Cover not available
Part of
From Pragmatics to Dialogue
Edited by Edda Weigand and István Kecskés
[Dialogue Studies 31] 2018
► pp. 83–112

Research interview as social interaction

Epistemic implications

This chapter discusses and empirically illustrates the epistemic implications of a dialogic approach to language when used as a research tool. I analyze examples of one of the most commonly used methods in social science research, the interview, and discuss some implications of foregrounding the performative and emergent properties of dialogues occurring between the researcher and her informants. I contend that applying a dialogic view of language to the specific forms of talk used for doing research, requires a substantial change in how we conceive of scientific knowledge and what we expect from it. This is perhaps the reason why researchers often ignore contemporary linguistic theory and preserve their working tools from it: what if we consider referentiality as a dialogic, interactive achievement?
Keywords: epistemics, language use, indexicality, intersubjectivity, referentiality, reflexivity, relativism, research interview, social interaction
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Research interviewing: What’s in a practice?
  • 3.Meaning as a bounded, stable and observable entity: The bias theories
  • 4.Telling in interviews: When and for whom meaning is an interactive achievement?
  • 5.From a dialogic point of view: Research interview as social interaction
  • 6.The question – answer game
  • 7.Post hoc ergo propter hoc: Contradictions or context shaped contributions?
  • 8.Meaning and the dialogical organization of talk: Rethinking the researcher’s effect
  • 9.The dialogical nature of research interviewing: The epistemological consequences of a neglected dimension
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 5 October 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.31.06car
References (125)
References
Agar, Michael and Jerry R. Hold. 1982. “Interpreting Discourse: Coherence and the Analysis of Ethnographic Interviews.” Discourse Processes 5(1): 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alvesson, Mats. 2011. Interpreting Interviews. London: Sage.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bazzanella, Carla. 2002. Sul dialogo [On Dialogue]. Milano: Guerini.Google Scholar
Bailey, Kenneth D. 1978. Methods of Social Research. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Baxter, Leslie. 2011. Voicing Relationships: A Dialogic Perspective. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Benney, Mark and Everett C. Hughes. 1970. “Of Sociology and Interview.” In Sociological Methods, ed. by Norman K. Denzin, 190–198. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Berger, Peter L. and Thomas Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Bernard, Russel H. 2002. Research Methods in Anthropology. Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, 3rd edition. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira.Google Scholar
Billig, Michael. 1987. Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boyatzis, Richard E. 1998. Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Braun, Virginia and Victoria Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Briggs, Charles. 1986. Learning How to Ask. A Sociolinguistic Appraisal of the Role of Interview in Social Science Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brenner, Michael. 1981. “Aspects of Conversational Structure in the Research Interview.” In Conversation and Discourse: Structure and Interpretation, ed. by Paul Werth, 19–40. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
. 1982. “Response Effects of the ‘Role-Restricted’ Characteristics of the Interviewer.” In Response Behaviour in the Survey Interview, ed. by Wil Dijkstra and Johannes Van der Zouwen, 131–165. New York: New York Academic Press.Google Scholar
Caron, André H. and Letizia Caronia. 2007. Moving Culture. Mobile Communication in Everyday Life. Montreal: McGill-Queens.Google Scholar
Caron, André H., Jennie M. Hwang, Boris H. J. M. Brummans, and Letizia Caronia. 2013. “Business Writing on the Go: How Executives Manage Impressions Through E-mail Communication in Everyday Work Life.” Corporate Communication: An International Journal 18(1): 8–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caronia, Letizia. 1996. “Chi è il bambino straniero? Educazione e costruzione sociale dell’etnicità” [Who is the Foreign Child? Education and the Social Construction of Ethnicity]. In Incontri di Infanzie. I bambini dell’immigrazione nei servizi educativi [Childhoods’ Meetings. Immigrated Children in Educational Contexts] ed. by Graziella Favaro and Antonio Genovese, 44–67. Bologna: Clueb.Google Scholar
. 1997. Costruire la Conoscenza. Interazione e Interpretazione nella Ricerca sul Campo in Educazione [Constructing Knowledge. Interaction and Interpretation in Educational Field Research]. Firenze: la Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
. 2014. “The Fabric of Certainty: Ignoring Interactional Details as an Epistemic Resource in Research Interviews.” In Communicating Certainty and Uncertainty in Medical, Supportive and Scientific Contexts, ed. by Andrzej Zuczkowski et al., 249 – 271. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Caronia, Letizia and André H. Caron. 2011. “Family Morality and Cultural Identity in Parents’ Use of the Quebec Movie Rating System.” Journal of Children and Media 5(1): 20–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clifford, James and George E. Marcus. 1986. Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Charmaz, Kathy. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory. A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Cooren, François. 2010. Action and Agency in Dialogue: Passion, Incarnation and Ventriloquism. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corsaro, William. 1985. Friendship and Peer Culture in the Early Years. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
