialogue: Invitations offered and negotiated
Edited by Roger D. Sell
[Dialogue Studies 22] 2014
► pp. 99114
References (32)
References:
Asibong, Andrew and Shirley Jordan (eds). 2009. Marie NDiaye: l’ étrangeté à l’oeuvre . Revue des Sciences Humaines 293 (1).Google Scholar
Craps, Stef. 2008. “Linking Legacies of Loss: Traumatic Histories and Cross-Cultural Empathy in Caryl Phillips’s Higher Ground and The Nature of Blood .” Studies in the Novel 40 (1&2): 191-202. A revised version of this essay was also published in Caryl Phillips: Writing in the Key of Life. Bénédicte Ledent and Daria Tunca (eds). Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi: 155-172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
D’Aguiar, Fred. 1989. “Descent into Madness.” Third World Quarterly 11 (4): 286-288.Google Scholar
Evaristo, Bernardine. 2012. Review of Three Strong Women by Marie NDiaye. Independent. 26 May.Google Scholar
Flagel, Nadine. 2011. “Testing Relation: Breaking and Balancing Testimonies of Prisoner, Slave, and Holocaust Survivor in Caryl Phillips’s Higher Ground .” English Studies in Canada 37 (1): 31-61. [URL], accessed on 20 February 2013. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Maurice. 2009. “The Outreach of Dialogue.” Journal of Humanistic Psychology 49: 409-418. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halloran, Vivian Nun. 2009. Exhibiting Slavery: The Caribbean Postmodern Novel as Museum. Charlottesville and London: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Herman, David. 2008. “Narrative Theory and the Intentional Stance.” Partial Answers: Journal of Literature and the History of Idea 6 (2): 233-260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaggi, Maya. 2012. Review of Three Strong Women by Marie NDiaye. Guardian. 6 July. [URL], accessed on 8 August 2012.Google Scholar
Kuurola, Mirja. 2007. “Caryl Phillips’s Cambridge: Discourses in the Past and Readers in the Present.” NJES: Nordic Journal of English Studies 6 (2): 129-144.Google Scholar
Ledent, Bénédicte. 1992. “Voyages into Otherness: Cambridge and Lucy .” Kunapipi 14 (2): 53-63.Google Scholar
. 1996. “Is Counter-Discursive Criticism Obsolescent? Intertextuality in Caryl Phillips’s Higher Ground .” In A Talent(ed) Digger: Creations, Cameos, and Essays in Honour of Anna Rutherford.Hena Maes-Jelinek, Gordon Collier and Geoffrey V. Davis (eds).Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi: 301-308.Google Scholar
. 2005. “Slavery Revisited Through Vocal Kaleidoscopes: Polyphony in Novels by Fred D’Aguiar and Caryl Phillips.” In Revisiting Slave Narratives / Les Avatars contemporains des récits d’esclaves. Judith Misrahi-Barak (ed). Montpellier: Université Paul Valéry, Montpellier III, Coll. “Les Carnets du Cerpac”, n°2: 281-293.Google Scholar
Letsch, Nathalie. 2010. “Procédés de distanciation chez Marie NDiaye: En famille (1991), Rosie Carpe (2001), Mon cœur à l’étroit (2007).” Mémoire de master, Université de Neuchâtel. [URL], accessed on 10 March 2013.
McLeod, John. 2011. “Sounding Silence: Transculturalism and its Thresholds.” Transnational Literature 4 (1): 1-13. [URL], accessed on 6 March 2013.Google Scholar
Murray, Stuart. 2004. “Bartleby, Preference, Pleasure and Autistic Presence.” [URL], accessed on 22 February 2013.
Najar, Imen. 2012Caryl Phillips’s ‘Heartland’ and Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness: Revisiting Fear - An Intertextual Approach.” In Caryl Phillips: Writing in the Key of Life. Bénédicte Ledent & Daria Tunca (eds). Amsterdam & New York: Rodopi: 139-151.Google Scholar
NDiaye, Marie. 2009a. Trois femmes puissantes. Paris: Gallimard. 2012. Three Strong Women. Translation by John Fletcher. London: Maclehose Press Quercus.Google Scholar
. 2009b. “Entretien avec Marie NDiaye” [by Angie David]. La Revue littéraire 41 (September): 1. [URL], accessed on 25 March 2012.Google Scholar
Phillips, Caryl. 1989. Higher Ground. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
. 2012. “‘Who are you calling a foreigner?’: Caryl Phillips in Conversation with John McLeod.” In New Perspectives on the Black Atlantic: Definitions, Readings, Practices, Dialogues. Bénédicte Ledent and Pilar Cuder-Domínguez (eds). Bern: Peter Lang: 275-294.Google Scholar
Rimmon-Kenan, Shlomith. 1983. Narrative Fiction: Contemporary Poetics. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Said, Edward W. 1994 [1993]. Culture and Imperialism. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
Sarvan, Charles P. and Hasan Marhama. 1991. “The Fictional Works of Caryl Phillips: An Introduction.” World Literature Today 65 (1): 35-40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sell, Roger. 2000. Literature as Communication: The Foundation of Mediating Criticism. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011a. Communicational Criticism: Studies in Literature as Dialogue. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011b. “Dialogicality and Ethics: Four Cases of Literary Address.” Language and Dialogue 1 (1): 79-104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sell, Roger, Adam Borch and Inna Lindgren (eds). 2013. The Ethics of Literary Communication: Genuineness, Directness, Indirectness. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Dominic. 2010. “The ‘Marie NDiaye Affair’ or the Coming of a Postcolonial Evoluée.” In Transnational French Studies: Postcolonialism and Littérature-monde. Alec G. Hargreaves, Charles Forsdick and David Murphy (eds). Liverpool: Liverpool University Press: 146-163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toker, Leona. 1993. Eloquent Reticence: Withholding Information in Fictional Narrative. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Williams, Thomas Chatterton. 2012. Review of Three Strong Women by Marie NDiaye. San Francisco Chronicle. 20 August. [URL], accessed on 13 March 2013.Google Scholar
Zunshine, Lisa. 2006. Why We Read Fiction: Theory of Mind and the Novel. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Tunca, Daria
2020. “Nobody disappears. People don’t just disappear”: Repetition and negation as dialogic devices in Caryl Phillips’s “Northern Lights”. Journal of Literary Semantics 49:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.