Part of
From Pragmatics to Dialogue
Edited by Edda Weigand and István Kecskés
[Dialogue Studies 31] 2018
► pp. 113136
Drew, Paul
1998 “Complaints about transgressions and misconduct.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 31(3–4): 295–325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul and Kathy Chilton
2000 “Calling just to keep in touch: regular and habitualised telephone calls as an environment for small talk.” In Small Talk, ed. by J. Coupland, 137–162. Harlow, England: Longman.Google Scholar
Emerson, Robert M.
2015Everyday troubles: The Micro-Politics of Interpersonal Conflict. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox, Barbara
2015 “On the notion of pre-request.” Discourse Studies 17(1): 41–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1971Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. New York: Basic Books, Inc.Google Scholar
Hewitt, John P. and Randall Stokes
1975 “Disclaimers.” American Sociological Review 40(1): 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
1984 “On stepwise transition from talk about a trouble to inappropriately next-positioned matters.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by John Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 191–222. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita
1984 “Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by John Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
1992Lectures on Conversation, Vol. 1 and 2, ed. by Gail Jefferson. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sanders, Robert E.
2003 “Conversational socializing on marine VHF radio: Adapting laughter and other practices to the technology in use.” In Studies in Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Phillip Glenn, Curtis LeBaron, and Jenny Mandelbaum, 309–326. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1995 “Discourse as an interactional achievement III: The omnirelevance of action.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 28(3): 185–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. and Gene H. Lerner
2009 “Beginning to respond: Well-prefaced responses to wh-questions.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 42(2): 91–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, Marvin B. and Stanford Lyman
1968 “Accounts.” American Sociological Review 33(1): 46–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sterponi, Laura
2003 “Account episodes in family discourse: the making of morality in everyday interaction.” Discourse Studies 5(1): 79–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 “Caught red-handed: How Italian parents engage children in moral discourse and action.” In Talking about Right and Wrong, ed. by Cecilia Wainryb and Holly E. Recchia, 122–142. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weigand, Edda
2010Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 “Rationality of performance.” Philosophia Scientiae 18(3): 1–21.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Săftoiu, Răzvan
2019. The Dialogic Turn in Language Study. Language and Dialogue 9:3  pp. 471 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.