Article published In:
Lexical Issues in the Architecture of the Language Faculty
Edited by Andrea Padovan
[Evolutionary Linguistic Theory 2:1] 2020
► pp. 5683
References (60)
References
Acquaviva, P. (2009). Roots and Lexicality in Distributed Morphology. In A. Galani, D. Redinger, & N. Yeo (Eds.), York-Essex Morphology Meeting 5: Special Issue of York Working Papers in Linguistics, (pp. 1–21). York: University of York. [URL]
(2014). The Roots of Nominality, the Nominality of Roots. In A. Alexiadou, H. Borer, & F. Schäfer (Eds.), The Syntax of Roots and the Roots of Syntax, (pp. 33–56). Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Acquaviva, P., & Panagiotidis, P. (2012). Lexical Decomposition Meets Conceptual Atomism. Lingue e Linguaggio 111, 105–20.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, A., & Lohndal, T. (2017). On the Division of Labor between Roots and Functional Structure. In R. D’Alessandro, I. Franco, & Á. Gallego The Verbal Domain, (pp. 85–102). Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anagnostopoulou, E., and Samioti, Y. (2014). Domains within Words and Their Meanings: A Case Study. In A. Alexiadou, H. Borer, & F. Schäfer (Eds.), The Syntax of Roots and the Roots of Syntax, (pp. 81–111). Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arad, M. (2003). Locality Constraints on the Interpretation of Roots: The Case of Hebrew Denominal Verbs. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 211, 737–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005). Roots and Patterns Hebrew Morpho-Syntax. Dordrecht: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Aronoff, M. (1994). Morphology by Itself: Stems and Inflectional Classes. Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 22. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2007). In the Beginning Was the Word. Language 831, 803–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beard, R. (1995). Lexeme-Morpheme Base Morphology: A General Theory of Inflection and Word Formation. SUNY Series in Linguistics. Albany: State University of New York.Google Scholar
Borer, H. (2005). In Name Only. Structuring Sense, volume I1. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2009). “Roots and Categories.” Talk presented at the 19th Colloquium on Generative Grammar, University of the Basque Country, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain, April.Google Scholar
(2013). Taking Form. First edition. Structuring Sense, volume III1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2014). The Category of Roots.” In A. Alexiadou, H. Borer, & F. Schäfer (Eds.), The Syntax of Roots and the Roots of Syntax, (pp. 112–148). Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruening, B. (2018). The Lexicalist Hypothesis: Both Wrong and Superfluous. Language 941, 1–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V., & Clark, H. C. (1977). When Nouns Surface as Verbs. Language 551, 767–811. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Belder, M. (2011). Roots and Affixes: Eliminating Lexical Categories from Syntax. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Don, J. (2004). Categories in the Lexicon. Linguistics, 931–56.Google Scholar
Embick, D., & Marantz, A. (2008). Architecture and Blocking. Linguistic Inquiry 391, 1–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emonds, J. E. (1985). A Unified Theory of Syntactic Categories. Studies in Generative Grammar 19. Dordrecht, Holland; Cinnaminson, U.S.A: Foris Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000). Lexicon and Grammar: The English Syntacticon. Studies in Generative Grammar 50. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1998). Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. Oxford: Clarendon. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). LOT 2: The Language of Thought Revisited. Oxford: Clarendon. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Galani, A. (2005). The Morphosyntax of Verbs in Modern Greek. PhD thesis, University of York.Google Scholar
Hale, K. L., & Keyser, S. J. (1993). On Argument Structure and the Lexical Expression of Syntactic Relations. In K. L. Hale & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The View from Building 20. Essays in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, (pp. 53–109). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2002). Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure. Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 39. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halle, M. (1997). Distributed Morphology: Impoverishment and Fission. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 301, 425–49.Google Scholar
Halle, M., & Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection. In K. L. Hale & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The View from Building 20. Essays in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, (pp. 111–76). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harley, H. (2005). How Do Verbs Get Their Names? Denominal Verbs, Manner Incorporation and the Ontology of Verb Roots in English. In N. Erteschik-Shir & T. Rapoport (Eds.), The Syntax of Aspect: Deriving Thematic and Aspectual Interpretation (pp. 42–64). Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). On the Identity of Roots. Theoretical Linguistics 401, 225–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harley, H., & Noyer, R. (1999). State-of-the-Article: Distributed Morphology. GLOT International 41, 3–9.Google Scholar
