Cover not available
Article published In:
Evolutionary Linguistic Theory
Vol. 5:2 (2023) ► pp.103–127

Pragmatics in the Minimalist framework

Evidence from the study of emotional language

| Università Ca’ Foscari
This article explores the relationship between pragmatics and the other components of grammar. Specifically, it aims to determine whether pragmatics is a distinct module of grammar coming into play at some point in the derivation process to connect the sentence with the context. The conclusion is that, based on the phenomena considered in this work, pragmatics rather than being a separate module, is distributed in the various components. It is shown in fact that the context immediately intervenes at the representative level to yield the correct syntax to be fed to the sensorimotor system on one side, and to the conceptual one on the other. The empirical focus of the article is on a specific type of questions in Italian, namely surprise and surprise-disapproval questions, because they are most sensitive to pragmatic factors. The syntactic, prosodic, and gestural components of these constructions will be examined, highlighting their most important characteristics.
Keywords: pragmatics, Minimalism, interfaces, emotional language, surprise, surprise-disapproval, special questions
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The theoretical framework
  • 3.Special questions
    • 3.1Introduction
    • 3.2The experimental evidence
      • 3.2.1Surprise questions
      • 3.2.2Surprise disapproval questions
  • 4.Warning expressions
    • 4.1Introduction
    • 4.2The experimental evidence
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 26 March 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/elt.00049.gio
References (43)
References
Alcázar, Asier and Saltarelli, Mario. (2014). The Syntax of Imperatives, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allott, Nichols and Wilson, Deirdre. (2021). Chomsky and pragmatics. In: N. Allott, T. Lohndal & G. Rey (Eds.), A Companion to Chomsky, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell, 433–447. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Angelo, Denise and Schultze-Berndt, Eva. (2016). Beware bambai – lest it be apprehensive. In: Meakins, Felicity and Al. Loss and Renewal: Australian Languages Since Colonisation, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 255–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Avesani, Cinzia. (1995). ToBIt: un sistema di trascrizione per l’intonazione italiana, Atti delle Quinte Giornate di Studio del Gruuppo di Fonetica Sperimentale, A.I.A., Povo (TN), 1994, pp. 85–98.Google Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier Marco and Denis Delfitto. (2000). Aspect vs. Actionality: Why They Should Be Kept Apart. In: Östen Dahl (ed.), Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 189–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berwick, Robert. (1989). Natural Language, Computational Complexity and Generative Capacity, Computers and Artificial Intelligence, 8, 5, 423–421.Google Scholar
Berwick, Robert and Weinberg, Amy. (1982). Parsing Efficiency, Computational Complexity, and the Evaluation of Grammatical Theories, Linguistic Inquiry, Vol. 13, 2, 165–191.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. (1959). On Certain Formal Properties of Grammar, Information and Control, 21, 137–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1975). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, MIT Press, MA.Google Scholar
. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris Pub., Dordrecht.Google Scholar
. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
. (2000). Minimalist Inquiries. In: Martin Roger, et al. (eds.), Step by step: Minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 31, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 89–155.Google Scholar
. (2008). On Phases. In: Freidin, Robert et al. (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory. Essays in honor of Jean-RogerVergnaud, Cambridge MA: MIT Press. 291–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2013). Problems of Projection. In Lingua, 1301, Special Issue “Core Ideas and Results in Syntax”. 33–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dal Farra, Chiara; Giorgi, Alessandra; Hinterhölzl, Roland. (2018). Syntax, prosody and gestures in the expression of surprise in Italian and German. In: Book of Abstracts. 51st Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea, Tallinn University, Estonia, 631.
Domaneschi, Filippo and Bambini, Valentina. (2020). Pragmatic Competence, in: Ellen Fridland and Carlotta Pavese (eds), Routledge Handbook of Skill and Expertise, Springer 2020, 419–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Furlan, Erica. (2019). Preguntas especiales en contextos de sorpresa: entonacióen n y gestualidad castellano. Análisis de datos experimentales procedentes de entrevistas a nativos, MA Thesis, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice.
