Review published In:
Evolutionary Linguistic Theory
Vol. 1:2 (2019) ► pp.197202
Croft, W., & D. A. Cruse
(2004) Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C. J.
(1976) Frame semantics and the nature of language. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2801, 20–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hart, Ch.
(2011) Force-interactive patterns in immigration discourse: A Cognitive Linguistic approach to CDA. Discourse & Society, 22(3), 269–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janda, L.
(2013) Quantitative methods in Cognitive Linguistics. In L. A. Janda (Ed.), Cognitive Linguistics: The Quantitative Turn (pp. 1–32). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jäger, S., & F. Maier
(2009) Theoretical and methodological aspects of Foucauldian critical discourse analysis and dispositive analysis. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 34–61). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
(2008) Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, E.
(2000) The Creation Evolution Continuum. The National Center for Science Education. Retrieved from [URL]
Stefanowitsch, A.
(2006) Words and their metaphors: A corpus-based approach. In A. Stefanowitsch & S. T. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy. Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs (pp. 63–105). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Talmy, L.
(1988) Force Dynamics in Language Cognition. Cognitive Science, 12 (1), 49–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar