Article published In:
Grammar, usage and discourse: Functional studies offered to Kristin Davidse
Edited by Lieven Vandelanotte, Wout Van Praet and Lieselotte Brems
[English Text Construction 10:2] 2017
► pp. 187198
References (55)
References
Aspeslagh, Ellen. 1999. Language as ideology: Transitivity and ergativity in the female voices of Virginia Woolf's The Waves . PALA Occasional Papers 101. Available online at <[URL]> (Last accessed on 27 June 2017).Google Scholar
Brazil, David. 1997. The Communicative Value of Intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Breban, Tine. 2010. English Adjectives of Comparison: Lexical and Grammatical Uses (Topics in English Linguistics 63). Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breban, Tine & Kristin Davidse. 2016. The history of very: The directionality of functional shift and (inter)subjectification. English Language and Linguistics 20 (2): 221–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brems, Lieselotte. 2011. Layering of Size and Type Noun Constructions in English (Topics in English Linguistics 74). Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Craps, Geert. 1999. Structuur en Textuur: Thema en Cohesie in Nederlandse Expositorische Teksten. Gent: Koninklijke Academie voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde (KANTL).Google Scholar
Davidse, Kristin. 1991. Categories of experiential grammar. Doctoral dissertation, University of Leuven. Published as: Davidse, Kristin. 1999. Categories of Experiential Grammar (Monographs in Systemic Linguistics 11). Nottingham: Nottingham Trent University, Department of English and Media Studies.
. 1994. Language and world view in the poetry of G. M. Hopkins. In Acknowledged Legislators: Essays on English Literature in Honour of Herman Servotte, Ortwin de Graef, Vik Doyen, Erik Hertog, Guido Latré & Hedwig Schwall (eds). Kapellen: Pelckmans, 104–119.Google Scholar
. 1998. On transitivity and ergativity in English, or on the need for dialogue between schools. In English as a Human Language: To Honor Louis Goossens, Johan Van der Auwera, Frank Durieux & Ludo Lejeune (eds). München: LINCOM Europa, 95–108.Google Scholar
. 1999. The semantics of cardinal versus enumerative existential constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 10 (3): 203–250.Google Scholar
. 2000. A constructional approach to clefts. Linguistics 38 (6): 1101–1131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. The interaction of quantification and identification in English determiners. In Language, Culture and Mind, Michel Achard & Suzanne Kemmer (eds). Stanford: CSLI Publications, 507–533.Google Scholar
. 2009. Complete and sort of: From identifying to intensifying? Transactions of the Philological Society 107 (3): 262–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds). 2010. Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization (Topics in English Linguistics 66). Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin, Tine Breban, Lieselotte Brems & Tanja Mortelmans (eds). 2012. Grammaticalization and Language Change: New Reflections (Studies in Language Companion Series 130). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin, Caroline Gentens, Lobke Ghesquière & Lieven Vandelanotte (eds). 2014. Corpus Interrogation and Grammatical Patterns (Studies in Corpus Linguistics 63). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin, Ditte Kimps & Ngum Meyuhnsi Njende. 2016. Making the case for defining clefts broadly as secondary specification structures: Prosody and information structure. Paper presented at the Second Round Table on Communicative Dynamism, University of Namur, 13-14 September 2016.
Davies, Eirian C. 2015 [1979]. On the Semantics of Syntax: Mood and Condition in English (Routledge Library Editions: The English Language 8). London: Routledge. (Original edition London: Croom Helm.) DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017. The significance of theme. English Text Construction 10 (2) :298–322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming. Elements of English Functional Grammar: A Set-Theoretical Approach (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 280). Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Firth, John Rupert. 1957. Papers in Linguistics 1934–1951. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gentens, Caroline. 2016. The factive-reported distinction in English: Representational and interpersonal semantics. Doctoral dissertation, University of Leuven.
