Article published In:
English Text Construction
Vol. 12:2 (2019) ► pp.235264
References (44)
Allison, Desmond, Linda Cooley, Jo Lewkowicz & David Nunan
1998Dissertation writing in action: The development of a dissertation writing support program for ESL graduate research students. English for Specific Purposes 17 (2): 199–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Basturkmen, Helen & Janet von Randow
2014Guiding the reader (or not) to re-create coherence: Observations on postgraduate student writing in an academic argumentative writing task. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 161: 14–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruce, Ian
2014Expressing criticality in the literature review in research article introductions in applied linguistics and psychology. English for Specific Purposes 361: 85–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bunton, David
1998Linguistic and Textual Problems in Ph. D and M. Phil Theses: an analysis of genre moves and metatext. PhD dissertation, University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
2005The structure of PhD conclusion chapters. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 4 (3): 207–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canagarajah, Suresh A.
2013Critical academic writing and multilingual students. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Candlin, Christopher, Guenter Plum, Sue Spinks & National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research
1998Researching academic literacies. Sydney: Macquarie University.Google Scholar
Chik, Sonya
2015Rhetorical Relations in Japanese and English Corporate Enabling Texts. Proceedings of JASFL 91: 39–52.Google Scholar
Cho, Seonhee
2004Challenges of entering discourse communities through publishing in English: Perspectives of nonnative-speaking doctoral students in the United States of America. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education 3 (1): 47–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cooley, Linda & Jo Lewkowicz
1997Developing awareness of the rhetorical and linguistic conventions of writing a thesis in English. In Culture and styles of academic discourse, Anna Duszak (ed.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 113–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flowerdew, John
2000Discourse community, legitimate peripheral participation, and the nonnative-English-speaking Scholar. TESOL Quarterly 34 (1): 127–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Golebiowski, Zofia
2006The distribution of discoursal salience in research papers: Relational hypotaxis and parataxis. Discourse Studies 8 (2): 259–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009Prominent messages in Education and Applied Linguistic abstracts: How do authors appeal to their prospective readers? Journal of Pragmatics 41 (4): 753–769. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gosden, Hugh
1992Research writing and NNSs: From the editors. Journal of Second Language Writing 1 (2): 123–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grabe, William & Robert B. Kaplan
1996Theory and practice of writing: An applied linguistics perspective. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Gruber, Helmut & Peter Muntigl
2005Generic and rhetorical structures of texts: Two sides of the same coin? Folia Linguistica 39(1–2): 75–114.Google Scholar
Hinds, John
1987Reader versus writer responsibility. In Writing across languages: Analysis of L2 text, Ulla Connor & Robert B. Kaplan (eds). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 141–152.Google Scholar
1990Inductive, deductive, quasi-inductive: expository writing in Japanese, Korean, Chinese and Thai. In Coherence in writing: Research and pedagogical perspectives, Ulla Connor & Ann M. Johns (eds). Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, 87–110.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken
2003Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing 12 (1): 17–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004Disciplinary discourses, Michigan classics ed.: Social interactions in academic writing. University of Michigan Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Lee, Icy
2002Teaching coherence to ESL students: A classroom inquiry. Journal of Second Language Writing 11 (2): 135–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewin, Beverly, Jonathan Fine & Lynn Young
2001Expository discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Mann, William C.
2003RST relation definition. [URL] (Last accessed on 7 February 2019).
Mann, William C. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
1991Functions of language in two frameworks. Word 42(3): 231–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mann, William C., Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen & Sandra A. Thompson
1992Rhetorical structure theory and text analysis. In Discourse description: Diverse linguistic analyses of a fund-raising text, William C. Mann & Sandra A. Thompson (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 39–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mann, William C. & Sandra A. Thompson
1988Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text 8 (3): 243–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M.
2015Rhetorical system and structure theory: The semantic system of rhetorical relations. Book manuscript.Google Scholar
McNabb, Richard
2001Making the gesture: Graduate student submissions and the expectation of journal referees. Composition Studies 29 (1): 9–26.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Theresa
1995Rhetorical Structure analysis and the case of the inaccurate, incoherent source-hopper. Applied Linguistics 16 (4): 442–482. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Donnell, Mike
2002RST tool – an RST markup tool. [URL] (Last accessed on 7 February 2019).
Paltridge, Brian & Sue Starfield
2007Thesis and dissertation writing in a second language: A handbook for supervisors. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peacock, Matthew
2002Communicative moves in the discussion section of research articles. System 30 (4): 479–497. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Redeker, Gisela
2000Coherence and structure in text and discourse. In Abduction, belief, and context in dialogue: Studies in computational pragmatics, Harry Bunt & William Black (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 233–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Redeker, Gisela & Helmut Gruber
2014Introduction. In Pragmatics of discourse coherence, Helmut Gruber & Gisela Redeker (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1–20.Google Scholar
Shaw, Philip
2000Towards classifying the arguments in research genres. In Analysing professional genres, Anna Trosberg (ed.). John Benjamins, 41–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stede, Manfred
2008RST revisited: Disentangling nuclearity. In Subordination verses Coordination in sentence and text – from a cross-linguistic perspective, Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen & Wiebke Ramm (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 33–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swales, John M.
1990Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2004Research genres: Explorations and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swales, John M. & Christine B. Feak
2012Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills (3rd ed). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taboada, Maite
2006Discourse markers as signals (or not) of rhetorical relations. Journal of pragmatics 38 (4): 567–592. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taboada, Maite & Julia Lavid
Tardy, Christine M.
2005“It’s like a story”: Rhetorical knowledge development in advanced academic literacy. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 4 (4): 325–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, Ruiying & Desmond Allison
2003Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving from results to conclusions. English for Specific Purposes 22 (4): 365–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by 3 other publications

Kawase, Tomoyuki
2022. How do applied linguistics researchers structure coherence relations in the process of establishing a niche for their research?. Text & Talk 42:2  pp. 233 ff. DOI logo
Kawase, Tomoyuki
2024. Move combinations in the conclusion section of applied linguistics research articles. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) DOI logo
Abu-Ayyash, Emad A. S.
2021. Non-coherent cohesive texts. English Text Construction 14:2  pp. 182 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.