Part of
Communicating Certainty and Uncertainty in Medical, Supportive and Scientific Contexts
Edited by Andrzej Zuczkowski, Ramona Bongelli, Ilaria Riccioni and Carla Canestrari
[Dialogue Studies 25] 2014
► pp. 291308
References (59)
References
Bloor, Meriel. 1996. “Academic writing in computer science: a comparison of genres.” In Academic Writing, ed. by Eija Ventola, and Anna Mauranen, 59–87. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bongelli, Ramona, Ilaria Riccioni, Carla Canestrari, Mina Sehdev, Cinzia Buldorini, and 
Andrzej Zuczkowski. 2012. “The Communication of Certainty/Uncertainty and Hedging in Scientific Writing.” In Applied Psycholinguisitcs. Positive Effects and Ethical Perspectives, Vol. II, ed. by Giuseppe Mininni, and Amelia Manuti, 403–408. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Crismore, Avon, Raija Markkanen, and Margaret S. Steffensen. 1993. “Metadiscourse in Persuasive Writing: A Study of Texts Written by American and Finnish University Students.” Written Communication 10 (1): 39–71. Retrieved from [URL], at b-on: 01100 Universidade do Porto on March 14, 2013. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crompton, Peter. 1997. “Hedging in Academic Writing: Some Theoretical Problems.” English for Specific Purposes 16 (4): 271–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Trine. 2004. “Textual Metadiscourse in Research Articles: A Marker of National Culture or of Academic Discipline?” Journal of Pragmatics 36: 1807–1825. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Field, Andy. 2009. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
Figueiredo-Silva, Maria Isabel R. de. 2001. “Teaching Academic Reading: Some Initial Findings from a Session on Hedging.” Proceedings of the Postgraduate Conference 2001 – Department of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics. The University of Edinburgh, 1–13. Retrieved from [URL], on 09-06-2012.
Gardner, Sheena, and Hilary Nesi. 2013. “A Classification of Genre Families in University Student Writing.” Applied Linguistics 34 (1): 25–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, G.N. 1977. “Referencing as Persuasion.” Social Studies of Science 7: 113–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grabe, William, and Robert B. Kaplan. 1997. “On the Writing of Science and the Science of Writing: Hedging in Science Text and Elsewhere.” In Hedging and Discourse. Approaches to the Analysis of a Pragmatic Phenomenon in Academic Texts, ed. by Raija Markkanen, and Hartmut Schröder, 151–167. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Guimarães, Mónica S. de A. 2009. Escrita Acadêmica e Avaliação: o Uso de Reforços e Atenuadores em Artigos Científicos Publicados em Inglês por Pesquisadores Brasileiros [Academic writing and assessment: the use of boosters and hedges in scientific articles published in English by Brazilian researchers] Belo Horizonte: Faculdade de Letras da UFMG. Tese para a obtenção do Título de Doutor em Lingüística Aplicada, 2009. Retrieved from [URL],on 02-06-2012.Google Scholar
Hüttner, Julia. 2008. “The Genre (s) of Student Writing: Developing Writing Models.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 18 (2): 146–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 1994. “Hedging in Academic Writing and EAP Textbooks.” English for Specific Purposes 13 (3): 293–256. Retrieved from [URL], on 26-12-2012. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. “The Author in the Text: Hedging Scientific Writing.” Hong Kong Papers in Linguistics and Language Teaching 18: 33–42. Retrieved from [URL], on 26-12-2012.Google Scholar
. 1996. “Writing without Conviction? Hedging in Science Research Articles.” Applied Linguistics 14 (4): 433–454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998a. “Boosting, Hedging and the Negotiation of Academic Knowledge.” Text 18 (3): 349–382. Retrieved from [URL], 33p., on 30-12-2012.Google Scholar
. 1998b. Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. “Academic Attribution: Citation and the Construction of Disciplinary Knowledge.” Applied Linguistics 20 (3): 341–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000a. Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interaction in Academic Writing. Harlow: Longman/Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Hyland, K. 2000b. “Hedges, Boosters and Lexical Invisibility: Noticing Modifiers in Academic Texts.” Language Awareness 9 (4): 179–197. Retrieved from [URL], on 28-03-2013. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2001. “Humble Servants of the Discipline? Self-mention in Research Articles.” English for Specific Purposes 20: 207–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K. 2006. Medical Discourse: Hedges. Retrieved from [URL], on 26-12-2012.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2008. “Academic Clusters: Text Patterning in Published and Postgraduate Writing.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 18 (1): 41–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Teaching and Researching Writing (2nd ed.). Harlow: Longman/Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken, and Polly Tse. 2004a. “Metadiscourse in Academic Writing: A Reappraisal.” Applied Linguistics 25 (2): 156–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004b. “‘I Would Like to Thank My Supervisor’. Acknowledgements in Graduate Dissertations.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 14 (2): 259–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. “Hooking the Reader: A Corpus Study of Evaluative that in Abstracts.” English for Specific Purposes 24: 123–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. 1997. “Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals.” Public Health Reports. May/June 1997 112: 253–263.Google Scholar
Jalilifar, Alireza. 2012. “Academic Attribution: Citation Analysis in Master’s Theses and Research Articles in Applied Linguistics.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 22 (1): 23–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1973/1972. “Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 2: 458–508.First published in 1972 in Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting, ed. by P. Peranteau, J. Levi, and G. Phares, by Chicago Linguistics Society. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lemke, Jay. 1998. “Multiplying Meaning. Visual and Verbal Semiotics in Scientific Text.” In Reading Science. Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourse of Science, ed. by J.R. Martin, and Robert Veel, 87–113. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Libra, Judy A. 2001. How to Write a Paper. Introduction to Scientific Work Seminar, Module 6. International Study Course Environmental and Resource Management, Brandenburg Technical University Cottbus, Germany.Google Scholar
Luukka, Minna-Riitta, and Raija Markkanen. 1997. “Impersonalization as a Form of Hedging.” In Hedging and Discourse. Approaches to the Analysis of a Pragmatic Phenomenon in Academic Texts, ed. by Raija Markkanen, and Hartmut Schröder, 168–187. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Macedo, Tatiana S. de, and Adriana S. Pagano. 2011. “Análise de citações em textos académicos escritos [An analysis of citations in written academic texts].” D.E.L.T.A. Revista de Documentação de Estudos em Linguística Teórica e Aplicada 27 (2): 257–288.Google Scholar
Markkanen, Raija, Margaret S. Steffensen, and Avon Crismore. 1990. “Quantitative Contrastive Study of Metadiscourse Problems in Design and Analysis of Data.” Papers presented at the XXV Conference of Contrastive Linguistics and Cross-Cultural Studies . Rydzyna, December 6–8. 1990: 137–151. Retrieved from [URL], on 14-3-2013.
