Cover not available
Article published In:
English Text Construction
Vol. 13:2 (2020) ► pp.132–157

What dialog is absent from constructed dialog?

 | Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg
This paper is concerned with constructed dialog in conversational storytelling. Based on Clark & Gerrig’s (1990) demonstration theory, its focus is on what is absent from constructed dialog. To determine what is absent, a comparison is made between constructed dialog tokens and utterances in conversation. The inquiry uses both quantitative and qualitative methods. It is based on the Narrative Corpus (NC; Rühlemann & O’Donnell 2012), a corpus of conversational narratives extracted from the conversational component of the British National Corpus (BNC), and its systematic annotation of constructed dialog (that is, direct speech introduced by a quotative and free direct speech without any introducer). The quantitative comparison of verbalizations used in constructed dialog as opposed to verbalizations used in conversational utterances demonstrates that a particular utterance type is significantly missing from constructed dialog: the continuer utterance, whose basic function is to exhibit an understanding that a form of ‘telling’ by another speaker is going on. The qualitative analysis, based on a subset of storytellings from the NC that were re-analyzed acoustically and re-transcribed using Jeffersonian conventions based on the Audio BNC (Coleman et al. 2012), reveals a stark mismatch between the commonness of tellings in talk-in-interaction and their uncommonness in constructed dialog. The absence of continuers from constructed dialog is discussed against the backdrop of indexicality. I argue that continuers share the key properties of indexicals – semantic vacuity and an existential relationship with the ‘thing’ indicated – and can therefore be seen as indexicals themselves. As indexicals, intrinsically connected to the speech situation of their utterance, continuers cannot be included in constructed dialog, which typically occurs in a different speech situation with different interactional parameters. Finally, I offer initial thoughts on the underrepresentation of telling sequences in constructed dialog.
Keywords: constructed dialog, demonstration, backchannels, continuers, indexicals
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Data and methods
  • 3.Results
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 10 December 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.00038.ruh
References (76)
References
Barthes, Roland. 1975. An introduction to the structural analysis of narrative. New Literary History 6 (2): 237–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bavelas, Janet Beavin, Linda Coates & Trudy Johnson. 2000. Listeners as co-narrators. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 791: 941–952. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blackwell, Natalia L., Marcus Perlman & Jean E. Fox Tree. 2015. Quotation as multi-modal construction. Journal of Pragmatics 811: 1–7. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bühler, Karl. 1990 [1934]. Theory of Language. The Representational Function of Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carter, Ronald & Michael McCarthy. 1997. Exploring spoken English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chatman, Seymour. 1975. Towards a theory of narrative. New Literary History 6 (2): 295–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. 2016. Depicting as a method of communication. Psychological Review 123 (3): 324–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. & Richard J. Gerrig. 1990. Quotations as demonstrations. Language 66(4): 764–805. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clift, Rebecca & Elizabeth Holt. 2007. Introduction. In Reporting talk: Reported Speech in Interaction, Elizabeth Holt & Rebecca Clift (eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, John, Ladan Baghai-Ravary, John Pybus & Sergio Grau. 2012. Audio BNC: The Audio Edition of the Spoken British National Corpus. Phonetics Laboratory, University of Oxford. <[URL]> (7 October 2020).
