Article published In:
Revisiting Shakespeare's Language
Edited by Annalisa Baicchi, Roberta Facchinetti, Silvia Cacchiani and Antonio Bertacca
[English Text Construction 11:1] 2018
► pp. 81104
Bergs, Alexander
2010Expressions of futurity in contemporary English: A Construction Grammar perspective. English Language and Linguistics 14 (2): 217–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berry, Francis
1958Poets’ Grammar: Person, Time, and Mood in Poetry. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bloom, Harold
2005 [1998]An essay by Harold Bloom. In Macbeth. Annotated Shakespeare, Burton Ruffel (ed.). New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 169–204.Google Scholar
2008 [1987]“Introduction,” from Macbeth (Bloom’s Modern Critical Interpretations series). In Bloom’s Shakespeare Through the Ages. Macbeth, Harold Bloom (ed.). New York: Infobase Publishing, 339–343.Google Scholar
Booth, Stephen
1983King Lear, Macbeth, Indefinition and Tragedy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Boroditsky, Lera
2000Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition 75 (1): 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H.
1973Space, time, semantics, and the child. In Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language, Timothy E. Moore (ed.). New York: Academic Press, 27–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clemen, Wolfang
1951The Development of Shakespeare’s Imagery. London: Methuen and Co.Google Scholar
Consiglio, Maria Cristina
2008E-Lears. A corpus approach to Shakespeare and Tate. In The State of Stylistics, Greg Watson (ed.). Amsterdam: Rodopi, 191–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Craig, William J.
(ed.) 1916The Complete Works of William Shakespeare (The Oxford Shakespeare). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, David & Ben Crystal
2004Shakespeare’s Words: A Glossary and Language Companion. London: Penguin. Online edition: [URL] (Last accessed on 28 December 2017).
Culpeper, Jonathan
2014 [2001]Language and Characterisation: People in Plays and other Texts. Oxon and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002Computers, language and characterisation: An analysis of six characters in Romeo and Juliet. In Conversation in Life and in Literature: Papers from the ASLA Symposium, Ulla Melander-Marttala, Carin Ostman & Merja Kytö (eds). Uppsala: Universitestryckeriet, 11–30.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen
2000The grammar of future time reference in European languages. In Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, Östen Dahl (ed.). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 309–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engler, Balz, Regula Hohl, Christian Gebhard, Lukas Rosenthaler & Marco Fava
2003Hyperhamlet. Basel: Department of English, University of Basel.Google Scholar
Gentner, Dedre
2001Spatial metaphors in temporal reasoning. In Spatial Schemas and Abstract Thought, Merideth Gattis (ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press, 203–222.Google Scholar
Guj, Luisa
1986“Macbeth” and the seeds of time. Shakespeare Studies XVIII1: 175–188.Google Scholar
Harcourt, John B.
1961 “I Pray You, Remember the Porter”. Shakespeare Quarterly 121: 393–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hays, Michael L.
2008 [2003]“Macbeth: Loyal Stewards and Royal Succession,” from Shakespearean Tragedy as Chivalric Romance. In Bloom’s Shakespeare Through the Ages. Macbeth, Harold Bloom (ed.). New York: Infobase Publishing, 350–358.Google Scholar
Honigmann, Ernst A. J.
1989Past, present and future in Macbeth and Antony and Cleopatra . In Myriad-minded Shakespeare. Contemporary Interpretations of Shakespeare. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 93–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hope, Jonathan
2003Shakespeare’s Grammar. London: Thomson Learning. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hope, Jonathan & Michael Witmore
2014The language of Macbeth. In Macbeth: The State of Play, Ann Thompson (ed.). London: Bloomsbury, 183–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howard-Hill, Trevor H.
(ed.) 1971The Oxford Shakespeare Concordances. Macbeth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kermode, Frank
2000Shakespeare’s Language. London: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Knight, Wilson G.
2002 [1931]The milk of concord: Life-themes in Macbeth. In G. Wilson Knight. Collected Works. The Imperial Theme, G. Wilson Knight, London and New York: Routledge, 125–153.Google Scholar
Knights, Lionel C.
1946Explorations: Essays in Criticism Mainly on the Literature of the Seventeenth Century. London: Chatto and Windus.Google Scholar
Kolbe, Frederick C.
