Article published In:
Intersections of Intersubjectivity
Edited by Lieselotte Brems, Lobke Ghesquière and Freek Van de Velde
[English Text Construction 5:1] 2012
► pp. 101127
Cited by

Cited by 24 other publications

Cirillo, Letizia
2019. The pragmatics of air quotes in English academic presentations. Journal of Pragmatics 142  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
2023. İKİNCİ/YABANCI DİL OLARAK TÜRKÇE ÖĞRETİMİ BAĞLAMINDA ÜSTSÖYLEM VE AKADEMİK DİNLEME İLİŞKİSİ. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Türkiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi (HÜTAD) :39  pp. 171 ff. DOI logo
Deroey, K. L. B.
2015. Marking Importance in Lectures: Interactive and Textual Orientation. Applied Linguistics 36:1  pp. 51 ff. DOI logo
Hyland, Ken
2017. Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going?. Journal of Pragmatics 113  pp. 16 ff. DOI logo
Janier, Mathilde & Chris Reed
2017. I didn’t say that! Uses of SAY in mediation discourse. Discourse Studies 19:6  pp. 619 ff. DOI logo
Kashiha, Hadi
2021. Stance-taking across monologic and dialogic modes of academic speech. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 39:4  pp. 352 ff. DOI logo
Kashiha, Hadi
2022. On persuasive strategies: Metadiscourse practices in political speeches. Discourse and Interaction 15:1  pp. 77 ff. DOI logo
Kashiha, Hadi
2022. Academic lectures versus political speeches: Metadiscourse functions affected by the role of the audience. Journal of Pragmatics 190  pp. 60 ff. DOI logo
Malmström, Hans
2016. Engaging the Congregation: The Place of Metadiscourse in Contemporary Preaching. Applied Linguistics 37:4  pp. 561 ff. DOI logo
Moreton, Emma
2015. “I hope you will write”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16:2  pp. 277 ff. DOI logo
Nesi, Hilary & Sian Alsop
2021. Stories and scenarios: Lecturers’ use of fantastic hypothetical events. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 53  pp. 101022 ff. DOI logo
Peterlin, Agnes Pisanski
2016. Engagement markers in translated academic texts. English Text Construction 9:2  pp. 268 ff. DOI logo
Rozumko, Agata
2017. Adverbial Markers of Epistemic Modality Across Disciplinary Discourses: A Contrastive Study of Research Articles in Six Academic Disciplines. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 52:1  pp. 73 ff. DOI logo
Salama, Amir H. Y.
2022. Cross-textual reconceptualisation of the deictic space of “victory” in political discourse: Donald Trump versus Joseph Biden. Discourse and Interaction 15:1  pp. 101 ff. DOI logo
Wu, Xinxin & He Yang
2022. Unpacking the Functions of Personal Metadiscourse in Teachers’ Classroom Discourse. Sustainability 14:20  pp. 13502 ff. DOI logo
Xu, Jun & Yuxiao Liang
2023. Negotiating intersubjectivity by interpersonal and appraisal shifts in Chinese-English government press conference interpreting. Frontiers in Psychology 14 DOI logo
Yu, Yang & Gang Zeng
2023. Lesser relevance markers in Chinese academic spoken English corpus: a cross-disciplinary study on pragmatic features. Frontiers in Psychology 14 DOI logo
Zare, Javad
2020. Awareness of discourse organizers and comprehension of academic lectures: The effect of using concordancers. Current Psychology 39:2  pp. 419 ff. DOI logo
Zare, Javad & Zahra Keivanloo-Shahrestanaki
2017. The language of English academic lectures: The case of field of study in highlighting importance. Lingua 193  pp. 36 ff. DOI logo
Zare, Javad & Mansoor Tavakoli
2017. The Use of Personal Metadiscourse over Monologic and Dialogic Modes of Academic Speech. Discourse Processes 54:2  pp. 163 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Dongyun & Diyun Sheng
2021. EFL Lecturers’ Metadiscourse in Chinese University MOOCs Across Course Types. Corpus Pragmatics 5:2  pp. 243 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Dongyun & Diyun Sheng
2023. A Contrastive Analysis of Metadiscourse by Native and EFL Lecturers in Chinese University MOOCs. In New Trends on Metadiscourse,  pp. 129 ff. DOI logo
Ädel, Annelie
2017. Remember that your reader cannot read your mind: Problem/solution-oriented metadiscourse in teacher feedback on student writing. English for Specific Purposes 45  pp. 54 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.