Article published In:
Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 3:2 (2014) ► pp.199212
Baayen, H.R., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L
(1995) The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Benoît, C., Grice, M., & Hazan, V
(1996) The SUS test: A method for the assessment of text-to-speech synthesis intelligibility using semantically unpredictable sentences. Speech Communication, 181, 381–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bleses, D., Vach, W., Slott, M., Wehberg, S., Thomsen, P., Madsen, T., & Basbøll, H
(2008) Early vocabulary development in Danish and other languages: A CDI-based comparison. Journal of Child Language, 351, 619–650. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D
(2009) Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.1.12) [Computer programme]. Amsterdam: Universiteit van AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
De Jong, N., & Wempe, T
(2009) Praat script to detect syllable nuclei and measure speech rate automatically. Behavior Research Methods, 41(2), 385–390. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engstrand, O., & Krull, D
(2001) Segment and syllable reduction: Preliminary observations. Working Papers Lund University, Department of Linguistics, 491, 26–29.Google Scholar
Ernestus, M., Baayen, H., & Schreuder, R
(2002) The recognition of reduced word forms. Brain and Language, 811, 162–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairbanks, G., & Kodman, F
(1957) Word intelligibility as a function of time compression. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29(5), 636–641. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairbanks, G., Guttman, N., & Miron, M.S
(1957) Effects of time-compression upon the comprehension of connected speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 221, 10–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foulke, E., & Sticht, T.G
(1969) Review of research on the intelligibility and comprehension of accelerated speech. Psychological Bulletin, 72(1), 50–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gooskens, C., Van Bezooijen, R., & Van Heuven, V. J
(2015) Mutual intelligibility of Dutch-German cognates by children: The devil is in the detail. Linguistics, 53(2). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gordon-Salant, S., Fitzgibbons, P.J., & Friedman, S.A
(2007) Recognition of time-compressed and natural speech with selective temporal enhancements by young and elderly listeners. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 501, 1181–1193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, R
(1992) Speech rate and listening comprehension: Further evidence of the relationship. TESOL Quarterly, 26(2), 385–390. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grønnum, N
(2003) Why are the Danes so hard to understand? In P. Thomsen, H. Galberg Jacobsen, D. Bleses, &Thomas O. Madsen (Eds.), Take Danish - for instance: Linguistic studies in honour of Hans Basbøll presented on the occasion of his 60th birthday 12 July 2003 (pp. 119–130). Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark.Google Scholar
(2007) Rødgrød med fløde - En lille bog om dansk fonetik. [Rødgrød med fløde - A little book on Danish phonetics]. Copenhagen: Akademisk forlag.Google Scholar
Hilton, N.H., Schüppert, A., & Gooskens, C
(2011) Syllable reduction and articulation rates in Danish, Norwegian and Swedish. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 34(2), 215–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacewicz, E., Fox, R.A., O’Neill, C., & Salmons, J
(2009) Articulation rate across dialect, age, and gender. Language Variation and Change, 211, 233–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janse, E
(2004) Word perception in fast speech: Artificially time-compressed vs. naturally produced fast speech. Speech Communication, 421, 155–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janse, E., & Ernestus, M
(2011) The roles of bottom-up and top-down information of reduced speech: Evidence from listeners with normal and impaired hearing. Journal of Phonetics, 391, 330–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, C., Berry, L., & Stevens, C
(2007) Synthesized speech intelligibility and persuasion: Speech rate and non-native listeners. Computer Speech and Language, 21(3), 641–651. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koreman, J
(2006) Perceived speech rate: The effects of articulation rate and speaking style in spontaneous speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(1), 582–596. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krause, J., & Braida, L
(2002) Investigating alternative forms of clear speech: The effects of speaking rate and speaking mode on intelligibility. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112 (5), 2165–2172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Letowski, T., & Poch, N.E
(1996) Comprehension of time-compressed speech: Effects of age and speech complexity. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 71, 447–457.Google Scholar
Osser, H., & Peng, F
(1964) A cross cultural study of speech rate. Language and Speech, 7(2), 120–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poch, N.E
(1992) Effects of discard intervals and compression frequency on comprehension of CD in time-compressed speech. Paper presented at the 124th meeting of The Acoustical Society of America, New Orleans.
Schüppert, A., Hilton, N.H., Gooskens, C., & Van Heuven, V
(2012) Syllable deletion in contemporary Danish. Copenhagen Studies in Language, 421, 73–99.Google Scholar
Sticht, T.G
(1969) Some interactions of speech rate, signal distortion, and certain linguistic factors in linguistic comprehension. A V Communication Review, 17(2), 159–171.Google Scholar
Tsao, Y.C., & Weismer, G
(1997) Interspeaker variation in habitual speaking rate: Evidence for a neuromuscular component. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 401, 858–866. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vaughan, N., & Letowski, T
(1997) Effects of age, speech rate, and type of test on temporal auditory processing. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 401, 1192–1200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhoeven, J., De Pauw, G., & Kloots, H
(2004) Speech rate in a pluricentric language: A comparison between Dutch in Belgium and the Netherlands. Language and Speech, 471, 297–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Schüppert, Anja, Nanna H. Hilton & Charlotte Gooskens
2016. Why is Danish so difficult to understand for fellow Scandinavians?. Speech Communication 79  pp. 47 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.