Article published In:
CLIL and Bilingual Education in the Netherlands
Edited by Tessa Mearns and Rick de Graaff
[Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 7:2] 2018
► pp. 264273
(2018) Symposium: Processes and outcomes of content and language integrated learning in the Netherlands. Presented at the Anéla Applied Linguistics Conference 2018, Egmond aan Zee.
Berliner, D. C.
(2002) Educational research: The hardest science of all. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 18–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bonnet, A.
(2012) Towards an evidence base of CLIL: How to integrate qualitative and quantitative as well as process, product and participant perspectives in CLIL research. International CLIL Research Journal, 4(1), 66–78.Google Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, C.
(2011) Content-and-Language Integrated Learning: From practice to principles? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 311, 182–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006) Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) at school in Europe. Brussels: Eurydice European Unit. Retrieved from [URL]
Fleckenstein, J.
(2018) All good things come in threes: Learning a third language in dual immersion. Presentation at the Bilingual Education Research Conference, Berlin, Germany, 30–31 August.
Fleckenstein, J., Möller, J., & Baumert, J.
(2018) Mehrsprachigkeit als Ressource: Kompetenzen dual-immersiv unterrichteter Schülerinnen und Schüler in der Drittsprache Englisch. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 21(1), 97–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kultusministerium des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen
(1995) Empfehlungen für den bilingualen deutsch-englischen Sachfachunterricht. Sekundarstufe I: Erdkunde. Frechen: Ritterbach.Google Scholar
Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M.
(2010) Immersion and CLIL in English: More differences than similarities. English Language Teaching Journal, 64(4), 367–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leisen, J.
(2015) Fachliches und sprachliches Lernen im sprachsensiblen Fachunterricht. In J. Drumbl, & A. Hornung (Hrsg.), Beiträge der XV. Internationalen Tagung der Deutschlehrerinnen und Deutschlehrer: Band 1 (Hauptvorträge). IDT 2013 (pp. 249–274). Bozen: BUPress. Retrieved from [URL]
Marsh, H. W.
(1987) The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(3), 280–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyer, O., Coyle, D., Halbach, A., Schuck, K., & Ting, T.
(2015) A pluriliteracies approach to content and language integrated learning – Mapping learner progressions in knowledge construction and meaning-making. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 41–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyer, O., & Coyle, D.
(2017) Pluriliteracies teaching for learning: Conceptualizing progression for deeper learning in literacies development. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 418. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyer, O., Coyle, D., Imhof, M., & Connolly, T.
(2018) Beyond CLIL: Fostering student and teacher engagement for personal growth and deeper learning. In Martínez Agudo, Juan de Dios (Ed.), Emotions in second language teaching. Theory, research and teacher education (pp. 277–297). New York, NY: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morton, T., & Llinares, A.
(2017) Content and language integrated learning (CLIL). Type of programme or pedagogical model? In A. Llinares & T. Morton (Eds.), Applied linguistics perspectives on CLIL. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Cañado, M. L.
(2012) CLIL research in Europe: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(3), 315–341. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rumlich, D.
(2009) The impact of bilingual teaching on students’ accuracy – A case study (Unpublished state examination dissertation). University of Duisburg-Essen.Google Scholar
(2016) Evaluating bilingual education in Germany: CLIL students’ general English proficiency, EFL self-concept and interest. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018) Englischnoten und globale englische Sprachkompetenz in bilingualen Zweigen. Zeitschrift Für Erziehungswissenschaft, 21(1), 29–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wesche, M. B.
(2002) Early French Immersion: How has the original Canadian model stood the test of time? In P. Burmeister, T. Piske, & A. Rohde (Eds.), An integrated view of language development – Papers in honor of Henning Wode (pp. 357–379). Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.Google Scholar
Wolff, D., & Sudhoff, J.-T.
(2015) Zur Definition bilingualen Lehrens und Lernens. In B. Rüschoff, J.-T. Sudhoff, & D. Wolff (Eds.), CLIL Revisited: Eine kritische Analyse des gegenwärtigen Standes des bilingualen Sachfachunterrichts (pp. 9–39). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Mearns, Tessa & Nivja de Jong
2021. Sketching a motivational landscape. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 9:1  pp. 85 ff. DOI logo
Rumlich, Dominik
2020. Bilingual education in monolingual contexts: a comparative perspective. The Language Learning Journal 48:1  pp. 115 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.