D’Andrade, Roy. 1987. “A Folk Model of the Mind.” In Cultural Models in Language and Thought, ed. by Dorothy Holland and Naomi Quinn, 112–147. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dick, Hilary Parsons. 2006. “What to do with ‘I don’t know’: Elicitation in Ethnographic and Survey Interviews.” Qualitative Sociology 29: 87–102 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dore, John and Robert McDermot. 1982. “Linguistic Indeterminacy and Social Context in Utterance Interpretation.” Language 58: 374–398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul. 2006. “When Documents Speak: Documents, Language and Interaction.” In Talk and Interaction in Social Research Methods, ed. by Paul Drew, Geoffrey Raymond, and Darin Weinberg, 63–80. London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul and John Heritage (ed.). 1992. Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul, Geoffrey Raymond, and Darin Weinberg. 2006. Talk and Interaction in Social Research Methods. London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro. 1994. From Grammar to Politics: Linguistic Anthropology in a Samoan Village. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
. 2006. “Transcripts, Like Shadows on a Wall.” Mind, Culture and Activity 13(4): 301–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro and Donald Brenneis. 1986. “The Audience as Co-Author.” Text 6(3): 239–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro and Charles Goodwin. 1992. Rethinking Context. Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto. 1979. Lector in Fabula. Milano: Milano Bompiani.Google Scholar
Edwards, Derek. 2004. “Analyzing Racial Discourse: The Discoursive Psychology of Mind-World Relationships.” In Analyzing Race Talk: Multidisciplinary Approaches to the Research Interview, ed. by Harry van den Berg, Margaret Wetherell and Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra, 31–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. “Discourse, cognition and social practices: the rich surface of language and social interaction”. Discourse Studies 8(1): 41–49.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fasulo, Alessandra and Cristina Zucchermaglio. 2008. “Narratives in the Workplace: Facts, Fiction and Canonicity.” Text and Talk 28(3): 351–376. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flaskerud, Jacquelyn H. and Cecilia E. Rush. 1989. “AIDS and Traditional Health Beliefs and Practices of Black Women.” Nursing Research 38(4): 210–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frake, Charles O. 1969. “The Ethnographic Study of Cognitive Systems.” In Readings in the Sociology of Language, ed. by Joshua A. Fishman, 434–446. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Freed, Alice F. and Susan Ehlrich (ed.). 2010. Why do you Ask. The Function of Questions in Institutional Discourse, 87–107. Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press.Google Scholar
Gergen, Kenneth and Mary H. Gergen. 1991. “From Theory to Reflexivity in Research Practice.” In Method and Reflexivity: Knowing as Systemic Social Construction, ed. by Frederick Steier, 76–95. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Giorgi, Amedeo. 2009. The Descriptive Phenomenological Method in Psychology: A Modified Husserlian Approach. Pittsburg, PA: DuquesneGoogle Scholar
Goodenough, Ward H. 1957. “Cultural Anthropology and Linguistics.” In Report of the Seventh Annual Round Table Meeting on Linguistics and Language Study, ed. by Paul L. Garvin, 167–173. Washington, D.C: Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie H. 1991. He-said-she-Said: Talk as Social Organization among Black Children. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael. 1973. Explorations in the Functions of Language. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
. 1976. “Anti-languages.” American Anthropologist 78: 570–584. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John. 1984a. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Oxford: Polity.Google Scholar
. 1984b. “A Change-of-State Token and Aspects of Its Sequential Placement.” In Structures of Social Action, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1985. “Analysing News Interviews: Aspects of the Production of talk for an Overhearing Audience.” In Handbook of Discourse Analisys. Vol.3: Discourse and Dialogue, ed. by Teun A. van Dijk, 95–117. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 2010. “A Galilean Moment in Social Theory? Language, Culture and Their Emergent Properties.” Qualitative Sociology 34: 263–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45 (1): 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John and Douglas W. Maynard. 2006. Communication in Medical Care. Interaction between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John and Rod Watson. 1980. “Aspects of the Properties of Formulations in Natural Occurring Conversations: Some Instances Analysed.” Semiotica 30: 245–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holland, Dorothy and Naomi Quinn (ed.). 1987. In Cultural Models in Language and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holland, Dorothy and Skinner Debra. 1987.“Prestige and Intimacy: The Cultural Models Behind Americans’ Talk about Gender Types.” Cultural Models in Language and Thought, ed. by Dorothy Holland and Naomi Quinn, 78–111. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Houtkoop-Steenstra, Hanneke. 2000. Interaction and the Standardized Survey Interview: The Living Questionnaire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Herbert H. and William J. Cobb. 1975. Interviewing in Social Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jacquemet, Marco. 1996. Credibility in Court. Communicative Practices in the Camorra Trials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kanisza, Silvia. 1995. “L’intervista nella ricerca educativa [The Interview in Educational research]”. In La ricerca sul campo in educazione. I metodi qualitativi [Educational Field Research. Qualitative Methods], ed. by Susanna Mantovani, 35–81. Milano: Bruno Mondadori.Google Scholar
