Article published In:
Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 4:1 (2015) ► pp.86100
References
Clark, H.H
(1996) Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Englert, C
(2010) Questions and responses in Dutch conversations. Journal of Pragmatics, 421, 2666–2684. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J
(1984) Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, J., & Clayman, S
(2010) Talk in action. Interaction, identities, and institutions. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, G
(1978) Sequential aspects of story telling in conversation. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 219–248). New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koole, T
(2010) Displays of epistemic access. Student responses to teacher explanations. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43(2), 183–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012) Conversation analysis and education. In C.A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 977–982). Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondada, L
(2011) Understanding as an embodied, situated and sequential achievement in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 431, 542–552. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, A
(1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 57–102). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, A., & Heritage, J
(2013) Preference. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 210–228). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Raymond, G
(2003) Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review, 68(6), 939–967. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiter, J.P. de
(Ed.) (2012) Questions. Formal, functional and interactional perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E.A
(1992) Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 981, 1295–1345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) Sequence organization in interaction. A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E.A., & Sacks, H
(1973) Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8(4), 289–327 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schutz, A
(1932/1967) The phenomenology of the social world. Evanston Ill.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Stivers, T
(2008) Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41(1), 31–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Seuren, Lucas M.
2019. Oh (/o/) als ontvanger van informatie in sociale interactie. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing 41:2  pp. 363 ff. DOI logo
Seuren, Lucas M., Mike Huiskes & Tom Koole
2016. Remembering and understanding with oh-prefaced yes/no declaratives in Dutch. Journal of Pragmatics 104  pp. 180 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.