This conceptual paper reflects on the role of ‘subjectivity’ in the analysis of the semantic domain of modality. It offers a critical review of the traditional notions of subjectivity vs. objectivity (including Lyons’ 1977), and it elaborates further on an alternative notion, labeled (inter)subjectivity, as proposed in earlier work (Nuyts 2001b; 2012). The paper spends particular attention to the question of the precise range of applicability of the category of (inter)subjectivity (which extends beyond the modal categories), and to the question of its status in a cognitive semantic theory.
2004Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Benveniste, Émile
1958“De la subjectivité dans le langage.”Journal de Psychologie normale et pathologique 55: 257–265.
Coates, Jennifer
1983The Semantics of the Modal Auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.
DeLancey, Scott
1997“Mirativity.”Linguistic Typology 1: 33–52.
DeLancey, Scott
2001“The Mirative and Evidentiality.”Journal of Pragmatics 33: 369–382.
Fortuin, Egbert
2008“The Construction of Degree in Russian.” In Dutch Contributions to the Fourteenth International Congress of Slavists, ed. by Peter Houtzagers, Janneke Kalsbeek, and Jos Schaeken, 45–108. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Hengeveld, Kees
1988“Illocution, Mood and Modality in a Functional Grammar of Spanish.”Journal of Semantics 6: 227–269.
Hengeveld, Kees
1989“Layers and Operators in Functional Grammar.”Journal of Linguistics 25: 127–157.
Kiefer, Ferenc
1984“Focus and Modality.”Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 24: 55–81.
1999Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: De Gruyter.
López-Couso, María José
2010“Subjectification and Intersubjectification.” In Historical Pragmatics, ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, and Irma Taavitsainen, 127–163. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Lyons, John
1977Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lyons, John
1982“Deixis and Subjectivity.” In Speech, Place and Action, ed. by Robert J. Jarvella, and Wolfgang Klein, 101–124. New York: Wiley.
Matthews, Richard
2003“Modal Auxiliary Constructions, TAM and Interrogatives.” In Modality in Contemporary English, ed. by Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred G. Krug, and F. Robert Palmer, 47–70. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Meier, Cecile
2003“The Meaning of Too, Enough and So…that.” Natural Language Semantics 11: 69–107.
In print. “Analyses of the Modal Meanings.” In The Oxford Handbook of Mood and Modality ed. by Jan Nuyts, and Johan van der Auwera Oxford Oxford University Press
Nuyts, Jan
In prep. Modal and Other Qualifications in Language and Thought. Book ms.
Nuyts, Jan, Pieter Byloo, and Janneke Diepeveen
2010“On Deontic Modality, Directivity, and Mood.”Journal of Pragmatics 42: 16–34.
Palmer, Frank Robert
1979Modality and the English Modals. London: Longman.
Palmer, Frank Robert
1986Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Perkins, Michael
1983Modal Expressions in English. London: Pinter.
Schwarzschild, Roger
2008“The Semantics of Comparatives and Other Degree Constructions.”Language and Linguistics Compass 2: 308–331.
Smet, Hendrik De, and Jean-Christophe Verstraete
2006“Coming to Terms with Subjectivity.”Cognitive Linguistics 17: 365–392.
Traugott, Elizabeth
1989“On the Rise of Epistemic Meanngs in English.”Language 65: 31–55.
Traugott, Elizabeth
2010“(Inter)Subjectivity and (Inter)Subjectification.” In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, ed. by Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte, and Hubert Cuyckens, 29–71. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Traugott, Elizabeth, and Richard Dasher
2002Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Verhagen, Arie
2005Constructions of Intersubjectivity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2007Rethinking the Coordinate-Subordinate Dichotomy. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Watts, Richard
1984“An Analysis of Epistemic Possibility and Probability.”English Studies 65: 129–140.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.