Part of
Communicating Certainty and Uncertainty in Medical, Supportive and Scientific Contexts
Edited by Andrzej Zuczkowski, Ramona Bongelli, Ilaria Riccioni and Carla Canestrari
[Dialogue Studies 25] 2014
► pp. 1330
Aikhenvald, Alexandra
2004Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Émile
1958“De la subjectivité dans le langage.” Journal de Psychologie normale et pathologique 55: 257–265.Google Scholar
Coates, Jennifer
1983The Semantics of the Modal Auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
1997“Mirativity.” Linguistic Typology 1: 33–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001“The Mirative and Evidentiality.” Journal of Pragmatics 33: 369–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fortuin, Egbert
2008“The Construction of Degree in Russian.” In Dutch Contributions to the Fourteenth International Congress of Slavists, ed. by Peter Houtzagers, Janneke Kalsbeek, and Jos Schaeken, 45–108. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees
1988“Illocution, Mood and Modality in a Functional Grammar of Spanish.” Journal of Semantics 6: 227–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1989“Layers and Operators in Functional Grammar.” Journal of Linguistics 25: 127–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiefer, Ferenc
1984“Focus and Modality.” Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 24: 55–81.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald
1990“Subjectification.” Cognitive Linguistics 1: 5–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
López-Couso, María José
2010“Subjectification and Intersubjectification.” In Historical Pragmatics, ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, and Irma Taavitsainen, 127–163. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
1977Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1982“Deixis and Subjectivity.” In Speech, Place and Action, ed. by Robert J. 
Jarvella, and Wolfgang Klein, 101–124. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Matthews, Richard
2003“Modal Auxiliary Constructions, TAM and Interrogatives.” In Modality in Contemporary English, ed. by Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred G. Krug, and 
F. Robert Palmer, 47–70. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Meier, Cecile
2003“The Meaning of Too, Enough and So…that.” Natural Language Semantics 11: 69–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nuyts, Jan
2001aEpistemic Modality, Language, and Conceptualization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001b“Subjectivity as an Evidential Dimension in Epistemic Modal Expressions.” Journal of Pragmatics 33: 383–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005“The Modal Confusion.” In Modality, ed. by Alex Klinge, and Henrik Hoeg Müller, 5–38. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
2006“Modality.” In The Expression of Modality, ed. by William Frawley, 1–26. 
Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
2009“The ‘One-Commitment-per-Clause’ Principle and the Cognitive Status of Qualificational Categories.” Linguistics 47: 141–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012“Notions of (Inter)Subjectivity.” English Text Construction 5: 53–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
In print. “Analyses of the Modal Meanings.” In The Oxford Handbook of Mood and Modality ed. by Jan Nuyts, and Johan van der Auwera Oxford Oxford University Press DOI logo
In prep. Modal and Other Qualifications in Language and Thought. Book ms.
Nuyts, Jan, Pieter Byloo, and Janneke Diepeveen
2010“On Deontic Modality, Directivity, and Mood.” Journal of Pragmatics 42: 16–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Frank Robert
1979Modality and the English Modals. London: Longman.Google Scholar
1986Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Perkins, Michael
1983Modal Expressions in English. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Schwarzschild, Roger
2008“The Semantics of Comparatives and Other Degree Constructions.” Language and Linguistics Compass 2: 308–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smet, Hendrik De, and Jean-Christophe Verstraete
2006“Coming to Terms with Subjectivity.” Cognitive Linguistics 17: 365–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth
1989“On the Rise of Epistemic Meanngs in English.” Language 65: 31–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010“(Inter)Subjectivity and (Inter)Subjectification.” In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, ed. by Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte, and Hubert Cuyckens, 29–71. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth, and Richard Dasher
2002Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Verhagen, Arie
2005Constructions of Intersubjectivity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2007Rethinking the Coordinate-Subordinate Dichotomy. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard
1984“An Analysis of Epistemic Possibility and Probability.” English Studies 65: 129–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willett, Thomas
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Medadian, Gholamreza & Dariush Nejadansari Mahabadi
2018. A More Explicit Framework for Evaluating Objectivity and (Inter)Subjectivity in Modality Domain . Research in Language 16:1  pp. 65 ff. DOI logo
Mélac, Eric
2024. The links between evidentiality, modality, and grammaticalization. Studies in Language 48:3  pp. 513 ff. DOI logo
Peng, Bingzhuan & Zijing Lin
2024. Cognitive Contrastive Study on Subjectivity in Political Discourse. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences 9:1 DOI logo
Van Olmen, Daniël

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.