Part of
Persuasive Games in Political and Professional Dialogue
Edited by Răzvan Săftoiu, Maria-Ionela Neagu and Stanca Măda
[Dialogue Studies 26] 2015
► pp. 318
References (17)
References
Burke, Kenneth. 1950. A Rhetoric of Motives. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Damasio, Antonio. 2000. The Feeling of What Happens. Body, Emotion and the Making of Consciousness. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
Gell-Mann, Murray. 1994. The Quark and the Jaguar. Adventures in the Simple and the Complex. London: Abacus.Google Scholar
Iacoboni, Marco. 2008. Mirroring People. The New Science of How We Connect with Others. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.Google Scholar
Lausberg, Heinrich. 2000. Elemente der Literarischen Rhetorik. München: Hueber.Google Scholar
Perelman, Chaïm. 1977. L’empire Rhétorique. Rhétorique et Argumentation. Paris: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Ramachandran, Vilayanur. 2003. The Emerging Mind. London: Profile Books Ltd.Google Scholar
Rapaille, Clotaire. 2007. The Culture Code. An Ingenious Way to Understand Why People Around the World Buy and Live as They Do. New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar
Rizzolatti, Giacomo, and Michael A. Arbib. 1998. “Language within Our Grasp.” Trends in Neurosciences 21 (5): 188–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. 1983. Reason in Human Affairs. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen. 2001. Return to Reason. Cambridge/ Mass., London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Peter Houtlosser. 1999. “Strategic Manoeuvring in Argumentative Discourse.” Discourse Studies 1: 479–497. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weigand, Edda. 2002. “Constitutive Features of Human Dialogic Interaction: Mirror Neurons and What They Tell Us About Human Abilities.” In Mirror Neurons and the Evolution of Brain and Language, ed. by Maxim Stamenov, and Vittorio Gallese, 229–248. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. “Argumentation: The Mixed Game.” Argumentation 20 (1): 59–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed). 2008. Dialogue and Rhetoric. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Language as Dialogue. From Rules to Principles of Probability, ed. by Sebastian Feller. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Kayam, Orly
2018. Donald Trump’s rhetoric. Language and Dialogue 8:2  pp. 183 ff. DOI logo
Săftoiu, Răzvan & Adrian Toader
2018. The persuasive use of pronouns in action games of election campaigns. Language and Dialogue 8:1  pp. 21 ff. DOI logo
Agyekum, Kofi
2017. The language of Akan herbal drug sellers and advertisers. Language and Dialogue 7:3  pp. 360 ff. DOI logo
Agyekum, Kofi
2024. The ethnopragmatics of Akan leave-takings and farewells. Language and Dialogue 14:3  pp. 403 ff. DOI logo
Weigand, Edda
2016. How to verify a theory of dialogue. Language and Dialogue 6:3  pp. 349 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.