Cover not available
Article published In:
Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 8:2 (2019) ► pp.172–205

Eighth graders’ expository text comprehension

Do motivational aspects add to cognitive skills?

ORCID logo | Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences
| Radboud University
| University of Amsterdam
The present study examined whether ten motivations to read expository texts moderated the effects of cognitive skills on eighth graders’ expository text comprehension, while accounting for the main effects of cognitive skills. Furthermore, it was examined whether the effect of motivational dimensions on expository text comprehension differed between monolingual and bilingual Dutch students, and between poor and good readers. Hundred fifty-two eighth graders took tests measuring their expository text comprehension, sentence reading fluency, linguistic knowledge, metacognitive knowledge and motivations to read expository texts. None of ten motivational aspects did moderate the effect of cognitive skills on expository text comprehension. Furthermore, there were no differences between monolingual and bilingual Dutch students, or between poor and good readers, in terms of the relationship between motivational dimensions and expository text comprehension. Differences between our findings and results from other studies are interpreted in the context of measurement specificity and the school system.
Keywords: motivations to read, expository text comprehension, secondary school, cognitive skills, bilingual readers
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1The importance of motivational aspects for subgroups
    • 1.2The present study
    • 1.3Motivations to read expository texts
    • 1.4Cognitive skills required for expository texts
  • 2.Method
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Instruments
      • Expository text comprehension
      • Linguistic knowledge
      • Metacognitive knowledge
      • Sentence reading fluency
      • Motivations to read
      • Background questionnaire
    • 2.3Procedure
    • 2.4Scoring and missing value treatment
    • 2.5Analyses
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Confirmatory factor analyses
    • 3.2Descriptive statistics for cognitive skills
    • 3.3Descriptive statistics for motivations to read
    • 3.4Correlations
    • 3.5Research questions: Predictive value of motivational aspects
    • 3.6Robustness check: Models with 191 students
  • 4.Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 11 April 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dujal.17020.wel
References (80)
References
Aarts, R., & Verhoeven, L. (1999). Literacy attainment in a second language submersion context. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20(3), 377–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anmarkrud, Ø., & Bråten, I. (2009). Motivation for reading comprehension. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(2), 252–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
Beck, I. L., Perfetti, C. A., & McKeown, M. G. (1982). Effects of long-term vocabulary instruction on lexical access and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(4), 506–521. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blom, G. (1958). Statistical estimates and transformed beta variables. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Carlisle, J. F. (2007). Fostering morphological processing, vocabulary development, and reading comprehension. In R. K. Wagner, A. E. Muse, & K. R. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Vocabulary acquisition: Implications for reading comprehension (pp. 78–103). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Chapman, J. W., & Tunmer, W. E. (1995). Development of young children’s reading self-concepts: An examination of emerging subcomponents and their relationship with reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(1), 154–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003). Reading difficulties, reading-related self-perceptions, and strategies for overcoming negative self-beliefs. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(1), 5–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coddington, C. S. (2009). The effects of constructs of motivation that affirm and undermine reading achievement inside and outside of school on middle school students’ reading achievement. College Park, MD: University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Cromley, J. G., & Azevedo, R. (2007). Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 311–325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Milliano, I. (2013). Literacy development of low-achieving adolescents. The role of engagement in academic reading and writing. Enschede: Iskamp drukkers b.v.Google Scholar
Dowson, M., & McInerney, D. M. (2003). What do students say about their motivational goals? Towards a more complex and dynamic perspective on student motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(1), 91–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 531, 109–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S., & Gottfried, A. W. (2001). Continuity of academic intrinsic motivation from childhood through late adolescence: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 3–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, J. T., & Coddington, C. S. (2009). Reading motivation. In K. R. Wentzel, & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 503–536). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Guthrie, J. T., Coddington, C. S., & Wigfield, A. (2009). Profiles of reading motivation among African American and Caucasian students. Journal of Literacy Research, 41(3), 317–353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, J. T., & Klauda, S. L. (2014). Effects of classroom practices on reading comprehension, engagement, and motivations for adolescents. Reading Research Quarterly, 49(4), 387–416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, J. T., Klauda, S. L., & Ho, A. N. (2013). Modeling the relationships among reading instruction, motivation, engagement, and achievement for adolescents. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(1), 9–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (3rd ed., pp. 403–422). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Cambria, J., Coddington, C. S., Klauda, S. L., & Morrison, D. A. (2009). Motivations for reading information books among adolescent students. College Park, Maryland, United States: University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & You, W. (2012). Instructional contexts for engagement and achievement in reading. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 601–634). New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hacquebord, H., Stellingwerf, B., Linthorst, R., & Andringa, S. (2005). Diataal verantwoording en normering. Retrieved from [URL] [09-09-2015]