1930Shakepseare’s Way. London: Sheed and Ward.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N. & Mick Short
1981Style in Fiction. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Louw, Bill
1993The diagnostic potential of semantic prosodies. In Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair, Mona Baker, Gill Francis & Elena Tognini-Bonelli (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 157–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997The role of corpora in critical literary appreciation. In Teaching and Language Corpora, Anne Wichmann, Steven Fligelstone, Tony McEnery & Gerry Knowles (eds). London: Longman, 240–251.Google Scholar
Mahlberg, Michaela & Dan McIntyre
2011A case for corpus stylistics: Ian Fleming’s Casino Royale. English Text Construction 4 (2): 204–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McDonald, Russ F.
2006Shakespeare’s Late Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moore, Peter R.
2009Epicurean time in Macbeth. Brief Chronicles: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Authorship Studies I1: 141–154.Google Scholar
Mueller, Martin, William Parod, Jeffrey Cousens, Philip Burns & John Norstad
2006WordHoard. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University.Google Scholar
Murphy, Sean
2007Now I am alone: A corpus stylistic approach to Shakespearian soliloquies. In Papers from the Lancaster University Postgraduate Conference in Linguistics & Language Teaching, Volume 1: Papers from LAEL PG 2006, Costas Gabrielatos, Richard Slessor & Johann W. Unger (eds). Lancaster, UK: Lancaster University, 66–85.Google Scholar
OED Online
Oxford English Dictionary Online. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [URL] (Last accessed on 9 June 2018).
Open Source Shakespeare
An Experiment in Literary Technology. Fairfax: George Mason University. [URL] (Last accessed on 18 September 2018).
Palmer, Frank
2001Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plescia, Iolanda
2010Il discorso del futuro in Macbeth. Memoria di Shakespeare 71: 135–150.Google Scholar
Rauber, D. F.
1969Macbeth, Macbeth, Macbeth. Criticism 11 (1): 59–67.Google Scholar
Salkie, Raphael
2010 Will: Tense or modal or both? English Language and Linguistics 14 (2): 187–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Susanne
2006Future time reference in English and Italian. Quaderni del Laboratorio di Linguistica 61: 1–30.Google Scholar
Scott, Mike
2006Key words and key sections: Exploring Shakespeare. Paper presented at the 7th Conference on Teaching and Language Corpora (TaLC), Université Paris 7 – Denis Diderot, 1–4 July 2006.
2016Wordsmith Tools 7.0. Stroud: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar
Scott, Mike & Christopher Tribble
2006Textual Patterns: Key Words and Corpus Analysis in Language Education. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Semino, Elena & Mick Short
2004Corpus Stylistics: Speech, Writing and Thought Presentation in a Corpus of English Writing. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Serpieri, Alessandro
1986Retorica e immaginario. Parma: Pratiche.Google Scholar
Shakespeare Corpus
Lexical Analysis Software Ltd. & Oxford University Press. [URL] (Last accessed on 18 September 2018).
Sinclair, John
1996The search for units of meaning. Textus 9 (1): 75–106.Google Scholar
2004Trust the Text: Language Corpus and Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smith, Emma
2013Macbeth. Language and Writing. London and New York: Bloomsbury Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spevack, Marvin
1973The Harvard Concordance to Shakespeare. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Stubbs, Michael
2005Conrad in the computer: Examples of quantitative stylistics analysis. Language and Literature 14 (1): 5–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toolan, Michael
2009Narrative Progression in the Short Story: A Corpus Stylistic Approach. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C.
1978On the expression of spatio-temporal relations in language. In Universals of Human Language, Volume 31, Joseph H. Greenberg, Charles A. Ferguson & Edith A. Moravcsik (eds). Stanford: Stanford University Press, 369–400.Google Scholar
Williams, George W.
2004‘Time for such a word’. Verbal echoing in Macbeth . In Shakespeare and Language, Catherine M. S. Alexander (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 240–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zyngier, Sonia
1999“Smudges on the canvas”? A corpus stylistics approach to Macbeth. In Poetics, Linguistics and History: Discourses of War and Conflict, Ina Biermann & Annette Combrick (eds). Potchefstroom: Potchefstroom University, 529–545.Google Scholar