Keesing, Roger M. 1987. “Models, ‘Folk’ and ‘Cultural’: Paradigms Regained?” In Cultural Models in Language and Thought, ed. by Dorothy Holland and Naomi Quinn, 78–111. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kvale, Steinar and Svend Brinkmann. 2009. InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, William and David Fanshell. 1977. Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lindlof, Thomas R. and Taylor Bryan C. 2011. Qualitative Communication Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SageGoogle Scholar
Linell, Per. 1998. Approaching Dialogue: Talk, Interaction and Contexts in Dialogical Perspectives. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Rethinking Language, Mind and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-Making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Marková, Ilana, Per Linell, Michèle Grossen, and Anne Salazar Orvig. 2007. Dialogue in Focus Groups. Exploring Socially Shared Knowledge. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Marnette, Sophie. 2005. Speech and Thought Presentation in French: Concepts and strategies. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamns. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maynard, Douglas W. and Nora Cate Schaeffer. 2002. “Standardization and Interaction in the Survey Interview.” In Handbook of Interview Research: Context and Method, ed. by Jaber F. Gubrium and James A. Holstein, 577–602. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Maynard, Douglas W., Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra, Johannes van der Zouwen, and Nora Cate Schaeffer (ed.). 2002. Standardization and Tacit Knowledge: Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Mehan, Hugh. 1979. Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mishler, Elliot. 1986. Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moerman, Michael. 1988. Talking Culture: Ethnography and Conversation Analysis. Philadelphia, Penn.: University of Pennsylvania Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1974. “Accomplishing Ethnicity.” In Ethnomethodology, ed. by Roy Turner, 54–68. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza. 2009. “Videorecording Practices and the Reflexive Constitution of the Interaction.” Human Studies 32: 67–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Elinor and Lisa Capps. 2001. Living Narrative. Creating Lives in Everyday Storytelling. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pontecorvo, Clotilde, Anna Maria Ajello, and Cristina Zucchermaglio. 1998. Discutendo si Impara [Learning Through Talking]. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
Potter, Jonathan and Alexa Hepburn. 2005. “Qualitative Interviews in Psychology: Problems and Possibilities.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 2(4): 281–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “Eight Challenges for Interview Researchers.” In Handbook of Interview Research 2nd ed. by Jaber F. Gubrium and James A. Holstein, 555–570. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Potter, Jonathan and Margaret Wetherell. 1987. Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Powney, Janet and Mike Watts. 1987. Interviewing in Educational Research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Putnam, Linda L. and Anne M. Nicotera (ed.). 2009. Building Theories of Organization: The Constitutive Role of Communication. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Quinn, Naomi. 1987. “Convergent Evidence for a Cultural Model of American Marriage.” In Cultural Models in Language and Thought, ed. by Dorothy Holland and Naomi Quinn, 173–194. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey. 2003. “Grammar and Social Organization: Yes/No Interrogatives and the Structure of Responding.” American Sociological Review 68 (6): 939–967. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “Grammar and Social Relations: Alternative Forms of Yes/No-Type Initiating Actions in Health Visitor Interactions.” In Why do you Ask. The Function of Questions in Institutional Discourse, ed. by Alice F. Freed and Susan Ehlrich, 87–107. Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press.Google Scholar
Resnick, Lauren, John M. Levine, and Stephanie Teasley. 1991. Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. Washington, DC.: American Psychological Association. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rommetveit, Ragnar. 1976. “On the Architecture of Intersubjectivity.” In Social Psychology in Transition, ed. by L. H. Strickland, K. J. Gergen and F. J. Aboud, 163–175. New York: Plenum Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1972. “On the Analyzability of Stories by Children.” In Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, ed. by John J. Gumperz and Dell Hymes, 325–345. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Schank, Roger C. and Robert P. Abelson. 1977. Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel. 1987. “Between Micro and Macro: Context and Other Connections.” In The Micro-Macro Link, ed. by Jeffrey Alexander, Bernard Giessen, Richard Munch, and Neil Smelser, 207–234. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel, Gail Jefferson, and Harvey Sacks. 1977. “The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation.” Language 53(2) :361–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, David M. 1976. “Notes Toward a Theory of Culture.” In Meaning in Anthropology, ed. by Kenneth H. Basso and Henry A. Selby, 198–220. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Silverman, David. 2001. Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