Ho, A. N., & Guthrie, J. T. (2013). Patterns of association among multiple motivations and aspects of achievement in reading. Reading Psychology, 34(2), 101–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hu, M., & Nation, I. S. P. (2000). Unknown vocabulary density and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 13(1), 403–430.Google Scholar
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99(1), 122–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kindermann, T. A. (2007). Effects of naturally existing peer groups on changes in academic engagement of sixth graders. Child Development, 78(4), 1186–1203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W., & Rawson, K. A. (2005). Comprehension. In M. J. Snowling, & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 209–226). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klassen, R. (2002). Writing in early adolescence: A review of the role of self-efficacy beliefs. Educational Psychology Review, 14(2), 173–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koomen, H. M. Y., & Hoeksma, J. D. (1991). Development of early mother-child interaction and attachment. Amsterdam: Pro Lingua.Google Scholar
LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6(2), 293–323. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B. (1989). What percentage of text-lexis is essential for comprehension? In C. Lauren, & M. Nordman (Eds.), Special language: From humans to thinking machines (pp. 316–323). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Legault, L., Green-Demers, I., & Pelletier, L. (2006). Why do high school students lack motivation in the classroom? Toward an understanding of academic amotivation and the role of social support. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 567–582. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Logan, S., Medford, E., & Hughes, N. (2011). The importance of intrinsic motivation for high and low ability readers’ reading comprehension performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(1), 124–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mancilla-Martinez, J., & Lesaux, N. K. (2010). Predictors of reading comprehension for struggling readers: The case of Spanish-speaking language minority learners. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 701–711. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manis, F. R., Lindsey, K. A., & Bailey, C. E. (2004). Development of reading in grades K-2 in Spanish-speaking English-language learners. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 19(4), 214–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McKeown, M. G., Beck, I. L., Omanson, R. C., & Perfetti, C. A. (1983). The effects of long-term vocabulary instruction on reading comprehension: A replication. Journal of Reading Behavior, 15(1), 3–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meece, J. L., & Miller, S. D. (2001). A longitudinal analysis of elementary school students’ achievement goals in literacy activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(4), 454–480. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nagy, W. (2007). Metalinguistic awareness and the vocabulary-comprehension connection. In R. K. Wagner, A. E. Muse, & K. R. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Vocabulary acquisition: Implications for reading comprehension (pp. 52–77). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
Welie, C., Schoonen, R., Kuiken, F., & Van den Bergh, H. (2017). Expository text comprehension in secondary school: for which readers does knowledge of connectives contribute the most? Journal of Research in Reading, 40(S1), 42–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Reilly, T., & McNamara, D. S. (2007). The impact of science knowledge, reading skill, and reading strategy knowledge on more traditional “high-stakes” measures of high school students’ science achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 44(1), 161–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Páez, M. M., Tabors, P. O., & López, L. M. (2007). Dual language and literacy development of Spanish-speaking preschool children. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 28(2), 85–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Patrick, H., Ryan, A. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The differential impact of extrinsic and mastery goal orientations on males’ and females’ self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 11(2), 153–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1999). Comprehending written language: A blueprint of the reader. In C. M. Brown, & P. Hagoort (Eds.), The neurocognition of language (pp. 167–208). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2001). The lexical bases of comprehension skill. In D. Gorfien (Ed.), On the consequences of meaning selection (pp. 67–86). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. In M. J. Snowling, & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 227–247). Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., & Lesgold, A. M. (1977). Coding and comprehension in skilled reading and implications for reading instruction. Theory and Practice of Early Reading, 11, 57–84.Google Scholar
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 544–555. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rijkeboer, M. M., Van den Bergh, H., & Van den Bout, J. (2011). Item bias analysis of the Young Schema-Questionnaire for psychopathology, gender, and educational level. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 271, 65–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ryan, A. M. (2001). The peer group as a context for the development of young adolescent motivation and achievement. Child Development, 72(4), 1135–1150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 749–761. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salomon, G. (1984). Television is “easy” and print is “tough”: The differential investment of mental effort in learning as a function of perceptions and attributions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 647–658. