Part of
Communicating Certainty and Uncertainty in Medical, Supportive and Scientific ContextsEdited by Andrzej Zuczkowski, Ramona Bongelli, Ilaria Riccioni and Carla Canestrari
[Dialogue Studies 25] 2014
► pp. 79–98
Edited by Andrzej Zuczkowski, Ramona Bongelli, Ilaria Riccioni and Carla Canestrari
[Dialogue Studies 25] 2014
► pp. 79–98
On being certain whether
A puzzle about indirect interrogatives
This contribution deals with the question of why certain predicates, in particular be certain, that normally cannot embed interrogative clauses nevertheless do so when they occur in special contexts. A satisfactory answer to this question requires specifying the general conditions under which predicates can combine with interrogatives. Since, as is well known, such a specification is hard to come by, the larger part of the article is devoted to this question. It will be argued that, counter to the factivity hypothesis, it is reasonable to assume that the restrictions on the combinability of predicates with interrogatives are not rooted in general semantic properties of the predicates, but ultimately in the typical properties of question situations and the knowledge we have of these properties.
References
d’Avis, Franz-Josef
2002 “On the Interpretation of Wh-Clauses in Exclamative Environments.” Theoretical Linguistics 28: 5–32. 
Baker, Carl Leroy
1968 Indirect Questions in English. Urbana: University of Illinois (Ph.D. dissertation).
Bayley, Helen, Ruth Chambers, and Caroline Donovan
2004 The Good Mentoring Toolkit for Healthcare. Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing.
Egré, Paul
2008 “Question-Embedding and Factivity.” In Knowledge and Questions, ed. by Franck Lihoreau, 85–125. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Elliott, Dale
1971 The Grammar of Emotive and Exclamative Sentences in English. Columbus: Ohio State University (Ph.D. dissertation).
1974 “Toward a Grammar of Exclamations.” Foundations of Language 11: 231–246.
Grimshaw, Jane
1979 “Complement Selection and the Lexicon.” Linguistic Inquiry 10: 279–326.
1985 English Wh-Constructions and the Theory of Grammar. New York:
Garland (Ph.D. dissertation. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, 1977).
Guerzoni, Elena
2007 “Weak Exhaustivity: A Pragmatic Account.” Semantics and Linguistic Theory 17: 112–129.
Higginbotham, James
1993 “Interrogatives.” In The View from Building 20, ed. by Kenneth Hale, and Samuel J. Keyser, 195–227. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hölker, Klaus
1981 Zur semantischen und pragmatischen Analyse von Interrogativen.
Hamburg: Buske.
Huddelston, Rodney
1993 “Remarks on the Construction You Won’t Believe Who Ed Has Married.” Lingua 91: 175–184.
Lahiri, Utpal
2002 Questions and Answers in Embedded Contexts. Oxford: O.U.P.
Luther, Martin
2003 (11960) Letters of Spiritual Counsel (trans. and ed. by Theodore G.
Tappert). Vancouver: Regent College Publishing.
Sæbø, Kjell Johan
2007 “A Whether Forecast.” In Logic, Language, and Computation, ed. by Balder David ten Cate, and Henk Zeevat, 189–199. Berlin: Springer.
Zolfagharian, Mohammad Ali
2010 “Identification, Uniqueness and Art Consumption among Bicultural Consumers.” Journal of Consumer Marketing 27: 17–25.
Zuczkowski, Andrzej, Ramona Bongelli, and Ilaria Riccioni
2011 “Proposizione costitutiva di mondo e indicatori linguistici percettivi e cognitivi.” In Dimensionen der Analyse von Texten und Diskursen. Festschrift für János Sándor Petöfi zum achtzigsten Geburstag. Dimensioni dell’analisi di testi e discorsi. Festschrift für János Sándor Petöfi in occasione del suo ottantesimo compleanno, ed. by Klaus Hölker, and Carla Marello, 41–61. Berlin: Lit-Verlag.