Maxwell, Joseph A. 2012. Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications Inc.Google Scholar
McKenna, Bernard. 1997. “How Engineers Write: An Empirical Study of Engineering Report Writing.” Applied Linguistics 18 (2): 189–211. Downloaded from [URL]at Universidade do Porto on January 2, 2013. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meltzoff, Julian. 1998. Critical Thinking About Research: Psychology and Related Fields. Washington, DC: APA.Google Scholar
Morgan, G.M., and M. Henrion. 1990. Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murray, Neil. 2012. Writing Essays in English Language and Linguistics. Principles, Tips and Strategies for Undergraduates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myers, Greg. 1989. “The Pragmatics of Politeness in Scientific Articles.” Applied Linguistics 10 (1): 1–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996. “Strategic Vagueness in Academic Writing.” In Academic Writing, ed. by Eija Ventola, and Anna Mauranen, 3–17. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, Michel. 2006. “More Belles Infidèles – or Why do so Many Bilingual Studies Speak with Forked Tongue?” Journal of Neurolinguistics 19 (3): 195–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piqué-Angordans, Jordi, Santiago Posteguillo, and J.-Vicent Andreu-Besó. 2002. “Epistemic and Deontic Modality: A Linguisitc Indicator of Disciplinary Variation in Academic English.” LSP & Professional Communication 2 (2), October 2002: 49–65. Retrieved from [URL], on 15-03-2013.Google Scholar
Pourjalali, Samaneh, E.M. Skrzynecky, and James C. Kaufman. 2009. “The Creative Writer, Dysphonic Rumination, and Locus of Control.” In The Psychology of Creative Writing, ed. by Scott B. Kaufman, and James C. Kaufman, 23–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ruggeri, Nancy Lee. 2011. Scientific Uncertainty and its Relevance to Science Education. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
Shi, Ling. 2008. “Textual Appropriation and Citing Behaviors of University Undergraduates.” Applied Linguistics 31 (1): 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skelton, John. 1988. “The Care and Maintenance of Hedges.” ELT Journal 42 (1) January: 37–43. Retrieved from [URL], on 26-12-2012. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. “The Representation of Truth in Academic Medical Writing.” Applied Linguistics 18 (2): 121–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swales, John M., Ummul K. Ahmad, Yu-Ying Chang, Daniel Chavez, Dacia F. Dressen, and Ruth Seymour. 1998. “Consider this: The Role of Imperatives in Scholarly Writing.” Applied Linguistics 19 (1): 97–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taş, E. Eda I. 2010. “«In this Paper I Will Discuss…»: Current Trends in Academic Writing.” Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 3: 121–126. Available online at [URL]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Robert B. 2011. Medical Writing. A Guide for Clinicians, Educators, and Researchers (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoff. 2001. “Interaction in Academic Writing: Learning to Argue with the Reader.” Applied Linguistics 22 (1): 58–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Varttala, Teppo. 1999. “Remarks on the Communicative Functions of Hedging in Popular Scientific and Specialist Research Articles on Medicine.” English for Specific Purposes 18 (2): 177–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vassileva, Irena. 1998. “Who am I/Who are We in Academic Writing? A Contrastive Analysis of Authorial Presence in English, German, French, Russian and Bulgarian.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 8 (2): 163–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vázquez, Ignacio, and Diana Giner. 2009. “Writing with Conviction: The Use of Boosters in Modelling Persuasion in Academic Discourses.” Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 22: 219–237. Retrieved from [URL], on 9-06-2012.Google Scholar
Vihla, Minna. 1999. Medical Writing. Modality in Focus. Amsterdam – Atlanta, GA: Editions Rodopi B.V.Google Scholar
Vold, Eva T. 2006. “Epistemic Modality Markers in Research Articles: A Cross-linguistic and Cross-disciplinary Study.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 16 (1): 61–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yngve, Victor H. 1986. “To be a Scientist.” The Thirteenth Linguistic Association of Canada and the United States (LACUS) Forum 1986 The Presidential Address . Texas: University of Texas at Arlington, August 12–16, 1986. 21p.
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Ningrum, Panggih Kusuma & Iana Atanassova
2024. Annotation of scientific uncertainty using linguistic patterns. Scientometrics 129:10  pp. 6261 ff. DOI logo
Pastore, Luigi & Sara Dellantonio
2016. Modelling Scientific Un/Certainty. Why Argumentation Strategies Trump Linguistic Markers Use. In Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology [Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, 27],  pp. 137 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.