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sawyer, R. J., Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1992). Direct teaching, strategy instruction, and strategy instruction with explicit self-regulation: Effects on the composition skills and self-efficacy of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 340–352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, E., & Schiefele, U. (2013). The prediction of reading comprehension by cognitive and motivational factors: Does text accessibility during comprehension testing make a difference? Learning and Individual Differences, 26(1), 42–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N., Jiang, X., & Grabe, W. (2011). The percentage of words known in a text and reading comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 95(i), 26–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schoonen, R., Hulstijn, J., & Bossers, B. (1998). Metacognitive and language-specific knowledge in native and foreign language reading comprehension: An empirical study among Dutch students in grades 6, 8 and 10. Language Learning, 481, 71–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schunk, D. H. (2003). Self-efficacy for reading and writing: Influence of modeling, goal setting, and self-evaluation. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 159–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and application. (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Stahl, S. A., & Fairbanks, M. M. (1986). The effects of vocabulary instruction: A model-based meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 56(1), 72–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swanson, H. L., Sáez, L., & Gerber, M. (2006). Growth in literacy and cognition in bilingual children at risk or not at risk for reading disabilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(2), 247–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taboada, A., Tonks, S., Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. (2009). Effects of motivational and cognitive variables on reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 221, 85–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trapman, M., Van Gelderen, A., Van Steensel, R., Van Schooten, E., & Hulstijn, J. (2014). Linguistic knowledge, fluency and meta-cognitive knowledge as components of reading comprehension in adolescent low achievers: Differences between monolinguals and bilinguals. Journal of Research in Reading, 37(S1), S3–S21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Schnyder, I., & Niggli, A. (2006). Predicting homework effort: Support for a domain-specific, multilevel homework model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(2), 438–456. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Unrau, N., & Schlackman, J. (2006). Motivation and its relationship with reading achievement in an urban middle school. The Journal of Educational Research, 100(2), 81–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2006). Sources of academic and self-regulatory efficacy beliefs of entering middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31(2), 125–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Gelderen, A., Schoonen, R., De Glopper, K., Hulstijn, J., Snellings, P., Simis, A., & Stevenson, M. (2003). Roles of linguistic knowledge, metacognitive knowledge and processing speed in L3, L2 and L1 reading comprehension: A structural equation modeling approach. International Journal of Bilingualism, 11, 7–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Gelderen, A., Schoonen, R., Stoel, R. D., De Glopper, K., & Hulstijn, J. (2007). Development of adolescent reading comprehension in language 1 and language 2: A longitudinal analysis of constituent components. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 477–491. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Steensel, R., Oostdam, R., & Van Gelderen, A. (2013). Vermijding en frustratie: Het belang van negatieve motivaties voor de leesvaardigheid van vmbo’ers. In D. Schram (Ed.), De aarzelende lezer over de streep; recente wetenschappelijke inzichten (pp. 105–122). Delft: Eburon.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L. (2000). Components in early second language reading and spelling. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(4), 313–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walczyk, J. J. (1995). Testing a compensatory-encoding model. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(3), 396–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000). The interplay between automatic and control processes in reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(4), 554–566. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walczyk, J. J., Wei, M., Grifith-Ross, D. A., Goubert, S. E., Cooper, A. L., & Zha, P. (2007). Development of the interplay between automatic processes and cognitive resources in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 867–887. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, J. H., & Guthrie, J. T. (2004). Modeling the effects of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, amount of reading, and past reading achievement on text comprehension between US and Chinese students. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(2), 162–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wentzel, K. R. (1996). Motivation in context: Social relationships and achievement in middle school. In J. Juvonen, & K. R. Wentzel (Eds.), Social motivation: Understanding children’s school adjustment (pp. 226–247). New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wigfield, A., Cambria, J., & Ho, A. (2012). Motivation for reading information texts. In J. T. Guthrie, A. Wigfield, & S. L. Klauda (Eds.), Adolescents’ engagement in academic literacy (pp. 52–102). Sharjah, UAE: Bentham Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Schiefele, U., Roeser, R., & Davis-Kean, P. (2006). Development of achievement motivation. In W. Damon, & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (6th ed., pp. 933–1002). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (1997). Relations of children’s motivation for reading to the amount and breadth or their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 420–432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Cruz Neri, Nadine, Sascha Bernholt, Hendrik Härtig, Anke Schmitz & Jan Retelsdorf
2024. Cognitive and motivational characteristics as predictors of students’ expository versus narrative text comprehension. European Journal of Psychology of Education 39:2 ► pp. 885 ff. DOI logo
Cao, Yijie & Bing Xiao
2020. Research on Digital Reading App Design to Stimulate Reading Motivation of Teenagers. In Advances in Human Factors in Training, Education, and Learning Sciences [Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 1211], ► pp. 63 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.