Cover not available
Part of
Persuasive Games in Political and Professional Dialogue
Edited by Răzvan Săftoiu, Maria-Ionela Neagu and Stanca Măda
[Dialogue Studies 26] 2015
► pp. 249–274

Persuading through narratives

A multimodal analysis of the Council of Europe photo exhibition “Break the silence on domestic violence”

 | University of Naples Federico II (Italy)
Following the tradition of Critical Discourse Analysis and Social Semiotics, this paper seeks to identify the linguistic and visual tools of persuasion in the Council of Europe photo exhibition “Break the silence on domestic violence” by looking at the way in which they interact to produce a persuasive message. In particular, the investigation focuses on narratives, which are one of the most powerful persuasive strategies available. They can combine different modalities and many voices in a single event and can have different functions: informative, self-presentational, entertaining, or, as in this case, persuasive. In this campaign material narratives evoke images and help European citizens to feel strong emotions associated with the stories represented. The text analysis helps to reveal that verbal and pictorial narratives are employed as a persuasive instrument to raise awareness on human rights by facilitating identification with the victims of abuses.
Published online: 1 October 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.26.12zol
References (40)
References
Abbott, Porter H. 2002. The Cambridge Introduction to Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
. 1999. “The Problem of Speech Genres.” In The Discourse Reader, ed. by Adam Jaworski, and Nicholas Coupland, 236–251. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. 1977. Image, Music, Text (essays selected and translated by Stephen Heath). London: Fontana Press.Google Scholar
Bauman, Robert, and Charles L. Briggs. 1990. “Poetics and Performance as Critical Perspectives on Language and Social Life.” Annual Review of Anthropology 19: 59–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bell, Allan. 1999. “News Stories as Narratives.” In The Discourse Reader, ed. by Adam Jaworski, and Nicholas Coupland, 236–251. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay K. 2004. Worlds of Written Discourse: A Genre-Based View. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Billig, Michael. 1985. “Prejudice, Categorization and Particularization: From a Perceptual to a Rhetorical Approach.” European Journal of Social Psychology 15: 79–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1987. Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1991. Ideology and Opinions. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. 2005. Discourse. A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borchers, Timothy. A. 2005. Persuasion in the Media Age. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Chouliaraki, Lilie. 2006. Spectatorship of suffering. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Chouliaraki, Lilie, and Norman Fairclough. 1999. Discourse in Late Modernity. Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Clapham, Andrew. 2007. Human Rights: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dijk, Teun A. van. 2001. “Multidisciplinary CDA: A Plea for Diversity.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 95–120. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van, Rob Grootendorst, Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, J. Anthony Blair, Ralph H. Johnson, Erik C.W. Krabbe, Christian Plantin, Douglas N. Walton, Charles A. Willard, John Woods, and David Zarefsky. 1996. Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. London: Polity.Google Scholar
. 1993. “Critical Discourse Analysis and the Marketization of Public Discourse: The Universities.” Discourse and Society 4 (2): 133–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Language and Globalization. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2011. “Discursive Hybridity and Social Change in Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Genre(s) on the Move: Hybridization and Discourse Change in Specialized Communication. ed. by Srikant Sarangi, Vanda Polese, and Giuditta Caliendo, 11–26. Napoli: ESI.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman, and Ruth Wodak. 1997. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Discourse as Social Interaction. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, Vol. 2, ed. by Teun A. van Dijk, 103–136. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman, Jane Mulderrig, and Ruth Wodak. 2011. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Discourse Studies. A Multidisciplinary Introduction, ed. by Teun. A. van Dijk, 357–378. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hodge, Robert, and Gunther Kress. 1988. Social Semiotics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Iedema, Rick. 2003. “Multimodality, Resemiotization: Extending the Analysis of Discourse as Multi-semiotic Practice.” Visual Communication 2 (1): 29–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaworski, Adam, and Nicholas Coupland. 1999. “Introduction: Perspectives on Discourse Analysis.” In The Discourse Reader, ed. by Adam Jaworski, and Nicholas Coupland, 158–166. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kitis, Eliza. 1997. “Ads – Part of our Lives: Linguistic Awareness of Powerful Advertising.” Word and Image 13 (1): 304–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen. 1996. Reading Images: the Grammar of Visual Design. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2001. Multimodal Discourse. The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 2006. “The Transformation of Experience in Narrative.” In The Discourse Reader (2nd ed.), ed. by Adam Jaworski, and Nicholas Coupland, 214–226. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Labov, William, and Joshua Waletzky. 1997. “Narrative Analysis: Oral Versions of Personal Experience.” Journal of Narrative and Life History. Special Issue 7 (1-4): 3–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leeuwen, Theo van. 2002. “The Representation of Social Actors.” In Critical Discourse Analysis. Critical Concepts in Linguistics, ed. by Michael J. Toolan, 302–339. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Leeuwen, Theo van, and Ruth Wodak. 1999. “Legitimizing Immigration Control: A Discourse-historical Analysis.” Discourse Studies 1 (1): 83–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linell, Per. 1998. “Discourse across Boundaries: On Recontextualisations and the Blending of Voices in Professional Discourse.” Text 18 (2): 143–157.Google Scholar
Machin, David. 2007. Introduction to Multimodal Analysis. London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar
Nelson, Jameer., Allan Megill, and David McClosky (eds). 1987. The Rhetoric of the Human Sciences. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Paisley, William. J. 2001. “Public Communication Campaigns. The American Experience.” In Public Communication Campaigns (3rd ed.), ed. by Ronald E. Rice, and Charles K. Atkin, 3–22. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perloff, Richard M. 2003. The Dynamics of Persuasion: Communication and Attitudes in the 21st Century (2nd ed.). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Simons, Herbert W. (ed). 1989. Rhetoric in the Human Science. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Symon, Gilles. 2000. “Everyday Rhetoric: Argument and Persuasion in Everyday Life.” European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 9 (4): 477–488. DOI logoGoogle Scholar