Ghesquière, Lobke. 2014. The Directionality of (Inter)subjectification in the English Noun Phrase: Pathways of Change (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 267). Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ghesquière, Lobke & Kristin Davidse. 2011. The development of intensification scales in noun-intensifying uses of adjectives: Sources, paths and mechanisms of change. English Language and Linguistics 15 (2): 251–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 1st ed. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Heyvaert, Liesbet. 2003. A Cognitive-Functional Approach to Nominalization in English (Cognitive Linguistics Research 26). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kimps, Ditte. Forthcoming. Tag Questions in Conversation: A Typology of Their Interactional and Stance Meanings (Studies in Corpus Linguistics). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo DOI logo
Laffut, An. 2006. Three-Participant Constructions in English: A Functional-Cognitive Approach to Caused Relations (Studies in Language Companion Series 79). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume 2: Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
2008. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017. Grounding, semantic functions, and absolute quantifiers. English Text Construction 10 (2) :233–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McGregor, William B. 1997. Semiotic Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
2008. Complementation as interpersonal grammar. Word 59 (1-2): 25–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013. Optionality in grammar and language use. Linguistics 51 (6): 1147–1204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017. There’s grammar and there’s grammar just as there’s usage and there’s usage. English Text Construction 10 (2) :199–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Méndez-Naya, Belén. 2017. Co-occurrence and iteration of intensifiers in Early English. English Text Construction 10 (2) :249–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milsark, Gary. 1976. Existential Sentences in English. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
. 1977. Toward an explanation of certain peculiarities of the existential construction in English. Linguistic Analysis 31: 1–29.Google Scholar
O’Grady, Gerard. 2010. A Grammar of Spoken English Discourse: The Intonation of Increments. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
. 2013. Key Concepts in Phonetics and Phonology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
. 2017. Theme and prosody: Redundancy or meaning making? English Text Construction 10 (2) :274–297. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwall, Hedwig. 2017. Towards a new grammar of interiority: James Ramsay’s circuitous way To the Lighthouse . English Text Construction 10 (2) :323–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, John. 1991. Corpus, Concordance, Collocation (Describing English language). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Taverniers, Miriam. 2002. Systemic-functional linguistics and the notion of grammatical metaphor: A theoretical study and a proposal for a semiotic-functional integrative model. Doctoral dissertation, University of Ghent.
. Forthcoming. Grammatical Metaphor as a Construction Type: A Semiotic-Functional Model (Discussions in Functional Approaches to Language). Sheffield: Equinox.
Tobin, Vera. 2010. Joint attention, To the Lighthouse, and modernist representations of intersubjectivity. English Text Construction 3 (2): 185–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vandelanotte, Lieven. 2002. ‘But forced to qualify’: Distancing speech and thought representation as a symptom of uninformedness in Larkin. Leuvense Bijdragen (Leuven Contributions in Linguistics and Philology) 91 (3–4): 383–426. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Speech and Thought Representation in English: A Cognitive-Functional Approach (Topics in English Linguistics 65). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vandelanotte, Lieven, Kristin Davidse, Caroline Gentens & Ditte Kimps (eds). 2014. Recent Advances in Corpus Linguistics: Developing and Exploiting Corpora (Language & Computers 78). Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van linden, An, Jean-Christophe Verstraete & Kristin Davidse (eds). 2010. Formal Evidence in Grammaticalization Research (Typological Studies in Language 94). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Praet, Wout, Kristin Davidse, Ditte Kimps & Lieven Vandelanotte. 2016. The information structure of copular clauses. Paper presented at the Second Round Table on Communicative Dynamism, University of Namur, 13-14 September 2016.
Van Rompaey, Tinne. 2013. The development of P + NP + of/to + V(-ing) progressive aspect markers. Doctoral dissertation, University of Leuven.
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe. 2007. Rethinking the Coordinate-Subordinate Dichotomy: Interpersonal Grammar and the Analysis of Adverbial Clauses in English (Topics in English Linguistics 55). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willemse, Peter. 2005. Nominal reference-point constructions: Possessive and esphoric NPs in English. Doctoral dissertation, University of Leuven.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Lastres-López, Cristina
2020. Beyond conditionality: On the pragmaticalization of interpersonal if-constructions in English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 157  pp. 68 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.