A corpus-based account of left-detached items in the recent history of English
Left Dislocation vs. Left Detached-sequences
This paper investigates sequences featuring a coreferential link between a left-detached constituent and a resumptive in the following main clause [‘LDet-sequences’]. Their syntactic, semantic and textual behaviour is investigated in historically recent texts (since Modern English) where such detachments are not generally expected to replicate the behaviour that has been attested for contemporary spoken English Left Dislocation [‘LDis’] (cf. Geluykens 1993; Gregory & Michaelis 2001; Snider 2005; Netz et al. 2011). A typology of LDet-sequences is proposed in order to investigate them beyond their apparent structural similarities with spoken English LDis. Left-detached referents are found to typically hold a weak relationship with clause-grammar; however, some of the LDet-sequences attested also exhibit a certain degree of deviation from the less syntactic and freer, discoursal behaviour that characterises others. As far as their diachronic development is concerned, only LDet-sequences that closely resemble LDis illustrate the declining course reported in previous research for LDis (cf. Pérez-Guerra & Tizón-Couto 2009). Lastly, LDet-sequences are more frequent in drama and fiction; thus, the prediction that they are employed to recreate conversation (cf. Geluykens 1992) is provisionally borne out.
References (65)
Acuña-Fariña, Juan Carlos. 1996. The Puzzle of Apposition: On So-called Appositive Structures in English. Santiago de Compostela: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (Servicio de Publicacións e Intercambio Científico).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Acuña Fariña, Juan Carlos. 1999. On apposition. English Language and Linguistics 3 (1): 59–81. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Anagnostopoulou, Elena, Henk van Riemsdijk & Frans Zwarts (eds.). 1997. Materials on Left Dislocation. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
ARCHER 3.1 = A Representative Corpus of Historical English Registers version 3.1. 1990–1993/2002/2007/2010/2013. Originally compiled under the supervision of Douglas Biber and Edward Finegan at Northern Arizona University and University of Southern California; modified and expanded by subsequent members of a consortium of universities. Current member universities are Bamberg, Freiburg, Heidelberg, Helsinki, Lancaster, Leicester, Manchester, Michigan, Northern Arizona, Santiago de Compostela, Southern California, Trier, Uppsala, Zurich. Examples of usage taken from ARCHER were obtained under the terms of the ARCHER User Agreement (available on the Documentation page of the ARCHER website, <[URL]>, last accessed on 30 June 2014).
Barcelona Sánchez, Antonio. 1988. El tópico desgajado en inglés: Motivación pragmática. Atlantis 10 (1–2): 9–20.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Birner, Betty. 2004. Discourse functions at the periphery: Noncanonical word order in English. ZASPIL 35 (1): 41–62.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Birner, Betty & Gregory Ward. 2002. Information packaging. In The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, Rodney Huddleston & Geoffrey Pullum (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1363–1447.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Burton-Roberts, Noel. 1975. Nominal apposition. Foundations of Language 13 (3): 391–419.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 1977. On wh-movement. In Formal Syntax, Peter Culicover, Thomas Wasow & Adrian Akmajian (eds.). New York: Academic Press, 71–132.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Culpeper, Jonathan & Merja Kytö. 2010. Early Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Vries, Mark. 2007. Dislocation and backgrounding. In Linguistics in the Netherlands, Bettelou Los & Marjo van Koppen (eds.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 235–247. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dik, Simon. 1997. The Theory of Functional Grammar. Part II: Complex and Derived Constructions. Kees Hengeveld (ed.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Downing, Angela & Philip Locke. 2006. English Grammar: A University Course. Abingdon and New York: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ford, Cecilia, Barbara Fox & Sandra Thompson. 2003. Social interaction and grammar. In The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure. Vol. 21, Michael Tomasello (ed.). London: Lawrence, 119–143.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geluykens, Ronald. 1993. Syntactic, semantic and interactional prototypes: The case of left-dislocation. In Conceptualizations and Mental Processing in Language, Richard Geiger & Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (eds.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 709–730. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Givón, Talmy. 1979. On Understanding Grammar. Orlando: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
González Álvarez, Dolores. 2002. Disjunct Adverbs in Early Modern English: A Corpus-based Study. Vigo: University of Vigo.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gregory, Michelle & Laura Michaelis. 2001. Topicalization and left-dislocation: A functional opposition revisited. Journal of Pragmatics 33 (11): 1665–1706. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grohmann, Kleanthes. 2000. Copy left dislocation. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Roger Billerey & Brook Danielle Lillehaugen (eds.). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 139–152.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gundel, Jeanette. 1977. The Role of Topic and Comment in Linguistic Theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hilpert, Martin. 2013. Constructional Change in English: Developments in Allomorphy, Word Formation, and Syntax (Studies in English Language). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hilpert, Martin & Stefan Gries. 2009. Assessing frequency changes in multi-stage diachronic corpora: Applications for historical corpus linguistics and the study of language acquisition. Literary and Linguistic Computing 24 (4): 385–401. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hirschbühler, Paul. 1997. The source of lefthand NPs in French. In Materials on Left Dislocation, Elena Anagnostopoulou, Henk van Riemsdijk & Frans Zwarts (eds.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 55–66. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jespersen, Otto. 1937. Analytic Syntax. Copenhagen: Levin and Munksgaard.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Keenan-Ochs, Elinor & Bambi Schieffelin. 1976. Foregrounding referents: A reconsideration of left dislocation in discourse.
Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society
, 240–257.