Coulmas, F. 1986. Reported speech: Some general issues. In F. Coulmas (ed.) Direct and indirect speech. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul. 1998. Complaints about transgressions and misconduct. Research on Language and Social Interaction 311: 295–325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gardner, R. 1998. Between speaking and listening: The vocalisation of understandings. Applied Linguistics 19(2): 204–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Ervin. 1981. Forms of talk. Philadelphia PA: Philadelphia University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 1986. Between and within alternative sequential treatments of continuers and assessments. Human Studies 91: 205–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles & Marjorie Goodwin. 1992. Assessments and the construction of context. In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, Allesandro Duranti (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 147–190.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles & John Heritage. 1990. Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology 191: 283–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Sebastian, Stefan Evert, Nicholas Smith, David Lee & Ylva Berglund Prytz. 2008. Corpus Linguistics with BNCweb – A Practical Guide. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Hepburn, Alexa & Galina Bolden. 2017. Transcribing for Social Research. Los Angeles CA: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hömke, Paul, Judith Holler & Stephen C. Levinson. 2017. Eye blinking as addressee feedback in face-to-face conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 50 (1): 54–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoey, Elliot Michael. 2017. Sequence recompletion: A practice for managing lapses in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 1091: 47–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holt, Elizabeth. 1996. Reporting talk: The use of direct reported speech in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 29 (3): 219–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Reporting and reacting: Concurrent responses to reported speech. Research on language and social interaction 33 (4): 425–454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. ‘I’m eying your chop up mind’: Reporting and enacting. In Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction, Elizabeth Holt & Rebecca Clift (eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 47–80.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 2004. Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, Gene H. Lerner (ed.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 13–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, O. 1924. The Philosophy of Grammar. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Koester, Almut & Michael Handford. 2018. It’s not good saying “Well it it might do that or it might not”’: Hypothetical reported speech in business meetings. Journal of Pragmatics 1301: 67–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Language in the Inner City. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William & Joshua Waletzky. 1967/1997. Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts, June Helms (ed.). Seattle: University of Washington Press, 12–44, reprinted in Journal of Narrative Inquiry and Life History 7 (1–4): 3–38.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey & Mick Short. 1981. Style in Fiction. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004. Deixis. In The handbook of pragmatics, Lawrence R. Horn & Gregory Ward (eds). Malden, MA: Blackwell, 97–121.Google Scholar
2006. On the human interactional engine. In Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction, Nicholas Enfield & Stephen C. Levinson (eds). Oxford: Berg, 39–69.Google Scholar
2016. Turn-taking in human communication: Origins and implications for language processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 20 (1): 6–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. & Judith Holler. 2014. The origin of human multi-modal communication. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 369 (1651): 20130302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. & Francisco Torreira. 2015. Timing in turn-taking and its implications for processing models of language. Frontiers in Psychology, 6 (731). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Longacre, Robert E. 1983. The grammar of Discourse. New York NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Mathis, Terrie & George Yule. 1994. Zero quotatives. Discourse Processes 18 (1): 63–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mayes, Patricia. 1990. Quotation in spoken English. Studies in Language 141: 325–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, Michael. 2003. Talking back: ‘Small’ interactional response tokens in everyday conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 36 (1): 33–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, Daniel, Carol Bellard Thomson, John Heywood, Tony McEnery, Elena Semino & Mick Short. 2004. Investigating the presentation of speech, writing and thought in spoken British English: A corpus-based approach. ICAME Journal 281: 49–76.Google Scholar
Mindt, Dieter. 2000. An Empirical Grammar of the English Verb System. Berlin: Cornelsen.Google Scholar
