Part of
Communicating Certainty and Uncertainty in Medical, Supportive and Scientific Contexts
Edited by Andrzej Zuczkowski, Ramona Bongelli, Ilaria Riccioni and Carla Canestrari
[Dialogue Studies 25] 2014
► pp. 5978
References (17)
References
Alberti, Gábor. 2005. “Accessible Referents in “Opaque” Belief Contexts.” In Proc’s of 9th ESSLLI Belief Revision and Dynamic Logic Workshop, ed. by Hans van Ditmarsch, and Andreas Herzig, 1–7. Edinburgh: Heriot-Watt University.Google Scholar
Alberti, Gábor, and Márton Károly. 2012. “Multiple Level of Referents in Information State.” In Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing, CICLing2012, LNCS7181, ed. by Alexander Gelbukh, 349–362. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alberti, Gábor, Márton Károly, and Judit Kleiber. 2010. “The ReALIS Model of Human Interpreters and Its Application in Computational Linguistics.” Proc. of ICSOFT 2010, 5th International Conference on Software and Data Technologies, Athens, Greece, Vol. 2, 468–474. Portugal: SciTePress.Google Scholar
Alberti, Gábor, and Judit Kleiber. 2012. “Where are Possible Worlds? (Arguments for ReALIS).” Acta Linguistica Hungarica 59 (1–2): 3–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Asher, Nicholas, and Alex Lascarides. 2003. Logics of Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bussmann, Hadumod. 1996. Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H., and Richard J. Gerrig. 2007. “On the Pretence Theory of Irony.” In Irony in Language and Thought, ed. by Raymond W. Gibbs, and Herbert L. Colston, 25–33. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Falkenberg, Gabriel. 1982. Lügen. Grundzüge einer Theorie sprachlicher Täuschung. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hans-Martin, Gärtner, and Beáta Gyuris. 2012. “Pragmatic markers in Hungarian: Some introductory remarks.” Acta Linguistica Hungarica 59: 387–426. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W., and Herbert L. Colston. 2007. Irony in Language and Thought. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Grice, Paul. 1975. “Logic and Conversation”. In Syntax and Semantics 3, ed. by Peter Cole, and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kamp, Hans, Josef van Genabith, and Uwe Reyle. 2011. “Discourse Representation Theory.” In Handbook of Philosophical Logic 15, ed. by Dov Gabbay, and Franz Guenthner, 125–394. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Károly, Márton, and Gábor Alberti. 2013. “The Implementation of a ReALIS-based Method of Static Intensional Interpretation.” In Proceedings of KEOD 2013, 5th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Ontology Development (Vilamoura, Portugal, 19–22 September 2013), ed. by Joaquim Filipe, and Jan Dietz, 393–398.Google Scholar
Kleiber, Judit, and Gábor Alberti. In press. “Uncertainty in Polar Questions and Certainty in Answers?” In Certainty–Uncertainty – and the Attitudinal Space in Between, ed. by Sibilla Cantarini, Werner Abraham, and Elisabeth Leiss. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo
Meibauer, Jörg. 2005. “Lying and Falsely Implicating.” Journal of Pragmatics 37: 1373–1399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Posner, Roland. 1980. “Semantics and Pragmatics of Sentence Connectives in Natural Language.” In Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics, ed. by John R. Searle, Ferenc Kiefer, and Manfred Bierwisch, 168–203. Reidel: Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Ruzsa, Imre. 2001. Bevezetés a modern logikába [Introduction to modern logic]. Budapest: Osiris.Google Scholar