Keizer, Evelien. 2005. The discourse function of close appositions. Neophilologus 89 (3): 447–467. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kies, Daniel. 1988. Marked themes with and without pronominal reinforcement: Their meaning and distribution in discourse. In Pragmatics, Discourse and Text: Some Systemically-inspired Approaches, Erich Steiner & Robert Veltman (eds.). London: Pinter, 47–72.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kroch, Anthony & Lauren Delfs. 2004. The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English (PPCEME). Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania. CD-ROM, first edition, <[URL]> (Last accessed on 30 June 2014).
Kroch, Aanthony & Ariel Diertani. 2010. The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Modern British English (PPCMBE). Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania. CD-ROM, first edition, <[URL]> (Last accessed on 30 June 2014).
Kroch, Anthony & Ann Taylor. 2000. The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English (PPCME2). Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania. CD-ROM, second edition, <[URL]> (Last accessed on 30 June 2014).
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lambrecht, Knud. 1996. On the formal and functional relationship between topics and vocatives: Evidence from French. In Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language, Adele Goldberg (ed.). Stanford: CSLI Publications, 267–288.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Larsson, Eva. 1979. La Dislocation en français: Étude de syntaxe generative (Études Romanes de Lund). Lund: CWK Gleerup.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lennard, John. 1995. Punctuation: and – Pragmatics. In Historical Pragmatics, Andreas Jucker (ed.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 65–98. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Los, Bettelou & Erwin Komen. 2012. Clefts as resolution strategies after the loss of a multifunctional first position. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds.). New York: Oxford University Press, 884–898.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Meyer, Charles. 1992. Apposition in Contemporary English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Miller, Philip. 2001. Discourse constraints on (non)extraposition from subject in English. Linguistics 39 (4): 683–701. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Montgomery, Michael. 1982. The functions of left dislocation in spontaneous discourse. In The Ninth Lacus Forum, John Morreal (ed.). Columbia: Hornbeam, 425–432.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Netz, Hadar, Ron Kuzar & Zohar Eviatar. 2011. A recipient-based study of the discourse functions of marked topic constructions. Language Sciences 33 (1): 154–166. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Newmeyer, Frederick. 2004. On split-CPs, uninterpretable features, and the ‘perfectness’ of language. ZASPIL 35 (2): 399–422.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ono, Tsuyoshi & Sandra Thompson. 1994. Unattached NPs in English conversation. BLS 20 (1994): 402–419. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Parsed Corpus of Early English Correspondence, parsed version. 2006. Annotated by Ann Taylor, Arja Nurmi, Anthony Warner, Susan Pintzuk & Terttu Nevalainen. Compiled by the CEEC Project Team. York: University of York and Helsinki: University of Helsinki. Distributed through the Oxford Text Archive.
Pérez-Guerra, Javier. 1999. Historical English Syntax: A Statistical Corpus Based Study on the Organisation of Early Modern English Sentences. Muenchen: Lincom Europa.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pérez-Guerra, Javier. 2005. Word order after the loss of the verb-second constraint or the importance of early Modern English in the fixation of syntactic and informative (un-)markedness. English Studies 86 (4): 342–369. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pérez-Guerra, Javier & David Tizón-Couto. 2009. On left dislocation in the recent history of English: Theory and data hand in hand. In Dislocated Elements in Discourse: Syntactic, Semantic, and Pragmatic Perspectives, Benjamin Shaer, Philippa Cook, Werner Frey & Claudia Maienborn (eds.). London: Routledge, 31–48.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Prince, Ellen. 1998. On the limits of syntax, with reference to left-dislocation and topicalization. In The Limits of Syntax, Peter Culicover & Louise McNally (eds.). San Diego: Academic Press, 281–302. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reinhart, Tanya. 1981. Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica 27 (1): 53–94.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rodman, Robert. 1974. On left dislocation. Papers in Linguistics 71: 437–66. [1997. Reprinted In Materials on Left Dislocation, Elena Anagnostopoulou, Henk van Riemsdijk & Frans Zwarts (eds.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 31–54] ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ross, John. 1967. Constraints on Variables in Syntax. MIT: Doctoral Dissertation. [1986. Published as Infinite Syntax! Norton, NJ: Ablex].![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ross, John. 1973. A fake NP squish. In New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English, Charles-James Bailey & Roger Shuy (eds.). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 96–140.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Snider, Neal. 2005. A corpus study of left dislocation and topicalization. Stanford University: Linguistics Department, TS. <[URL]> (Last accessed on 29 April 2011).
Tizón-Couto, David. 2012. Left Dislocation in English: A Functional-discoursal Approach (Linguistic Insights 143). Bern: Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tizón-Couto, David. Forthcoming. A corpus-based account of the decline of left-dislocated noun phrases in the recent history of English.
Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics
, Leuven.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1972. The History of English Syntax: A Transformational Approach to the History of English Sentence Structure. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2007. Old English left-dislocations: Their structure and information status. Folia Linguistica 41 (3–4): 405–441. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Riemsdijk, Henk. 1997. Left dislocation. In Materials on Left Dislocation, Elena Anagnostopoulou, Henk van Riemsdijk & Frans Zwarts (eds.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1–10. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Villalba, Xavier. 2000. The syntax of sentence periphery. PhD dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Wald, Benji. 1983. Referents and topics within and across discourse units: Observations from current vernacular English. In Discourse Perspectives on Syntax, Flora Klein-Andreu (ed.). London and New York: Academic Press, 91–106.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.