Cover not available
Article published In:
English Text Construction
Vol. 11:2 (2018) ► pp.257–285

Online conference announcements as spaces for disciplinary communication

| Universidad de Zaragoza
The aim of the study is to explore online conference announcements as sites for disciplinary communication and the way they are realized linguistically. A corpus of 50 conference announcements included in a major listserv in the field of linguistics is analysed, focusing on rhetorical structure and major interpersonal features, namely self mentions, engagement markers, modal verbs and the use of passive voice. Results show that linguistic interpersonal markers are deployed in the text according to the various communicative functions the text has and also the role played by the writer at each stage and, subsequently, the roles ascribed to readers. Moreover, it is claimed that the wide distribution of conference announcements ensured through electronic platforms reinforces the strategic role of these texts as vehicles of communication and interaction among disciplinary members.
Keywords: academic genres, interpersonal markers, online conference announcements, rhetorical structure, virtual disciplinary community
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.A framework for the analysis of online conference announcements
  • 3.Corpus and methodology
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1The rhetorical structure of conference announcements in the Linguist List
    • 4.2Interpersonal markers as indicators of rhetorical structure
    • 4.3Quantitative analysis of interpersonal markers
      • 4.3.1Self mentions
      • 4.3.2Engagement markers
      • 4.3.3Modal verbs
      • 4.3.4Passive voice
  • 5.Discussion of results
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 19 October 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.00011.lor
References (42)
References
Anthony, Laurence. 2017. AntConc (Version 3.5.0) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. <[URL]> (Last accessed on 2 September 2018).
Askehave, Inger & Anne Ellerup Nielsen. 2005. Digital genres: A challenge to traditional genre theory. Information Technology and People 18 (2): 120–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauman, Marcy Lassotta. 1999. The evolution of Internet genres. Computers and Composition 16 (2): 269–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bawarshi, Anis S. & Mary Jo Reiff. 2010. Genre: An Introduction to History, Theory, Research, and Pedagogy. Lafayette, USA: Parlor Press.Google Scholar
Berkenkotter, Carol & Thomas N. Huckin. 1993. Rethinking genre from a sociocognitive perspective. Written Communication 10 (4): 475–509. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication: Cognition/Culture/Power. Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan. 1999. The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Breivega, Kjersti, Trine Dahl & Kjersti Fløttum. 2002. Traces of self and others in research articles. A comparative pilot study of English, French and Norwegian research articles in medicine, economics and linguistics. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 12 (2): 218–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charles, Maggie. 1999. Aspects of the author’s voice in three academic research articles. In Issues in EAP Writing Research and Instructions, Paul Thompson (ed.). Reading, UK: CALS publication, 71–83.Google Scholar
Cherry, Roger D. 1998. Ethos versus persona: Self-representation in written discourse. Written Communication 5 (3): 251–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crowston, Kevin & Marie Williams. 2000. Reproduced and emergent genres of communication on the World Wide Web. The Information Society 161: 201–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dimitrios, Nasiopoulos K., Damianos P. Sakas & D. S. Vlachos. 2014. Modeling publications in academic conferences. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 1471: 467–477. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ding, Huiling. 2007. Genre analysis of personal statements: Analysis of moves in application essays to medical and dental schools. English for Specific Purposes 26 (3): 368–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herring, Susan C. 2004. Computer-mediated discourse analysis. In Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning, Sasha Barab, Rob Kling & James H. Gray (eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 338–376. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007. A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated discourse. Language@Internet 4 (1). <[URL]> (Last accessed on 2 September 2018).
2013. Discourse in Web 2.0: Familiar, reconfigured, and emergent. In Discourse 2.0: Language and New Media, Deborah Tannen & Anna Marie Trester (eds). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1–25.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2001. Humble servants of the discipline? Self mentions in research articles. English for Specific Purposes 20 (3): 207–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. Options of identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics 34 (8): 1091–1112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 131: 133–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005a. Metadiscourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
. 2005b. Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies 7 (2): 173–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ivanič, Roz. 1998. Writing and Identity: The Discoursal Construction of Identity in Academic Writing. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, Jennifer, Alessia Cogo & Martin Dewey. 2011. Review of developments in research into English as a Lingua Franca. Language Teaching 44 (3): 281–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuo, Chih-Hua. 1999. The use of personal pronouns: Role relationships in scientific journal articles. English for Specific Purposes 18 (2): 121–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Catherine. 2014. Genre as social action (1984), revisited 30 years later. Letras & Letras 31 (3): 56–72.Google Scholar
Mur-Dueñas, M. Pilar, Rosa Lorés-Sanz & Enrique Lafuente-Millán. 2010. Editorial. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9 (2): 83–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Orlikowski, Wanda & Jo Anne Yates. 1994. Genre repertoire: The structuring of communicative practices in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 39 (4): 541–574. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Llantada, Carmen. 2013. The article of the future: Strategies for genre stability and change. English for Specific Purposes 32 (4): 221–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Räisänen, Christine. 1999. The Conference Forum as a System of Genres. Gothenberg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
Sancho-Guinda, Carmen. 2015. Genres on the move: Currency and erosion of the genre moves construct. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 191: 73–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schryer, Catherine. 1994. The lab vs. the clinic: Sites of competing genres. In Genre and the New Rhetoric, Aviva Freedman & Peter Medway (eds). London: Taylor & Francis, 105–124.Google Scholar
St Aman, Kirk & Rich Rice. 2015. Online writing in global contexts: Rethinking the nature of connections and communication in the age of international online media. Computers and Composition 381: v–x. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swales, John M. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2004. Research Genres. Exploration and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tang, Ramona & Suganthi John. 1999. The ‘I’ in identity: Exploring writer identity in student academic writing through the first person pronoun. English for Specific Purposes 18 (Supplement 1): S23–S39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thurlow, Crispin & Kristine Mroczek (eds). 2011. Introduction: Fresh perspectives on new media sociolinguistics. Digital Discourse: Language in the New Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press, xix–xxxliv. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vande Kopple, William J. 1985. Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication 36 (1): 63–94.Google Scholar
Vassileva, Irena. 1998. Who am I/Who are we in academic writing? International Journal of Applied Linguistics 8 (2): 163–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Who is the Author? A Contrastive Analysis of Authorial Presence in English, German, French, Russian and Bulgarian Academic Discourse. Sankt Augustin: Asgard Verlag.Google Scholar
Yang, Wenhsien. 2013. Two folded messages behind CFP: A cross disciplinary study. International Journal of Language Studies 7 (2): 83–108.Google Scholar
. 2015. “Call for papers”: Analysis of the schematic structure and lexico-grammar of CFPs for academic conferences. English for Specific Purposes 37 (1): 39–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Lorés, Rosa & Giuliana Diani
2021. Disseminating knowledge: the effects of digitalised academic discourse on language, genre and identity. European Journal of English Studies 25:3 ► pp. 249 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.