Haugen, J. (2009). Hyponymous Objects and Late Insertion. Lingua 1191, 242–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M. (2005). Argument Realization. Research Surveys in Linguistics. Cambridge [England]; New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, L. (2007). The Roots of Verbs. PhD thesis, NYU.Google Scholar
Marantz, A. (1997). No Escape from Syntax: Don’t Try Morphological Analysis in the Privacy of Your Own Lexicon. U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 41, 201–25.Google Scholar
(2006). Phases and Words. Unpublished ms. MIT. [URL]
(2012). Locality Domains for Contextual Allosemy in Words. Unpublished ms. New York University.Google Scholar
Mitrović, M., & Panagiotidis, P. (2018). The Categorial Anatomy of Adjectives. Submitted ms. Nicosia. [URL]
(2020). “Adjectives Exist, Adjectivisers Do Not: A Bicategorial Typology.” Glossa. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nóbrega, V. (2018). Isomorphic Approach: Articulating the Lexicon and Syntax in the Emergence of Language. Unpublished PhD thesis, São Paulo: São Paulo.Google Scholar
Oostendorp, M. van. (2012). Stress as a Proclitic in Modern Greek. Lingua 1221, 1165–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Panagiotidis, P. (2011). Categorial Features and Categorizers. The Linguistic Review 281, 325–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014a). A Minimalist Approach to Roots. In P. Kosta, S. Franks, L. Schürcks, & T. Radeva-Bork (Eds.), Minimalism and Beyond: Radicalizing the Interfaces, (pp. 287–303). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John BenjaminsGoogle Scholar
(2014b). Indices, Domains and Homophonous Forms. Theoretical Linguistics 401, 415–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Categorial Features: A Generative Theory of Word Class Categories. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 145. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2019). “Ρίζες: Μεταξύ Λέξεων Και Γραμματικής.” In A. Archakis, N. Koutsoukos, G. Xydopoulos, & D. Papazachariou (Eds.), Γλωσσική Ποικιλία: Μελέτες Αφιερωμένες Στην Αγγελική Ράλλη (pp. 437–51). Athens: Kapa Ekdotiki.Google Scholar
Panagiotidis, P., Revithiadou, A., & Spyropoulos, V. (2017). Little v as a Categorizing Verbal Head: Evidence from Greek.” In R. D’Alessandro, I. Franco, & Á. Gallego (Eds.), The Verbal Domain (pp. 29–48). Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Preminger, O. (in progress). Non-Semiotic Grammar: A Symmetric, Distributed Model for Syntax and Its Interfaces. Unpublished ms. University of Maryland.
Pullum, G. (2010). Isms, Gasms, Etc. The Language Log (blog). February 8, 2010. [URL]
Ralli, A. (1988). Eléments de La Morphologie Du Grec Moderne: La Structure Du Verbe. Montreal: Université du Montréal.Google Scholar
(2003). Morphology in Greek Linguistics: The State of the Art. Journal of Greek Linguistics 41, 77–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005). Μορφολογία [Morphology]. Athens: Patakis.Google Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, M., & Levin, B. (1998). Building Verb Meanings. In M. Butt & W. Geuder (Eds.), The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors (pp. 97–134). Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Saab, A. (2016). No Name: The Allosemy View. Unpublished ms. National Scientific and Technical Research Council, Buenos Aires, Argentina. [URL]
Siddiqi, D. (2006). Minimize Exponence: Economy Effects on a Model of the Morphosyntactic Component of the Grammar. PhD thesis, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Spyropoulos, V., & Revithiadou, A. (2009). The Morphology of Past in Greek. Studies in Greek Linguistics 291, 108–22.Google Scholar
Spyropoulos, V., Revithiadou, A., & Panagiotidis, P. (2015). Verbalizers Leave Marks: Evidence from Greek. Morphology 251, 299–325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Veselinova, L. N. (2006). Suppletion in Verb Paradigms: Bits and Pieces of the Puzzle. Typological Studies in Language, v. 67. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: J. Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, C. D. (2016). The Price of Linguistic Productivity: How Children Learn to Break the Rules of Language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Αναστασιάδη-Συμεωνίδη, Ά. (1994). Το Τεμάχιο -Τος Στα Ρηματικά Επίθετα Της Νεοελληνικής. Studies in Greek Linguistics 151, 473–84.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Carston, Robyn
2024. Words and Roots – Polysemy and Allosemy – Communication and Language. Review of Philosophy and Psychology DOI logo
Panagiotidis, Phoevos
2024. Against semantic features: the view from derivational affixes. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 9:1 DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2034. Title Pending 15249. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.