Giorgi, Alessandra. (2010). About the Speaker: Towards a Syntax of Indexicality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. (2016). On the temporal interpretation of certain surprise questions. SpringerPlus, 51:1390 DOI logo (last accessed July 12, 2023).Google Scholar
. (2018). Ma non era rosso? (But wasn’t it red?): On counter-expectational questions in Italian. In: Lori Repetti, Francisco Ordóñez (eds.). Selected papers from the 46th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), New York, John Benjamins, 69–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2021). Danger! Towards an integrated model of syntax, prosody and gesture for warning expressions, paper presented at Pragmasophia Meeting, Noto, July 2021. [URL]
. (2023). Micro-discourses and context-enrichment: Interjections, vocatives and adversative particles, In Tommaso Balsemin, Irene Caloi, Jacopo Garzonio, Nicolas Lamoure, Francesco Pinzin (Eds.), Quaderni di Lavoro ASIt 251, Padova, 571–600.Google Scholar
(forthcoming), Towards a Syntax of Adversative Constructions in Italian. Ms. Ca’ Foscari University of Venice.
Giorgi, Alessandra, Dal Farra, Chiara. (2019). On the Syntax/Pragmatics Interface: Expressing Surprise and Disapproval. Intercultural Pragmatics, 161, 35–361. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra and Petrocchi, Erika (forthcoming), A cross-linguistic perspective on surprise and surprise-disapproval questions.
Giorgi, Alessandra and Pianesi, Fabio. (2001). Imperfect Dreams. The temporal dependencies of fictional predicates. Probus, 131, 31–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, Martine, D’Imperio, Mariapaola, Savino, Michelina, Avesani, Cinzia. (2005), “Strategies for intonation labeling across varieties of Italian”. In: Jun Sun-Ah (ed.), Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 362–389. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ippolito, Michela. (2004). Imperfect Modality. In: Jacqueline Guéron and Jacqueline Lecarme (Eds.), The Syntax of Time. Cambridge, MA., MIT Press, pp. 359–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendon, Adam. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marchetiello, Chiara. (2022). UE, ma che staje facenno?! (‘Hey, but what are you doing?!’): Expressing Expectation and Surprise/Disapproval in Neapolitan Dialect, MA Thesis, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice.
Munaro, Nicola & Cecilia Poletto. (2003). Sentential particles and clausal typing in the Veneto dialects. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics. 131. 127–154.Google Scholar
Munaro, Nicola & Hans-Georg Obenauer. (1999). On underspecified wh-elements in pseudo interrogatives. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 9(1–2). 181–253.Google Scholar
Obenauer, Hans-Georg. (2004). Nonstandard wh-questions and alternative checkers in Pagotto. In: H. Lohnstein & S. Trissler (eds.), Syntax and Semantics of the Left Periphery, 343–384. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2006). Special interrogatives, left-periphery, Wh-Doubling and (apparently) optional elements. In: Doetjes and González. Selected papers from Going Romance 2004. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 247–273.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Obenauer, Hans-Georg & Cecilia Poletto. (2000). Rhetorical wh-phrases in the left periphery of the sentence. University of Venice Working papers in Linguistics, 101: 121–151.Google Scholar
Petrocchi, Erika. (2022). Multimodality in Grammar: The case of special questions expressing surprise in oral and sign language, PhD Thesis, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice.
Popper, Karl. (1959). the Logic of Scientific Discovery, New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery, In: Haegeman, Liliane (ed) Elements of Grammar. International Handbooks of Linguistics. Dordrecht, Springer, 281–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, John. (1967). Constraints on Variables in Syntax, PhD Dissertation, MIT.
Searle, John. (1975). Indirect Speech Acts, In: Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, 3: Speech Acts, New York: Academic Press. 59–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vicente, Louis. (2010). On the syntax of adversative coordination. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 28(2). 381–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiltschko, Martina. (2022). What is the Syntax-pragmatics interface? In: Bîlbîie, Gabriela et al. (eds.), Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 141, Paris CSSP, 273–208.Google Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella. (2008). Encoding the addressee in the syntax: Evidence from English imperative subjects. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 261:185–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Giorgi, Alessandra & Erika Petrocchi
2024. A cross-cultural analysis of the gestural pattern of surprise and surprise-disapproval questions. Intercultural Pragmatics 21:3 ► pp. 307 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.