Article published In:
The dynamicity of communication below, around and above the clause
Edited by Ben Clarke and Jorge Arús-Hita
[English Text Construction 9:1] 2016
► pp. 18
References
Bourdieu, Pierre
1977Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brazil, David
1995A Grammar of Spoken English Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burton, Deirdre
1978Towards an analysis of casual conversation. Nottingham Linguistic Circular 7 (2): 131–164.Google Scholar
Daneš, František
1974Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. In Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective, František Daneš (ed.). Prague: Academia, 106–128.Google Scholar
Firbas, Jan
1971On the concept of communicative dynamism in the theory of functional sentence perspective. Sbornik prací filosofické fakulti brnenské university 19 (71): 135–144.Google Scholar
1992Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fries, Peter
1995Themes, methods of development, and texts. In On Subject and Theme: A Discourse Functional Perspective, Ruqaiya Hasan & Peter Fries (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 317–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
2014An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 4th edition. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya
1981What’s going on: A dynamic view of context. In The Seventh LACUS Forum, James E. Copeland & Philip W. Davis (eds). Columbia: Hornbeam Press, 106–121.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & J. Lachlan Mackenzie
2008Functional Discourse Grammar: A Typologically-Based Theory of Language Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman & Morris Halle
1956Fundamentals of Language. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Martin, James R
1985Process and text: Two aspects of human semiosis. In Systemic Perspectives on Discourse, Vol. 11, James D. Benson & William S Greaves (eds). Norwood: Ablex, 248–274.Google Scholar
Mathesius, Vilém
1911O potenciálnosti jevů jazykových [On the potentiality of the phenomena of language]. Věstník Královské české společnosti nauk, 1911–12, třída filozoficko-historicko-jazykozpytná, č. 2, únor 1911: 1–24. English translation in A Prague School Reader in Linguistics, Josef Vachek (ed.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1–32.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Michael
1999Context in dynamic modelling. In Text and Context in Functional Linguistics, Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 63–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013A dynamic view of choice in writing: Composition as text evolution. In Systemic Functional Linguistics: Exploring Choice, Lise Fontaine, Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 247–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Grady, Gerard
2010A Grammar of Spoken English Discourse: The Intonation of Increments. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen
1981Toward a taxonomy of given–new information. In Radical Pragmatics, Peter Cole (ed.). New York: Academic Press, 223–255.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John McH. & Malcolm Coulthard
1975Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John McH. & Anna Mauranen
2006Linear Unit Grammar. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D
2005Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Van Praet, Wout
2019. Focus assignment in English specificational and predicative clauses: intonation as a cue to information structure?. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 51:2  pp. 222 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.