The dynamicity of communication below, around and above the clause
Introduction
References (20)
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brazil, David. 1995. A Grammar of Spoken English Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Burton, Deirdre. 1978. Towards an analysis of casual conversation. Nottingham Linguistic Circular 7 (2): 131–164.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Daneš, František. 1974. Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. In Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective, František Daneš (ed.). Prague: Academia, 106–128.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Firbas, Jan. 1971. On the concept of communicative dynamism in the theory of functional sentence perspective. Sbornik prací filosofické fakulti brnenské university 19 (71): 135–144.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Firbas, Jan. 1992. Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fries, Peter. 1995. Themes, methods of development, and texts. In On Subject and Theme: A Discourse Functional Perspective, Ruqaiya Hasan & Peter Fries (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 317–360. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, M.A.K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2014. An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 4th edition. London: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1981. What’s going on: A dynamic view of context. In The Seventh LACUS Forum, James E. Copeland & Philip W. Davis (eds). Columbia: Hornbeam Press, 106–121.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hengeveld, Kees & J. Lachlan Mackenzie. 2008. Functional Discourse Grammar: A Typologically-Based Theory of Language Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jakobson, Roman & Morris Halle. 1956. Fundamentals of Language. The Hague: Mouton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martin, James R. 1985. Process and text: Two aspects of human semiosis. In Systemic Perspectives on Discourse, Vol. 11, James D. Benson & William S Greaves (eds). Norwood: Ablex, 248–274.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mathesius, Vilém. 1911. O potenciálnosti jevů jazykových [On the potentiality of the phenomena of language]. Věstník Královské české společnosti nauk, 1911–12, třída filozoficko-historicko-jazykozpytná, č. 2, únor 1911: 1–24. English translation in A Prague School Reader in Linguistics, Josef Vachek (ed.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1–32.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
O’Donnell, Michael. 1999. Context in dynamic modelling. In Text and Context in Functional Linguistics, Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 63–99. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
O’Donnell, Michael. 2013. A dynamic view of choice in writing: Composition as text evolution. In Systemic Functional Linguistics: Exploring Choice, Lise Fontaine, Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 247–266. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
O’Grady, Gerard. 2010. A Grammar of Spoken English Discourse: The Intonation of Increments. London: Continuum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Prince, Ellen. 1981. Toward a taxonomy of given–new information. In Radical Pragmatics, Peter Cole (ed.). New York: Academic Press, 223–255.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sinclair, John McH. & Malcolm Coulthard. 1975. Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. London: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sinclair, John McH. & Anna Mauranen. 2006. Linear Unit Grammar. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Valin, Robert D. 2005. Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Van Praet, Wout
2019.
Focus assignment in English specificational and predicative clauses: intonation as a cue to information structure?.
Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 51:2
► pp. 222 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.