Article published In:
English Text Construction
Vol. 10:1 (2017) ► pp.106131
Ariel, Mira
1988Referring and accessibility. Journal of Linguistics 24 (1): 65–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1960The Rhetoric of Aristotle. Trans. Lane Cooper. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle
2014Quotatives: New Trends and Sociolinguistic Implications. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Coulson, Seana
2001Semantics Leaps: Frame-shifting and Conceptual Blending in Meaning Construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William & D. Alan Cruse
2004Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara & Eve Sweetser
2014Figurative Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara & Lieven Vandelanotte
2016Discourse viewpoint as network. In Viewpoint and the Fabric Meaning: Form and Use of Viewpoint Tools Across Languages and Modalities, Barbara Dancygier, Wei-lun Lu & Arie Verhagen (eds). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 13–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Submitted. Internet memes as inter-modal constructions.
Dawkins, Richard
1976The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles
1994Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner
2002The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J.
1982Frame semantics. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, The Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.). Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Co., 111–137.Google Scholar
Forceville, Charles & Eduardo Urios-Aparisi
(eds) 2009Multimodal Metaphor. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentner, Dedre & Brian Bowdle
2001Convention, form and figurative language processing. Metaphor and Symbol 16 (3/4): 222–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Israel, Michael, Jennifer Riddle Harding & Vera Tobin
2004On simile. In Language, Culture and Mind, Michel Achard & Suzanne Kemmer (eds). Stanford CA: CSLI Publications, 123–135.Google Scholar
Moder, Carol
2008It’s like making a soup: Metaphors and similes in spoken news discourse. In Language in the Context of Use: Discourse and Cognitive Approaches to Language, Andrew Tyler, Yiyoung Kim & Maria Takada (eds). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 301–320.Google Scholar
Pascual, Esther
2014Fictive Interaction: The Conversation Frame in Thought, Language, and Discourse. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perelman, Chaim & Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca
1969The New Rhetoric. Trans. John Wilkinson and Purcell Weaver. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne & Deborah Lange
1991The use of like as a marker of reported speech and thought: A case of grammaticalization in progress. American Speech 66 (3): 227–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shifman, Limor
2014Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Siegel, Muffy E.A
2002 Like: The discourse particle and semantics. Journal of Semantics 19 (1): 35–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, Karen
2013Frames and Constructions in Metaphoric Language. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali & Alex D’Arcy
2005When people say, “I was like...”: The quotative system in Canadian youth. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 10 (2): 257–272.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah & Anna Marie Trester
(eds) 2013Discourse 2.0: Language and New Media. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Vandelanotte, Lieven
2012Quotative go and be like: Grammar and grammaticalization. In Quotatives: Cross-Linguistic and Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives, Isabelle Buchstaller & Ingrid Van Alphen (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 173–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vandelanotte, Lieven & Kristin Davidse
2009The emergence and structure of be like and related quotatives: A constructional account. Cognitive linguistics 20 (4): 777–807. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiggins, Bradley E. & G. Bret Bowers
2015Memes as genre: A structurational analysis of the memescape. New Media & Society 17 (11): 1886–1906. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 22 other publications

Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed
2021. Reality bites: How the pandemic has begun to shape the way we, metaphorically, see the world. Discourse & Society 32:5  pp. 519 ff. DOI logo
Bülow, Lars
2023. Image Macros als Ressource für sprachliche Verstärkungsprozesse. In Remotivierung in der Sprache [Linguistik in Empirie und Theorie/Empirical and Theoretical Linguistics, ],  pp. 257 ff. DOI logo
Bülow, Lars & Marie-Luis Merten
2023. Multimodale Metaphern im Kontext von Internet-Memes. Korpuspragmatische und kognitionslinguistische Zugänge zu einem soziokognitiven Online-Phänomen. In Digitale Pragmatik [Digitale Linguistik, 1],  pp. 127 ff. DOI logo
Bülow, Lars, Marie-Luis Merten & Michael Johann
2018. Internet-Memes als Zugang zu multimodalen Konstruktionen. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik 2018:69  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Chagas, Vicktor
2020. Da memética aos estudos sobre memes: uma revisão da literatura concernente ao campo nas últimas cinco décadas (1976-2019). In A cultura dos memes: aspectos sociológicos e dimensões políticas de um fenômeno do mundo digital,  pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Dancygier, Barbara & Lieven Vandelanotte
2017. Internet memes as multimodal constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 28:3  pp. 565 ff. DOI logo
Diedrichsen, Elke
2023. Internet Memes – Funktionen und Motivationen. In Digitale Pragmatik [Digitale Linguistik, 1],  pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
Jackson, Brad
2023. Embodied Figuration and Character Emotion in Cinema: The Role of Embodied Affective Cues. Baltic Screen Media Review 11:1  pp. 106 ff. DOI logo
Kang, Ji-in, Hanbeom Jung, A Young Kwon & Iksoo Kwon
2023. Meaning extensions of internet memes. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 21:1  pp. 178 ff. DOI logo
Khustenko, A. A.
2022. Specificity of Semiotic Organization of Internet Memes of Professional Community of Lawyers in Social Networks. Nauchnyi dialog 11:4  pp. 258 ff. DOI logo
Lugea, Jane
2018. The year’s work in stylistics 2017. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 27:4  pp. 329 ff. DOI logo
Maslo, Adi & Sofia Kefalidou
2023. Spreading Like a Virus: Conceptual Integration and Discourse Viewpoint in Internet Memes about the Covid-19 Pandemic. Društvene i humanističke studije (Online) 8:3(24)  pp. 231 ff. DOI logo
Ntouvlis, Vinicio & Jarret Geenen
2023. “Ironic memes” and digital literacies: Exploring identity through multimodal texts. New Media & Society DOI logo
Piata, Anna
2020. Stylistic humor across modalities. Internet Pragmatics 3:2  pp. 174 ff. DOI logo
Piata, Anna
2022. Stylistic humor across modalities. In The Pragmatics of Internet Memes [Benjamins Current Topics, 120],  pp. 36 ff. DOI logo
Steciąg, Magdalena
2021. Co wyraża twarz Grety Thunberg? Emocje w skali piko w nowych mediach (z zastosowaniem hipotezy ekologii rozszerzonej). Stylistyka 30  pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
Tommasini, Riccardo, Filip Ilievski & Thilini Wijesiriwardene
2023. IMKG: The Internet Meme Knowledge Graph. In The Semantic Web [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 13870],  pp. 354 ff. DOI logo
Vandelanotte, Lieven
2019. Changing perspectives. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)  pp. 170 ff. DOI logo
2020. (Non-)quoting and subjectivity in online discourse. E-rea :17.2 DOI logo
Vandelanotte, Lieven
2021. Creative constructs, constructions, and frames in Internet discourse. Constructions and Frames 13:1  pp. 160 ff. DOI logo
Younes, Afakh Said & Abdel Rahman Mitib Altakhaineh
2022. Metaphors and metonymies used in memes to depict COVID-19 in Jordanian social media websites. Ampersand 9  pp. 100087 ff. DOI logo
Yus, Francisco
2023. Meme-Mediated Humorous Communication. In Pragmatics of Internet Humour,  pp. 245 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.