. 2007. A Very Short, Fairly Interesting and Reasonably Cheap Book about Qualitative Research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1981. “The Limits of Awareness.” Sociolinguistic Working Papers 84. Austin: Southwest Educational Developmental Laboratory.Google Scholar
Singer, Eleanor, Martin R. Frankel, and Marc B. Glassman. 1983. “The Effect of the Interviewer Characteristics and Expectations on Response.” Public Opinion Quarterly 43: 68–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Jonathan A. and Mike Osborn. 2003. “Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.” In Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods, ed. by Jonathan A. Smith, 51–80. London and Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Smith, Jonathan, Paul Flowers, and Michael Larkin. 2009. Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Speer, Susan A. 2002. “Natural and Contrived Data: a Sustainable Distinction?” Discourse Studies 4: 511–525.Google Scholar
Spradley, James P. 1979. The Ethnographic Interview. New York: Holt-Reinhart & Winston.Google Scholar
Steier, Frederick. 1991. “Research as Self-Reflexivity, Self-Reflexivity as Social Process.” In Research and Reflexivity, ed. by Frederick Steier, 1–11. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Stati, Sorin. 1982. II Dialogo. Considerazioni di Linguistica Pragmatica [Dialogue. Advances in linguistic pragmatics]. Napoli: Liguori.Google Scholar
Stylianou, Stelios. 2008. “Interview Control Questions.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 11: 239–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., Barbara A. Fox, and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen. 2015. Grammar in Everyday Talk. Building Responsive Actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toulmin Stephen 2001. Return to Reason. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tracy, Karen, and Jessica Robles. 2009. “Questions, Questioning, and Institutional Practices: An Introduction.” Discourse Studies 11(2): 131–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tracy, Karen and Jessica Robles. 2010. “Challenges of Interviewers’ Institutional Positionings: Taking into Account of Interview Content and the Interaction.” Communication Methods and Measures 4(3): 177–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tracy, Sarah J. 2013. Qualitative Research Methods. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tyler, Stephen A. 1978. The Said and the Unsaid. Language, Thought and Culture: Advances in the Study of Cognition. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. 1987. Communicating Racism. Ethnic Prejudice in Though and Talk. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Van Manen, Max. 1990. Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. London, ON, Canada: Althouse Press.Google Scholar
. 1997. “From Meaning to Method.” Qualitative Health Research 7: 345–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Manen, Michael A. 2014. “On Ethical (In)Decisions Experienced by Parents of Infants in Neonatal Intensive Care.” Qualitative Health Research 24(2): 279–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weigand, Edda. 2009. Language as Dialogue. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “Paradigm Changes in Linguistics: From Reductionism to Holism.” Language Sciences 33: 544–549. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wertsch, James V. 1985. Culture, Communication and Cognition: Vygotskian Perspectives. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
1993. Voices of the Mind. Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wetherell, Margaret, Stephanie Taylor, and Simeon J. Yates (ed.). 2001. Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Sue. 2006. “Analyzing Interaction in Focus Groups.” In Talk and Interaction in Social Research Methods, ed. by Paul Drew, Geoffrey Raymond and Darin Weinberg, 50–62. London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, Sue and Celia Kitzinger. 2000. “Thinking Differently About Thinking Positive: A Discursive Approach to Cancer Patients’ Talk”. Social Science and Medicine 50: 797–811. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wooffitt, Robin. 2001. “Researching Psychic Practitioners: Conversation Analysis.” In Discourse as Data. A Guide for Analysis, ed. by Margaret Wetherell, Stephanie Taylor, and Simeon J. Yates, 49–92. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Wooffitt, Robin and Sue Widdicombe. 2006. “Interaction in Interviews.” In Talk and Interaction in Social Research Methods, ed. by Paul Drew, Geoffrey Raymond, and Darin Weinberg, 28–49. London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Caronia, Letizia & André H. Caron
2019. Morality in Scientific Practice: The Relevance and Risks of Situated Scientific Knowledge in Application-Oriented Social Research. Human Studies 42:3 ► pp. 451 ff. DOI logo
Săftoiu, Răzvan
2019. The Dialogic Turn in Language Study. Language and Dialogue 9:3 ► pp. 471 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.