Nichols, Thomas E. & Andrew P. Holmes. 2001. Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples. Human Brain Mapping 15 (1): 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Keeffe, A. and S. Adolphs. 2008. ‘Response tokens in British and Irish discourse. Corpus, context and variational pragmatics‘. In K. P. Schneider & A. Barron (eds) Variational pragmatics) Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 69–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peters, Pam & Deanna Wong. 2015. Turn management and backchannels. In Corpus Pragmatics: A handbook, Karin Aijmer & Christophe Rühlemann (eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 408–429. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rühlemann, Cristophe. 2013. Narrative in English Conversation: A Corpus Analysis of Storytelling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Integrating corpus-linguistic and conversation-analytic transcription in XML. The case of backchannels and overlap in storytelling interaction. Corpus Pragmatics 1 (3): 201–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rühlemann, Cristophe and Matthew B. O’Donnell. 2012. Towards a corpus of conversational narrative. Construction and annotation of the Narrative Corpus. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 8 (2): 313–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rühlemann, Cristophe and Stefan T. Gries. 2015. Turn order and turn distribution in multi-party storytelling. Journal of Pragmatics 871: 171–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rühlemann, C. and M. Gee. 2017. Conversation Analysis and the XML method. Gesprächsforschung 181: 274–296.Google Scholar
Rühlemann, Cristophe & Martin Hilpert. 2017. Colloquialization in journalistic writing: Investigating inserts in TIME magazine with a focus on well . Journal of Historical Pragmatics 18 (1): 102–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rühlemann, Cristophe. 2018. TCU-initial backchannel overlap in storytelling. Narrative Inquiry 28 (2): 257–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rühlemann, C, A. Bagoutdinov and M. B. O’Donnell. 2015. Modest XPath and XQuery for corpora: Exploiting deep XML annotation. ICAME Journal 391: 47–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Gail Jefferson. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50 (4): 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1982. Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences. In Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk, Deborah Tannen (ed). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press, 71–93.Google Scholar
2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Semino, Elena & Mick Short. 2004. Corpus Stylistics: Speech, Writing and Thought Presentation in a Corpus of English Writing. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sidnell, Jack. 2006. Coordinating gesture, talk, and gaze in reenactments. Research on Language in Social Interaction 39 (4): 377–409. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Short, Mick, Elena Semino & Jonathan Culpeper. 1996. Using a corpus for stylistics research: Speech and thought presentation. In Using corpora for Language Research: Studies in Honour of Geoffrey Leech, Jenny Thomas & Mick Short (eds). London: Longman, 110–131.Google Scholar
Soulaimani, Dris. 2018. Talk, voice and gestures in reported speech: Toward an integrated approach. Discourse Studies 20 (3): 361–376. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stec, Kashmiri, Mike Huiskes & Gisela Redeker. 2016. Multimodal quotation: Role shift practices in spoken narratives. Journal of Pragmatics 1041: 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya. 2008. Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41 (1): 31–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Sequence organization. In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (eds). Malden MA: Wiley Blackwell, 191–209.Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, Nicholas J. Enfield, Penelope Brown, Christina Englert, Makato Hayashi, Trine Heinemann, Gertie Hoymann, Federico Rossano, Jan Peter de Ruiter, Kyung-Eun Yoon & Stephen C. Levinson. 2009. Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences. U.S.A. 106 (26): 10587–10592. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1986. Introducing constructed dialog in Greek and American conversational and literary narrative. In Direct and Indirect Speech, Florian Coulmas (ed.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 311–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1989. Talking Voices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
ten Bosch, Louis, Nelleke Oostdijk & Lou Boves. 2005. On temporal aspects of turn taking in conversational dialogues. Speech Communication 471: 80–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tolins, Jackson & Jean E. Fox Tree. 2014. Addressee backchannels steer narrative development. Journal of Pragmatics 701: 152–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun. 1975. Action, action description, and narrative. New Literary History 6 (2): 273–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun & Walter Kintsch. 1983. Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wade, Elizabeth & Herbert H. Clark. 1993. Reproduction and demonstration in quotations. Journal of Memory and Language, 32 (6), 805–819. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wennerstrom, Ann. 2001. The Music of Everyday Speech: Prosody and Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wesseling, Wieneke & Rob J. J. H van Son. 2005. Timing of experimentally elicited minimal responses as quantitative evidence for the use of intonation in projecting trps. Interspeech 61, 3389–3392.Google Scholar
White, Sheida. 1989. Backchannels across cultures: A study of Americans and Japanese. Language in Society 18 (1): 59–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wong, Deanna & Pam Peters. 2007. A study of backchannels in regional varieties of English, using corpus mark-up as the means of identification. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 12 (4): 479–509. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

De Cesare, Anna-Maria & Elwys De Stefani
2022. Pseudo-clefts in Italian talk-in-interaction and in interaction-as-represented. Lingua 271 ► pp. 103227 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.